KRISS Vector in pistol configuration

The KRISS Systems' KRISS Vector is now available in a pistol configuration. This allows civilians to purchase a short barreled configuration where previously they were limited to the 16" carbines. The military and law enforcement the select-fire pistol version makes for a compact and controllable PDW.

.45 KRISS pistol

Related Posts

31 Responses to “KRISS Vector in pistol configuration”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Redchromewrote on June 05th, 2010 at 2:26 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @don

    WRT reliability of the Kriss guns, this report from AAC indicates the bolt design has been changed and is now more reliable.

    http://www.aacblog.com/?p=6694#comments

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Redchromewrote on February 17th, 2010 at 11:04 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The thing to remember about recoil is that it is not an instant thing; it exists over a certain length of time.

    At 600 rpm, there is a full 1/10th of a second between shots. Seems like a short time; but the bullet travels down the bore in a tiny fraction of that time. If you can lengthen out the recoil pulse across that full 1/10th second, it’ll be more of a push than a whack.

    This is the idea behind Jim Sullivan’s ‘constant recoil’ principle as used in the Ultimax 100. Lengthen out the recoil pulses as much as possible so it just feels like a continual push that you can easily counteract.

    The point is that you can’t escape Newton; but you can accomodate him.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Destroyerwrote on February 17th, 2010 at 8:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    i agree with carl, especially with the AR15, comparing and contrasting gas piston versus DI, there is little difference in recoil (anybody who knows anything about the AR15 knows that the problem is not its recoil).

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. donwrote on January 29th, 2010 at 9:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hey guys, still don’t have by Kriss back, any of you had problems getting it fire like I have? Would appreciate any help, the factory has been of little help, pretty sad it would not even fire right out of the box.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Carlwrote on January 28th, 2010 at 11:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Whatever, the point about Newton’s laws is a good one. However, some people seem to think there is a significant difference in recoil between piston and direct impingement AR-15′s, and all of these are also subject to the laws of physics.
    If I had to guess though I’d have to agree that most of the improvement is probably from the lower placed bore.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. jdun1911wrote on January 28th, 2010 at 12:17 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cymond,

    I gave two options to go to. It’s always better to go with the $200 blackmail then the $5 version. At least with the $200 version you can put a stock on.

    Again it’s not illegal. You just need to paid the overpaid lazy unproductive unionized government workers to send you a stamp that only takes less then five minute to do but takes 2 to 6 months for it to arrive in your mailbox. God forbid they work more then 1 hours a day.

    Personally I think the tax stamp is discriminatory against working Americans. I would like it to go to the SCOTUS for a ruling.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Whateverwrote on January 28th, 2010 at 9:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Am I the only one who doesn’t get the appeal of this thing? You could get the same results from any pistol or machine gun if you dropped the barrel’s axis down a few inches. The stuff about the mechanism being some sort of magical recoil reducing thing is nothing but marketing malarkey as there’s no escaping Newton’s third law.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Jay-Macwrote on January 27th, 2010 at 8:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    There were rumours floating around about a year ago that Taurus (as far as I remember) were planning on releasing their own version of the Broomhandle Mauser. I heard about it on Michael Bane’s blog.

    Sadly, nothing seems to have come of it- but I would have loved to see this classic resurrected.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. donwrote on January 27th, 2010 at 7:00 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Bought a Vector back in November, cool gun, but wouldn’t fire, of the first 60 rounds, 11 fired. Stripped down, cleaned, lubed it again, still would not fire. Ok, some guns can come flawed, we gun owners all know this. That is when you count on the “lifetime warrenty”. Went through my local gun shop, Kriss refused to take the gun in and repair it, instead insisted on sending a new bolt, did’nt work. Finally Kriss agreed to take the gun into their shop for repair, they will not return my calls, the dealer says they would not send shipping label, still do not have my gun. I would not count on service from these guys no matter how cool the gun looks.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Maigowrote on January 26th, 2010 at 2:33 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    They weigh 6lb, no thanks

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Cymondwrote on January 26th, 2010 at 2:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    jdun, that ‘blackmail’ is exactly the concern with pistol VFGs, and presumably this is not an AOW. I suspect that is it a very small market segment that would buy an AOW but refuse a SBR. (but there are some states that allow AOWs but not SBRs). Still, that seems like a very small niche market.

    Also, I think AOWs transfer with a $5 tax but creating one requires the same $200 tax.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Redchromewrote on January 26th, 2010 at 1:32 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like something out of a space opera. Not that it’s a bad thing.

    Definitely not a win for someone like me, when compared to a Glock 21. However, Jesse’s comment above is noteworthy, and demonstrates that it’s just a matter of finding the right market niche. :)

    I do have something of a sour taste in my mouth from TDI tho… I signed up for their ‘waiting list’ and they didn’t even bother letting me know when the carbines were out for sale; let alone reserving me one (even at MSRP). I still want one; but I have my doubts about their support. Waiting for them to come down to below MSRP before I buy one of the carbines.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. jdun1911wrote on January 26th, 2010 at 11:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Jesse,

    They don’t do it because it is inefficient use of weight and size.

    The reason why TDI use this method is due to their recoil damping system.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Carlwrote on January 26th, 2010 at 8:55 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    There are plenty of .22 (and a few .32) target pistols with the magazine in front. But even with a tiny barrel they’re quite long. And the magazine only holds 6 rounds. :) But you’d probably hit your assailant very accurately. :)
    http://julientir.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/pardini-sp-mech2.jpg
    http://www.fsguns.com/images/sp20.gif
    http://www.carlwalther.com/images/gsp_expert_2661951.jpg

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Meltronwrote on January 26th, 2010 at 5:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Jesse,

    Putting the magwell in front of the trigger group makes the gun front heavy, throwing off accuracy as well as balance which is integral to said accuracy

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Jessewrote on January 26th, 2010 at 1:52 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I often wonder why more companies don’t go the Broomhandle Mauser C98 method of putting the magazine in front of the pistol grip. As someone with smaller hands I recently discovered that I shoot revolvers an order of magnitude better because the grip is made to fit my hand, not the double stack mag.

    If someone would separate the mag well from the grip Scorpion style I could get the best of both worlds. Sure it wouldn’t be terribly compact and therefore not really a carry piece but as a compact high capacity home defense weapon I’d purchase one it a hard beat.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. jdun1911wrote on January 25th, 2010 at 7:29 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Linoge,

    It is not illegal to snap a VG onto a handgun as long as your pay the blackmail, I mean the tax stamp (AOW $5 or SBR $200) to the US government.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Jimwrote on January 24th, 2010 at 12:34 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    it’s not a VFG, it’s the magwell.. which is no different than any of the other rifle-to-pistol configurations..

    you can use the front of the magwell on a AR pistol, as well as the magazine on a AK pistol as a “grip”..

    this is no different, it was not designed as a specific VFG.. and is not removable like what is commonly thought of as a VFG..

    i agree with the comments about pricing.. this will not be “inexpensive” either..

    this is gonna be fun to CCW in a IWB holster..

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Squirrelwrote on January 24th, 2010 at 5:30 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    There’s a little bit of info on the new Kriss on this forum thread. (pictures and possible MSRP)

    http://ingunowners.com/forums/21st_century_firearms/70687-stay_tuned_announcement_coming_this_week-7.html

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. Linogewrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 10:36 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So I have to ask the stupid question – how does this work with BATFE regulations? I know slapping a VFG on the front of a pistol (assuming it has rails to support it) is 100% illegal, but what if the pistol in question already has a vertical-ish hand-gripping point?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Steveresponded to Linoge on January 23rd, 2010 at 7:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Linoge, the machine gun version is shown in the photo.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. Carlwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 9:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Kudos for managing to include a proper trigger guard inside the whole-hand guard.

    The trigger looks funky.

    Looks kind of bulky like most SMG-to pistol converts, but maybe it will be good as far as stability is concerned. You think it’ll be legal in production class?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  22. Andy in Connecticutwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 8:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Unless I’m a complete idiot (which sometimes I am) the Kriss gets away with the “pistols can’t have a V-grip” by the owner being able to use the weak hand by wrapping it around the magwell.

    Otherwise it would be kinda muzzle heavy.

    Make mine in 10mm please!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. higgswrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    wow. thats hot.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. Zachwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    It’s nice to see this option… BUT… I was on the pre-order list for the TDI carbine when it came out a while ago, and the sticker shock was at least as great as what we all got earlier this week with the Bushmaster ACR. I’ll be curious to see if this “pistol” is priced reasonably or somewhere up in geosynchronous orbit with the national debt.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  25. Calebwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    OMG HAWT

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  26. HK_WSUwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Did they have an MSRP for the pistol variant? Thanks for all the cool information from the show.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Steveresponded to HK_WSU on January 23rd, 2010 at 7:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      HK_WSU, not yet, but I may have written it down (hordes of stuff still to blog)

