[SHOT 2016] S&W Releases New Bodyguard 380 With No Manual Safety

Nathaniel F
by Nathaniel F

Smith & Wesson’s big announcement at the show was something concealed carriers have been asking after for years now: An M&P Bodyguard 380 with no manual thumb safety. This would perhaps have been a much bigger announcement than it was, had the company released the product in 2012, rather than 2016. The fact is that those looking for a pocket .380 handgun – those who just can’t live with a nigh-useless manual safety, that is – have so many options to choose from at this point that the safety-less Bodyguard won’t be terribly exciting news for most.

Smith & Wesson’s execution of the no-manual-safety model (? What do we call this thing? The “less-safe” model? The “safety-free” model – wait, no, not that) leaves a little bit to be desired, as well. One might expect that after six years of their customers (past and potential) clamoring for a Bodyguard with no manual safety, they would spring for new frame molds, but that’s not so. The, um, dingusless model uses the same mold as the old manual-safety-equipped M&P Bodyguard, with the addition of a plastic insert. Maybe one could rationalize this decision as meaning that Smith & Wesson could ship conversion kits to owners of the original models, except A.) There’s no reason they could have done that anyway and B.) Who would spring for a conversion kit when they could just, y’know, not use the gun’s safety?

Bizarrely, S&W is offering the new model with the same integrated Crimson Trace laser that requires you to lay the gun flat on a table and hit the activation button with a punch to turn it on – a decision made even more baffling by the existence of grip-activated triggerguard-mounted Crimson Trace lasers for the laserless Bodyguard. MSRP on the model without laser is $379, while the one equipped with the impossible-to-use laser is $449.

Nathaniel F
Nathaniel F

Nathaniel is a history enthusiast and firearms hobbyist whose primary interest lies in military small arms technological developments beginning with the smokeless powder era. He can be reached via email at nathaniel.f@staff.thefirearmblog.com.

More by Nathaniel F

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 45 comments
  • Ftyjyry Ftyjyry on Jan 23, 2016

    It's a good first step, now if they would do something with that horrible trigger. What is that thing, 12 lbs? A little light weight gun with that trigger pull, it's hard to hit anything even with a friggin' laser beam.

    The trigger is so heavy they never needed the safety in the first place. It took two hands to pull that thing.

    • See 1 previous
    • Ftyjyry Ftyjyry on Jan 23, 2016

      @Nathaniel F. Surprisingly the Taurus TCP has a pretty sweet trigger and no safety to deal with. No laser and only minimal sights yet, for me anyway, it's very accurate. I actually shoot it better than my G19. For a couple hundred bucks, you can't go wrong. It's like a cheaper LCP with a better trigger.

  • Adverse Adverse on Jan 23, 2016

    No safety, no sale.

    • BeenThereDoneThat BeenThereDoneThat on Jan 24, 2016

      @adverse Why? Can't you control your booger hook? The handgun has built in safeties, but there is NO safety that precludes any gun with untold number of safeties from being "unintentionally" discharged!!!

Next