Ruger SR-556: AR-15 has arrived
Ruger was that attractive girl at high school who you wanted to love but she stabbed you in the back and you just could not trust her again. That was two decades ago. Sturm, Ruger & Company CEO Michael O. Fifer has listened us, the customers, and changed the company culture for the better.
There is no better illustration for this change than the Evil Black Rifle itself which has just joined the Ruger product offering. The slogan for the SR-556 is "a platform redefined". I say it should be "a company redefined". I present to you the Ruger AR-15, the SR-556:
Ruger SR-556
Ok, I will wipe the tear from my eye, be a man and shove my emotional outburst back down where it came from 
Onto the features ...
The most significant feature is a new short stroke gas piston designed by Ruger. It shares the same benefits as other gas pistons system: a cleaner, cooler bolt carrier as the excess gas it vented out the gas block, far from the upper receiver. The AR-15 was not designed for a piston and retrofit piston systems can cause problems, for example the pressure from the piston operating rob can cause the bolt carrier to bind. It was been suggested that the Ruger bolt carrier is designed to mitigate this particular problem. Time will tell (I am no expert on this topic).
The chrome lined SR-556 bolt carrier.
Disassembly of the gas system.
Another feature is a four position gas regulator. The first position prevents any gas entering the piston system. This turns the rifle into a single shot which requires the bolt to be manually cycled between shots. The next position allows the normal quantity of gas into the piston system to cycle the bolt. The next two position each let in more gas than the previous system which can help when the rifle is dirty or the ammunition is low powered. It is a compelling feature for reloaders because it gives them a greater range of adjustment for thier powder loads.
Chromed gas regulator.
Gas regulator positions.
The rifle also features:
- Full length Troy Industries Quad Rail with rail covers.
- Hogue Pistol grip.
- Ruger branded Troy Industries flip up Backup Iron Sights (BUIS).
- Ships with three 30-round Magpul PMAG magazines.
Ruger branded Troy Rear Sight
The Specs:
Caliber: 5.56mm NATO / .223 Remington Barrel: 16.12" Barrel Twist: 1:9 Right Hand Weight: 7.92 lbs Total Length: 32.75" - 36" (depending on stock position) Stock: 6 position M4 style
It is nice to see Ruger has explicitly said .223 Remington AND 5.56mm NATO are compatible with the rifle.
The MSRP is $1,995. It is expensive and you could build one your self from parts for less, but if the gas system works flawlessly then I think it will be a good seller. I think it will sell for about $1800 on the street.
Here is the Ruger promotional video. They seem to be keen to promote it to law enforcement and military:
GunBlast.com made this video showing the rifle in action:
This photo is from Snowflakes in Hell. For the high resolution version and many more photos as well as on the ground reporting from the launch visit Snowflakes in Hell:
This photo Adam's Incoming blog. For many more photos check out the Guns and Hunting Incoming blog.
More information about the rifle is at Caleb's Gun Nuts Media blog.
Thanks to y'all who emailed me about the SR-556. I appreciate it. Contrary to popular belief I am not dead just slow and overworked.
UPDATE: Many thanks to Brian for sending me these photos of his new Ruger SR-556.
Fore-end and gas regulator.
The Backup Iron Sights.
Nice touch with the buttstock Ruger logo.
The four position gas regulator is interesting. It is a good selling point.
One thing for sure Ruger is under a lot of pressure to keep up with the younger generation of firearms makers.
Sorry Ruger, it is not that exciting….Another AR… Yawn….
Yeah. I, too, am disappointed. They’re redefining nothing. Unlike this LCR, this is not interesting in the slightest. Just another overpriced AR clone.
Ruger, Ruger, Ruger….
What are you doing? Don’t get me wrong, thanks for the pretty new AR, but I think we have just a few AR’s on the market already… oh wait, not at your ridiculous price point…
$2,000 for an AR? I know you guys are late to the game, and have developed (read: borrowed and tweaked) this piston system, but how about firearms for the common man.
I grew up with my dad telling me that Ruger was different, and that they make quality firearms that the regular joe could afford… not this one.
You have been on this great marketing kick of self defense with your “too hot to keep in stock” LCP and LCR, now you go and produce a fancy AR with a fat sticker price and hope to ride the hipe wave to the next hit product… sorry guys, this ain’t it.
Should have gone along with some of the rumor mill produced ideas… polymer 1911 — with a price point to under cut Wilson’s and it would have stuck with your marketing campaign of affordable self defense/conceal carry products… well there is always shot show 2010
It is expensive, but at least they didn’t go with the gas-impingement. Nothing would of been “redefined” then.
Piston driven is the way to go, at least they had the fore-sight to do that.
Great job, Steve!
V/R
C_S
Nice……but you can buy/build so many just like it, although without the almost useless gas regulator adjustment. POF is probably one of the best of the bunch. So what exactly did Ruger do? At least Magpul/Bushmaster is coming out with the Masada or whatever they call it now. That’s what I expected out of Ruger. Not to mention they don’t even offer it in 6.8mm, 7.62×39 nor 6.5mm in some type of interchangeable system. That would have made it something exciting.
This is typical of old American companies which do not have fresh thinking, forward thinking people working for them. No wonder our automobile industry failed.
They could have done so much more and chose not to. They spent the least amount of R&D money to come out with a weapon that already floods the market.
Watching the videos I see the same kind of jerk upward all piston AR-15/M-16 type weapons have that the much maligned gas impingement system does not have. I hated the gas in my face and smell when I fired my M-16. Not to mention the cleaning issues. But it is a smoother firing system especially on full auto. There is no way to fix the issues with the bolt carrier unless you completely redesign it as H&K found out.
Well, based on the number of comments on this thread I’d say that Ruger just farted into the wind on this product. A post I made a couple days ago had me sounding optimistic but after seeing this offering I think Ruger brought an overpriced commodity to market with a gimmicky valve. I call BS on this one. That said, I will still purchase an LCR as soon as discretionary funds permit.
My gun buying orgy as of late has me a little light in the wallet.
Looks pretty good to me. The AR seems to be very popular today, despite the age of the basic platform, so they would be stupid not to enter this market.
How many natively piston driven AR-15’s are there? Not counting bolt-on systems of course.
Carl, quite a few options, but an insignificant number compared to normal AR-15s. S&W recently entered the market with piston AR-15s (search the blog for more info), but they used another companies piston kit.
interesting, but i could live happily without the “tactical rail” that everybody seems to be putting on guns these days. most of us don’t hang stuff on our carry guns, or do drug raids and dynamic entry warrants, so the rails are about as much use as teats on a boar hog.
The rail is ideal for customizing the handguard grip surface, and I like the look of it as well, I find the non-rails truly useless.
This seems to compete, advantageously, with the LMT (Lewis Machine & Tool) CQB piston rifle, same price point and same quality, but with the “gimmicky valve” and Ruger name. Perhaps it’s more on par for quality and brand recognition with the Barrett rec7. I like it but I think they could have priced it more, shall I say, honestly. Though they will likely still sell every one one of them they produce within a day at that price point, for the next year or two.
I’m having a hard time deciding, I was waiting for the ACR but this might be just as good for me.
-Jeff
Ruger rocks! And for all you silly bills that think this is the last thing to come from Ruger are going to be soaringly mistaken. I agree Ruger is perhaps a bit late in bringing this forward and the price a bit steep, however once all the hype is out of the way and production and demand level this will be highly competitive price wise.
I really believe in patroning our home made brands, thus compelling them to listen more to “us” the consumer and listening both by producing products we want, but also at prices we want.
Already called my dealer to get in on the goods, sounds like just under two grand if your dealer stands with Ruger, not bad with all the goodies you get out of the box. My Christmas has come early… God bless.
Hmmm a polymer style 1911, I might know something about this…
Plain and simple Ruger makes an excellent product a good percentage of the time and they seem to be stepping up to the plate lately when problems are brought to their attention. I applaud this.
So do you think they will get into selling their components, especially the lowers??
I really believe in patroning our home made brands,…
So, Tyson, do you suggest I and the other six billion or so non US people (I am assuming here you live in the United States) do the same? Should we stay away from Ruger in favor of our “domestic brands”?
This is an honest question. I am interested in your reasoning. When shopping for a firearm, should you buy the best firearm on the entire market within your budget? Or should you base your purchase decision on criteria other than performance, like where the firearm is produced?
Wow- tough crowd. To the ‘already too many AR’s on the market’ complaint I would say- there is a REASON there are so many makers now, they sell. Ruger is a business and wants a piece of that pie. You are free to complain (obviously) and not buy if you aren’t excited by the product, but don’t fault them for entering a thriving market niche. As for ‘over-priced’ mantra the market will determine if they’re priced it too high or didn’t offer enough new features. Besides, have you all seen what a SCAR is going for? What does it do that a CETME doesn’t? Looks a lot cooler, that’s all.
Puhleez. I’ve had a Daewoo Max II since the mid 80s and I’ve always pointed out what a better firearm it was than any AR, HK, or whatever. Dime sized groups at 100 yards out-of-the-box and still keeps on kick’n butt. It’s nice to see Ruger has gone in the right direction with the gas system, but Korea got it right when they kicked Colt and their M-16 rifles out and had Daewoo make the K-2 (Max II) for them.
I was there at the NRA convention. I just put in an order one for $1,499.99 plus shipping. I think this is a very good price for gas piston plus troy rails, sights and 3 mags from PMag Maglevel.
HOORAAAAAYE!!!! WOOOOO HOOOO! I AM STOKED! PISTON DRIVEN AR BY MY FAVORITE MANUFACTURER! I will add this to my Garand and be real happy about it!!
Hardly “just another AR”
FRIGGIN’ SWEET!!!!
NOOBS SHOULD GAIN SOME KNOWLEDGE BEFORE SPEAKING!!
This is so so very far from just a AR-Clone as all you noobs are screaming. Ruger has hit the mark dead center! on all the drawbacks from just a AR-clone!!
Ruger could have just took somone elses crap and relabeled it like so many others did. BUT THEY DID NOT! They waited till they had it just right, all the MAJOR improvements and basically reinvented the AR with a better proven reliable system and built it up to Ruger lengendary quality!
You will not find a better one at this price-point and value! PERIOD!
Oh, and yeah I aint going over why its better, cause if you lazy butts are too lame to educate yourselves on something first before slamming it well, go read for yourself idiots!
I like the piece….I’m gittin’ one.
How about offering this rifle in a .308? Now that would be an attractive option to a new “AR-type” rifle!
