The .700 WTF : For Hunting Dinosaurs

A member of the Cast Boolits forums posted photos and video of a rifle and .700 caliber cartridge he designed. The only component he did not make himself was the barrel.

The cartridge, named the .700 WTF ("What The F...") and is made by fire forming a .50 BMG brass case, trimming it to 3" in length and then sizing it. The round is loaded with a 1132 grain paper patched .700 lead cast bullet.

The rifle, with just a 16.25" barrel, can push the 1132 grain of lead up to 2300 fps. Thats 13,000 ft/lbs of energy, right up there with the .50 BMG and far exceeding the .700 Nitro Express. The cast lead bullet has enough energy to pass clean through a 1/4" steel plate.

The rifle uses a shell-holder style action. My understanding is that the difference between a shell holder and a bolt action is that a shell holder lacks an automatic ejector and must be entirely removed from the action in order to load a new cartridge. Note how in the video below the shell holder, holding the cartridge, it loaded into he rifle.

The rifle is accessorized with a Magpul pistol grip (probably the largest caliber gun to ever be fitted with a Magpul accessory), a Limbsaver recoil pad and a Aimpoint comp M4.

Juding by the video case extraction is tough. If you miss your shot at a charging Rhino T-Rex, you need to be able to reload quickly.

UPDATE: The inventor believes the rifle is not classified by the BATFE as a destructive because it is a sporting weapon. There is sporting weapons, such as shotguns and big bore double rifles, are exempt, the usual procedure it to obtain a letter from the BATFE stating that the particular weapon is a sporting weapon.

[ Many thanks to James T for emailing us the link. ]

Related Posts

73 Responses to “The .700 WTF : For Hunting Dinosaurs”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Annie Wicklundwrote on February 06th, 2012 at 7:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Muchos Gracias for your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  2. Clayton Fowlerwrote on December 12th, 2011 at 11:51 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    People in America have a right to make what they like, with the right approvals They also have a right to call the gun and the bullet whatever they want. If you don’t want one because you don’t like it or the name, then don’t buy one. Even better, don’t even comment, if all you have is a negative comment…

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
  3. ndrwrote on December 10th, 2011 at 3:36 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    and who are the retards who shot this video??? isnt the impact, what the round does to the target what people really want to see?

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 10
    • Oddbodresponded to ndr on December 14th, 2011 at 10:23 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I’m thinking the video is mostly for those doing the shooting & don’t we all like to see ourselves doing cool stuff?
      I thought the “after action” look at the bullet & plate was pretty informative.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  4. ndrwrote on December 10th, 2011 at 3:30 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    there are sporting weapons. every single article i read on the internet has a grammatical error, and im getting sick of it.

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 5
    • Steveresponded to ndr on December 12th, 2011 at 3:05 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      “there are sporting weapons. every single article i read on the internet has a grammatical error, and im getting sick of it.”

      Okay, if you want to complain about articles with poor grammer, you’ll need to learn grammer for yourself. Try this –

      “There are sporting weapons. Every single article I read on the internet as a grammatical error, and I’m getting sick of it.”

      Much better.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4
      • demonkoryuresponded to Steve on December 14th, 2011 at 2:14 am Link To Comment |

        “Grammar”. Not “grammer”. It’s “grammar”.

        This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
      • Oddbodresponded to Steve on December 14th, 2011 at 9:51 am Link To Comment |

        You missed the “h” off has……:-)

        Anyway: If there’s one thing I love about firearms, it is their sheer diversity & this is one more added to the pool.
        Where would we be without the innovators & “off the wall” thinkers?
        Still shooting muskets most likely.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  5. ChrisCwrote on December 09th, 2011 at 5:20 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Great invention, awesome idea, but I agree with the comment up towards the top – EXTRMELY POOR FIREARM SAFETY. You guys need to do this cool stuff AND set an example that won’t get your video clip posted on Brady’s website as an example of why we shouldn’t be allowed to own even single-shot weapons…..

