FN HAMR in Action
This promotional video from FNH-USA shows the FN HAMR in action (at 1:41).
[ Many thanks to Iroquois for posting the link. ]
13 Responses to “FN HAMR in Action”
Sort The Responses Below: |
-
Jimwrote on November 02nd, 2010 at 1:20 pm Link To Comment |
Sorry, but what again is the difference between the SCAR and HAMR?
Please rate this comment:
0 
0 -
Bradwrote on November 13th, 2010 at 12:41 am Link To Comment |
Hmm…
I like the high mounted bipod arrangement for the HAMR. Reminds me of the FAMAS, except the bipod folds forward on the HAMR.
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
jacob kenworthywrote on November 25th, 2010 at 10:46 am Link To Comment |
starship troopers
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
REMOVwrote on December 06th, 2010 at 12:34 am Link To Comment |
This IS NOT the FN HAMR despite the description in commercial but FN IAR, take a look at the bayonet lug, which HAMR doesnt have! There are other minor differences between the FN USA proposal for the USMC and the HAMR shown at the AUSA, the barrel profile for example.
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
Rijoenpialwrote on October 30th, 2010 at 12:18 am Link To Comment |
I saw this video months ago, and it blows my mind each and every time I watch it! I loved the precision of the 5.56 EGLM, with the first round nailing the spot where the pink smoke grenade fell!
The video also contradicts the fears of the underbarrel grenade launcher preventing the mag from falling freely! the 7.62 worked beautifully!
The HAMR is great… I would much like to see a fully one-coloured one, either in flat dark earth or black…!
The Mk48 is awesome! the new and improved Mk46 (SAW) is also great!
In a word, a very good presentation video from FN!
It puts the Remington ACR one to shame!
Cheers!
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
Rijoenpialwrote on November 01st, 2010 at 5:38 am Link To Comment |
Mikon,
It’s a Burris Fastfire… Nutnfancy’s PFIDude uses one on his FNP45 Tactical:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD9XjsefvDI
Cheers!
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
Lancewrote on October 30th, 2010 at 8:14 am Link To Comment |
Its a commercial Steve its not “in action”.
Please rate this comment: 0 0-
Steveresponded to Lance on October 30th, 2010 at 8:33 am Link To Comment |
Lance, point taken.
Please rate this comment: 0 0
-
-
MikonNikonwrote on October 30th, 2010 at 9:14 pm Link To Comment |
Could anyone be so kind as to tell me what sights they had on their pistols? Looked like a reflex sight. Possibly a Docter model of some sort?
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
Hellhoundwrote on October 30th, 2010 at 12:59 am Link To Comment |
The HAMR looks like a beast.
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
Vakwrote on October 30th, 2010 at 3:47 am Link To Comment |
So much tacticool I grew my own eotech.
Please rate this comment: 0 0 -
Rijoenpialwrote on November 03rd, 2010 at 1:25 am Link To Comment |
Jim,
the REAL difference is that the SCAR is an Assault Rifle (5.56 NATO) or a Battle Rifle (7.62 NATO), whereas the HAMR is a full-auto SAW-type (Squad Automatic Weapon) AR…
With a 150-round MAG, it becomes a lighter, more manageable SAW weapon than the SAW Minimi…
Cheers!
Please rate this comment: 0 1 -
Lancewrote on November 02nd, 2010 at 7:18 pm Link To Comment |
@ Jim
the SCAR MK 16 is a rilfe made for SOCM force (before the 5.56mm version was abandoned the design in favor of M-4A1s). The HAMR was FNs competititor for the USMC IAR competition which lost to the H&K 416. The HAMR has alot hever barrel and a barrel change option and can fire both from closed and open bolts.
Please rate this comment: 0 1
Leave a Comment
-
Twitter
-
Email Subscription
-
Facebook
Top Posts
-
Categories
This IS NOT the FN HAMR despite the description in commercial but FN IAR, take a look at the bayonet lug, which HAMR doesnt have! There are other minor differences between the FN USA proposal for the USMC and the HAMR shown at the AUSA, the barrel profile for example.
starship troopers
Hmm…
I like the high mounted bipod arrangement for the HAMR. Reminds me of the FAMAS, except the bipod folds forward on the HAMR.
Jim,
the REAL difference is that the SCAR is an Assault Rifle (5.56 NATO) or a Battle Rifle (7.62 NATO), whereas the HAMR is a full-auto SAW-type (Squad Automatic Weapon) AR…
With a 150-round MAG, it becomes a lighter, more manageable SAW weapon than the SAW Minimi…
Cheers!
@ Jim
the SCAR MK 16 is a rilfe made for SOCM force (before the 5.56mm version was abandoned the design in favor of M-4A1s). The HAMR was FNs competititor for the USMC IAR competition which lost to the H&K 416. The HAMR has alot hever barrel and a barrel change option and can fire both from closed and open bolts.
Sorry, but what again is the difference between the SCAR and HAMR?
Mikon,
It’s a Burris Fastfire… Nutnfancy’s PFIDude uses one on his FNP45 Tactical:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD9XjsefvDI
Cheers!
Could anyone be so kind as to tell me what sights they had on their pistols? Looked like a reflex sight. Possibly a Docter model of some sort?
Its a commercial Steve its not “in action”.
Lance, point taken.
So much tacticool I grew my own eotech.
The HAMR looks like a beast.
I saw this video months ago, and it blows my mind each and every time I watch it! I loved the precision of the 5.56 EGLM, with the first round nailing the spot where the pink smoke grenade fell!
The video also contradicts the fears of the underbarrel grenade launcher preventing the mag from falling freely! the 7.62 worked beautifully!
The HAMR is great… I would much like to see a fully one-coloured one, either in flat dark earth or black…!
The Mk48 is awesome! the new and improved Mk46 (SAW) is also great!
In a word, a very good presentation video from FN!
It puts the Remington ACR one to shame!
Cheers!