This rifle rocks. For this nut, Sturm Ruger & CO. are one the most brilliant and iconic firearms manufaturers in the history of firearms manufacturing. And this rifle only adds to the passion. Barrels are manufactured in house. That isn’t typical from typical AR-15 manufacturers. Neither is the operating system. Granted there are other piston driven AR-15’s out there, but the consensus view and fact of the matter is, the majority of piston driven AR-15’s are garbage. We needed a company to redifine this system. Hats off to Ruger.
Smith&Wesson did it. Big green did it. Why not Ruger? At least they didn’t just take a DPMS or a Bushmaster, slap there company name on it, and finish it in real treet camo. Come on, the AR-15 is deemed Americas rifle. It’s like peas and carrots, boys and girls.
If you guys are going to dog a Ruger rifle, I would suggest the early mini-14’s. At least there would be a little legitimacy to your pessimism. I guess the cynics’ minds won’t actually open until caseless ammunition is introduced. Or maybe death ray laser pistols with integrated tracking beams.
where the heck do you buy the sweet thing
If it’s ‘just another AR’ then why did the guys at the SIG booth at the NRA convention send me over to look at it????? When you’re competitor thinks you’ve got hold of something then maybe you do….And I agree with ‘chpstx’, with the features and a ’street’ price $1500-$1600 it’s actually a decent deal……
At first, I thought “$2,000.00?????!!!!! W-T-F????”…..then I re-looked it. That’s out-of-the-box, ready for tactical application minus an optic. The price of a base AR model, plus the folding sights, plus rail system, plus Hogue handgrip, plus three Magpul magazines would probably be well over two G’s.
I hope everyone remember what Ruger Sr. did to 1994 Gun ban, I piss on this gun and get something else.
I dont know what alot of people are complaining about this is a pretty NEAT AR. I did alot of careful research on this guns price and every where i saw it listed its between 1,499- 1,699 with the very same features including the three mags.(IMPACT GUNS Was the CHEAPEST!) Not 2000 like the author notes.
Im not a huge ruger fan, but i think this is gonna be the gun that redefines their image. For a long time Ruger has been like the old man you see at the range who only shoots a WW2 era Garand. They refused to acknowledge the idea that the market calls for modern assualt style rifles with high capacity magazines not mini 14s. Im glad to see that they got their heads out of their asses alot of us have spent along time waiting for ruger to develope something like the SR-556. I imagine it will be a great rifle.
Personally I don’t think there’s really anything wrong with the AR platform with its direct impingment systen as originally designed by Eugene Stoner.
But the fad du jour seems to be to badmouth it and praise the piston driven AR (of course if it has a piston then its not really an AR) as the best thing since sliced bread, miniskirts and forward cocking serrations on 1911s.
But, for the most part, Ruger makes reliable weapons and stands behind them with excellent customer service, so I suspect the Ruger SR556 will be a popular item. In fact, the only thing I wonder/worry about with this rifle is that renowned Ruger customer service.
Ruger has a long standing policy of either refusing to work on any Ruger branded firearm that has been altered with aftermarket parts or else returning a repaired modified gun to its owner with the aftermarket parts replaced with genuine Ruger factory parts. (Let’s face it, the AR-15 is the 1911 of the rifle world. The three most adaptable/modifiable gizmos in the civilized world are the PC computer, the 1911 pistol and the AR-15 rifle. All three are capable of, and constantly, handing tasks never imagined by their creators.) And the #1 reason most people buy an AR is the ability to build/rebuild/modify it exactly the way you want it. Hopefully Ruger will realize this and give their loyal followers some latitude when it comes to factory service. For in order to survive it today’s marketplace they will have to.
The bottom line for me is this; The more companies that manufacture the AR type rifle the more mainstream it becomes. And that makes it less and less an evil black assault weapon and more and more just another rifle. I applauded Remington when it disguised a Bushmaster with heat skrink twigs and leaves and slapped the big R on it. That made it less of an evil black riflle. Heck fire, I wish someone would start making them in multiple colours. I’d love to see some company offer ARs with wooden stocks and forearms. (I have seen photos of custom jobs and they are beautiful.) The more ARs, AKs and M-whatevers there are the less nefarious they all become.
I welcome the new Ruger and say “The more, the merrier!”
I order mine. $1,437.39 out the door! You can’t beat it and my friend is one of those who got to shoot it. He shot a lot of rounds and never had a problem. He shoot some late 90’s wolf steel cased ammo through it without a problem. The wolf ammo shot fine, but the wolf ammo did not function so well in some of the other fore mentioned ar style rifles. Yes, I do have dream rifles but to equip one likes with quality parts isn’t cheap or easy. I talked to the owner of Impact Guns and he said he was killing prairie dogs past 350 yards with a straight 10x scope. That’s impressive. The have his experience with it on their website. So the two people I talked to that have shot it like it. No, it is not a $2,500 POF nor Para ttr and other variants using the exact same system. They are good products. I think I’ll be happy with my SR 556 to go with my ZM LR300 AXLT (Now Labeled Para TTR) My brother hates my ZM and I hate his standard m4 carbine but we both agree that you should shoot what you like and let others be happy theirs. Enjoy the shooting sports!
One thing to remember is that this is not Bill Ruger’s company. We all know what was said by him during his reign but he is gone . Its nice to see antoher AR in the market. Look at what Keith wrote. It holds true. The more AR type platforms, the less eveil they become. Another point I hadnt seen brought up is the fact that Ruger has been making gas piston rifle for decades. The Mini-14 doesnt get alot of love because it isnt ‘tactically sexy’ enough but it runs like a scalded cat. The price point seems to be holding out at around $1300-$1400. DI Colt 6920 are going for $1100+ and the 6940 is higher. Time will tell as far as durability etc. My agency has 3 Ruger’s on order for T&E. I plan on burning it up and seeing how it takes it.
