SOCOM Precision Sniper Rifle (PSR) Competition

The US Military is looking for a system to replace the existing bolt-action SOF Sniper Systems M40, M24 and MK13 which are all based on Remington 700 actions.

800Px-M-40A3
Marine’s M40A3 Sniper rifle.

One of the key requirements for this system that differentiates it from the existing 7.62×51mm NATO and .300 Win. Mag. sniper systems is that it needs to reach out to 1500 meters with MOA accuracy. Armed forces around the world have long recognized the need for a system that can reach out further than the 7.62mm NATO but is lighter than .50 BMG rifles. Many have adopted the .338 Lapua Magnum chambered rifles to fill this niche. The .338 Lapua Magnum was originally a US Military project but it lost traction and the .300 Win. Mag. is currently used for longer range shooting. The .300 Win. Mag. lacks downrange energy and the lighter projectiles mean greater wind drift at long range (1000 – 2000 yards).

The current Precision Sniper Rifle, as at March 2009, are as follows.

1) The system shall be chambered to safely fire factory produced “non-wildcat” Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing Institute (SAAMI) or Commercial European standard (CIP) ammunition.

This eliminates some of the fancy odd-ball caliber long range cartridges such as the .408 Cheyenne Tactical (CheyTac). The most obvious choice is the before mentioned .338 Lapua Magnum. The cartridge has been around for a while and manufactures know how to get the most our of the cartridge. Another alternative is the .338 Norma Magnum which is only coming into production this year. It is similar in length to the .338 Lapua but has a slightly shorter and fatter case so it can use heavier and longer bullets which have a higher ballistic co-efficient.

300Px-.338 Lapua Magnum Vs .338 Norma Magnum
.338 Lapua vs. .338 Norma Mag. Photo from Wikipedia.

2) The action can be either manually or gas operated and available in left and right hand versions.

I think most, or all, entries will be bolt-action rifles. They are easier to make accurate, lighter and more reliable than autoloading rifles. The advantage of a semi-auto is of course rate of fire, but this is not a requirement for this weapons system.

3) With primary day optic and ammunition the system shall provide 1.0 MOA from 300 to 1500 meters (in 300 meter increments) when fired from the shoulder or an accuracy fixture in nominal conditions. This is further defined as 1 MOA Extreme Vertical Spread for all shots in a 10 round group at the stated distances.

1500 meters = 1640 yards.

The rifle is fired from a rest and 80% of the fifty 10 round groups need to be 1 MOA. Note that the MOA is measured only for the vertical spread which eliminates the effects of wind on the measured accuracy. 1 MOA spread is over 10 round groups is much harder than getting 1 MOA for a standard 3 round group!

4) Mean Rounds Between Failures (MRBF) shall be 1000 rounds.

5) The system shall have an overall length no greater than 52″ in full configuration / extended excluding suppressor with a single component no greater in length than 40″.

6) The system shall weigh no more than 18 lbs with a 12:00 MilStd 1913 rail and a loaded magazine with 5 rounds.

7) The system shall be capable of operator breakdown into major components in less than two minutes.

The barrel also needs to be able to be swapped out by the operator within 20 minutes.

8 ) The system will assemble from the major component breakdown in less than two minutes by the operator.

9) The system will assemble from breakdown with no change in weapon zero.

10) The system will have an integral MilStd 1913 rail at the 12:00 position, the rail will be capable of maintaining bore sight alignment and weapon zero while conducting routine firing combined with combat movement and operational training drills.

These are all pretty standard requirements. One other test than will be performed will be drop tests with loaded rifles. The rifles are expected to be able to be dropped 1.5 meters at various angles without firing the chambered cartridge.

Overall they seem very sensible requirements. It will be interesting to see how this competition progresses.

Related Posts

Steve Jun 23rd 2009 rifles Tags: , , , , , , , 11 Comments

11 Responses to “SOCOM Precision Sniper Rifle (PSR) Competition”

  1. Philon 24 Jun 2009 at 6:02 am link comment

    Is 1 MOA at 1500 meters realistic?

  2. alexon 24 Jun 2009 at 7:21 am link comment

    it sucks that they;re not gonna use the CheyTac….its so accurate….

  3. Donon 24 Jun 2009 at 9:16 am link comment

    Hi Steve,

    What is the unit of measurement on the drop test?

    -D

  4. Steveon 24 Jun 2009 at 10:43 am link comment

    Don, meters. I have updated the article.

  5. Gregon 25 Jun 2009 at 4:17 am link comment

    One other little typo issue, 1500 meters = 1640.4 yds. Little typo but big difference.

  6. ERic Blumensaadton 18 Sep 2009 at 6:00 pm link comment

    By looking at the new .338 Norma Magnum case I would guess that it may be more consistently accurate than the .338 Lapua Magnum (originally developed in the U.S. than adopted by Lapua).

    I say this because in benchrest shooting cartridges that are shorter, fatter and have a sharper shoulder angle tend to generate better accuracy.
    In any case I’d like either cartridge in a Desert Tactical SRS bullpup bolt rifle. Now THAT’S a rifle to meet the SOCOM specs if I ever saw one.

  7. Matton 20 Oct 2009 at 8:21 pm link comment

    Phil,
    I realize the odds of you reading this slim, but yes. 1 MOA is totally realistic at 1500. Barrett, Chey Tac, Dakota, Remington, McMillan, and numerous others have demonstrated .5 MOA or better out to 2500. Though not with 10 round groups, that I’ve seen.

  8. Bradon 21 Oct 2009 at 7:51 pm link comment

    Hmm… requirement #6 implies a repeating weapon with a 5 round magazine. Yet requirement #2 does not say it must be a repeating weapon! So why not use a falling-block single-shot action? Perhaps the Ruger No. 1 action?

    Perhaps such a system wouldn’t make the grade in terms of accuracy. But every rifle would be ambidextrous, the overall cartridge length and cartridge resistance to recoil wouldn’t be as much a problem (long 300 grain bullets in .338 Lapua for example), and overall system length wouldn’t be as much a problem.

  9. zachon 30 Oct 2009 at 6:38 pm link comment

    why would a single shot falling block be at all useful for modern military operations? Does the M40A3 use a McMillan stock? Cause it looks like an A5 with different cheekrest

  10. Lanceon 28 Nov 2009 at 9:17 am link comment

    I dont think this is going to happen. SOCOM is going nuts with getting its own guns. Most of which is not needed. The head of this is a nutter who wants his own service to chair. 308 is the norm for sniping and I dont see the US alone going to a wildcat caliber.

  11. Sean Ingramon 24 Dec 2009 at 3:04 pm link comment

    Why not a falling block? It is just as accurate as any bolt action that I’ve ever shot and locks up just as tight, plus it’s ambidextrous.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.