Browning .40 S&W BXP 180 gr X-Point Gel Test and Review

Andrew
by Andrew

We shoot Browning .40 S&W BXP 180 gr X-Point ammunition from a Glock 22 with a 4.5″ barrel into Clearballistics ballistic gel to measure velocity, penetration, expansion/fragmentation, and retained weight.

Bare gel:

Penetration: 13.2″, 13.8″
Retained weight: 177.0gr, 175.2gr
Max expansion: 0.741″, 0.721″
Min expansion: 0.540″, 0.504″

Guns in this video:
Glock 22

Thanks to our sponsors:

Ventura Munitions – Retailer of quality ammunition.

Proxibid – Track Down Your Perfect Rifle On Proxibid.com

Savage Arms – The Definition of Accuracy

Please subscribe!!! Click here.
Support TFBTV on Patreon

Transcript ….

[coming soon]

Andrew
Andrew

Andrew is a combat veteran of OEF and has performed hundreds of ballistic tests for his YouTube channel, The Chopping Block (https://www.youtube.com/user/chopinbloc). He is an avid firearm collector and competitor and lives with his family in Arizona. If you have any questions, you may email him at choppingblocktests@gmail.com

More by Andrew

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 9 comments
  • Vic Nighthorse Vic Nighthorse on Dec 04, 2017

    Nobody shoots the .40 anymore. It is too "snappy".
    I bet TwSp's mother upgraded to a 9mm and just didn't tell him;-)

  • Matt Collins Matt Collins on Dec 04, 2017

    Is anyone else sick & tired of seeing gel block tests done with 2 or 3 rds, and then the presenter opines about the results as if they are definitive, sometimes even in regard to the entire brand or line of ammo they are testing? Does it not occur to people that to have relevant test results that they would want to test around 100 rds, from different guns, and at different ranges / angles, and compare those results to other products in that class with similar testing parameters? I realize that the 2-shot results are anecdotally interesting as far as being compared relatively to other 2-shot tests, but they should by no means disqualify a bullet’s potential performance based on such a limited test sample. It seems that the logistical issues with having to use so many gel blocks, or having to remelt them over and over is keeping amateur analysts from being thorough.

    • See 2 previous
    • Vic Nighthorse Vic Nighthorse on Dec 05, 2017

      @Matt Collins I apologize, I didn't mean to come off accusative. Generally I fire 5-10 bullets from at least two different box bought at least a month apart into gel before accepting it. Since there are bullets that have never failed to expand for me, I do ditch any one that has any failures in my gel or the online testers. So for me, if one or two of two shots don't expand or don't penetrate far enough it is an automatic thumbs down. I don't rely on any one else's tests. If Andrew, STHB410, PocketGunsandGear or any one else gets good results that only encourages me to test them myself not trust them because of said Youtube test. I have had some remarkably different results than those fellows so I am guessing that some manufactures have quality differences between batches.

Next