<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>US loses bid to extradite Lord of War</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/24/us-loses-bid-to-extradite-lord-of-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/24/us-loses-bid-to-extradite-lord-of-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viktor Bout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Thai supreme court has denied the United States request to extradite arms dealer Viktor Bout, better known as the Lord of War and the Merchant of Death.
The Bangkok Post interviewed the man of whom only a few years ago precious little was known. Emphasis mine.
Bout becomes incensed at the suggestion he supplied weapons to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thai supreme court has denied the United States request to extradite arms dealer <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/viktor-bout/">Viktor Bout</a>, better known as the Lord of War and the Merchant of Death.</p>
<p>The Bangkok Post <a href="http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/investigation/22161/betrayed-by-a-friend-set-up-in-a-sting-operation-viktor-bout-wonders-why-the-us-wants-him-so-bad">interviewed the man</a> of whom only a few years ago precious little was known. Emphasis mine.</p>
<blockquote><p>Bout becomes incensed at the suggestion he supplied weapons to Farc or other terrorist organisations.</p>
<p>&#8221;No, I didn&#8217;t. Never! This is all bullshit,&#8221; he says. &#8221;Everything is in the Americans&#8217; minds. They don&#8217;t know what to do anymore in the world. <strong>During the past eight years the Western media didn&#8217;t want even to talk to me because they knew that they would have problems</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Bout is particularly angry about the 2005 film Lord of War starring Nicolas Cage as Yuri Orlov</strong>, which is allegedly based on his life story and details the gruesome trade of weapons-trafficking in Africa.</p>
<p>&#8221;The movie is pure fiction, fantasy and fabrication which has nothing to do with me or my previous business. The movie didn&#8217;t make much money either. I used to admire actor Cage, but not anymore.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, when asked if his air-freight company shipped arms before it went out of business, he replied: &#8221;<strong>Some cargo shipped by my air-freight company included weapons, but it doesn&#8217;t mean that I am an arms dealer</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>When asked if he was involved in air freighting goods for America&#8217;s war in Iraq after 2003, he said &#8221;I can categorically state that I have never shipped anything to Iraq as reported by the BBC and other news organisations, nor did anything for the Americans there whatsoever.&#8221;</p>
<p>He added: &#8221;I must condemn reputable news organisations such as the British Broadcasting Commission, the Cable News Network and other Western media for totally distorting the facts about my past activities. I would describe most of what they say about me as lies and fabrications.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>My understand is that nobody ever talked to him because they could not find him. If you consider how much an interview with him would have been worth for the Times or Post, it seems unlikely that they did not try. My understanding is that even photos of him were scarce. </p>
<p>My theory is that Bout will be delivered to whoever is more embarrassed by what he knows. While he disputes it, it is generally accepted that the US made use of him to transport weapons in the Middle East. I am sure the Russians also used his services. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/24/us-loses-bid-to-extradite-lord-of-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raytheon applies for MILES Claymore mine patent</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/15/raytheon-applies-for-miles-claymore-mine-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/15/raytheon-applies-for-miles-claymore-mine-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claymore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[War games just got more fun. Raytheon has applied for a patent on a simulated M18 Claymore Anti-Personal Mine for the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES) training system.

