Khar PM9 given the Massachusetts makeover

Khar have given the PM9 sub-compact what I call the "Massachusetts makeover". An external thumb safety has been added along with a loaded chamber indicator. It has already been added to the Massachusetts EOPS Approved Firearms Roster. I think this model, with the safety, is probably going to be popular outside of MA.

kahr pm9193 2 tfb Khar PM9 given the Massachusetts makeover photo

Specifications
Model PM9193 / PM9193N
Caliber 9mm Luger
Capacity 6+1, 7+1 (magazine with grip extension)
Operation Trigger cocking DAO; lock breech; "Browning - type" recoil lug; passive striker block; no magazine disconnect
Barrel 3.0", polygonal rifling; 1 - 10 right-hand twist
Length O/A 5.3"
Height 4.0"
Slide Width .90"
Weight Magazine 1.9 ounces, Pistol 14 ounces,
Grips Textured polymer
Sights Drift adjustable, white bar-dot combat sights
Finish Black frame, matte stainless steel slide (PM9093), matte blackened stainless steel slide (PM9094)
MA Approved YES
MSRP (Price) $924.00 (PM9193), $1,049.00 (PM9193N)
Availability Fall 2009

Related Posts

20 Responses to “Khar PM9 given the Massachusetts makeover”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Mathew P.wrote on March 08th, 2011 at 2:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Kind of expensive!

    I would prefer the Sig P290 or the new Ruger LC9, but neither are MA compliant. Go figure.

    Whats the next best compact 9mm for the $

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Kevinwrote on November 11th, 2009 at 4:40 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like a great little pistol for states that have chosen to cripple their citizens with “idiot proof” legislation.

    Carl, we expect our Police to be trained, qualified and PAID. How much are you willing to pay an individual to go through your training regimen? If it’s mandatory and/or unfunded, it’s just infringement.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Steve Twrote on November 04th, 2009 at 1:16 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Ugh great, I been looking for one of these for months and now this? What happened here? They had a product that was in such high demand in a brutal economy and they change it? My quest has ended.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. carlwrote on October 07th, 2009 at 3:47 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    the more safety the better. you cant have enough. i think everyone who a gun should have a permit. that means a background check, medical records ect. then i believe a safety course should be mandatory. one like the police use to qualify. last a course taught by the d/a or a lawyer as to the legal responsibilities to gun ownership. that said, this should allow concealed carry in all states. we expect our police to be trained and qualified …so should we be.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Aronwrote on September 30th, 2009 at 5:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Take it easy on Massachsetts, eh? Liberal doesn’t mean evil. Some of us like it there just fine.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Tamwrote on September 30th, 2009 at 1:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    They seem to have attached the safety upside-down.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Durham68wrote on September 30th, 2009 at 1:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Backwards safety on a DAO pocket gun that will almost exclusively be used in high stress self defense situations. Great! It seems Mass really wants you to have to think about it before you defend yourself.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  8. Cymondwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 3:14 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I have to play devil’s advocate on the loaded chamber indicator.

    A loaded chamber indicator is only useful if the person looking at it understands what it means. Everyone else seems to have assumed that the owner/operator will be the only person who gets ahold of this thing. Arguably, possibly, some idiot may find this in a desk drawer, under the couch, in a glove compartment, etc. In those cases, labeling that funny little thing that’s sticking up may inform the idiot that the gun is loaded.

    Personally, the only safety I trust is a visually inspected empty chamber. Anything less can malfunction and fail. However, not everyone knows about guns.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Roberta Xwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 12:12 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    And/or to shoot yourself in the privates, it seems. Backwards safety on a DAO: double bad.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Steveresponded to Roberta X on September 29th, 2009 at 12:26 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Hey Roberta, great to see you on The Firearm Blog :)

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. EzGoingKevwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 10:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    To live in MA is to truly hate MA.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. jdun1911wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Daniel,

    Yeah they messed up with the safety switch. Bet you people will start blowing up their dicks because of the piss poor way the company design the safety.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. jdun1911wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:35 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Who the hell want to buy a DAO pistol with manual safety?

    Liberals are dumb and makes laws that they don’t understand. DAO IS THE SAFETY. Manual safety is only needed for SA handgun.

    Load indicator is bad because you should have learned the first rule of gun safety. The GUN IS ALWAYS LOADED. If you relied on load indicator instead of visually checking the gun you will blow your dick off soon or later.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. SPQRwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Not want. That safety would get me killed.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Kurgen99wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    How small is this compared to a PPK/s?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Daniel E. Watterswrote on September 29th, 2009 at 7:07 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Note that the safety works in the reverse direction of most frame mounted safeties.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. John K.wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 7:07 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I love the PM9′s trigger (or I should say the old PM9′s trigger since I don’t know if they made any changes to it now that they added the safety they said the PM9 didn’t need). I still absolutely love the look but that warning on the slide is just ridiculous and ruins this gun for me.

