Glock G22 RTF2: 4th Gen Glock is official

This is the first high quality photo I have seen of the 4th Generation Glock featuring the RTF2 (Rough Texture Frame 2). That fish gill serrations are awful.

 2009Shotshow Day1 2009Shotshow-01152009-041
Glock G22. Photo Copyright Ken Lunde. Used with permission.

I think 3rd gen glocks will be considered the “classic” and having an older one will be “cool”.

UPDATE: From the press release:

The G22 RTF2 (Rough Textured Frame version #2) has more than 4,000 raised pyramids on the front, rear and sides of the polymer receiver. The raised pyramids are also located on the thumb rests for increased grip traction. In addition, the slide on the G22 RTF2 has a new, modern look with crescent-shaped serrations located at the rear of the slide.

“We have already had several major agencies commit to the G22 RTF2 and have had an outpouring of interest from our Commercial and Law Enforcement distributors about our new product,” said Director of Sales Craig Dutton.

Related Posts

Steve Jan 16th 2009 handguns Tags: , , , , 19 Comments

19 Responses to “Glock G22 RTF2: 4th Gen Glock is official”

  1. Rustmeisteron 17 Jan 2009 at 4:47 am link comment

    Since when have Glocks looked like anything other than awful? =)

  2. 22lron 17 Jan 2009 at 6:38 am link comment

    Wow that looks really bad. I defiantly wont be buying a new one (if I even ever buy an older 3rd gen).

  3. dogon1013on 18 Jan 2009 at 3:05 pm link comment

    I handled it at the show. The grip texture actually feels good (very grippy). But the serrations do not feel any better (I think worse).

  4. David Hon 29 Jan 2009 at 6:17 pm link comment

    Great site Steve. Have 5 Glocks and love everything about them, company, support and quality.

  5. gglasson 04 Feb 2009 at 11:08 am link comment

    MY EYES!

  6. gglasson 04 Feb 2009 at 11:11 am link comment

    If any other manufacturer changed so little and called their product the next generation, the buyers would run away in droves.

    It really must be nice to have a cult following.

  7. Cleatus Van Dammeon 25 Feb 2009 at 9:25 am link comment

    I find ignorance in those of you who believe in the cosmetic looks over function. The only reason I am commenting is because I carry one now. Its reliability is the same, the grip is improved. Watch, it will catch on, and to those who don’t like it, don’t buy it!

  8. yankeeon 26 Feb 2009 at 10:36 pm link comment

    AMEN

  9. glockRTF2on 04 Mar 2009 at 5:15 am link comment

    I just got for 3 weeks now and everytime i shoot it it would get jammed after 7 or 8 rounds is anybody else is having this problem..

  10. Omaron 21 Mar 2009 at 10:49 am link comment

    As long as they fixed the failure to feed issue in attaching a weaponlight to the G22, that gun will rule. Honestly, who cares what it looks like? It’s a tool, not a showpiece.

  11. Randy Candleron 28 Mar 2009 at 4:00 am link comment

    Use a tighter grip I have had no problems with mine been through 500 rounds

  12. Roberton 07 May 2009 at 4:17 am link comment

    I agree with dogon. The serrations appear to be backwards in my opinion. Why did they have to mess with them? What most companies do when designing new firearms is to study the way previous owners have modified them. As far as the slide serrations, I have seen them customized to be diagonal and even to add serrations near the muzzle. These new “serrations” look weak. Glock, however, is known for innovation rather than immitation and these serrations probably work. I cannot decide until I pick one up. Glocks are indeed ugly. These days, I favor revolvers, my current favorite is my 50th anniversary .44 mag Blackhawk. We watch movies together a lot. But, when I go out, there is a G27 with laser guide-rod, pachmeyer grip, re-triple blued Quick-Draw, XS sights, Glock extended mag-release and slide-stop lever, custom trigger and .357 sig stainless barrel drop-in parts; laser engraved with flames and the Punisher Skull. Overkill? Maybe. The fact is: I know my Glock will work. No matter the scenario, I can count on it above anything else.

  13. Chrison 28 May 2009 at 8:53 am link comment

    I purchased the Glock 22 RTF2 a few days ago and so far I’m in love with it. Yes, the serrations look stupid, but the new grip is amazing. To anyone who has used this gun a lot: Any problems that I should be looking forward to?

  14. DasBeckon 27 Aug 2009 at 4:43 pm link comment

    This thing may look ugly, but who cares. The grip is awesome. It couldn’t slip unless you threw it.

  15. JTon 23 Sep 2009 at 9:24 am link comment

    Change is different. I just purchased this gun after testing out both the 3G and this 4G Glock. This grip is very comfortable and I definitely feel more secure holding it versus the 3G versions. As far as the new serrations, I thought it looked a lot better for my taste. Looks like they put more attention to detail with the design of it.

  16. zachon 26 Oct 2009 at 12:41 pm link comment

    It’s ugly, the rtf grip according to massad ayoob is excellent, but yes, I agree the serrations look bad and don’t look any more comfortable then the old one. I would just do this, buy (if possible) an RTF frame, and then just put a 3rd gen. slide on it. If not, then just buy the whole gun and switch slides. problem solved.

  17. rmillon 31 Oct 2009 at 2:40 pm link comment

    just bought mine and find it much easier to handle with less slippage when hands sweat. the looks won’t interfere with its function.

  18. smoltion 08 Nov 2009 at 7:57 am link comment

    The slide serrations look like they imitate the shape of your fingertip. I know it’s kinda gross but almost like the shape of your fingernail clipping. Curved maybe for your thumb to grab on to? I don’t know, I’m not really much of an expert.

  19. Edon 10 Nov 2009 at 4:37 pm link comment

    To date Glock has not released the 4th gen pistol. This is all heresay!

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.