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 7
    • Oddbodresponded to ChrisC on December 14th, 2011 at 10:27 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Agreed: It’s no excuse to relax safety because it’s a single shot firearm, as this breaks the instinctive habit we should all have about safe practices.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. paintball barrelwrote on December 08th, 2011 at 5:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Im surprised that the kick doesn’t look all that bad in the video. Well, it looks bad, but I mean limbs are still attached afterwards and such.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  7. Wowwrote on December 06th, 2011 at 5:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow, nice muzzle control while sweeping his friends. I mean it happens at times while training, but come on…

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
  8. John Doewrote on December 05th, 2011 at 1:51 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    For overkill purposes, I’m going to need one with an expanding bullet. Those pesky squirrels just don’t learn, do they?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  9. Whedgitwrote on December 04th, 2011 at 8:32 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Put a longer barrel on it and make a FMJ round for it. Would make an excellent anti-material rifle. It could easily crack an engine block or blow the tracks off a tank with a well placed shot.

    Or you could take it deer hunting…if you really hate deer.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
  10. HarryRwrote on December 04th, 2011 at 2:42 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Nobody seems to like this comment! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 36
  11. Netforcewrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 7:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Now what we need is the actual Jurassic Park.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
  12. JeffreyBwrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 4:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Nobody seems to like this comment! What do you think? Thumb up 19 Thumb down 68
  13. Robwrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 7:41 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    We’ll talk when it’s a necked up 20mm.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  14. Jim Twrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 5:32 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d like to add that the gun DOES have an extractor, just no ejector. The shellholder style action will extract the fired case, but you will then have to remove them from the bolt. P.S I’m NOT the inventor of this gun, I just followed the design and build closely and talk to the designer frequently.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
    • Mattresponded to Jim T on December 03rd, 2011 at 4:34 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Forgive me if this has already been asked, or is a dumb question…. but I gotta know: where can I get one? or more appropriately, how much would it set me back?

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Flounderresponded to Matt on December 05th, 2011 at 2:03 pm Link To Comment |

        He built it at home… I’m sure he’ll send you the specs! :D
        But the whole point of this rifle seems to be 50BMG level of power in a gun that you can run cast lead bullets through.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • noobresponded to Jim T on December 05th, 2011 at 7:37 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      how much are a couple of spare bolts that you can keep loaded with cartridges for quick reloads?

      Pop out the spent bolt, slap in a new loaded one…

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  15. JRwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 7:24 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is the short barrel so it can be used for home defence?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
  16. JTwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 7:21 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So, for a “quick followup” you have to have a bandoleer with extra bolts and .700 rounds?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  17. Jameswrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:42 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’m guessing he’s not keeping a spare bolt in the magpul grip?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  18. Matt Greggwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:31 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Are they planning on making a magnum version?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 35 Thumb down 0
    • mosinmanresponded to Matt Gregg on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:53 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      i agree matt, the stopping power just isnt enough :)

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
  19. mosinmanwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 4:47 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    and here comes the ienvitable chuck norris joke…….
    chuck norris called and he said he wants his BB gun back

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 2
  20. Naterwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 3:37 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Maybe with a magazine (3 rounds + 1 in the chamber) and a Mauser-style action, then I’d hunt T-Rex or Giganotosaurus with it. Otherwise, no thanks.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  21. Milowrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 2:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Nobody seems to like this comment! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 69
    • Durayresponded to Milo on December 02nd, 2011 at 4:50 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Or, it’s what someone builds when they have way more skill than time to spend watching Dancing with the Stars.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 34 Thumb down 0
  22. John Bear Rosswrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:27 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Sporting Exemption should be easy to get. JD Jones does it often enough. Same with the 12 Gauge From Hell and its variants.
    Excellent concept and execution. The world needs more garage designers like this fellow.

    Best,
    JBR

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  23. DaveRwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:22 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve been wanting a new squirrel gun…hmmmmm….

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
    • christianresponded to DaveR on December 05th, 2011 at 11:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      i am assuming your “hmmmmm” is to be said, stroking your beard (or wear your beard would be) and looking out to the upper-right and direction

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  24. JimSwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The name has a lot of win!

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3
  25. I am afraid I’ll have to side with gvass: rifled barrel, over .50-caliber, definitely a DD. I don’t think the BATFE will be much prone to give this an exemption.

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 2 Thumb down 10
    • Jim Tresponded to Pierangelo Tendas (PT-The Italian Commie) on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:35 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I would have to say that if there is a public youtube video up with 15,000 views, and the ATF has not come knocking on his door, it is not a destructive device. Besides, if an over 50 caliber rifled gun is illegal, that puts alot of 577 t-rex’s and nitro express guns in an odd place.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • Pierangelo Tendas (PT-The Italian Commie)responded to Jim T on December 02nd, 2011 at 10:30 pm Link To Comment |

        Looks like you’re underestimating the facts that:

        #1 – Most of the over-.50 “safari” cartridges are well-established “sporting” calibers, some of them as old as over 1 century, and that would be hard for the BATFE to reclassify them, unlike what they could easily do for new developments.

        #2 – The guns normally chambered for those calibers are not “evil-looking”, this one is… and we all know what BATFE thinks about.

        #3 – The BATFE is usually “strong with the weak, weak with the strong” – a well-established gun company will have more chances that an amateur.

        Is not like I am saying that this *should* be a DD. I am just saying that I don’t trust the BATFE’s judgement in taking the right decision; we all know their well-established “position”, and we all know it’s all but permissive.

        This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 4
  26. gvasswrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Isn’t it a Destructive Device? .50+ caliber, rifled barrel.

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 2 Thumb down 12
  27. Lancewrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:41 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    We all know dinosaurs are dead there for hunting terminators LOL. By the way ouch looks painful.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  28. Brian P.wrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Put a 20-24″ barrel on it, give it an extractor, and I’ll take one! I’m surprised to see how easily those guys are taking the recoil too!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Byronresponded to Brian P. on December 02nd, 2011 at 2:28 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I think that tank brake on the muzzle has a lot to do with that, same as on most .50 bmg rifles.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  29. El Freddiowrote on December 01st, 2011 at 8:11 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Don’t let the makers of COD see it, or all the COD nerds will jump around ‘quickscoping’ and dual wielding it in the next Modern Warfare :P

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 5
    • Komradresponded to El Freddio on December 01st, 2011 at 11:51 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      As an actual nerd, I take good hearted offense. COD kiddies are not nerds by any stretch of the imagination. Real nerds are busy either writing their own games or playing games that have some actual value to them beyond hype. /nerd

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 15
      • El Freddioresponded to Komrad on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:08 pm Link To Comment |

        Hey, I’m not trying to offend anyone. I love to play video games. I’m just hating on COD. Next time I will remember not to use ‘nerd’ if people are going to get so touchy about it.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  30. Edgar Castelowrote on December 01st, 2011 at 8:04 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Take that and shove it, “don’t kill any Dinos” Terra Nova Emo Series!

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  31. Brandrwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 7:49 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I wonder what the tax stamp costs for a destructive device like that?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
    • Fredresponded to Brandr on December 01st, 2011 at 7:54 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      $200, like most other class 3 items.

      Some are only $5.

      This may be eligible for a DD exemption but I don’t know all the criteria for exemption.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • Komradresponded to Fred on December 01st, 2011 at 11:48 pm Link To Comment |

        The requirement for exemption is the ATF deciding it’s worthy. Technically, a cartridge must have sporting purpose, but thing s like the .950 JDJ, which has no such purpose, have gotten through before, as have all the big Safari calibers.
        Really, the ATF just doesn’t want 20mm Vulcan and similar stuff getting through.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
  32. Wwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 7:23 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    incredible…utterly incredible.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  33. Deojewrote on December 01st, 2011 at 7:09 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow! That is all.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  34. Andrewwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Best quote from the video:
    “The bullet only started out as 1132 grains.”

