Syrian Developed Tracked RC Weapons Platform

Miles
by Miles

Two Arabic news sources ( Military-Zones, Middle East Panamera) have published independent posts about a remote control vehicle currently at least in the developmental phase of design within the highly contested Aleppo province in Syria. The designers are in areas still in control by Assad’s Syrian Arab Army, and have been working with the SAA in the hopes of a purchase. Originally it was constructed due to Syrian troops taking casualties in the current fight against numerous rebel and terrorist groups operating throughout Syria and especially in Aleppo province. The group mentioned backing the project is the Aleppo Chamber of Industry, however, this is from the Google Translation and is most likely a translation error instead of any actual organization.

Given the circumstances described, working under less than ideal conditions amid the chaos and violence going on in the province. According to the reports, it has been over a year in development. Currently, it appears to be a tracked RC vehicle with a camera showing the direction of movement and fire. It has been observed with PKM machine guns mounted, in addition to an unidentified rocket launcher (readers chime in?). It appears that all RC controls are basic in that it can probably propel itself in any ground direction, the weapons mounted might have elevation and traverse capabilities, and it can be fired remotely. Other than this, it doesn’t appear that it can change out ammunition, remotely charge a PKM or clear a malfunction, or climb over the rubble and debris found in an urban terrain.

Nonetheless, the vehicle is certainly an achievement given the situation it was created in. However, I’m not sure if it will offer itself as a battlefield multiplier to the SAA due to the constrictions listed above, and due to the nature of the fighting. Having one of these RC vehicles is great, but it could be easily outflanked or maneuvered simply by moving to ground high enough where it couldn’t traverse to, or by having at least two angles of attack on the vehicle. Essentially a platoon or company commander would have to have a number of these vehicles to cover each other, in addition to troops who understand the capabilities and limitations of the device, very similar to infantry troops fighting alongside armor. When done correctly it can be a force multiplier, but if done incorrectly the results can be catastrophic.

Miles
Miles

Infantry Marine, based in the Midwest. Specifically interested in small arms history, development, and usage within the MENA region and Central Asia. To that end, I run Silah Report, a website dedicated to analyzing small arms history and news out of MENA and Central Asia.Please feel free to get in touch with me about something I can add to a post, an error I've made, or if you just want to talk guns. I can be reached at miles@tfb.tv

More by Miles

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 13 comments
  • EC EC on May 11, 2017

    My money is on it being an RPO/MRO thermobaric rocket launcher.

    It's not an RPG-29 because the grips are far too much forward. In an RPG-29 the grips would be towards the centre, or the rear of the tube if it was disassembled.

    The RPG-32, on the other hand, does have a forward placement grips. However, it is a weapon where the rear of the tube is completely replaced to reload it, which makes for a rather significant "hump" in the tube. The launcher in this picture does not have that "hump". There are also other key differences, like in the types of grips.

    On the other hand, there is a high chance of it being an RPO-A. The sights are similar in construction. The rear grip is offset. The body matches. And, most importantly, a thermobaric launcher makes sense to burn out dirty rebels (instead of trying to hit them with a tandem-charge HEAT warhead).

    So to me it looks like an RPO-A.

    • See 1 previous
    • EC EC on May 11, 2017

      @Major Tom Not seeing the sight similarities at all between the RPG-29 and the rocket

      launcher in this picture. The RPG-29 usually has a built-in optical sight, and the irons are a flip-up variety.

      This rocket launcher features iron sights where the front sights are fixed, a sort of metal frame. The rear sights are a ladder-peep variety. Quite tall actually, with a fairly distinct cup.

      Pretty much the sights are nothing alike between this rocket and the RPG-29. This thing would also be about half the length of an RPG-29... they're quite long.

      On the other hand, the RPO-A:

      https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gEaC...

      Features pretty much identical sights as the rocket launcher in question. As well as all the other identifying features.

      Pretty much if I had a clear view of the right side of the rocket launcher then it'd be much easier to identify... the RPO has a distinctive side tube. But given the other features I think it is much more likely to be an RPO.

      As for T-72s, I don't think the Syrian forces are too worried about those. Like most RPGs, their primary use is against infantry targets. The RPOs would be used to clear a room or even a small building. If there are rebels known to be hiding in there, roll out the little robot and cook them all.

  • Tenmillimeter Tenmillimeter on May 16, 2017

    this seems like a counter sniper weapon more than a squad augmentation. this is how I would field it.

Next