Semi-Automatic .22 Pistol Design For 3D Printers

Steve Johnson
by Steve Johnson

Proteus at the DefCad forums has published CAD files for “The Brick”, a 3D printable semi-automatic .22 LR pistol. The gun is mostly made out of ABS plastic, even the bolt and barrel, but it does require a number of metal components, including an AR-15 semi-automatic fire control group, firing pin and buffer spring as well as a Ruger 10/22 magazine spring, a 1x8mm metal insert (for the chamber) and .44 caliber lead bullets or equivalent (inserted into the bolt to provide weight).

As far as I know, this design is theoretical and nobody has actually fired it. Given the venerable .22 round’s rimmed design is infamous for causing feeding problems, I am going to remain skeptical that consumer 3D printers are a practical, and safe, method to produce semi-automatic firearms in their entirety.


Many thanks Eric for the tip.

Steve Johnson
Steve Johnson

I founded TFB in 2007 and over 10 years worked tirelessly, with the help of my team, to build it up into the largest gun blog online. I retired as Editor in Chief in 2017. During my decade at TFB I was fortunate to work with the most amazing talented writers and genuinely good people!

More by Steve Johnson

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • RagTime RagTime on Oct 06, 2013

    Hello! Random fosscad lurker here, I'll just answer a few questions.

    -Generally when downloading files on certain sites, there are many fake sign up to download ads or fake click on me buttons. Obviously a direct link would be preferable, but due to the nature of the files, such sites are necessary.

    -We already have a derringer, http://vimeo.com/71010558

    I hope that answers your questions about this! :)

    Oh, and we're short on testers, so if you've got a 3d printer, come over to defcad.com (fosscad is not doing this with Cody FYI, we're just using the forums), and see what you want to download and try out! If you aren't eager to try out the firearms, you can still try out the lowers, those are for sure quite reliable.

  • Player_L Player_L on Nov 07, 2013

    I humbly think 3d printing, as it is now, a hugely overrated technology.

    While fun, it´s slow as hell, uses very weak building materials, and whenever metal is used (laser sintering) the material stress renders most pieces useless for direct use.

    Another huge negative point is that most thermoplastics attain most of their useful properties by mixing with other non-plastic materials (Think fiberglass and nylon to make weapons-grade Zytel), which most definitively cannot be extruded through the nozzle of the printer.

    I think additive 3D processes have a lot to offer, but they´re not quite there yet.

    Besides, why someone with the funds and technical expertise needed to build and operate such a machine wouldn´t be able to procure a more effective weapon by other means is beyond me.
    Homemade gunsmithing is nothing new, and hasn´t changed much since the ´50s.

    You could either make a pipe-and-washers smg or go the distance and actually use a lathe or stamping press to make an assault rifle receiver. The result may be of some use to a criminal, terrorist or insurgent, but it will not, by any stretch of imagination, compare to the reliability and accuracy of a factory-made weapon.

    And you still need to get ammo for it! Most countries where guns are heavily restricted, also make it difficult to acquire ammunition, which is not something you want to make from scratch.

    I guess in some countries like the USA, where you can manufacture for personal use arms you can legally buy, it might be an interesting hobby. Personally, I´d rather keep all my fingers, thank you very much.

    I think 3d gun printing is still a an answer looking for a question.

Next