What is all the bashing of the Ruger company and its new 556 rifle? These guys must have NOT spent ANY time on research. This Is probably the least priciest of most gas piston AR’s. No ONE is forcing you to purchase it, RIGHT??? HEY, I’ll let ya on l lil secret…the price…that 2,000 number, remember? Well, take a stroll over to gunbroker.com, they have a listing of 17 Ruger SR 556. The prices are from the lowest 1,399. to 1,795, plus ya get 3 mags. So, all you guys B——- and complaining of “OMG” the high price…I ask you, If you can beat that, let us know??? I’ll be a proud and happy owner, soon. As far as a 308. caliber, well, I just pull out my Socom 16.
Anybody have info as far as legality of the SR 556 in NY State? No 30 rd mags or collapsable buttstocks, gonna need to pick up just an upper?
Hey, I want it! Any idea if it will cycle subsonic ammo in the third possition? that would be sweet, no springs to change to make it slow and quiet enough for home protection too. Dont have an AR yet but if they dont offer it in CA it may be time for a move… this and the XD-M might be worth it.
I just purchased a Ruger 556, I paid $1549.00 for it; I was going to buy the LWRC AR but for the features the Ruger gives you more bang for the buck. I have several Ruger 22 rifles & pistols that are suppressed, I have never had a problem with any of my Ruger’s and hopefully the new 556 won’t disappoint.
I have owned many piston driven rifles and shotguns, I currently own a HK SL8, a Sig 556, a Vector AK-47, a STG-556, a Norinco SKS, a Saiga 12, the new Ruger rounds out my collection very nicely. The only piston rifle that I ever had a problem with was a first gen Robinson ACR, out of the box that rifle wouldn’t shoot in semi-auto, single shot only! It didn’t matter what setting the gas regulator was set to, it just didn’t want to run. The ACR was sent back to Robinson and the gas system was replaced, I never shot the rifle after it was repaired, I traded it off to someone who really wanted it.
The Ruger looks solid, I haven’t shot it yet, but I will keep you updated on the performence.
I just got mine on Gunbroker.com! Paid $1436.00 for it. I have read up on all the higher end AR’s and found that although this may be in the minds of many “ruger-haters”, I am willing to bet that they did not do their homework. DGI systems are where the AR community is heading and all the DI gun owners are feeling left out. Improvements come around in all aspects of life (cars, computers, tech gear, etc..), and everyone always wants the latest “toy”. I have been a fan of Ruger for some time, and find it ironic that so many want to rail on the company for a stand that it’s founder (no longer there), decided to side with the anti-gun lobby, foes any one remember when S&W betrayed the ENTIRE gun community?
“I’m not willing to be a pawn in a political chess game,” S&W CEO Ed Schultz is quoted in the March 27, 2000, edition of Newsweek. Yet by signing this sweeping agreement, Schultz has become exactly that, manipulated by the Administration into executing a “settlement” that is widely portrayed as a political victory for the White House.
Nuff said. I am going to keep looking forward and EXPECT improvement from all the awesome competition out there! I even think I may start a Ruger 556 blog, to record my experience with it!
ruger makes the best quality american fierarms today,period. but i agree with one man up there that said my dad always told me ruger makes great guns that are afordible. but it does not look like that any more. the quality is still there and the guns are still great but whysuddenly a price tag that looks that it should be on a H&H or something made of gold. i will always love their guns and this new AR is great but at the price, im not gona put 4 carpaments down for just another high quality AR.
The going price for those seems to be around 1500, and considering that an AR built or bought with the same options costs about the same, I would say it’s a fairly good deal for an, especially if the piston system is proven reliable.
the price point seems very comparable to other gas piston models
Considering Ruger’s politics, this isn’t the first that we’ve seen of their change in feelings towards civilians and ‘evil’ guns. They released the SR9 which was the first of it’s kind from Ruger, dispelling their H&K-like hatred for the common man defending themselves to the fullest extent. Seems to be a good step in the right direction, making a well equipped version of one of the most popular platforms, and making it available to everyone who should be allowed one.
Does anyone have any experience firing sub sonic ammo through the Ruger 556, and will it cycle in position #3?
First off, who ever says direct impingment is the way to go hasn’t shot both or is crazy. Being in the military and shooting them all the dang time, i can tell you that i LOVE piston driven rifles. On top of that, the AR has needed an adjustable gas regulater for a long time. If your using a suppresor, SUBSONIC AMMUNITION!! (they usualy go hand in hand) crappy NATO ammuntion!! Having the abillity to send more gas twards the bolt to eject ammunition would have saved countless lives since the AR has been in service. We never should have gone with the FN FAL like everybody else………never here a FAL going down when you needed it the most. Anyways, This AR has everything you need and nothing that you don’t. You want rails because if you are using this for self defence, the first thing your putting on there is a light, maybe a grip, and a red dot. hmmmmmm where is all that stuff going to go? along with that, every part that has needed to be chromed has been. I am getting this rifle the first chance that i get, and i wasn’t even that big of an AR fan (M14 all the way) untill i saw this RUGER because nobody has made a AR the way it should be made. Keep up the work RUGER!!!!!
sorry, i meant we should have gone with the FN FAL or there 5.56 version, the only reason the Dewoo is good is because they put an AR and an AK into a cage together and let them mate, and there child was born a really big and heavy beast of an AR that is as tough as an AK!!!!! hahaha……i still want one though, i keep thinking of taking the Korean guard’s Dewoo any time i leave base lol
The AR has been the main service rifle for 45 years, far longer than any other rifle in US history, and deservedly so. The A2 has been in service 27 years, and, like the 1911, is a superior weapon for professionals, though not the best choice for conscripts.
This new short-stroke gas impingement system of Ruger’s might help with their marketing, or maybe not, judging from some of the responses on here, but it is certainly no true improvement on the A2, any more so than the 1/9 twist, popular as it has become, is an improvement on the 1/7.
I don’t hold Ruger or S&W responsible for actions of their past management, as egregious as those past actions might have been, but then again I have never been very interested in their products. I will admit that S&W has made some well-built firearms in the past, but Ruger, with their investment-cast P-series and their less-than-durable Mini-14, have always seemed directed at the lower-middle end of the firearms market. They’re a step above AK’s and Helwans/Stars/East Bloc copies of the Browning, but they aren’t on the level of good 1911’s and HK USP’s.
It’s interesting to see them try and compete with their SSR 556 in the price range of quality AR’s. I noticed their LCR is also more expensive than most of their other products. I think they’d have more success if they stayed in their usual price niche a few steps down from the main contenders, but perhaps they are trying to go more upscale in the handgun and semi-auto rifle market the way they did with their No 1 rifle.
I would rather own a LWRC rifle.
I was about to buy this weapon, but chose the M6A1.
6.8 x43mm >>>>> 5.56 x45.
If I buy a gun, I want a real bullet, not a varmint killing round.
Love what i’ve read and i have four Ruger pistols (p-95-50yr aniversary singel six-sp101 357-bisley) and would love to add this AR but at 2000.00 dollars i have to look elsewear. i hope the price comes down once the product has been out a while.
I am astounded by many of the preceeding comments.
Does no one bother to read them?
Seems there are several who are getting them for substantially less that MSRP. Which is normal for Ruger products.
If any of you (outside of the Republik of Californication or Kennedom of Taxichooseus that is) are paying, or have ever paid, full retail for any standard production Ruger firearm, you either make too much money or need a few lessons in smart shopping.
I had a terrible time with mine. It went 20 rounds and froze up. There was a problem with the trigger pins and Ruger informed me that the rifle goes into a fail safe mode rather than go full auto. I sent the rifle to them and they fixed it, tested it and gave me three free Magpul mags. I have not gotten it back yet and I cannot decide if I should keep it or not. I could sell it with a clean conscience now that it has been fixed. I mean, what is going to go wrong next? The Ruger people were first rate in the customer support area. I have dealt with HK, S&W, Taurus and Berretta. Ruger has been the best. HK was the worst. I just wonder when they are going to recall all the other guns with this faulty part. The fact that they have not is another story. They say that they installed a redesigned pin in mine. Anyway, I have never had a worse start with any gun, ever. I don’t know if it’s accurate. I never got that far. All in all, a big disappointment for the money.
I want to make something clear after my last comment, I will give the SR a full and objective test when I get it back and post my results here. I have been very critical and I owe it to the good people at Ruger and those who read this blog to have a real accounting made rather than my frustrations expressed. My critical thread on M4.net was cut off. I was informed that they do not allow heavy criticism on their site. AR15.com has a thread about bolt tilt that readers might want to see. I do know this from experience… if there is a problem, Ruger will fix it. I get the rifle back next week free of shipping charges either way. By next Friday, the results will be posted.
It seems that the SR-556 isn’t getting MSRP, and you can pick one up for around $1600-$1700, US. Sure, Ruger isn’t revolutionizing the industry, but if you take the time compare price, platform, and options to other gas-piston systems, this rifle is very competitive.
Correction on my other post. I meant to type.
M6A3.
Anybody have any first hand knowledgeabout whether the SSR-556 is subject to “bolt carrier tilt?”
I seem to be hearing alot of Gas piston bashing, there was a reason behind the idea in the first place,to make a cooler running, cleaner rifle. Almost every other manufactorer is getting in to the gas piston ar biz. Smith and wesson,bushmaster, and paraordanance among others all have gas piston run A-Rs. The direct impingement gas system is a very good system without a doubt, but theres always room for improvement. I strongly believe that the gas piston system will soon become the standard.
In response to SWATCybercop “My local gunsmith said ruger has the rear of the bolt carrier machined in a way that prevents Bolt Carrier tilt. I appreciate the post by Savvoy 6. If I am using my gun in a time of self defense I would rather have it go full auto than not at all. I also feel that their is nothing wrong with direct impingement. For me I try to spend my time and money finding what works best for me with the guns particular limitations and strengths for the value offered. The best research (in my opinion) comes from shooting the gun and using it. Lastly, thanks to The Firearm blog and those who post. I really enjoy this sight and the posts. Again, go out and enjoy the shooting sports.
In the past three weeks I’ve been able to fondle, er, um, I mean handle four of the new Ruger rifles.
I must admit all four seemed to be flawless in construction. They balance well. They feel solid when you pick one up.
And the price on each one was well UNDER $2K.
I really like the sights AND the longer sight radius. I just don’t understand why ANYONE would want a 16 inch barreled M-4gery. Rock River got it right with their midlength. Better cyclic timing since the gas port is as equidistant from the muzzle as the full sized M-16/AR-15 AND the longer sight radius helps your accuracy when using iron sights.
And yes Virginia there are still us dinosaurs out here who use iron sights on occasion. And the sights oin the new Ruger just seem to lay there when you throw it to your shoulder and go for a flash sight picture.
I was a skeptic when I first head about it. But now I am a convert.
Now I just need to fire one to be 100% sure. But then I’d probably want one badly and my budget just won’t allow for one for quite a while.
Hmmm… anyone need any extra body parts?
I had the same experience as Savvoy 6. Fired one full clip and inserted the second and the bolt would only drop half way. A pin was coming out of the side of the lower, and could not be pushed in as it was out of alignment. Gun would not work at all. Called Ruger and they said they had never heard of this happening. Took it back to retailer. Retailer said they were going to send it back to Ruger and gave me a brand new gun. Fired two clips through this one and it did the exact same thing when I put in the third clip. Using Winchester brass casing fmj 5.56. I guess I will be taking it back to the retailer first thing Monday morning. Funny thing, the salesman who sold it to me said they had 9000 rounds through the store model and it worked flawlessly.
Well, I have been thinking this all along but I was shy to say it because I was hoping the jinx had lifted…
But if you think about it there have been “recalls” on two of the newest Uberveapons from Ruger lately.
First there was the recall to fix a minor problem with the Ruger SR9. That was their first really modern gun in thirty years. It was discovered that some of them (Not All just SOME) could fire if dropped with their safety off. A minor concern, but a concern no less. Now I would have really been worried if some had fired with the safety on. But Ruger, unlike some plastik pistol companies, freely admitted there was a real defect and promptly instigated a zero cost repair program.
Next came the eagerly awaited .380 caliber LCP. Finally a true pocket rocket from a mainstream manufacturer. And guess what? OOOOPS, it was discovered that they too could fire if dropped with a chambered round. It was determined that an upgraded hammer mechanism would fix the problem and once again a ZERO cost repair program was put in place.
It would seem, at first glance, that new Rugers have teething problems. Possibly, in their desire to shorten the timeline from concept, to announcement, to dealer delivery, there just isn’t enough time to discover all of the ways Murphy can appear.
Consider this for a moment, Ruger COULD produce a hundred or so and put them in the hands of real “operators” (and not just a few magazine writers) who would really put them through their paces for six months, or so, in hopes of discovering any weaknesses. Naturally, this would delay the final production by AT LEAST six months. Six months that is IF no problems werwe found. If any problems arose then they would be addresses and then the process would begin again. POOF, then you are looking at a year delay at best. And then there would be no assurance that every conceivable operational faux pas had been encountered.
As it is, Ruger does its best to produce a reliable tool that will give years of trouble free service. [All in all, they have an enviable track record.] Then they release it to the public where thousands are put to use all at once. Now, between all of the professionals using it in hard life environments, the hobbiests shooting the snot out of them in the first week, the chairborne rangers (those few who actually buy one) nit-picking it to death after field stripping it 14 times per day and the novices dropping it on the kitchen floor while practicing their quick draw, any real problems will appear rather quickly. A lot quicker than they would in any contrived testing protocol.
Just like I vow to never buy the 1.0 version of any software, I usually wait until the furror dies down on any new firearm. I am quite content to sit by and let someone else do the beta testing.
Now I understand that there are those of you out there who simply need to be the first on your block with the newest of the new. That’s fine.
But you have to accept the reality that by having the first version, you may not (yet) have the best version.
Personally I just wait for the SR-556 Service Pack 2.
I see this thing selling for 1500. That is really a steal guys for what you get, that is if you want a gas piston system.
The only thing that is what is always on my mind with a new gun is proven reliability which is obviously non-existent. This is something the poster above me addressed in much more depth.
Can anyone inform me on how is this things accuracy out of the box?
I also agree with 1994 gun ban, however the company has taken a completely different direction now.
I just re-read my post, and one thing stuck out like a sore thumb. I do not agree with the 1994 gun ban! I agree with the poster by that name above.
How do you remove the stock from the SSR 556?
As near as I can tell it uses a standard CAR/M4 stock.
I spoke with a fellow at my range last week (he was packing up as I arrived so I didn’t get to fire it-drats) who had installed a Magpul stock that was formerly attached to a DPMS.
He reported zero problems in 500 rounds and is very satisfied with the Ruger’s accuracy. He also said that so far he was liking it slightly better than his Stag and had already sold off his DPMS since it couldn’t hold a candle to the Ruger.
it might operate well and shoot well can’t speak to that but took a look at it in the store yesterday and it is HEAVY. might as well carry a semi auto tactical “sniper” rifle. it had no optics on and no clip in it and had to weigh over 16lbs. forget that i’ll splurge for the S&W. they might be able to save some weight if the forend wasn’t all aluminum and made it out of a polymer.
I like the Ruger system. With a good gas regulator like the M-14 (M-14 all the way!) it can take any ammo. I think the US military needs to take a look at this. The M-4 will be around for a while and I think a upgrade for it will be well liked. Ruger is a relighable US company and is not a EURO transfer like HK, FN, or Beretta which I DO NOT trust at all since they have there owners live in Brussels or Berlin and dont have US intrests at heart. I ike the HK-416 but I know its far more expensive and would require HK to ship its production line from Europe to the US which would take alot of time. Ruger is already here. I think a SR-5.56 would be a good military rifle.