    Sorry, Kahr, you guys are asking some big bucks for that small pistol (MSRP for the night sight version is $1,049 – yikes!) so you’d better make it perfect. And “warning: loaded when indicator is up” says “our lawyers and the Brady bunch have convinced us that our customers are idiots”, not “perfect”.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. Vote For Davidwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 5:22 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow. Welcome to kindergarten. Next they will etch “point this somewhere else” around the muzzle end of the slide.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Wolfwoodwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 3:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Um…what was wrong with the loaded chamber indicator the PM9 already had?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Donwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 2:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I love the MK9 and PM9, and I do like having the option of using a safety and loaded chamber indicators, but do they really need to stamp “INDICATOR” and a warning on the thing? That’s just ugly.

    I heard that the CA model has the “TRIGGER” labled and “WARNING: BULLETS COME OUT OF THIS HOLE” on the front of the barrel.

    -D

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Durham68wrote on September 30th, 2009 at 1:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Backwards safety on a DAO pocket gun that will almost exclusively be used in high stress self defense situations. Great! It seems Mass really wants you to have to think about it before you defend yourself.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  2. Tamwrote on September 30th, 2009 at 1:14 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    They seem to have attached the safety upside-down.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Cymondwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 3:14 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I have to play devil’s advocate on the loaded chamber indicator.

    A loaded chamber indicator is only useful if the person looking at it understands what it means. Everyone else seems to have assumed that the owner/operator will be the only person who gets ahold of this thing. Arguably, possibly, some idiot may find this in a desk drawer, under the couch, in a glove compartment, etc. In those cases, labeling that funny little thing that’s sticking up may inform the idiot that the gun is loaded.

    Personally, the only safety I trust is a visually inspected empty chamber. Anything less can malfunction and fail. However, not everyone knows about guns.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Aronwrote on September 30th, 2009 at 5:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Take it easy on Massachsetts, eh? Liberal doesn’t mean evil. Some of us like it there just fine.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. carlwrote on October 07th, 2009 at 3:47 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    the more safety the better. you cant have enough. i think everyone who a gun should have a permit. that means a background check, medical records ect. then i believe a safety course should be mandatory. one like the police use to qualify. last a course taught by the d/a or a lawyer as to the legal responsibilities to gun ownership. that said, this should allow concealed carry in all states. we expect our police to be trained and qualified …so should we be.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Mathew P.wrote on March 08th, 2011 at 2:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Kind of expensive!

    I would prefer the Sig P290 or the new Ruger LC9, but neither are MA compliant. Go figure.

    Whats the next best compact 9mm for the $

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Kevinwrote on November 11th, 2009 at 4:40 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like a great little pistol for states that have chosen to cripple their citizens with “idiot proof” legislation.

    Carl, we expect our Police to be trained, qualified and PAID. How much are you willing to pay an individual to go through your training regimen? If it’s mandatory and/or unfunded, it’s just infringement.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Steve Twrote on November 04th, 2009 at 1:16 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Ugh great, I been looking for one of these for months and now this? What happened here? They had a product that was in such high demand in a brutal economy and they change it? My quest has ended.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Roberta Xwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 12:12 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    And/or to shoot yourself in the privates, it seems. Backwards safety on a DAO: double bad.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Steveresponded to Roberta X on September 29th, 2009 at 12:26 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Hey Roberta, great to see you on The Firearm Blog :)

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. EzGoingKevwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 10:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    To live in MA is to truly hate MA.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. John K.wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 7:07 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I love the PM9′s trigger (or I should say the old PM9′s trigger since I don’t know if they made any changes to it now that they added the safety they said the PM9 didn’t need). I still absolutely love the look but that warning on the slide is just ridiculous and ruins this gun for me.

    Sorry, Kahr, you guys are asking some big bucks for that small pistol (MSRP for the night sight version is $1,049 – yikes!) so you’d better make it perfect. And “warning: loaded when indicator is up” says “our lawyers and the Brady bunch have convinced us that our customers are idiots”, not “perfect”.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Vote For Davidwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 5:22 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Wow. Welcome to kindergarten. Next they will etch “point this somewhere else” around the muzzle end of the slide.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Wolfwoodwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 3:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Um…what was wrong with the loaded chamber indicator the PM9 already had?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Daniel E. Watterswrote on September 29th, 2009 at 7:07 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Note that the safety works in the reverse direction of most frame mounted safeties.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Kurgen99wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    How small is this compared to a PPK/s?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. jdun1911wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Daniel,

    Yeah they messed up with the safety switch. Bet you people will start blowing up their dicks because of the piss poor way the company design the safety.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. jdun1911wrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:35 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Who the hell want to buy a DAO pistol with manual safety?

    Liberals are dumb and makes laws that they don’t understand. DAO IS THE SAFETY. Manual safety is only needed for SA handgun.

    Load indicator is bad because you should have learned the first rule of gun safety. The GUN IS ALWAYS LOADED. If you relied on load indicator instead of visually checking the gun you will blow your dick off soon or later.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. SPQRwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 8:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Not want. That safety would get me killed.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Donwrote on September 29th, 2009 at 2:44 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I love the MK9 and PM9, and I do like having the option of using a safety and loaded chamber indicators, but do they really need to stamp “INDICATOR” and a warning on the thing? That’s just ugly.

    I heard that the CA model has the “TRIGGER” labled and “WARNING: BULLETS COME OUT OF THIS HOLE” on the front of the barrel.

    -D

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment