New Report & Testing Confirms SIG Sauer's Modular Handgun System is Reliable
The US Army selected SIG Sauer’s Modular Handgun System entry back in 2017 and since then the full-size sidearm has begun to reach active units. Some controversy regarding reliability initially surrounded the XM17 but a recent report from the Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation confirms these issues have now been addressed.
The recently published annual report from the Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation (DOT&E) Annual Report confirms the M17 and M18’s reliability performance. The report notes that “the MHS experienced a large number of stoppages in early developmental testing with ball ammunition”, however, it seems this issue has now been addressed by a team of both government and SIG Sauer personnel. To ensure reliable feeding with both the Army’s new 147 grain XM1153 jacketed hollow point round and 115 grain XM1152 ball ammunition a number of changes were made to the magazine spring, magazine follower, slide geometry, and some of the pistol’s internal components. The report concludes that “the XM17 and the XM18 are operationally effective and operationally suitable with jacketed hollow point ammunition.”
Examining the data provided in the DOT&E report it appears that both pistols have improved function with both types of ammunition but that the XM18 is now superior to the XM17 in terms of reliability with the compact pistol improving more between the first and second product verification tests (PVT). The XM17’s reliability with XM1152 Ball has improved significantly, but its round count before a failure decreased from 7,009 to 6,349. With XM1153 JHP rounds the XM17’s reliability has decreased with the mean number of rounds before a stoppage decreasing from 2,709 to 1,880. Similarly, the mean round count before failure with the JHP round has fallen from 15,501 to 10,321. It should be noted, however, that while performance with JHP has decreased it is still superior to XM1152 Ball and reliability with both ammunition types falls well within the army’s reliability requirements of firing 5,000 rounds before a failure.
SIG Sauer celebrated the DOT&E report and the positive results of recent Lot Acceptance Testing with a press release. During a round of acceptance testing, 12,000 rounds were put through three M18s without a single stoppage. SIG Sauer confirmed that in addition to the endurance test the M18 also “passed a parts interchange test, met all of the stringent accuracy and dispersion requirements, was tested for firing pin indent and trigger pull measurements to ensure consistency, and conformed to all workmanship standards.”
Ron Cohen, President & CEO of SIG Sauer, said:
the results of this testing for the M18 pistol is truly impressive. The M18 withstood the harsh testing and performance requirements set forth in the MHS contract and has set a new standard for reliability in service pistols. For this testing the U.S. Army set very high standards for quality and performance, and at SIG we relish the opportunity to meet a challenge and exceed expectations. The performance of the M18 not only surpassed the U.S. Army’s testing requirements, its performance was simply outstanding and nothing short of perfection.
In their statement, SIG Sauer also confirmed that of the 480,000 pistols ordered, the first 20,000 have now been delivered. The US Army (including Army Special Operations Command) intends to purchase 233,429 pistols, 4.5% or 10,500 of which will be M18s. Under the same contract the Navy, USMC and Air Force can purchase as many as 224,000 pistols – it is unknown what the M17/M18 ratio from branch to branch will be. We haven’t yet seen DoD photographs of the M18 in service personnel’s hands and it’s interesting to note that the pistol posted with SIG Sauer’s statement (featured above) has black rather than coyote-tan controls.
One final snippet we might have learned from SIG Sauer’s new M18 photo is from the operator manual behind the pistol itself, it lists the NATO Stock Number (NSN) of a ‘GO’ or General Officer’s pistol. So we can guess that there’s a General Officer’s MHS pistol, we just don’t know what it looks like yet.
Managing Editor: TheFirearmBlog.com & Overt Defense.com. Matt is a British historian specialising in small arms development and military history. He has written several books and for a variety of publications in both the US and UK. Matt is also runs The Armourer's Bench, a video series on historically significant small arms. Here on TFB he covers product and current military small arms news. Reach Matt at: matt@thefirearmblog.com
More by Matthew Moss
Comments
Join the conversation
Just my thoughts...I bought a P320 Compact & Sub-compact. I did return them to Sig for the "voluntary up-grade". I'll never shoot them as much as the various "testers"...but with 2500 + rounds thru both guns, I've yet to have any sort of malfunction. In fact, I've never had any sort of malfunction in any Sig centerfire handgun (P220, P226, P228, P239, P210).
OK all you Glock fanboys out there crying how your little precious should have won the MHS trials listen up!! I'll break it down Barney Style for you !
1- THE GLOCK WASN'T MODULAR!!!! Just read the name of the trials: MODULAR Handgun System Trial! A removeable/changeable backstrap isn't modularity. Can you pull the guts out of a GLOCK and pop on a different grip configuration? Uhhh, no. If the frame of the GLOCK gets trashed by falling out of a Hummer, or melted by some unforeseen circumstance can you change it out? No! The whole thing is trashed and Uncle Sugar (or PVT Snuffy in a Statement of Charges) is out the cost of the entire pistol.
2- The thumb safety on the test GLOCKs were an abortive afterthought. Cominolli did it years ago and Glock finally had to use it. The SIG safety was purpose designed as part of the gun.
3- The tests were designed to find any flaws and let the manufacturers address them if they could. The SIG had some issues and they were successfully addressed.
4- There are these recent glowing Army test results:
https://www.gunsamerica.com...
https://www.thefirearmblog....
So get over it GLOCK people. Your precious is a good gun BUT it wasn't good enough to meet the military's requirements.