6.8mm! Helloooow! Now if you einsteins at Ruger had made it a 6.8, THAT would be something to write home about. This is just another ho-hum, also-ran, you dopes.
It is only 7.92 lbs Jason….not that heavy considering how solid it is built.
Wow! I think I scored bigtime. $1300 from a legitimate third party. New in the hard case. Not a shot fired. Only one 30 rd Mag though. That leaves a bit leftover for optics. Hope to bust her cherry tomorrow.
“The most significant feature is a new short stroke gas piston”
For the politically-minded among us, the most significant feature is that Ruger ships it with 30-round mags.
This gun WILL go in my arsenal; right next to my Mini-14 and Mini-30. I have ran thousands of rounds though both without even a small hiccup. Ruger stands for excellence in my book. I’m excited!
I purchased an LWRCi M6a2 a few months ago…..similiar specs….16″ CHF Barrel, Troy Battle Sights (same ones), full rail, gas piston (non adjustable), pmag…all very similiar…differences include a vltor emod collapsable stock, enhanced maid grip, 1/7 barrel,…..i paid $1700 on sale, common price is more along the lines of $2200 (most places online)….
I love the lwrci rifle…..but if i couldnt have gotten it at $1700, for my needs, i’d have gone with the ruger sr-556 based purely on similiar specs and value for the $…assuming i could get it for <$1600 vs the lwrci $2200+
Is the ruger the next thing since sliced bread, no, but for $1599 (in Cabella's current sale add – http://cabelasflyers.dirxion.com/7fe/Glendale/WebProject.asp?CodeReleaseId=7.0.3.0001#), it's got a lot to offer for a high end ar…given all the goodies and specs….and it kicks the tar out of the DI S&W's for the price point
I'm also in the market for a 6.8 or .308 / ar10….i may just hold for a few months to see if a SR-308 is in the works….if the actual street price is proportionally less with similiar specs to a high end .308 is…..i'd more than consider it.
I just won this rifle in a raffle.
I am happy.
I ordered one last week from the local store around the corner. $1450 and had it in 3 days.
I like it!
MPW
So many have noted that they either ordered one or have one or more AR style long gun. How about some feedback one of you guys that has fired one of these puppies alnog side and other AR’s.
Looking at buying one would like to hear some feedback this.
So…16lbs, huh? That would have meant you were holding 2 of them. Read the specs. So far mine is 100 percent and a steal, especially cosidering what the sights and rails cost sepearately.
Bought mine for 1470.00 + 15.00 shipping . Where is this 2000.00 stuff coming from? Yes i have shot only a couple of mags through it as it did not take long to sight in my EOtech 552 . This rifle is smooth and a lot less money than a Robinson XCR which would have been my choice if money was no matter. I have a Ruger mini 30 , Mark II pistol, and i like this Ruger the best so far. They definitely don’t cheat you on accessories as the Troy battlesights are some of the best. Also put a vickers tactical sling . If i ever get my Hensoldt magnifier in , i think i will have a hell of a package. Will post again after 1000 rounds.
I just got the new 556 yesturday and am looking forward to shooting it.the wepon looks to be well built.I have been a ruger fan for years.keep up the good work.I cant wait to see what ruger puts out next
So I took her to the range. only had a 25 yard pistol lane available, but accuracy was great, recoil was milder than my Mini-14 (which I do love), and reliability was 100% with all three included Pmags, two old PMI 40 rd mags, a Tapco mag, and some ofthe old Ramline translucent Mini-14 / AR-15 “dual purpose” mags. The sight picture on the Troys is excellent as well. No sign of carrier tilt or pin walkimg either.
Luv my new Ruger AR-15 SR 556…Own many differant Ar 15’s and this one really impressed me, granted I was optimistic before going out and shooting it, but what a sweet gun to shoot. If you have not shot one don’t comment, because you really have to shoot the gun to compared it to a non gas piston AR…Bottom line very happy with the Ruger & would strongly recommend it…For the price look at the add ons you cannot put these add ons on another AR at this price!
Ruger SR-556, I just had to have one. But now I wish I had waited. I have had nothing but problems with it. I have sent it back to the factory for repair twice and still not satisfied with it. From stuck shell cases, not chambering next round and the charging handle dragging across the lower receive causing wear on it. This rifle will not operate with cheaper ammo. I should have spent that $1600 on two other brands of AR15
I purchased a SR556 a week ago. When I got it home I excitedly took it out of the case to examine it. The trigger seemed heavy so I checked it on the trigger gauge and found it releasing at 11lbs, I checked the fit and finish and found that the upper and lower receivers did not fit tight, I was able to see daylight between the receivers and the rear of the receivers where they turn up only met in one smaller area with rather large gaps above and below where it touched. Everything else seemed ok. I called Ruger and they told me to send the rifle back to them. Now I paid $1795 for this gun and reading some of the negative comments made as to the problems and recurring problems with this gun I must say that I’m a little nervous right now. I own 8 other Rugers and have had no real problems with them. So Ive decided to focus on the positive comments and hope Ruger customer service is as good as Ive heard. Sorry about the rambling.
No such thing as to many anything on the market, it causes price drops via competition, and we win.
I have recently purchased mine for $1500, so go buy any gas piston design, with the Ruger quality (upper lower receivers are tight)(I own their bolt actions, and both the LCR, and LCP hand guns, all great quality), and all the extras they offer with it, and stay at $1500 or better. Hope you can, but I doubt it all things being equal.
I am off to shoot it tomorrow, and will give my feed back. GT Distributors Inc of Austin TX was my vendor, they had their’s out and had nothing but praise. They don’t BS customers at that store.
I put one of these on layawa
I put one of these on layaway 3 months ago. Picked it up a couple of days ago and got to put 500 rounds through it today. Shoots great, not a single hick-up. So far I am very happy with my ruger
I tore it down and cleaned it. Was impressed with how clean the lower was. The piston was dirty but very easy to clean. I shot all wallmart rem 55g ammo on setting #2. I saw many good reviews about this rifle but also saw that people were having problems. I am glad that I took the chance and bought this. I hope people dont get turned off by a few neg posts.
I just picked one of these up today from my local dealer and I love it. Everyone is complaining about the price but I got mine for $ 1,480.00 before tax. Sure cant find even a used one upgraded to some of the stuff this gun has for that. just my oppinion.
Does anyone have any idea how accurate this ruger SR-556 is? I know there are all kinds of carbines out their but I read one time in carbine magazine that a guy named Malachi Luhrs made a recorde shot of 1000 yards a with Bushmaster m4a2. I cant remember what the MOA was but it was good. Thats crazy.
@ CPShot
Are you asking for maximum effective range or accuracy? They’re different.
I don’t know about this rifle, but MER for an M-16 for a point target is 550m, and area is 800m. So it’s conceivable to hit a target at a grand with an AR, but far beyond most shooters’ abilities. I know I couldn’t, and I’m a soldier.
As for accuracy, the data I’ve read is that it shoots sub-MoA with the right ammo.
These days, most rifles will shoot MOA and it’s entirely dependent on you, the operator, to exercise proper technique to make it do so.
And I saw up there someone said it’s an 11lb trigger pull? Sounds a little heavy.. I’m thinking about picking one up next week before someone on the Hill makes them illegal again.
I bought my SR-556 about 2 weeks ago no malfuntions of any kind 1 M.O.A. accurate at 100 yards with 55 grain hornady softpoints. It does however show signs of carrier tilt after only 60 rounds. I am talking to a gun writer and his gunsmith about it and have an email in to ruger. I will let yall know how it turns out.
I have seen this carrier tilt issue on a few forums and my ruger is showing slight signs as well, from what I am hearing it only does it a little at first but never gets any worse? Also the bolt does not seem to be taking any damage so is it really anything to be overly concerned about?
I paid too much for it to eat itself, a guy on m4c.com seems to have a solution, but i dont believe i should have to pay for it. I paid a premium price for a great rifle on the outside, Ruger should step up and make it a premium rifle on the inside too.
M4carbine.net sorry
To answer your question yes i think its a problem and from what i gather it does vary from rifle to rifle, once it starts it has to get worse.
Reading through all of these entries, there is a great disparity between “it’s perfect, they’ve fired 9000 rounds without a hiccup” to “I fired 20 rounds and it froze up and had to go back to the factory for replacement parts”, to “new out of box, loose upper and lower fit, Ruger said sent it back”, and everything in between… a helluva lot of variations in the ownership experience from rifle-to-rifle.
That’s usually indicative of a quality control problem.
I agree with Keith Applegate that this is basically a Beta version that is now getting real-world testing, and issues are going to show up. They always do. I don’t know if Ruger is implementing corrections as problems are found, presumably they are, and as such, there could already be multiple ‘versions’ of the rifle out there, and this could account for some of the differences in first-hand experience. These corrections will have to be for both design bugs and any manufacturing problems.
And, of course, the influence and impact of different ammunitions on the operational performance of a weapon always has to be a consideration.
Thats true i have faith in rugers customer service (I pray) i sent my upper back today. I would be mad as you know what if the rifle wasnt so accurate. I will post back when i get it back.
I bought a new ruger SR 556 like the way it shoots pushed alot of round thru it with no problems…
Now my dilemma the chrome bolt carrier, Ruger made a big change in the machining of it which changes the function of the gun, if you look at the bolt carrier pictured above the serrated edge on the right side of the bolt is only machined up to the shell ejection window on the gun, now Ruger is machining the serrated edge all the way up to the Ruger logo on the bolt carrier “which now matches all AR’s”…
Why did they extend the surration another two inches? What problems will this cause having one like pictured above with the shorter surration?
If you would like a better comparison look in last months rifleman magazine and you can see the surration when the bolt is closed…I called Ruger & they said the first ones they machined for aesthetics “looks” but limits the function, with the bolt carrier above when the action is closed all you see is a nice rounded chrome bolt “yes looks nice not surrated?”.
Compare the bolt above to another black rifle you will see the differance…
Has anybody else noticed this? Or would Ruger like to comment on this?
I set out to buy a second SR556 when I noticed this, but refuse to be Rugers guinea pig with my money!
I’m very disapointed with Ruger making changes while in production without an answer or a fix to the ones already sold!
Great review on this item. We just started carrying this recently at our store and I look forward to trying it out. Using the piston system does seem like a really great way to keep the rifle clean.
Keep up the great work!
~Matt
Matt
Question the bolt? Ruger has changed how the gun is built both the old style and the new re-designed bolt carriers are out there on the market which one would you buy?
Same gun machined completely differant Hmmm which to choose….See my previous post