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. Crabulawrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 5:16 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Thats kinda sexy!!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  28. Markwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 5:03 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Any news about the .40 S&W Kriss?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Maigowrote on January 26th, 2010 at 2:33 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    They weigh 6lb, no thanks

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. donwrote on January 27th, 2010 at 7:00 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Bought a Vector back in November, cool gun, but wouldn’t fire, of the first 60 rounds, 11 fired. Stripped down, cleaned, lubed it again, still would not fire. Ok, some guns can come flawed, we gun owners all know this. That is when you count on the “lifetime warrenty”. Went through my local gun shop, Kriss refused to take the gun in and repair it, instead insisted on sending a new bolt, did’nt work. Finally Kriss agreed to take the gun into their shop for repair, they will not return my calls, the dealer says they would not send shipping label, still do not have my gun. I would not count on service from these guys no matter how cool the gun looks.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Cymondwrote on January 26th, 2010 at 2:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    jdun, that ‘blackmail’ is exactly the concern with pistol VFGs, and presumably this is not an AOW. I suspect that is it a very small market segment that would buy an AOW but refuse a SBR. (but there are some states that allow AOWs but not SBRs). Still, that seems like a very small niche market.

    Also, I think AOWs transfer with a $5 tax but creating one requires the same $200 tax.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Redchromewrote on January 26th, 2010 at 1:32 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like something out of a space opera. Not that it’s a bad thing.

    Definitely not a win for someone like me, when compared to a Glock 21. However, Jesse’s comment above is noteworthy, and demonstrates that it’s just a matter of finding the right market niche. :)

    I do have something of a sour taste in my mouth from TDI tho… I signed up for their ‘waiting list’ and they didn’t even bother letting me know when the carbines were out for sale; let alone reserving me one (even at MSRP). I still want one; but I have my doubts about their support. Waiting for them to come down to below MSRP before I buy one of the carbines.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Carlwrote on January 26th, 2010 at 8:55 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    There are plenty of .22 (and a few .32) target pistols with the magazine in front. But even with a tiny barrel they’re quite long. And the magazine only holds 6 rounds. :) But you’d probably hit your assailant very accurately. :)
    http://julientir.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/pardini-sp-mech2.jpg
    http://www.fsguns.com/images/sp20.gif
    http://www.carlwalther.com/images/gsp_expert_2661951.jpg

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. jdun1911wrote on January 26th, 2010 at 11:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Jesse,

    They don’t do it because it is inefficient use of weight and size.

    The reason why TDI use this method is due to their recoil damping system.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Jay-Macwrote on January 27th, 2010 at 8:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    There were rumours floating around about a year ago that Taurus (as far as I remember) were planning on releasing their own version of the Broomhandle Mauser. I heard about it on Michael Bane’s blog.

    Sadly, nothing seems to have come of it- but I would have loved to see this classic resurrected.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Whateverwrote on January 28th, 2010 at 9:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Am I the only one who doesn’t get the appeal of this thing? You could get the same results from any pistol or machine gun if you dropped the barrel’s axis down a few inches. The stuff about the mechanism being some sort of magical recoil reducing thing is nothing but marketing malarkey as there’s no escaping Newton’s third law.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Redchromewrote on February 17th, 2010 at 11:04 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The thing to remember about recoil is that it is not an instant thing; it exists over a certain length of time.

    At 600 rpm, there is a full 1/10th of a second between shots. Seems like a short time; but the bullet travels down the bore in a tiny fraction of that time. If you can lengthen out the recoil pulse across that full 1/10th second, it’ll be more of a push than a whack.

    This is the idea behind Jim Sullivan’s ‘constant recoil’ principle as used in the Ultimax 100. Lengthen out the recoil pulses as much as possible so it just feels like a continual push that you can easily counteract.

    The point is that you can’t escape Newton; but you can accomodate him.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Redchromewrote on June 05th, 2010 at 2:26 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @don

    WRT reliability of the Kriss guns, this report from AAC indicates the bolt design has been changed and is now more reliable.

    http://www.aacblog.com/?p=6694#comments

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Destroyerwrote on February 17th, 2010 at 8:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    i agree with carl, especially with the AR15, comparing and contrasting gas piston versus DI, there is little difference in recoil (anybody who knows anything about the AR15 knows that the problem is not its recoil).

