Justice Department Ruling Legalises 3D Gun Printing

Matthew Moss
by Matthew Moss
A 3D printed ‘Liberator’ on display at the V&A (Justin Pickard)

In 2015 we reported that Defense Distributed had teamed up with the Second Amendment Foundation to sue the Department of State over the “Censorship of 3-D Printing Information”. Three years later it has emerged that Defense Distributed and the Second Amendment Foundation have been successful, winning their case and achieving a settlement with the government.

Back in 2013 Cody Wilson, through his site, Defense Distributed introduced the first almost entirely 3D printed firearm. The plans for the firearm, known as the Liberator, were downloaded from Defense Distributed’s website more than 100,000 times before the site was taken down. The pistol is extremely simple, made up of just 16 printed pieces/parts, however, having handled an example of one of Wilson’s early pattern 3D printed guns, they are quite fragile.

After just a week of the plans being online, the US State Department demanded Wilson take them down or face prosecution for breaking Federal export controls – International Trade in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Essentially he was accused of exporting firearms without a license to do so. In 2015 Defense Distributed worked with the Second Amendment Foundation to launch a lawsuit to combat the State Department’s claims.

In June a deal was reached promising to change ITAR laws surrounding firearms below .50 calibre, with the government agreeing that these weapons are not ‘inherently military’ in nature. A statement from the Second Amendment Foundations said that “The government has also agreed to pay a significant portion of the plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees, and to return $10,000 in State Department registration dues paid by Defense Distributed as a result of the prior restraint.”

In the statement from the Second Amendment Foundation, Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb said:

Under this settlement the government will draft and pursue regulatory amendments that eliminate ITAR control over the technical information at the center of this case. They will transfer export jurisdiction to the Commerce Department, which does not impose prior restraint on public speech. That will allow Defense Distributed and SAF to publish information about 3-D technology.

The settlement will have interesting repercussions as Cody now plans to relaunch Defense Distributed’s website Defcad.com with an archive of blueprints for 3D printing. In 2014, 3D printing was a relatively expensive and widely unknown process but today 3D printers are increasingly affordable and ever more mainstream.

Sources: 1 2 3

Matthew Moss
Matthew Moss

Managing Editor: TheFirearmBlog.com & Overt Defense.com. Matt is a British historian specialising in small arms development and military history. He has written several books and for a variety of publications in both the US and UK. Matt is also runs The Armourer's Bench, a video series on historically significant small arms. Here on TFB he covers product and current military small arms news. Reach Matt at: matt@thefirearmblog.com

More by Matthew Moss

Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • Marine6680 Marine6680 on Jul 15, 2018

    "not inherently military in nature"

    I wonder if that will have any effect on things outside this perticular case.

    Seems like it could be a positive for fighting some gun control.

  • Rollin Shultz Rollin Shultz on Jul 15, 2018

    It would be kind of late in the game to try to limit free speech over information to create dangerous weapons. I remember as a 20 year old in ancient times, (1973) having a survivalist book explaining how to make such things as claymore mines and zip guns. We didn't hurt anyone with that knowledge back then.
    But then, these days leftist libtards are all too willing to employ dangerous weapons against all who reject their views.