An M4 takes 3.5 hours to manufacture

A journalist from the Malaysian newspaper Malay Mail was shown around the Colt's West Hartford factory ...

New machines were still being installed at the 26,687-square metre plant as The Malay Mail was shown around by Colt Defence executive vicepresident James R. Battaglini.

It takes 3 1/2 hours to complete a single M4 and the plant can churn out 900 a day with options for more when required.

The finished product then go below the plant for the test-firing process to ensure it performed to specifications.

Colt boasts a record of every gun made so that if it does not perform well, the company can determine if it is made to specs.

You may be thinking what a Malaysian newspaper is doing in West Hartford, Connecticut? Back in 2007 Malaysia announced plans** to switch away from the Steyr AUG and adopt the M4.

The Malay Mail also has a photo of some rare Colt pistols. Daniel Watters told me ...

there is one interesting picture showing a couple of rare Colt prototype pistols. These include the SSP and their submission for SOCOM's OHWS competition. I don't have a definitive name for the pistol above the OHWS, but I believe it was going to used as the platform for their "Smart Pistol". It certainly doesn't match any AA2000 variant that I remember.

[ Many thanks to Daniel E. Watters for sending me the link. ]

Related Posts

13 Responses to “An M4 takes 3.5 hours to manufacture”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Geodkytwrote on June 25th, 2011 at 6:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Considering I’ve watched an AR get assembled in under an hour from individual parts – the only things that was were preassembled were the locking collar (minutes, at best, in a factory setting) and the gas key (I’ve watched that operation, including staking, done in a few minutes with hand tools in an arms room). Even though the gun I watched go from pins and springs to firing weapon in an hour was “only” a semi, somehow I doubt that the autosear takes very much additional time for a select fire model, and I doubt the testing procedure takes 2.5 hours.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Billy Boneswrote on June 24th, 2011 at 12:02 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    More accurately, 3.5 hrs to assemble and test.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Daniel E. Watterswrote on January 26th, 2010 at 12:19 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    For what its worth, I found a January 1997 issue of Shooting Times that discussed the Colt Law Enforcement Pistol as a platform for their Smart Gun technology.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Rick Randallwrote on January 05th, 2010 at 5:30 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The reason it takes an average of 3.5 hours to do a rifle is that they have many different lines cranking out different machining operations. The longest part to be machined (I’m betting the barrel, with profiling, rifling, parkerizing, and mounting the FST, gas tube, barrel collar, etc.) is probably the sticking point, and you back calculate your need or other lines from that one longets time. I’m also willing to bet that springs, pins, furniture, etc., are made elsewhere and shipped in.

    (Just making up numbers for easy comparison here) For example, if the longest time part takes 3.5 hours, and the shortest part takes .5 hours, you will put in 7 production lines for that longest part for every production line for the part that takes .5 hours. (7x .5 = 3.5) Then your parts come out somewhat even, and you don’t end up with a CONEX full of hammers, sears, disconnectors, and selectors waiting for the lower receiver production to catch up so they can be installed.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. cm smithwrote on December 24th, 2009 at 12:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Moderator: here is a link to the Colt-Beretta smart gun photo on imageshack

    http://yfrog.com/izcoltberettasmartgunlo72j

    By sg_688 at 2009-12-23

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. cm smithwrote on December 24th, 2009 at 12:24 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think the Colt prototype pistol shown above the “OHWS” is the Colt police pistol [IIRC, that's what they called it.] that looked very much like a Sig slide on a frame with the ergonomics of the AA2000. That one did not show up in the recent auction of the factory collection.

