Sydney Siege
It seems that every time an event occurs that receives a massive amount of media attention and has multiple law enforcement agencies involved, all the interesting small arms in use come out of the woodwork and make themselves available to the viewers around the world. It’s a pity that there is usually an event where someone is killed that is apart of these times, such as when the Ferguson riots and in this case, the two innocent victims in the Sydney siege. These photos are a compilation of photos in the news depicting the New South Wales Tactical Operations Unit. if you need a good recap of how it unfolded, Sky News has a good video report out.
The fact that any of this footage became available to the public is quite impressive, on the same level as when the SAS handled the Iranian embassy hostage crisis (which ironically, is just like Sydney in that a violent Iranian is taking hostages and gets cut down by law enforcement). Even if it is just the breeching and entering portion of the operation, it’s still fascinating. In this case the large blasts at the start of the video appear to be the shotgun in use by the hostage taker. Tragically, this is probably when the first victim of the crisis was killed when he tried to disarm the hostage taker. After some of the team is inside, you can hear the smaller reports of the M4s going off, and notice how most of the fire, if not all of it, is all semi automatic. None of this full auto fire going on in the movies.
This is another video from the siege, and shows alot more than the first video. Why didn’t the snipers on scene just shoot the gunman through the window? Contray to popular movie belief, when bullets enter glass, unless the target is right in front of the glass, there is no telling where that bullet is going to go. NRA Blog has a post about it as well as a report published in 1993.
Infantry Marine, based in the Midwest. Specifically interested in small arms history, development, and usage within the MENA region and Central Asia. To that end, I run Silah Report, a website dedicated to analyzing small arms history and news out of MENA and Central Asia.Please feel free to get in touch with me about something I can add to a post, an error I've made, or if you just want to talk guns. I can be reached at miles@tfb.tv
More by Miles
Comments
Join the conversation
Definitely agree that the loud series of bangs are the 9-banger, and several of them.
As far as different colored uniforms - its a dynamic situation requiring rapid response. Could be he grabbed what he could and went, or it could be an officer from another agency (Australian National Police, e.g.).
The photo titled "The officer on the right here seems to be the outlier from all the other officers in this post'' is not only not from the siege it's not even from Australia, hence the difference in uniform and equipment. For some unknown reason AAP/skynews Australia published this photo in an online article relating to the story....when it has nothing to do with anything remotely regarding the siege or NSWPF TOU.
The UMP's are .40cal as are the Glock 22's.
Holster on the vest is simply to be able to change between a vest and conventional belt rig when not wearing a vest. TOU don't issue ''dual'' pistols.
The ''gunfire'' the media reported was in fact several 9-banger flash bangs from various locations going in (the news only shows one side of the location being breached).
''Balaclavas'' are worn for the safety reasons already mentioned combined with the fact TOU perform a wide variety of roles including plain clothes and covert operational support as part of their role.