    Oh, is that all?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  35. APBTFanwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    What powder and charge weight?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • Jim Tresponded to APBTFan on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:31 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      it hovers around 190 grains of W748 powder

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • Byronresponded to Jim T on December 02nd, 2011 at 3:03 pm Link To Comment |

        how much does the rifle weigh? (trying to figure the recoil impulse, not counting the brake)

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Jim Tresponded to APBTFan on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:17 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      He said it weighs 14 lbs. with the aimpoint.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  36. Juanwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:22 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Perfect weapon for Burt Gummer.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
    • christianresponded to Juan on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:41 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      exactly my same thought :p

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  37. C3P0wrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:21 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    It’s just so . . . so full of win

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  38. Reverend Clintwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:57 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    he should try n sell it to the FBI

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
    • El Duderinoresponded to Reverend Clint on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Yeah, I wonder if it’s a 100% stopper per FBI guidelines? :)

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  39. Flounderwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    AWESOME job on the machining and build! This man is obviously skilled…
    Which makes me wonder why he didn’t build an extractor…?
    AND
    how much does it weigh!?!?!?!?!
    it looks incredibly light yet everyone is handling recoil like it’s nothing at all!!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Chadresponded to Flounder on December 02nd, 2011 at 3:00 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      14lbs minus the weight of the muzzle break.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  40. J. Griggwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:22 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    That. Is. Awesome.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  41. JohnGaltwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:21 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    God Bless America!

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 24 Thumb down 8
    • Suburbanresponded to JohnGalt on December 06th, 2011 at 11:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Heh. Reminds me of a Chris Titus joke.

      To paraphrase:
      Terrorists messing with America? Are you sure you want to do that? We build drag cars that go from 0 to 300 in a quarter mile because we’re bored. Imagine what we’ll build if you really piss us off.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  42. Ralph Hernandezwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:13 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow! Awesome Gun, that would knock down a T-Rex for sure, Now make one to take down a bunch of Zombies! LOL!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
    • Sidresponded to Ralph Hernandez on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:08 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The zombies would have to line up.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
  43. WoodenPlankwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 4:59 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think the name is quite appropriate.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
    • Brian P.responded to WoodenPlank on December 01st, 2011 at 9:02 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Oh, come on. Have a sense of humor.

      This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 3 Thumb down 12
      • Austinresponded to Brian P. on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:48 am Link To Comment |

        Reading is fundamental…

        This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
  1. Matt Greggwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:31 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Are they planning on making a magnum version?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 35 Thumb down 0
    • mosinmanresponded to Matt Gregg on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:53 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      i agree matt, the stopping power just isnt enough :)

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
  2. mosinmanwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 4:47 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    and here comes the ienvitable chuck norris joke…….
    chuck norris called and he said he wants his BB gun back

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 2
  3. JohnGaltwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:21 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    God Bless America!

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 24 Thumb down 8
    • Suburbanresponded to JohnGalt on December 06th, 2011 at 11:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Heh. Reminds me of a Chris Titus joke.

      To paraphrase:
      Terrorists messing with America? Are you sure you want to do that? We build drag cars that go from 0 to 300 in a quarter mile because we’re bored. Imagine what we’ll build if you really piss us off.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  4. Clayton Fowlerwrote on December 12th, 2011 at 11:51 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    People in America have a right to make what they like, with the right approvals They also have a right to call the gun and the bullet whatever they want. If you don’t want one because you don’t like it or the name, then don’t buy one. Even better, don’t even comment, if all you have is a negative comment…

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
  5. Juanwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:22 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Perfect weapon for Burt Gummer.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
    • christianresponded to Juan on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:41 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      exactly my same thought :p

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. John Doewrote on December 05th, 2011 at 1:51 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    For overkill purposes, I’m going to need one with an expanding bullet. Those pesky squirrels just don’t learn, do they?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  7. Andrewwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Best quote from the video:
    “The bullet only started out as 1132 grains.”

    Oh, is that all?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  8. John Bear Rosswrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:27 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Sporting Exemption should be easy to get. JD Jones does it often enough. Same with the 12 Gauge From Hell and its variants.
    Excellent concept and execution. The world needs more garage designers like this fellow.

    Best,
    JBR

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  9. Naterwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 3:37 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Maybe with a magazine (3 rounds + 1 in the chamber) and a Mauser-style action, then I’d hunt T-Rex or Giganotosaurus with it. Otherwise, no thanks.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  10. El Freddiowrote on December 01st, 2011 at 8:11 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Don’t let the makers of COD see it, or all the COD nerds will jump around ‘quickscoping’ and dual wielding it in the next Modern Warfare :P

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 5
    • Komradresponded to El Freddio on December 01st, 2011 at 11:51 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      As an actual nerd, I take good hearted offense. COD kiddies are not nerds by any stretch of the imagination. Real nerds are busy either writing their own games or playing games that have some actual value to them beyond hype. /nerd

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 15
      • El Freddioresponded to Komrad on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:08 pm Link To Comment |

        Hey, I’m not trying to offend anyone. I love to play video games. I’m just hating on COD. Next time I will remember not to use ‘nerd’ if people are going to get so touchy about it.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  11. Edgar Castelowrote on December 01st, 2011 at 8:04 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Take that and shove it, “don’t kill any Dinos” Terra Nova Emo Series!

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  12. C3P0wrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:21 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    It’s just so . . . so full of win

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  13. Netforcewrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 7:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Now what we need is the actual Jurassic Park.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
  14. DaveRwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:22 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve been wanting a new squirrel gun…hmmmmm….

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
    • christianresponded to DaveR on December 05th, 2011 at 11:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      i am assuming your “hmmmmm” is to be said, stroking your beard (or wear your beard would be) and looking out to the upper-right and direction

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  15. JimSwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The name has a lot of win!

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3
  16. JRwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 7:24 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is the short barrel so it can be used for home defence?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
  17. Wowwrote on December 06th, 2011 at 5:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow, nice muzzle control while sweeping his friends. I mean it happens at times while training, but come on…

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
  18. WoodenPlankwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 4:59 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think the name is quite appropriate.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
    • Brian P.responded to WoodenPlank on December 01st, 2011 at 9:02 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Oh, come on. Have a sense of humor.

      This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 3 Thumb down 12
      • Austinresponded to Brian P. on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:48 am Link To Comment |

        Reading is fundamental…

        This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
  19. Whedgitwrote on December 04th, 2011 at 8:32 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Put a longer barrel on it and make a FMJ round for it. Would make an excellent anti-material rifle. It could easily crack an engine block or blow the tracks off a tank with a well placed shot.

    Or you could take it deer hunting…if you really hate deer.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
  20. ndrwrote on December 10th, 2011 at 3:30 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    there are sporting weapons. every single article i read on the internet has a grammatical error, and im getting sick of it.

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 5
    • Steveresponded to ndr on December 12th, 2011 at 3:05 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      “there are sporting weapons. every single article i read on the internet has a grammatical error, and im getting sick of it.”

      Okay, if you want to complain about articles with poor grammer, you’ll need to learn grammer for yourself. Try this –

      “There are sporting weapons. Every single article I read on the internet as a grammatical error, and I’m getting sick of it.”

      Much better.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4
      • demonkoryuresponded to Steve on December 14th, 2011 at 2:14 am Link To Comment |

        “Grammar”. Not “grammer”. It’s “grammar”.

        This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
      • Oddbodresponded to Steve on December 14th, 2011 at 9:51 am Link To Comment |

        You missed the “h” off has……:-)

        Anyway: If there’s one thing I love about firearms, it is their sheer diversity & this is one more added to the pool.
        Where would we be without the innovators & “off the wall” thinkers?
        Still shooting muskets most likely.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  21. JTwrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 7:21 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So, for a “quick followup” you have to have a bandoleer with extra bolts and .700 rounds?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  22. Jim Twrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 5:32 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d like to add that the gun DOES have an extractor, just no ejector. The shellholder style action will extract the fired case, but you will then have to remove them from the bolt. P.S I’m NOT the inventor of this gun, I just followed the design and build closely and talk to the designer frequently.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
    • noobresponded to Jim T on December 05th, 2011 at 7:37 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      how much are a couple of spare bolts that you can keep loaded with cartridges for quick reloads?

      Pop out the spent bolt, slap in a new loaded one…

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Mattresponded to Jim T on December 03rd, 2011 at 4:34 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Forgive me if this has already been asked, or is a dumb question…. but I gotta know: where can I get one? or more appropriately, how much would it set me back?

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Flounderresponded to Matt on December 05th, 2011 at 2:03 pm Link To Comment |

        He built it at home… I’m sure he’ll send you the specs! :D
        But the whole point of this rifle seems to be 50BMG level of power in a gun that you can run cast lead bullets through.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  23. Deojewrote on December 01st, 2011 at 7:09 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow! That is all.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  24. Ralph Hernandezwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:13 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow! Awesome Gun, that would knock down a T-Rex for sure, Now make one to take down a bunch of Zombies! LOL!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
    • Sidresponded to Ralph Hernandez on December 02nd, 2011 at 1:08 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The zombies would have to line up.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
  25. Jameswrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:42 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’m guessing he’s not keeping a spare bolt in the magpul grip?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  26. APBTFanwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 6:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    What powder and charge weight?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • Jim Tresponded to APBTFan on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:31 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      it hovers around 190 grains of W748 powder

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • Byronresponded to Jim T on December 02nd, 2011 at 3:03 pm Link To Comment |

        how much does the rifle weigh? (trying to figure the recoil impulse, not counting the brake)

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Jim Tresponded to APBTFan on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:17 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      He said it weighs 14 lbs. with the aimpoint.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. paintball barrelwrote on December 08th, 2011 at 5:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Im surprised that the kick doesn’t look all that bad in the video. Well, it looks bad, but I mean limbs are still attached afterwards and such.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  28. J. Griggwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:22 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    That. Is. Awesome.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  29. Lancewrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:41 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    We all know dinosaurs are dead there for hunting terminators LOL. By the way ouch looks painful.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  30. Brian P.wrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Put a 20-24″ barrel on it, give it an extractor, and I’ll take one! I’m surprised to see how easily those guys are taking the recoil too!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Byronresponded to Brian P. on December 02nd, 2011 at 2:28 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I think that tank brake on the muzzle has a lot to do with that, same as on most .50 bmg rifles.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  31. Wwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 7:23 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    incredible…utterly incredible.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  32. Robwrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 7:41 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    We’ll talk when it’s a necked up 20mm.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  33. Flounderwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    AWESOME job on the machining and build! This man is obviously skilled…
    Which makes me wonder why he didn’t build an extractor…?
    AND
    how much does it weigh!?!?!?!?!
    it looks incredibly light yet everyone is handling recoil like it’s nothing at all!!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Chadresponded to Flounder on December 02nd, 2011 at 3:00 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      14lbs minus the weight of the muzzle break.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  34. ChrisCwrote on December 09th, 2011 at 5:20 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Great invention, awesome idea, but I agree with the comment up towards the top – EXTRMELY POOR FIREARM SAFETY. You guys need to do this cool stuff AND set an example that won’t get your video clip posted on Brady’s website as an example of why we shouldn’t be allowed to own even single-shot weapons…..

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 7
    • Oddbodresponded to ChrisC on December 14th, 2011 at 10:27 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Agreed: It’s no excuse to relax safety because it’s a single shot firearm, as this breaks the instinctive habit we should all have about safe practices.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  35. Brandrwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 7:49 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I wonder what the tax stamp costs for a destructive device like that?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
    • Fredresponded to Brandr on December 01st, 2011 at 7:54 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      $200, like most other class 3 items.

      Some are only $5.

      This may be eligible for a DD exemption but I don’t know all the criteria for exemption.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • Komradresponded to Fred on December 01st, 2011 at 11:48 pm Link To Comment |

        The requirement for exemption is the ATF deciding it’s worthy. Technically, a cartridge must have sporting purpose, but thing s like the .950 JDJ, which has no such purpose, have gotten through before, as have all the big Safari calibers.
        Really, the ATF just doesn’t want 20mm Vulcan and similar stuff getting through.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
  36. Reverend Clintwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 5:57 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    he should try n sell it to the FBI

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
    • El Duderinoresponded to Reverend Clint on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Yeah, I wonder if it’s a 100% stopper per FBI guidelines? :)

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  37. Annie Wicklundwrote on February 06th, 2012 at 7:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Muchos Gracias for your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  38. ndrwrote on December 10th, 2011 at 3:36 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    and who are the retards who shot this video??? isnt the impact, what the round does to the target what people really want to see?

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 10
    • Oddbodresponded to ndr on December 14th, 2011 at 10:23 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I’m thinking the video is mostly for those doing the shooting & don’t we all like to see ourselves doing cool stuff?
      I thought the “after action” look at the bullet & plate was pretty informative.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  39. I am afraid I’ll have to side with gvass: rifled barrel, over .50-caliber, definitely a DD. I don’t think the BATFE will be much prone to give this an exemption.

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 2 Thumb down 10
    • Jim Tresponded to Pierangelo Tendas (PT-The Italian Commie) on December 02nd, 2011 at 5:35 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I would have to say that if there is a public youtube video up with 15,000 views, and the ATF has not come knocking on his door, it is not a destructive device. Besides, if an over 50 caliber rifled gun is illegal, that puts alot of 577 t-rex’s and nitro express guns in an odd place.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • Pierangelo Tendas (PT-The Italian Commie)responded to Jim T on December 02nd, 2011 at 10:30 pm Link To Comment |

        Looks like you’re underestimating the facts that:

        #1 – Most of the over-.50 “safari” cartridges are well-established “sporting” calibers, some of them as old as over 1 century, and that would be hard for the BATFE to reclassify them, unlike what they could easily do for new developments.

        #2 – The guns normally chambered for those calibers are not “evil-looking”, this one is… and we all know what BATFE thinks about.

        #3 – The BATFE is usually “strong with the weak, weak with the strong” – a well-established gun company will have more chances that an amateur.

        Is not like I am saying that this *should* be a DD. I am just saying that I don’t trust the BATFE’s judgement in taking the right decision; we all know their well-established “position”, and we all know it’s all but permissive.

        This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 4
  40. gvasswrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Isn’t it a Destructive Device? .50+ caliber, rifled barrel.

    This comment has sparked a hot debate! What do you think? Thumb up 2 Thumb down 12
  41. HarryRwrote on December 04th, 2011 at 2:42 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Nobody seems to like this comment! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 36
  42. JeffreyBwrote on December 03rd, 2011 at 4:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Nobody seems to like this comment! What do you think? Thumb up 19 Thumb down 68
  43. Milowrote on December 02nd, 2011 at 2:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Nobody seems to like this comment! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 69
    • Durayresponded to Milo on December 02nd, 2011 at 4:50 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Or, it’s what someone builds when they have way more skill than time to spend watching Dancing with the Stars.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 34 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment