US Army Considering Squad Size Change

Matthew Moss
by Matthew Moss
.S. Soldiers with the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Airborne) engage opposing forces in a simulated exercise during Saber Junction 18 at Hohenfels Training Area, Germany, Sept. 26, 2018. (US Army)

With the Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW) program underway, the US army is considering changes in squad size. Working with the basic assumption that introducing new weapons might mean a change in optimal squad organization, the Army’s Maneuver Battle Lab recently revealed that they have commenced a study tackling the issue. While it is uncertain if any change will result from the study, the army had already indicated that the size of the squad will not fall below 9 men.

The modern US Rifle Squad from Army Techniques Publication 3-21.8, Infantry Platoon and Squad, April 2016. Source: www.overtdefense.com

The idea of the general rifle squad as a tactical unit was forged by the American Expeditionary Force’s experience during World War I. At the time, the platoon remained the smallest tactical maneuver unit, with squads being specialized around roles like “riflemen”, “automatic riflemen”, and “bombers” which would serve as building blocks for unofficial half-platoon maneuver units. During the interwar period, the idea of a general rifle squad including all these specialties was finally adopted. Between then and now, official army squad sizes varied between the 8 men of 1920 and the 12 of 1942, with the latest official tables assuming a squad of 9 organized into two fire-teams.

US Rifle Squad in 1945, taken from contemporary US Army training materials Source: www.overtdefense.com

Over the past hundred years, the debate around the optimal size of the squad and its basic role has continued. Larger squads can absorb more casualties, carry more weapons and ammunition and have greater firepower. On the other hand, smaller squads are easier to control, are more maneuverable and less taxing on total manpower. Squads may be organized into two or three fire-teams which allow for complex maneuvers. Others, however, have supported the concept of a squad as a single maneuver unit which only maneuvers in cooperation with other squads as part of the platoon.

The Textron NGSW-AR at the range – Soldiers from 1st Battalion 32nd Infantry Regiment (Chosin), 1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division, participate in the testing of Next Generation Weapon Systems aiming to replace the M4 and the M249 at Fort Drum, New York. (US Army/Sgt. Cody W. Ewing) Source: www.overtdefense.com

A US Army study conducted in the 1990s concluded that the Army’s current 9-man organization was too small for the fire-team structure it adopted and that the army should either repurpose the squad to act as a single large fire-team within a platoon or raise its strength to 11 men. These recommendations, however, were not acted on at the time. Currently, the US Marine Corps are experimenting with 15-man squads but whether the US Army’s current study will lead to any change in squad organization remains uncertain. If the NGSW program is successful in selecting two new infantry weapons it will be fascinating to see how the new weapons’ weight, capabilities and ammunition requirements shape the future US Army infantry squad.


This article was written by Jakub Wozniak and originally published over on TFB’s sister site, OvertDefense.com. Check out OVD for the latest defense news and updates.

Matthew Moss
Matthew Moss

Managing Editor: TheFirearmBlog.com & Overt Defense.com. Matt is a British historian specialising in small arms development and military history. He has written several books and for a variety of publications in both the US and UK. Matt is also runs The Armourer's Bench, a video series on historically significant small arms. Here on TFB he covers product and current military small arms news. Reach Matt at: matt@thefirearmblog.com

More by Matthew Moss

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • Gunsandrockets Gunsandrockets on Nov 30, 2020

    Others, however, have supported the concept of a squad as a single maneuver unit which only maneuvers in cooperation with other squads as part of the platoon.

    Yeah, there is certainly plenty of criticism of the whole fire team concept despite its popularity.

    As pointed out, you really can't separate the question of correct infantry squad size from the question of the organization and doctrine of the whole platoon, company and battalion. How many heavy infantry weapons are there? At what organization level are they carried?

    Maintaining the appropriate balance between more firepower and adequate foot mobility is always a difficult question. Bullet resistant body armor, and fancy electronic gadgets are new complications added to the old hard equation. The tendency with U.S. military seems to be overloading the infantry, mostly because the U.S. can afford to lavish the men with extra equipment.

  • Padmmegh Ambrela Padmmegh Ambrela on Dec 15, 2020

    For an ifv with manned turret 3+9, for an APC with unmanned turret 3+12 and for helicopter assault or airborne 16 man squad (since after landing infantry have to depend on its legs to move). If their is only one size fits all is required a 12 man dismount squad is perfect. Neither too big nor too small.

Next