The HK USP Compact – After 15 Years Of Use

Matt E
by Matt E

The HK USP Compact holds a very special place in my heart. It was the first handgun I ever had and for the first five years, I shot the crap out of that gun. I think there’s always a special place in your heart for the first gun you own. The USP Compact was the first handgun I bought and learned how to shoot on. Luckily, I still own it today and still enjoy putting rounds through it at the range.

Buying It New

I picked up my HK USP Compact in 2004 for $848.99 at Jays Sporting Goods in Gaylord, Michigan. Since it was my first handgun, I spent a decent amount of time going between the HK, SIG Sauer P229, and Glock 19 Gen 2. I decided on the USP Compact based on how it felt in my hand and basic ergonomics. I planned on conceal carrying the gun and wanted to shoot in IDPA as well so I went with the compact frame size to compromise.

Shooting and Competing with The USP

Prior to buying my HK, I shot between 2,000-3,000 rounds out of my uncle’s Glock 17 Gen2. The Glock shot flawlessly throughout my first few months of learning to shoot. I could have bought a Glock but I wanted to try something else to see what I liked. At that time I was still a teenager and the HK fit my hand better while still being controllable and lightweight. A few things were different like the magazine release and DA/SA trigger but with practice, things became easier. Competing with an HK USP Compact was a bit unconventional compared to the older guys running their Smith & Wesson 686s and Kimber 1911s.

Despite being the area black sheep, I loved how well and consistent the USP shot every match I attended. The biggest issue I had with the gun was the polymer trigger and the amount of flex it had. Since it was my first handgun, I didn’t realize the difference in triggers until I switched. I decided to switch over to my SIG Sauer P226 after a few years of owning my HK. Honestly, in the grand scheme, the HK USP trigger isn’t terrible by any means. The USP has a recoil impulse that goes straight back and is very easy to control for quick follow up shots. I learned over time to hit the HK mag release with my trigger finger for faster reloads. After a while, the USP was a great gun for the IDPA arena but the 226 and other guns fit my needs a little better.

How It Stacks Up Today

The overall design of the HK USP Compact is 23 years old so it’s not considered new. Surprisingly, it holds up well compared to options offered today. With a full magazine, the USP Compact is very well balanced. It’s an easy gun to shoot and clean with a simple disassembly design of 4 major parts. In terms of disassembly, the USP Compact is just like any other modern-day handgun with simple takedown and reassembly. The biggest thing I see the USP having a disadvantage is mainly capacity. The standard flush-fitting magazines hold 13 rounds which isn’t a ton compared to the SIG P365 and Springfield Hellcat now. Modern variations from HK like the VP9 have higher capacity now. Back then, it was a good concealed carry option overall.

Overall if you’ve always wanted to own a USP Compact I would say you definitely should get one. Mine has been bulletproof reliable with any type of ammo. I still carry my USP Compact fairly often despite it not being the latest and greatest option out there. It may not have the capacity or features of handguns today, but it’s a workhorse and I still trust it with my life. Let me know what you guys think of the USP Compact after 23 years of it being on the market. If you have questions about my HK USP Compact fee free to message me on Instagram @fridgeoperator. Stay safe out there!

Matt E
Matt E

I'm an avid shooter and love educating whether it's at my job or in the shooting community. I'm an average joe that really loves talking with other people about firearms and other passions.I'm active on Instagram on @fridgeoperator.

More by Matt E

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 23 comments
  • The Dr The Dr on Oct 24, 2019

    The USP Family of HK's are junk guns IMHO.. 19 years LE/16 years USMC.. In 06 my agency switched from Glock 19's to USP 40's and HK P2000's.. In a salt water environment (Miami, Puerto Rico etc) those guns fail.. The internal metal parts corrode and springs break.. We sent some 300 guns to HK to "fix".. Cote and replace springs.. The guns came back and we ended up having failures in about 2 months.. Our big boss in DC told the powers that be "I won't send my boys out with guns they can't trust".. everyone operating in saltwater environments went back to Glocks.. The rest of us were stuck with HK's.. Horrible trigger, crappy to carry concealed.. just don't trust them... Range gun its fine, home defense (if you don't live on the beach or on a boat) sure, have at it.. Duty gun.. not so much... get a Sig or a Glock.. Happy to say we are back on the Glock train... Semper Fi..

    • Josh Josh on Oct 25, 2019

      @The Dr The bad trigger might've been the specific trigger version you had, of which there are many.... DAO, DA/SA, Pre-cocked DAO, Safety vs Decocker, etc. I personally have a 9mm P2000 I've beat the shit out of around Alaska for a couple of years. My one jam was from aggressively over-inserting a .40cal P30 mag on a slide lock, at it was fixed with a simple Tap/Rack. I've put maybe 2-3,000 rounds of shitty ammo through it with pretty minimal cleaning and no issues. Sample size of one and all, but the 9mm and the .40's are different animals as far as I've heard.

  • Sidney Stern Sidney Stern on Nov 01, 2019

    My yr2000 USP Tactical is still doing great, In fact, I just got an Omega 45K can for it, but man, the little polymer slide-rail holders on the frame have always looked like they are about to release their precious tiny metal cargo. Somehow, they never do.

Next