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. donwrote on January 29th, 2010 at 9:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hey guys, still don’t have by Kriss back, any of you had problems getting it fire like I have? Would appreciate any help, the factory has been of little help, pretty sad it would not even fire right out of the box.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. jdun1911wrote on January 28th, 2010 at 12:17 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cymond,

    I gave two options to go to. It’s always better to go with the $200 blackmail then the $5 version. At least with the $200 version you can put a stock on.

    Again it’s not illegal. You just need to paid the overpaid lazy unproductive unionized government workers to send you a stamp that only takes less then five minute to do but takes 2 to 6 months for it to arrive in your mailbox. God forbid they work more then 1 hours a day.

    Personally I think the tax stamp is discriminatory against working Americans. I would like it to go to the SCOTUS for a ruling.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Carlwrote on January 28th, 2010 at 11:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Whatever, the point about Newton’s laws is a good one. However, some people seem to think there is a significant difference in recoil between piston and direct impingement AR-15′s, and all of these are also subject to the laws of physics.
    If I had to guess though I’d have to agree that most of the improvement is probably from the lower placed bore.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Meltronwrote on January 26th, 2010 at 5:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Jesse,

    Putting the magwell in front of the trigger group makes the gun front heavy, throwing off accuracy as well as balance which is integral to said accuracy

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Jessewrote on January 26th, 2010 at 1:52 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I often wonder why more companies don’t go the Broomhandle Mauser C98 method of putting the magazine in front of the pistol grip. As someone with smaller hands I recently discovered that I shoot revolvers an order of magnitude better because the grip is made to fit my hand, not the double stack mag.

    If someone would separate the mag well from the grip Scorpion style I could get the best of both worlds. Sure it wouldn’t be terribly compact and therefore not really a carry piece but as a compact high capacity home defense weapon I’d purchase one it a hard beat.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. higgswrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    wow. thats hot.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Andy in Connecticutwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 8:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Unless I’m a complete idiot (which sometimes I am) the Kriss gets away with the “pistols can’t have a V-grip” by the owner being able to use the weak hand by wrapping it around the magwell.

    Otherwise it would be kinda muzzle heavy.

    Make mine in 10mm please!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Zachwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    It’s nice to see this option… BUT… I was on the pre-order list for the TDI carbine when it came out a while ago, and the sticker shock was at least as great as what we all got earlier this week with the Bushmaster ACR. I’ll be curious to see if this “pistol” is priced reasonably or somewhere up in geosynchronous orbit with the national debt.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. Calebwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    OMG HAWT

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. Crabulawrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 5:16 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Thats kinda sexy!!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  22. HK_WSUwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 6:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Did they have an MSRP for the pistol variant? Thanks for all the cool information from the show.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Steveresponded to HK_WSU on January 23rd, 2010 at 7:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      HK_WSU, not yet, but I may have written it down (hordes of stuff still to blog)

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. Carlwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 9:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Kudos for managing to include a proper trigger guard inside the whole-hand guard.

    The trigger looks funky.

    Looks kind of bulky like most SMG-to pistol converts, but maybe it will be good as far as stability is concerned. You think it’ll be legal in production class?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. Linogewrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 10:36 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So I have to ask the stupid question – how does this work with BATFE regulations? I know slapping a VFG on the front of a pistol (assuming it has rails to support it) is 100% illegal, but what if the pistol in question already has a vertical-ish hand-gripping point?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Steveresponded to Linoge on January 23rd, 2010 at 7:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Linoge, the machine gun version is shown in the photo.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  25. Jimwrote on January 24th, 2010 at 12:34 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    it’s not a VFG, it’s the magwell.. which is no different than any of the other rifle-to-pistol configurations..

    you can use the front of the magwell on a AR pistol, as well as the magazine on a AK pistol as a “grip”..

    this is no different, it was not designed as a specific VFG.. and is not removable like what is commonly thought of as a VFG..

    i agree with the comments about pricing.. this will not be “inexpensive” either..

    this is gonna be fun to CCW in a IWB holster..

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  26. jdun1911wrote on January 25th, 2010 at 7:29 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Linoge,

    It is not illegal to snap a VG onto a handgun as long as your pay the blackmail, I mean the tax stamp (AOW $5 or SBR $200) to the US government.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. Squirrelwrote on January 24th, 2010 at 5:30 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    There’s a little bit of info on the new Kriss on this forum thread. (pictures and possible MSRP)

    http://ingunowners.com/forums/21st_century_firearms/70687-stay_tuned_announcement_coming_this_week-7.html

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  28. Markwrote on January 23rd, 2010 at 5:03 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Any news about the .40 S&W Kriss?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment