Steyr's ACR: The '80s-Era Teutonic Wonderwaffe You Haven't Heard Of

Nathaniel F
by Nathaniel F

Quick: What’s the most advanced infantry rifle that was ever designed, but never got the chance it deserved? I’m thinking about a futuristic weapon from Central Europe that fired advanced, lightweight ammunition and featured a high rate of fire “hyperburst” firing mode. Care to take a guess?

Did you say “Heckler & Koch G11”? Well, that’s one possible answer, but another is the Austrian Steyr ACR, an advanced concept designed to compete against the G11 for the American Advanced Combat Rifle trials of the late 1980s. The Steyr ACR was just as ambitious as the G11: It used a separate rising chamber driven by an annular piston wrapped around the barrel, feeding incredibly lightweight polymer-cased telescoped flechette-firing ammunition from translucent polymer box magazines holding 24 rounds.

The Steyr-Mannlicher ACR rifle in the hands of a US Army soldier during the ACR program. Note small details like the adjustments on the futuristic optical sight, the in-line back up iron sights, and the compensating ports on the flash hider. Image source: The Black Rifle II, by Christopher Bartocci

The Steyr ACR incorporated many small details that made it every bit a match for its ambitious German competitor. Instead of the familiar centerfire primer, the ACR used an annular primer ignited when the rising chamber reached its zenith in the action; this simplified the rifle’s mechanism and also improved in theory the consistency of ignition.

Unlike the G11, the Steyr was production optimized with a simple mechanism and inexpensive polymer housing; estimates at the time put the cost of Steyr ACRs at up to $400 less per unit than the existing M16A2. The ammunition, too, was cheaper; 60% less expensive than existing brass-cased M855, while being only 42% as heavy.

The Steyr ACR's 5.56x45mm plastic cased flechette round, far left. It fired a 9.85 grain/0.638 gram flechette at 4,600 ft/s (1,400 m/s).

Ultimately, despite its promise, the Steyr ACR proved to be a dead end. The ACR trials it was created for did not result in a procurement program, and all rifles tested remained as prototypes only.

Today, you can still see the Steyr ACR, along with the other ACR entrants, at the National Infantry Museum in Ft. Benning, Georgia.

Nathaniel F
Nathaniel F

Nathaniel is a history enthusiast and firearms hobbyist whose primary interest lies in military small arms technological developments beginning with the smokeless powder era. He can be reached via email at nathaniel.f@staff.thefirearmblog.com.

More by Nathaniel F

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 99 comments
  • Rick Randall Rick Randall on Jun 15, 2016

    Too bad the only advantages it really had over conventional assault rifles then available OTS were entirely due to Steyr using absolutely ineffective ammo.

    Flechettes, other than in large groups (such as used by artillery), suck.

    • See 1 previous
    • Rick Randall Rick Randall on Jun 16, 2016

      @Arathar In actual testing, the Steyr ACR flechettes sucked at both penetration and wound channels, compared to conventional bullets.

      Poking tiny holes in tissue and shattering on light steel armor plate the "obsolete" bullets go through means your low recoil and flat trajectory is useless, militarily.

      I have yet to see any credible reports of effective small arms flechettes, despite reading decades of scientific literature and formal, professional test reports on them in the last twenty or so years I've been reviewing ballistics reports.

      Get them big enough to work reliably in a military rifle scenario, and they're less like flechettes and more like super-long for caliber bullets - only fin stabilized (which actually reduces yawing in tissue) instead of spin stabilized. Of course, making them that large means you just sacrificed the velocity and reduced recoil that was the whole point of the exercise!

  • Daisuke0222 Daisuke0222 on Jun 15, 2016

    So... does the problem that the ACR program was supposed to solve (doubling hit probability at 300m under combat conditions) still exist, or have modern optics on an otherwise conventional combat rifle helped to improve that?

Next