U.S. Approves $41.5 Million Precision Rifle Sale to Ukraine

Miles
by Miles

Along with the recent defense deal that the United States is in with Ukraine over Javelin anti-tank missiles, is the news that the State Department just approved an export license for Barrett Firearms to sell M107A1s to Ukraine. The Ukranian military has had a constant issue sourcing effective anti-material rifles in the current conflict. Both because of the complexity of the political situation and finding potential buyers, but also because of the difficulty of manufacturing small arms in the country itself amid the economic conditions. Thus, we see such inventions as the DShK converted rifle/bipod mount, or pretty much anything else that can be improvised to sling lead at an opposing force.

From the article on Washington Post

Administration officials confirmed that the State Department this month approved a commercial license authorizing the export of Model M107A1 Sniper Systems, ammunition, and associated parts and accessories to Ukraine, a sale valued at $41.5 million. These weapons address a specific vulnerability of Ukrainian forces fighting a Russian-backed separatist movement in two eastern provinces. There has been no approval to export the heavier weapons the Ukrainian government is asking for, such as Javelin antitank missiles.

The deal is valued at $41.5 Million USD. Even if every M107A1 package was $20,000, this would add up to at least a thousand or more rifles. That number obviously includes the miscellaneous costs of shipping, export permits, etc… But no doubt, it comes with a suite of primary optics, thermal or infrared imagers, maybe even Picatinny rail mounted ATPIAL devices and rangefinders, in addition to match grade .50 BMG ammunition.

Both this deal and the Javelin deal indicate that one of the threats posed by Ukranian Government forces against the separatists is an armor one, and thus the need to procure anti-armor small arms.

Miles
Miles

Infantry Marine, based in the Midwest. Specifically interested in small arms history, development, and usage within the MENA region and Central Asia. To that end, I run Silah Report, a website dedicated to analyzing small arms history and news out of MENA and Central Asia.Please feel free to get in touch with me about something I can add to a post, an error I've made, or if you just want to talk guns. I can be reached at miles@tfb.tv

More by Miles

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • 7.62x54r 7.62x54r on Jan 02, 2018

    Russia has already stated they will not allow a NATO-supervised massacre of ethnic Russian civilians in east Ukraine. When Americans are killed training Kiev's Galecian nazis on the front line, what then? How will Russians view the fact that Americans are helping murder their relatives?

  • Kaban Kaban on Jan 03, 2018

    Now, now. I don't think they are crazy enough to mount detectable illuminator (ATPIAL or not) on 20k$ weapon and operators that are not exactly disposable line animals :)

    The deal was to be expected. Ukrainians have no .50 rifles, indeed. Only Zbroyar could, in theory, crank out new design, but there was no way in hell they managed without \MoD request and some serious money, and, apparently, neither request nor money happened.

    Of designated anti-armor role, I am not so sure. Did not search for public data on Nammo's 211 (anything lighter won't do) vs Sovier-era armor, but the most probable target Ukrainians might have is pillaged civvy vehicles. Working real armor requires friendly skies for those 29s, and that is not going to happen unless external support to D/LPR proxies is shut down cold.

Next