Gonna Compete in ICSR? The Army Will Help You Get Ammo
Manufacturers who are gearing up for the US Army’s Interim Combat Service Rifle competition better know where to get their ammo for testing, and the Army is ready to help. The US Army is facilitating the procurement of 7.62mm M80A1 ammunition to competitors for testing purposes, according to a new amendment to the ICSR solicitation. The amendment states that contractors can procure ammunition from either Orbital ATK (who operates Lake City Army Ammunition Plant), or Olin-Winchester. The process is described in the handy dandy flowchart below:
The M80A1 is the 7.62mm version of the 5.56mm M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round (EPR). The central feature of EPR rounds is their highly effective three-part bullet, which has an armor-piercing penetrator, barrier-blind slug, and fragmenting jacket. It’s this same bullet, though, that three times caused controversy for the new rounds. The first was the use of the then-new ammunition for the Army’s Improved Carbine competition, a move which was seen as unfair by many of the competitors, who had not designed their weapons to fire it. The second was the hard, exposed penetrator’s tendency to damage rifle feedways over time, wearing out certain components prematurely. The and the third was when the US Army was sued by Liberty Ammunition for allegedly infringing on their patent ( a claim which was eventually thrown out of court).
Nathaniel is a history enthusiast and firearms hobbyist whose primary interest lies in military small arms technological developments beginning with the smokeless powder era. He can be reached via email at nathaniel.f@staff.thefirearmblog.com.
More by Nathaniel F
![[GunCon 2024] VKTR Industries DI Bolt Carrier Group With Precision Cam](https://cdn-fastly.thefirearmblog.com/media/2024/07/09/14431/post.jpg?size=350x220)
Comments
Join the conversation
Funny fact, or not so funny, about caliber effectiveness....
These days here in Cyprus it's the anniversary of the 1974 turkish invasion and occupation.
Last night there was a documentary about a battle at a check point.
Of the 15 or so Greeks manning the check point 6 where killed, one captured and since MIA.
Of the survivors all had gunshot wounds. The Turkish army then used G1 (FN FAL) and G3. All 7,62x51.
So, the survivors where shot multiple times by 7,62 and survived.
One of them was shot 5 times. One in the face which took part of the lower jaw of and made a slice on the carotid artery, 2 leg wounds (no bone injuries), one arm and one to the lower left chest area.
He walked all the way to friendly lines.
Didn't hear anyone say 7,62x51 was or is ineffective...
If they are determined to do this why not just go with an AR-10 platform. Lets please have a free float hand guard and at least A2 sights on a removable "carry handle" . Lots less re-training. The side benefit would be hopefully a standardized AR-10, wouldn't that be great?