Review: Hartman MH1 Reflex Sight

We’ve had a few articles discussing the much coveted MH1 Reflex sight from Hartman Ltd. I just spent a few days in a training class, ran by Lt Col Mickey Hartman himself, where the sights were an integral part of the curriculum.

One of the benefits of not only using the MH1, but getting time with the creator, is that I was able to get some insight into the “why” question for a number of features. This optic was well thought out and the main compromise (the height and weight) is well worth the benefit (near parallax free on the huge field of view).

Works well on a rifle

Works well on a rifle

Make no mistake, this is not a race sight–this is a battle sight. The features were developed to solve a number of challenges that were discovered in the crucible of a nearly non-stop combat environment for over 50 years. Don’t expect to see this sight at many 3-Gun competitions…

Construction and Design

There are twelve features and functions that differentiate the Hartman MH1 from the competition:

  • Largest Field of View
  • USB Rechargeable Internal and Replaceable CR123
  • Sleep Mode
  • Memory
  • Ranging and Balancing Reticle
  • Rear Control Panel Design
  • Low Battery Indicator
  • 5 Brightness modes/5 Night Vision Modes
  • All Settings User Configurable
  • Infrared Remote Control
  • Compatible with BUIS
  • Near Parallax Free
It is definitely super rugged. I'm going to be interested in it's long term durability.

It is definitely super rugged. I’m going to be interested in it’s long term durability.

The MH1 has the largest field of view of any reflex sight currently available. The field of view was specifically enhanced to be better for longer ranges, shooting at smaller targets, and for use with night vision (which is a huge issue for a number of sights due to the reduced field of view you get from most NODs). It is also built with real glass (opposed to polymer) which is one of the things that increases the weight.

The power system is pretty interesting. First you can recharge the MH1’s primary battery (which is not user replaceable) using a standard USB-micro cable. Just like the one you use for your phone, from any source that is USB compatible (power brick, car outlet, solar battery pack, etc). The power system is intelligent. It will use the rechargeable battery first, then fail over to the CR123. If only one battery has a charge it automatically picks that one. This also factors into the low battery indicator. It only triggers on low power in the system–not either battery specifically. The CR123 was chosen because of life and consistency of power, but at the expense of more weight (opposed to a disc battery). Additionally the CR123 is installed perpendicular to the barrel, to eliminate the potential for it becoming dislodged from recoil (which may, ahem, have been an issue for some other sights).

Adjusting the MH1. Note the remote forward mounted on the hand guard.

Adjusting the MH1. Note the remote forward mounted on the hand guard.

To better extend battery life the MH1 also has an intelligent sleep mode that utilizes dual motion sensors that are exceptionally sensitive. Basically the sight will only come on when the weapon is indexed, and it detects this by a roughly 20% change in orientation from horizontal (this can be disabled for high angle shooting). It will not go into sleep mode as long as the weapon is indexed–even if you are super still, it still detects the micro movements and stays awake. When it has gone to sleep, and it is woken back up, it remembers your last settings, no matter how much time has passed (I would assume a decade may be a bit much). The MH1, by default, will alert you at 2 hours out when the battery gets low by flashing the reticle. The flashing becomes more aggressive the closer you get to full drain.

It makes one handed pistol (er, micro RONI with stabilizer) shooting easier. Anyone up for making a slide cut out? :)

It makes one handed pistol (er, micro RONI with stabilizer) shooting easier. Anyone up for making a slide cut out? 🙂

Red dots are not the most optimal for engaging targets at any sort of range. Basically a dot has no “horizon” to indicate when the weapon is level. Not a big deal for CQB distances, but can translate out to misses if the weapon is angled and you are shooting at a few hundred yards. So how is that mitigated? By adding a horizon bar to the right an left of the center dot. And if you are going to add them, why not build in a range estimator.The space between the two bars (with the dot in the middle) is shoulder width at 50 yards, the bar itself is the width of a standard human’s shoulders at 100 yards, and the dot is head width at 300 yards. One of the other problems with reflex sights is they present the “enemy” side with a light source (the closer the light source is in line with the viewport the worse the problem). The MH1 completely eliminates this problem (even with observation from the front via NVDs) by placing the light in a totally different plane, and using a full size prism and mirror to reflect the reticle. This was the compromise that led to the tall profile. This design is also what gives the MH1 it’s near parallax free view (please feel free to discuss your opinion of parallax and reflex sights in the comments).

Note the slight angle of the rear control panel. It is just enough to allow access with a rear mounted magnifer.

Note the slight angle of the rear control panel. It is just enough to allow access with a rear mounted magnifer.

The control panel is angled and the power button is on both sides to accommodate the use of NVDs and magnifiers which would traditionally block access to a rear panel. The buttons also control the brightness level, 5 for day use and 5 for NVD use.

The two other really “standout” features are the remote and the user configuration software (the software is an additional charge). The remote is a strapped contraption that you mount to the top of your weapon, in line with the MH1. It communicates with the sight via a super short range infrared beam (that is a totally different wavelength than the ones used by NVDs; and doesn’t have a cable to get snagged on things). The remote allows you to turn the sight on, and adjust brightness. It doesn’t allow you to accidentally turn it off by not having an off function. It uses a CR2032 disc battery.

Finally, you can program the sight with the optional software, and you can literally change everything from intensity of the brightness settings to the low power indicator timeout, as well as enable and disable features. Super flexible.

And for those that care, the Hartman MH1 is MIL-STD-810G.


After running the Hartman MH1 in class for several days, I can attest that the features work and work well (with a couple of exceptions). We had one mounted on a Micro RONI Stab and one mounted on an AR-15.

Hartman MH1 mounted on a micro RONI. Note the height.

Hartman MH1 mounted on a micro RONI. Note the height.

It is very tall, if such things matter to you. I initially thought it may be too high, but within an hour of using it, it was no different than any other sight I’ve used–you just adapt to it.

The exceptions are the software and the remote. We didn’t get to use the software–there was just not really time in the schedule. The remote I found a little annoying at times as it was in the way. This is really a nit picky sort of thing. Since we were sharing the platforms among a few people we didn’t have much option to configure the rifles personally. When I eventually get one, I will be able to mount it where it makes sense for me.

Also it is important to note, while we abused them pretty good in the class, we did not have the ability to do durability testing on them. I’d like to see how they hold up in comparison to, say, an Aimpoint. And since they have not been in existence for very long at all, we don’t have any operational data on the battery life–can they eek out 5 years?

A great video discussing some of what I talked about as well as showing it in use:


No, I'm not shouldering it... :)

No, I’m not shouldering it… 🙂

I will definitely be adding one (maybe a couple) of these to my toy box as soon as they are generally available to the public. I totally understand and agree with the design and features the MH1 has. The biggest unknown to me is the long term durability and battery life–the sight is just too new to have that data–and we all know that the lab results are not necessarily the same as real world.

They are being sold as fast as they are produced, with production running twenty-four hours a day, six days a week. You can find some waiting lists to join at places like Optics Planet, but don’t expect one any time soon. MSRP is ~$650, and you can learn more at:

If you are going to be at SHOT, you can see them in person at booth #12571.

Pictures courtesy of Kevin “TacDaddy” Reichman.

Tom is a former Navy Corpsman that spent some time bumbling around the deserts of Iraq with a Marine Recon unit, kicking in tent flaps and harassing sheep. Prior to that he was a paramedic somewhere in DFW, also doing some Executive Protection work between shifts. Now that those exciting days are behind him, he has embraced his inner “Warrior Hippie” and assaults 14er in his sandals and beard, or engages in rucking adventure challenges while consuming craft beer. To fund these adventures, he writes medical software and builds websites and mobile apps. His latest venture is as one of the founders of; a search engine for all things gun related. He hopes that his posts will help you find solid gear that will survive whatever you can throw at it–he is known (in certain circles) for his curse…ahem, ability…to find the breaking point of anything.


  • MrBrassporkchop


    • Doc Rader

      To 10ft

  • int19h

    “The MH1 has the largest field of view of any reflex sight currently available” – more than Meprolight Tru-Dot RDS?

    • Doc Rader

      Yes. The Meprolight is 33mm x 20mm. The MH1 is 35mm x 24mm.

    • Ken Pagano


    • Jambo

      The dirty little secret is that if you keep both eyes open it doesn’t actually matter.

      • MrBrassporkchop

        This is why I’m leaning more towards the shield cqs. Basically a j point on steroids.

  • Ken Pagano

    I was there for the original testing of the sight a few years back…very good.

  • A bearded being from beyond ti

    Somewhat off topic, but what exactly is the difference between the aimpoint CompC3 and M4? The Micro H1 and T1?

    • david

      CompC3 is discontinued & uses 1/3N batteries. CompM4 has NVG brightness settings and uses AA batteries. Micro T1 has NVG brightness settings.

      • A bearded being from beyond ti

        So the only difference between the T1 and H1 is the NVG thing?

        • cwp

          The T1 is also rated for deeper water (25m vs 5m), but this is probably not likely to come into play for the typical user, or even for most atypical users.

          • A bearded being from beyond ti

            Alright, thanks for clearing that up. For whatever reason the M4 and T1 are not listed on the swedish version of Aimpoint’s website.

  • Jeremy Hogan
  • Howard M. Murdock

    I’ve been interested by this sight since I first saw it here on TFB. I have my reservations, I see the connectivity as superfluous and I not a fan of the CR2023 batteries. It’s only marginally larger than the Meprolight Tru-Dot RDS and twice the price. I like the reticle of the Hartman, but not being an eccentric billionaire, I’ll stick to my Meprolights for square aspect optics.

    • Doc Rader

      Actually, it has an internal rechargeable and also uses a CR123 battery.

      It is pretty hard to compare the two (aside from both being reflex sights) since the MH1 has a totally different feature set. The Meprolight doesn’t have really any of the same features (sensors, controls, field of view, etc).

    • Russ Kell

      I generally like my Mepro Tru-dots (hold zero like a rock, large viewing aperture, and common battery).

      That said, I have 3 and each one has a different level of actual brightness when turned all the way up. Not just a little difference, even someone who has never looked through a Mepro can detect it very quickly

      Mepro’s CS said ‘that is normal’. That irritates a bit as all 5 of my Aimpoint PROs have no detectable difference in max brightness.

      • Sunshine_Shooter

        If I was in your position I would have sold all 3 of those mepros and replaced them with Aimpoints.

  • The_Champ

    So the range estimation features go all the way out to about the maximum point blank range of 5.56? I have to question the usefulness of that. Or the usefulness of a 50m range estimator.
    Looks like a decent optic though.

  • Mrninjatoes

    Handled one at SHOT last year. They are built like a tank.

  • Edeco

    Rear Control Panel for users without the common courtesy to reach around.

  • YZAS

    Hmmm, thought it was going to be even heavier than 13 oz honestly. I’d skip the whole remote thing personally. Love the FOV, sight picture, reticle. Just not sure however that i’d get over the tall part though. Too set in my ways i think, but who knows.

  • Phaedrus

    I have not seen the sight so take my comments with a grain of salt. I see a few things that would give me pause. The first is the ‘sleep’ mode. I have never used an item with a ‘wake’ mode that didn’t eventually fail. Maybe this one is better than all the rest but it seems like a problem waiting to happen. The rechargeable battery also seems like would be a point of likely failure. They seem to give reasonable service in cell phones but I have never seen a battery that didn’t have any hysteresis. Repeated charging weakens all batteries I have seen. The excellent Eneloops can be charged 500 times; I suppose if this battery is that good it might be okay. Lastly depending on the tech used I would worry about battery life.

    That said it looks extremely promising! I’ll have to check into it further.

  • Joe

    First thought was “huh this is kind of odd” and once I heard “Israel” I knew why.

    Field of view is a non-issue except for using NOD’s, but anyone worth a damn uses the NVG in combination with a PEQ.
    “Make your own buttonology” is terrible if you’re issuing these out. Everyone has to have a standard to go from.
    The center dot is too big. The reticle pales in comparison to EOtech’s which 1) does a better job of range estimating and 2) also has a”horizon bar”
    The remote is a gimmick. If I can’t take my hand off the fore end of the rifle I’m shooting, not playing with my brightness settings.

    I’ll take Iraq and Afghanistan lessons any day over a pseudo “nearly non-stop combat environment for over 50 years.”

  • Tierlieb

    Wow. So much Blah. The only true advertising blurb is “this is not a race sight”, and only if you ignore the second part about it being a battle sight.

    The FOV argument is bull for daysights, the FOV argument for NVG is bull if you use anything but a monocular (and, as someone already said: NVG + Laser is the way to go at night), glass being better than plexi is bull, the remote is bull, angle and motion sensors and cut-offs are bull on battle sights, hell, even the “standard human shoulder width” thing is bull. And if you only get 5ft of waterproofing out of your overbuilt bull, then, well, bull.

    It does however beat 10 year old EOTechs by having the battery aligned correctly (which is why they came out with the XPS a few years ago after all) and all competitors by making a much heavier paperweight.

  • iksnilol

    Sooo… what does it do that an Aimpoint Micro T-1 won’t ?

    • Drew Coleman

      Or an Eotech for that matter?

      • iksnilol

        Dude, that’d be an easy blow: it holds zero and has a battery time that can be measured in hours instead of minutes.

        • Cuvie

          Are you referring to thermal drift? Because testing has shown that the Aimpoint experiences that as well.

          • iksnilol

            Negligible in comparison to Eotechs.

    • Sunshine_Shooter

      Israel! IDF! Non-stop battlezone for 50 years! Uhh… Remote control!

  • Magnum58

    I shot the MH1 on a sub-gun at 35M with head-shots every-time. I love the horizontal lines on each side of the dot.

  • cwolf

    I have one with the B reticle on backorder.

    However the ideal future sight (which would vary by requirements) would assist the shooter with range, the range solution, and moving targets. Once you get at 500+m most trajectories look like a rainbow.

    These technologies exist in sniper scopes (even LIDAR to read the wind), but eventually the technologies will come down in cost.

    I may be over stating the technology, but if a camera can have predictive focus, then why not a sight that estimates lead?