Brazilian IMBEL IA2 Photo

There are not a lot of photos of Brazil's new service on the internet, so I was pleased when a reader emailed me a photo in a photo of the IMBEL IA2. The rifle is based on the FN FAL, but uses a rotating bolt rather than a tilting bolt. It looks like they have modified the stock slightly since I last blogged about the gun.

[ Many thanks to Marcelo for emailing me the link. ]

Related Posts

14 Responses to “Brazilian IMBEL IA2 Photo”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Zermoidwrote on November 09th, 2011 at 2:45 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Damn Heath, you beat me to that!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Chasewrote on November 08th, 2011 at 7:15 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I VIGOROUSLY approve of the rifle grenades.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  3. Lancewrote on November 08th, 2011 at 8:39 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cool concept of having most in squad have a 5.56mm FAL and have one or two with a regular 7.62 FAL for a D.M. all with interchangeable parts and similar performance Brazil may be doing a real cost saving move with its infantry rifles.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. A.K. For T-7wrote on November 08th, 2011 at 8:34 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The photograph shows the carbine version which is not supposed to use neither the bayonet nor the rifle grenades (and the scope too…). Only the rifle version, which has a longer barrel, will use these rifle grenades and the bayonet knife. The rifle grenades in the photo are the training versions of the anti-personel rifle grenade (left) and the anti-armor rifle grenade (right).

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. RickHwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 5:06 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Actually it appears to be based on the FNC.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Tinkererresponded to RickH on November 08th, 2011 at 6:21 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The FNC has the upper/lower receiver hinge located on front of the magwell. The IMBEL has it between the magwell and the trigger guard -just like the FAL-.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • RickHresponded to RickH on November 08th, 2011 at 9:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      It still appears to have some features of the FNC. It probably has some of the CAL as well.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Tinkererresponded to RickH on November 08th, 2011 at 12:54 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      IMBEL has had the FAL license for decades. They developed the 5.56 rifle from that as the starting point, but all the further development has been indigenous. Same with Chile (my country)’s SG-542 (7.62 developed from the SIG-licensed SIG-540) and FAMAE SAF (SMG developed from the same SIG-540).

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. ThomasDwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 4:27 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Are you all sure about those two large projectiles being muzzle fired? The bases do not look large enough to fit over/onto the flash hider.

    Is there any reason they could not be launched from the grenade tube? Measuring from the photo there appear to be bore width standoffs approximately 2/3-3/4 above the base of each round. What would be their function if not to keep the round centered in the launcher?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Jimwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 2:19 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    what are those RPG looking rounds? Do they fire from the 40mm?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Michaelresponded to Jim on November 08th, 2011 at 2:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      They are rifle grenades that attach to the barrel, and either use a blank cartridge or a live round to launch them.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • Maverick Mooreresponded to Michael on November 08th, 2011 at 10:17 am Link To Comment |

        They’re still using rifle grenades? I thought the M320 and M230 design eliminated those.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Jackalresponded to Jim on November 08th, 2011 at 2:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      no,it’s is like the M1 garand grenades

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Heathwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 1:05 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Did you omit a word after “service” in the first sentence?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  1. Chasewrote on November 08th, 2011 at 7:15 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I VIGOROUSLY approve of the rifle grenades.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  2. Jimwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 2:19 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    what are those RPG looking rounds? Do they fire from the 40mm?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • Jackalresponded to Jim on November 08th, 2011 at 2:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      no,it’s is like the M1 garand grenades

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Michaelresponded to Jim on November 08th, 2011 at 2:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      They are rifle grenades that attach to the barrel, and either use a blank cartridge or a live round to launch them.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • Maverick Mooreresponded to Michael on November 08th, 2011 at 10:17 am Link To Comment |

        They’re still using rifle grenades? I thought the M320 and M230 design eliminated those.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Zermoidwrote on November 09th, 2011 at 2:45 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Damn Heath, you beat me to that!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Lancewrote on November 08th, 2011 at 8:39 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cool concept of having most in squad have a 5.56mm FAL and have one or two with a regular 7.62 FAL for a D.M. all with interchangeable parts and similar performance Brazil may be doing a real cost saving move with its infantry rifles.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. ThomasDwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 4:27 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Are you all sure about those two large projectiles being muzzle fired? The bases do not look large enough to fit over/onto the flash hider.

    Is there any reason they could not be launched from the grenade tube? Measuring from the photo there appear to be bore width standoffs approximately 2/3-3/4 above the base of each round. What would be their function if not to keep the round centered in the launcher?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. RickHwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 5:06 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Actually it appears to be based on the FNC.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Tinkererresponded to RickH on November 08th, 2011 at 12:54 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      IMBEL has had the FAL license for decades. They developed the 5.56 rifle from that as the starting point, but all the further development has been indigenous. Same with Chile (my country)’s SG-542 (7.62 developed from the SIG-licensed SIG-540) and FAMAE SAF (SMG developed from the same SIG-540).

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • RickHresponded to RickH on November 08th, 2011 at 9:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      It still appears to have some features of the FNC. It probably has some of the CAL as well.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Tinkererresponded to RickH on November 08th, 2011 at 6:21 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The FNC has the upper/lower receiver hinge located on front of the magwell. The IMBEL has it between the magwell and the trigger guard -just like the FAL-.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Heathwrote on November 08th, 2011 at 1:05 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Did you omit a word after “service” in the first sentence?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  8. A.K. For T-7wrote on November 08th, 2011 at 8:34 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The photograph shows the carbine version which is not supposed to use neither the bayonet nor the rifle grenades (and the scope too…). Only the rifle version, which has a longer barrel, will use these rifle grenades and the bayonet knife. The rifle grenades in the photo are the training versions of the anti-personel rifle grenade (left) and the anti-armor rifle grenade (right).

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment