Accessory Review: Strike Industries C.O.R.E. Vest

Strike has a history of making super affordable mods for your guns that really can dress it up and give it a different look than all of the other “black rifles” out there. When my editor approached me about doing a review for a new product they have, after he described it to me, I cocked my head to the left and affixed a blank bovine stare (a little how my pup does when I ask him to help solve a coding problem). The product is a plate carrier that is configured for rescue operations. Strike Industries, you say? Right?!?

I was definitely intrigued, though I remained (and remain) pretty skeptical.  I do want to add a disclaimer that my overall review of this item is colored by my personal experiences as a military medic and wilderness medicine instructor.

The vest’s name “C.O.R.E” is an acronym for “Clandestine Operations Rescue Extraction”.  Or maybe it is “Clandestine Operations Rescue Evacuation”.  Their product page and promo video differ in the name.


Okay, here is the description from their website.

Our plate carrier offers protection where you need it without the weight or bulk of others on the market. The C.O.R.E. Clandestine Operations Rescue Extraction Plate Carrier is a project that took over a year and a half to perfect and was designed by US Counter Terror Operators.   The design was built for superior protection, mobility and performance.  The C.O.R.E features a breathable waistband able to hold side armor and a padded yoke for a secure, comfortable and breathable fit. One feature that stands out above the rest is the patent pending two integrated nylon webbing rescue strap system.  This allows for rapid rescue and evacuation of downed operators.

It is patent pending for “two integrated nylon webbing rescue strap system”. The overall product is constructed with 100% Nylon 1000 Denier, 100% Nylon Webbing straps, and YKK Buckles.

Back waist adjustment

Back waist adjustment

Shoulder Yoke Adjustment

Shoulder Yoke Adjustment

Cummerbund style closure

Cummerbund style closure

It has a ton of panels to access the adjustment straps and it is pretty adjustable. The vest is a “cummerbund” style which is like the very first armor system I had in Iraq (the Eagle CIRAS).

Yoke style over the shoulder harness

Yoke style over the shoulder harness

The over the shoulder part is a “yoke” style and is much like some of the 5.11 tactical packs (as a point of reference).

The inside of the vest has a ton of thick padding.


Overall the vest is pretty tough. It survived numerous drags with people (and weighted dummies). It was soaked with water (and sim blood). It was pulled through mud, over grass and branches, through rocks, etc. The worst damage it took was doing a drag over pavement (but I wouldn’t really expect anything to hold up all that well). Resetting the straps after a drag was pretty easy to do—you can open up the bottom of the back section and just pull them back through.


Cavity opened to reset the straps.

The padding was pretty comfortable, but after getting it wet and sweating in it, it started to get a little funky. Anyone that has worn armor will know what I am talking about. Unfortunately it got a little ripe after not much usage. I let it bake in the sun a little and that seemed to reduce the odor.

My favorite plate carrier, moon dust all pressure washed out...

My favorite franken-plate carrier, moon dust all pressure washed out…

Okay so maybe things have changed a bit since I was down range. We had plate carriers. They had drag handles. If I needed to have a way to distance drag a downed Marine, I used a thirty foot piece of 1.5 inch tubular webbing with a carabiner attached to loops on both ends (a trick that one of my First Class Petty Officers showed me). The benefit of having a setup like I described is that if we had a casualty and the area was still “active”, and the casualty was still coherent so I could throw one of the carabiners to them, and they could hook it on nearly anywhere, and then we could pull them to cover. (Obviously they have to be alert enough to do that; otherwise I’d have gotten to test out my ESAPIs).

I’m still a fan of the first two concepts of battlefield medicine I was taught:

  1. The best medicine is more bullets into the bad guys, and
  2. Don’t make more casualties

The initial problem I see with the C.O.R.E. system is that you have to break cover to get to the casualty to actuate the drag handles. Anytime you are using a drag method (which is one of the crappiest and worst ways to evacuate a downed person; though super expedient), that means you are in a majorly bad situation. The other problem is that the vest seems designed for two rescuers (or more; their video shows a lifted carry with four people) evidenced by the two drag loops on the back.

During a wilderness medical class I integrated a 140 pound drag dummy wearing the Strike CORE into a simulation exercise. I’d actually taken a few videos but I think this one illustrates a few issues.

Things to note. I noticed both on dummies and people the vest tends to ride up. Someone would have to be very “V” shaped (very narrow waist and large thorax) for the vest to not travel up. You can see the side areas basically came up to the armpit, and the bottom bunched up. Now, in all fairness this example did not have the patient in full kit with side plates (just front and back plates; side plates potentially could have stiffened up the sides). The other important thing is the webbing loop that the rescuer holds onto. This is a simple webbing loop, not at all padded and the hook side of the “hook and loop fastener” is down the length of the handle. Unless you are wearing gloves it is pretty uncomfortable. The two rescuers did note (during a 14 second drag) that the webbing was already becoming uncomfortable.


Drag handles.

The marketing speak also doesn’t pass the sniff test—“was designed by US Counter Terror Operators” and “developed by Clandestine Operators” is a big red flag for me. Who is the target market for this product? Who are these mysterious individuals that found a problem while down range and developed this specific tool to resolve that issue?

Now for the bigger problem that I see. Has anyone here done a limited resource extrication several miles from definitive medical assistance? I have. I also teach this as part of wilderness medicine. Reality check here:

“The concept was developed by Clandestine Operators who operate in small teams in remote areas, generally several miles from tactical or medical assistance.  The straps allow a rescue team to tactically conduct a rescue while maintaining their weapon and situational awareness.”

Drag handles pulled out.

Drag handles pulled out.  “Traditional” drag handle center top.

You are not going to drag a casualty several miles, nor are you going to have a four-man team pick them up and carry them for several miles. Not happening. If you don’t believe me go get four friends and give it a try—I’ll wait. Seriously, even with serious rescue equipment (e.g. a stokes basket), carrying a 180 pound “operator” (likely 200+ pounds if they have gear on; I’m guesstimating 180 pounds as an average bodyweight) is going to require several people (along with additional resources to swap out as individuals get fatigued). Factor in trying to maintain weapon and situational awareness while tactically moving (and I would assume each rescuer is also wearing full kit), and you have a recipe for the creation of many more casualties (and I’m not even discussing getting shot—I’m thinking rolled ankles, heat injury, etc).  Their promo video shows a more urbanized scene, so maybe that is the target market?

Anchor attachment for the drag straps.

Anchor attachment for the drag straps (darker piece of webbing, center frame).

As far as rescue, nothing about the system is solid enough to hook a rescue line to. The handles in the back are attached down the length of a the inside back via a linear stitch—I didn’t see bar-tacking except for a single line up near the deployment hole. That would probably hold for a static pull, but I don’t think it could take a dynamic load, and the handles would certainly separate.


I like the construction of the plate carrier itself, and the materials that it is made of (with the exception of the padding). I like how light and flexible it is. It is also very adjustable. Overall it proves that you don’t need miles of one inch webbing coating a 1000D shell to make an effective plate carrier with a flexible attachment system. I am not a fan of cummerbund style closures (on anything), so I tried to keep that from coloring my review.

Personally the biggest problem I have with it is that I am having a hard time seeing the niche this fills—the “why”. The name (Clandestine Operations Rescue Extraction/Evacuation) implies a whole bunch of concepts which I am not sure fits this product. It is not really “clandestine”—it is not really a concealment system—use of a plate carrier suggests “Direct Action” to me.  As I mentioned in the opening, I’m reviewing this in the context of my experience.  The written marketing materials differ from the promo video, and it is entirely possible that this item would be more suitable for an urban police context (but I do not have experience in that area, so I would like to hear from any readers that are and could see this being utilized in their environment).

As far as rescue and extraction, well, yeah, it does extraction for sure. I’m not so sure about the use in rescue. I don’t know anyone that configures (nor buys) their armor system with the focus on it being used to facilitate a rescue or extraction. The plate carrier is there to carry armor and some kit for your mission specifics. And I certainly would not trust this gear for any sort of high angle rescue attachment.

The idea that it is going to be used for a small remote team evacuating a downed buddy well behind enemy lines with no support seems like a stretch.

I think Strike would be better off marketing this as a lightweight plate carrier and ditch the rescue concept.  Or adjust the marketing materials to discuss the populations for which this is intended.

The CORE runs $169 and you can find it at:

Tom is a former Navy Corpsman that spent some time bumbling around the deserts of Iraq with a Marine Recon unit, kicking in tent flaps and harassing sheep. Prior to that he was a paramedic somewhere in DFW, also doing some Executive Protection work between shifts. Now that those exciting days are behind him, he has embraced his inner “Warrior Hippie” and assaults 14er in his sandals and beard, or engages in rucking adventure challenges while consuming craft beer. To fund these adventures, he writes medical software and builds websites and mobile apps. His latest venture is as one of the founders of; a search engine for all things gun related. He hopes that his posts will help you find solid gear that will survive whatever you can throw at it–he is known (in certain circles) for his curse…ahem, ability…to find the breaking point of anything.


  • Clandestine is the new tactical… mark my words.

    • Doc Rader

      Right?!? The word “operator” needs to be banned as well… Unless of course I can dial “0” to talk to you…

      • Rick5555

        I sort of cringe when I see an ad, commercial, etc. where the person says “the operator.” Whatever happened to simply saying…”the user.” erwos is absolutely right. The new word for tactical will be Clandestine.

  • How is this any different from all the other lightweight plate carriers out there like the Condor Modular Platecarrier (reviewed by nutnfancy)

    • Doc Rader

      Cost. Design. Padding. Materials…

    • Bill

      If life is bad enough that you have to wear plates, I wouldn’t cut corners on the carrier. Tyr, First Spear, LBT, HSG, BFG are just a few of the top-tier makers, there’s no shortage of really high quality plate carriers out there.

  • New Dawn

    It looks to me as if this plate carrier was designed for law enforcement as opposed to military. The review made on this product seems to focus on extreme situations that would be associated with military operations. The article does not touch on law enforcement equipment or common emergencies whatsoever. You cannot associate a militant battle in Iraq with LE routine and emergent calls for service. I appreciate the article and advice Tom R, but I would like to see you elaborate more on how this plate carrier would be useful to Law Enforcement.

    • Doc Rader

      And unfortunately LE application is not in my wheel house. Based on the name and product descriptions, which you should read (I included relevant portions in this review), it doesn’t mention what I would consider LE context (this quote: “The concept was developed by Clandestine Operators who operate in small teams in remote areas, generally several miles from tactical or medical assistance.”). I was definitely confused as to the target market. I think it probably does have more utility for a LE context, but I still think the overall concept is flawed. Focusing on rescue applications and tying up structure and function on that is misplaced in my opinion, no matter what the target market.

      If they had named this Law Enforcement Rescue & Evacuation (and had supporting text to support that) it would be easier to support it as that.

  • Bill

    This is underwhelming. Every plate carrier and most chest rigs I have or have seen have drag handles, and they aren’t supposed to be “comfortable.” While I haven’t had to do it in real life, every simulated training rescue in which the handles where used typically ended up with a tangled mess, until we figured out that grabbing the blouse/shirt collar was a lot more secure, at least until it ripped, but I’m not a clandestine operator so I’m probably not qualified to discuss dragging almost-dead weight. There are other systems out there if a casualty needs to be moved for miles and a litter or backboard isn’t available, soft litters like Matbock’s, or hasty rigs such as firemen have used for decades. And padding equals weight and heat. I don’t know exactly where it’s padded, but anything other than the shoulders is going to restrict airflow.

    Funny how they don’t mention the non-PALS mounting system, which is far more relevant – I hate products that are predicated on the idea that the user will get shot, whereas my goal at least is to make certain that doest happen. But then the photos on the website show the carrier fitting so poorly it might as well not be worn.

    • Carlito B

      As an LEO that owns this product, I would like to share some thoughts. I’ve worn a fair share of plate carriers throughout my 16 year career, and this is by far the most comfortable and well designed one that I have worn. For those of you who never worked as an LEO in an urban environment, I do not understand how you are so quick to judge. As far as the built in straps, they aid in an extraction. Key word “aid”. The straps don’t magically float a down officer to safety. I would rather have more than less in an emergency situation. #bluelivesmatter

      • Bill

        I’m glad it works for you, and I’d be certainly willing to try it, but nothing about it appears to be outstanding or revolutionary. I’m a 30 year LE vet, urban, suburban and rural, and date to the days when a Nam era flak jacket was state of the art in “heavy armor.”

        In the LE context, extracting downed officers is relatively uncommon, often involves using vehicles as moving cover, and doesn’t really compare to military operations.

  • Anthony Acosta

    I purchased this vest approximately 6 months ago and its been ideal for undercover Police work. It holds a decent load without a bulky appearance. On several occasions I was able to conceal the vest with a large jacket while operating in an area where bad guys are well versed in counter surveillance tactics. I’ve actually used the vest while involved in a High Risk situation and it performed as advertised. Eh, I get it, nobody wants to get shot and go down. Truth be told, nine Police Officers have been killed in the last seven days, so I’ll keep my drag handles. The most comfortable vest I’ve ever owned was made by Eddie Bauer and stuffed with Goose Feathers. Until the day they start making Tactical Vests, I’ll stick to this one…

    • Doc Rader

      Very interesting. It is helpful to hear your experience with it in that context. I am surprised that you were able to conceal it under a jacket though–I assume not very much gear was attached? I’m guessing probably steel plates? My ceramics are fairly bulky.

      While it sucks that a high number of officers have recently been killed, I’m not sure I understand the contextual relevance to this product (or plate carriers in general).

      • Anthony Acosta

        You asked for an opinion on the vest, and I gave mine in a Law Enforcement perspective. Some people fail to see the relevance of drag handles or don’t like the idea of purchasing a vest on the thought that you can be killed. To each his own, I referenced the slain Police Officers as an example that bad things happen. As an Officer shot in the line of duty, I try to use what works. I try..

        • Doc Rader

          No, I really do appreciate the opinion. I’m just trying to get some more details–I am truly interested in the concealment of it since the one I have is fairly bulky with plates in it. Utilizing the attachments for gear would really bulk it up. Obviously I am coming from a different perspective.

          I based my review largely on that experience and how the item is advertised. Those features (beyond the ability to hold plates and attach kit) are largely useless for rescue and extraction in a limited resource context (which is what the advertising indicates).

          Yes you can rapidly pull someone out of an immediate danger zone with the drag handles (which sucks no matter what method you use) and the length of the handles would give enough webbing to allow the rescuer stand upright (opposed to hunched over using the standard loop on the upper back of most carriers). But to suggest that the vest is going to help with an issue “several miles from tactical or medical help” is where I have the problem.

          • CommonSense23

            Am I the only one who kinda feels that all the accounts which are praising this feel kinda fishy, all of them started on Sep 2, with no other comments but on this. I have been issued low vis plate carriers and they are way slimmer than this.

          • Bill

            It isn’t the issue of drag handles – it’s that they seem to be the only unique feature in the way that they are designed relative to this carrier. The cops who’ve been killed lately likely would not have been save by class 3 or 4 armor, as at least one was also shot in the head, but because handguns were involved, level 2 or 3 soft, concealable armor would protect against rated handgun rounds.

            Hard plates undercover, or more accurately in plain clothes is typically only done in surveillance, counter-robbery/violent crime interdiction, or possibly warrant service. Even then I typically will use a low-vis chest rig like a BFG 10-Speed over soft armor, under a loose jacket. Hard plate carriers, especially with pouches attached, seem to belong to the realm of SWAT, though when composite hard plates are developed that can be worn (realistically) in concealed carriers that may sort of change.

            I personally hope that the day of hard, or at least harder, concealable daily wear plates comes sooner rather than later, for spike protection and chest and back protection in car wrecks, which still kill more cops than gunshot wounds.

  • Peter L

    So this was designed by J-Tech in Taiwan and rebranded by Strike industries? (see first picture)

    • >’w'<

      I think so