EXCLUSIVE: The Original DROP-IN AR-15 Trigger. First Ever Photos of T86 Rifle Trigger Published Online

Steve Johnson
by Steve Johnson

Two days ago I published a blog post with diagrams of the REVOLUTIONARY Taiwanese T86 rifle. This AR-15-style rifle featured not only a self-contained piston gas system back in 1998, long before the piston-AR craze in the USA, but it also featured the first drop-in trigger for an AR-15. Sadly this rifle was as unknown in the West as it was innovative.

In that blog post I asked readers, living in countries where the T86 is in service, if they could try and obtain photos of its trigger system. Being a relatively obscure rifle that has only ever seen military use, I did not have a lot of hope. Imagine my surprise to get an email from an incredibly well-placed source who took the time to strip a T86 and take high resolution photos for TFB. As far as I know no detailed photos of the trigger system have ever been published online. I was not even able to find low-resolution photos, only diagrams.

The source has sworn me to secrecy, and so I will not even hint as to who or where the source is.

The design process of the T86 began in 1992 and ended 6 years later in 1998. The rifle went into production in 2000 and unfortunately did not see wide adoption due to military budget cuts, but it was exported to Jordan and the UAE.

The external dimensions of the T86 lower receiver are the same or very close to a standard AR-15 lower, but what is really interesting is that there are no trigger pins or hammer pin holes.

No pins means no pins to lose in the field and the lack of holes also gives it an aesthetically pleasing look (in my mind at least).

The trigger itself is self contained. It requires no pins other than the selector switch. It literally drops-in. The T86 trigger is larger than the AR-15 drop-in triggers on the market today. Compare it to the Rise Armament drop-in trigger below which does not enclose the selector switch.

Other than being physically larger it appears to operate the same as a regular AR-15 drop-in trigger. Both have pins in the same position to hold the trigger components. Unlike commercial drop-in triggers which fit into mil-spec lower receivers, the internal dimensions of the T86 lower were modified to hold its trigger in place without the need for receiver pins.

As you can see the tolerances are tight and there is no play between the trigger and the lower receiver. This is quite a beautiful system!

Unfortunately I do not have photos of the piston system. The only diagram I have shows a very interesting self-contained unit that contains both the piston and gas tube. This may have been the first AR-15 piston system to be adopted by any military ( Colt developed the first AR-15 gas piston, the Colt 703, but only two prototypes exist).

This rifle was ahead of its time, but sadly because of defense budget cuts in Taiwan in the late 1990s, it never saw the widespread use it may have. Earlier today a gun industry veteran emailed me saying he thought we will soon see lower receivers designed to accommodate drop-in triggers like the T86 system. This would get around Mossberg’s patent, which essentially patents the use of pins to secure a drop-in trigger, not the trigger itself.

Read more about the patent situation below:

[Breaking] Mossberg Suing Manufacturers of Drop-In Triggers

In another instance of the firearms industry feeding on it’s own, it appears that Mossberg is exercising it’s control on the original Chip McCormick patent (US 7,293,385 B2), that it acquired a while ago, and bringing lawsuits against a number of manufacturers of drop in triggers. Mossberg currently licenses the design to the new CMC … Continue reading

BREAKING: The Truth Behind Drop-in AR-15 Triggers. They Date Back to 1998.

Phil’s, Tom’s and my inbox have been blowing up with tips and emails from concerned gun owners worried about Mossberg’s lawsuits against 12 manufacturers of drop-in AR-15 trigger groups (read our post here and here catch up with the drama). We are only aware of 12 manufacturers being sued, but there could well be others being … Continue reading

Update: The very first Mossberg US Patent infringement suit in 2012 Vs. Timney

I received an email earlier today which provided additional information on the continuing story of Mossberg’s numerous suits filed in reference to drop in triggers. The first suit was actually filed some years ago in 2012. The first ‘385 patent infringement action actually started in 2012, when Mossberg sued Timney Triggers, LLC and Timney Manufacturing, … Continue reading

CMC Triggers Makes Statement

Regarding Mossberg Suing Manufacturers of Drop-In Triggers (allegedly at the request of CMC), CMC Triggers have released a statement: CMC Triggers is a Christian company, privately held and not owned by O.F. Mossberg or anyone else. We pay our bills when they’re due including our royalty responsibility to O.F. Mossberg. Fair competition in the market place … Continue reading

Steve Johnson
Steve Johnson

I founded TFB in 2007 and over 10 years worked tirelessly, with the help of my team, to build it up into the largest gun blog online. I retired as Editor in Chief in 2017. During my decade at TFB I was fortunate to work with the most amazing talented writers and genuinely good people!

More by Steve Johnson

Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Eric X Ericx Eric X Ericx on May 29, 2016

    There goes Mossberg's lawsuit! Bwahahahhahaa!!! Live by greed, die by greed!

  • XSFRGR XSFRGR on May 29, 2016

    The cassette type trigger housing has been around for years. If I recall correctly the German G-3 uses a cassette housing. Patent No. 4,679,487 (Houseman) is an excellent example of the cassette design, and was in effect when McCormick filled for his trigger in a beer can patent. For some reason McCormick failed to discover the Houseman patent, and did not disclose it in his application patent search.

    One requirement for a patent is that the design is not obvious. Using the existing trigger pins, to retain the cassette, is obviously obvious. Installing the cassette in the receiver is also obvious, and has been covered in previous patent applications including 4,679,487. I think Mr. McCormick has a vanity patent exhibiting no originality, and I hope that the effected manufacturers will, as a group, challenge the McCormick/Mossberg patent.