    I’ve seen two basic pistols used as Colt smart gun prototypes: one based on the Colt – CZ 75 and one that looks like a 1911 slide on a Beretta 92 frame. I kid you not. See the smart gun article in the July, 2000 Law & Order magazine for a photo.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Kenwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 3:39 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Question is, how many parts come in from sub contractors? This will decrease manufacturing time because parts are there and ready to add to the gun.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. uzim16wrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 8:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I visited SW, not a real factory tour, but for going to the exhibit room I passed by the shop floor, it’s very clean. Aslo, I watched video of HK, looks like the facory is high tech and clean. It’s hard to imagine any machine shop in Malaysia is upto their standard. So, does COLT update their equipments slower than other gun makers like SW HK…………….?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Lancewrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 8:02 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Many Austrilian troops perfer the M-4 over the F-88 (AUG) as well. It has alot better ergonomics and accuracy.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Ermacwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 5:47 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Machining aluminum takes a while. Steel stampings are much quicker and cheaper to make, and nearly as durable.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Carlwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 3:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So, what’s the problem with the AUG? Shooting from the weak side?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. ABwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 3:03 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d be interested with having a video of a gun being built from the ground up, following its way around the factory to being boxed and shipped. It is one thing to understand the tool you use in life, but another to understand how that tool came to be.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Rick Randallwrote on January 05th, 2010 at 5:30 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The reason it takes an average of 3.5 hours to do a rifle is that they have many different lines cranking out different machining operations. The longest part to be machined (I’m betting the barrel, with profiling, rifling, parkerizing, and mounting the FST, gas tube, barrel collar, etc.) is probably the sticking point, and you back calculate your need or other lines from that one longets time. I’m also willing to bet that springs, pins, furniture, etc., are made elsewhere and shipped in.

    (Just making up numbers for easy comparison here) For example, if the longest time part takes 3.5 hours, and the shortest part takes .5 hours, you will put in 7 production lines for that longest part for every production line for the part that takes .5 hours. (7x .5 = 3.5) Then your parts come out somewhat even, and you don’t end up with a CONEX full of hammers, sears, disconnectors, and selectors waiting for the lower receiver production to catch up so they can be installed.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Daniel E. Watterswrote on January 26th, 2010 at 12:19 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    For what its worth, I found a January 1997 issue of Shooting Times that discussed the Colt Law Enforcement Pistol as a platform for their Smart Gun technology.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Billy Boneswrote on June 24th, 2011 at 12:02 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    More accurately, 3.5 hrs to assemble and test.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Geodkytwrote on June 25th, 2011 at 6:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Considering I’ve watched an AR get assembled in under an hour from individual parts – the only things that was were preassembled were the locking collar (minutes, at best, in a factory setting) and the gas key (I’ve watched that operation, including staking, done in a few minutes with hand tools in an arms room). Even though the gun I watched go from pins and springs to firing weapon in an hour was “only” a semi, somehow I doubt that the autosear takes very much additional time for a select fire model, and I doubt the testing procedure takes 2.5 hours.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. cm smithwrote on December 24th, 2009 at 12:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Moderator: here is a link to the Colt-Beretta smart gun photo on imageshack

    http://yfrog.com/izcoltberettasmartgunlo72j

    By sg_688 at 2009-12-23

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. cm smithwrote on December 24th, 2009 at 12:24 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think the Colt prototype pistol shown above the “OHWS” is the Colt police pistol [IIRC, that's what they called it.] that looked very much like a Sig slide on a frame with the ergonomics of the AA2000. That one did not show up in the recent auction of the factory collection.

    I’ve seen two basic pistols used as Colt smart gun prototypes: one based on the Colt – CZ 75 and one that looks like a 1911 slide on a Beretta 92 frame. I kid you not. See the smart gun article in the July, 2000 Law & Order magazine for a photo.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Ermacwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 5:47 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Machining aluminum takes a while. Steel stampings are much quicker and cheaper to make, and nearly as durable.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Carlwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 3:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So, what’s the problem with the AUG? Shooting from the weak side?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Lancewrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 8:02 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Many Austrilian troops perfer the M-4 over the F-88 (AUG) as well. It has alot better ergonomics and accuracy.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. uzim16wrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 8:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I visited SW, not a real factory tour, but for going to the exhibit room I passed by the shop floor, it’s very clean. Aslo, I watched video of HK, looks like the facory is high tech and clean. It’s hard to imagine any machine shop in Malaysia is upto their standard. So, does COLT update their equipments slower than other gun makers like SW HK…………….?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Kenwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 3:39 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Question is, how many parts come in from sub contractors? This will decrease manufacturing time because parts are there and ready to add to the gun.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. ABwrote on December 23rd, 2009 at 3:03 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d be interested with having a video of a gun being built from the ground up, following its way around the factory to being boxed and shipped. It is one thing to understand the tool you use in life, but another to understand how that tool came to be.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment