Entry Level B&T GHM9 Redesign Finally Official
By now you are probably wondering if I get a secret monthly check from Switzerland to promote B&T products. So let me take a moment to set the record straight: I can not confirm or deny any foreign payroll income related to sexy Swiss firearms. But if your reading this, B&T mothership, call me. My last envelope must have been lost in the mail. As for the latest news, the B&T GHM9 redesign is official on the company’s website, and it is attractive in both form and price point.
As we have mentioned a few times in the past, the entry-level gun was recently reworked to become a side-charging action rather than a top charger like it’s limited release cousin the KH9. And with the changes and a predicted U.S. price point of $1,300, a whole new slice of the shooting/collecting market opens up.
Obviously, import restrictions will require the B&T GHM9 to be imported as a pistol, however the adventurous type can file their ATF Form 1 applications to make a short barreled rifle (SBR). Stay tuned for a release date announcement. As soon as I get word from my EU and FL handlers, that is.
The GHM9 is a sporty 9 x 19 mm carbine with an integrated shoulder stock. The GHM9 is a perfect and inexpensive semi-automatic carbine for dynamic shooting as well as just for plinking.
Features
- Calibre – 9 x 19 mm
- System – Close bolt blow back system
- Operation – Semi automatic
- Length min./max. – 435 mm / 660 mm
- Width – 65 mm (incl. loading lever)
- Height – 274 mm (incl. 30-round magazin)
- Barrel Length – 175 mm
- Twist Rate – 250 mm / 10″
- Weight – 2.4 kg (inkl. 30-round magazin) –
- Stock Pull – 400 mm
- Primary Sighting System – Foldable open sights
- Sight length – 311 mm
- Suppressor connector – 3-Lug
- NAR Rails – 1 + 3
- Charging handle – Interchangeable
- Magazines – 15, 20, 25 and 30 rounds, translucent Polymer magazines
- Handling – Ambidextrous
- Shoulder stock – Foldable
- Also included – One 30 round magazine, sling, case, manual
Comments
Join the conversation
Woot! Can't wait to form 1 that beauty!
Pete, as a professional writer, you should know better...
"But if your reading this,..." Should be "you're"
Also, how could your editor let this slip?
Language (and grammar) are actually critical to maintaining our culture - as well as our rights!