The patent describes a device that looks like a claymore but instead of hundreds of steel balls and C4 explosives, it is armed with over one hundred [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>War games just got more fun. Raytheon has <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;S1=20090165664&amp;OS=20090165664&amp;RS=20090165664">applied for a patent</a> on a simulated <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18A1_Claymore_Antipersonnel_Mine">M18 Claymore Anti-Personal Mine</a> for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_Integrated_Laser_Engagement_System">Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System</a> (MILES) training system.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-4-39.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-4-39.png','popup','width=436+20,height=592+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-4-39-tm.jpg" height="327" width="240" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 4-39" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>The patent describes a device that looks like a claymore but instead of hundreds of steel balls and C4 explosives, it is armed with over one hundred laser diodes and LEDs arranged to simulate a claymore explosion, including the back blast.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-5-31.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-5-31.png','popup','width=526+20,height=352+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-5-31-tm.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 5-31" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Real Claymore Range<br />
</em><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-6-31.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-6-31.png','popup','width=390+20,height=600+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-6-31-tm.jpg" height="373" width="242" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 6-31" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Simulated Claymore Killing Zone<br />
</em></p>
<p>To increase authenticity, the device could be hooked up to a pyrotechnic charge to simulate the light, sound and smoke of a real claymore. In short, it provides everything expect the for horrific mess and mental trauma that is the modern anti-personnal mine. I am sure it will help green recruits learn that &#8220;FRONT TOWARD ENEMY&#8221; does in fact mean front toward enemy <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon wink Raytheon applies for MILES Claymore mine patent photo" /> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/300px-us-m18a1-claymore-mine.jpg" height="259" width="300" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-Us M18A1 Claymore Mine" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p>Many thanks to <a href="http://www.thegunzone.com/">Daniel E. Watters</a> for telling me about the patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/15/raytheon-applies-for-miles-claymore-mine-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States powers global firearm industry</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/14/united-states-powers-global-firearm-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/14/united-states-powers-global-firearm-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US gun imports account for half of all rifle and pistol imports, and about 45% of all shotgun imports!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US gun imports account for <a href="http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com/2009/07/america-we-wanna-buy-your-guns-or-sell.html">half of </a><strong><a href="http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com/2009/07/america-we-wanna-buy-your-guns-or-sell.html">all</a></strong><a href="http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com/2009/07/america-we-wanna-buy-your-guns-or-sell.html"> rifle and pistol imports, and about 45% of all shotgun imports</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/14/united-states-powers-global-firearm-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brownells shipping M16 magazines with anti-tilt follower to military</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/13/brownells-shipping-m16-magazines-with-anti-tilt-follower-to-military/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/13/brownells-shipping-m16-magazines-with-anti-tilt-follower-to-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In March Brownells were awarded a contact for 1.4 million M16 magazines. They have just shipped the first 60,000. Interestingly these have a new propriety anti-tilt follower, instead of the normal green follower.

The new military magazine manufactured by Brownells

Larry, from Brownells, told me that the follower will unfortunately not be available to the civilian market [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In March Brownells were awarded a contact for 1.4 million M16 magazines. They have just shipped the first 60,000. Interestingly these have a new propriety anti-tilt follower, instead of the normal green follower.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cc.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cc.jpg','popup','width=989+20,height=1500+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cc-tm.jpg" height="365" width="241" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Cc" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The new military magazine manufactured by Brownells<br />
</em></p>
<p>Larry, from Brownells, told me that the follower will unfortunately not be available to the civilian market as part of the contact prohibits them from using the design for any other purpose than the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/13/brownells-shipping-m16-magazines-with-anti-tilt-follower-to-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do Miley Cyrus and the AK-47 have in common?</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/30/what-do-miley-cyrus-and-the-ak-47-have-in-common/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/30/what-do-miley-cyrus-and-the-ak-47-have-in-common/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ak-47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer? They are both victims of piracy, or at least that is what the Russian media would have you believe. The issue, from the Russian perspective, is the reverse of the allofmp3.com controversy. Russia accuses the United States and other governments of being complicit in the piracy that costs them $2 billion per year. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer? They are both victims of piracy, or at least that is what the Russian media <a href="http://lenta.ru/news/2009/04/29/assault/">would have you believe</a>. The issue, from the Russian perspective, is the reverse of the allofmp3.com <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9768658-7.html">controversy</a>. Russia accuses the United States and other governments of being complicit in the piracy that costs them $2 billion per year. The issue caused a minor diplomatic incident with Pakistan at a Turkish defense expo last month.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/ak-pirate.jpg" height="353" width="311" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Ak Pirate" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p><strong>Historical Context</strong></p>
<p>To understand the legal history of the AK-47 you need to understand the intellectual property history of the Soviet Union. Contra to popular belief the communists <a href="http://www.llrx.com/features/russiaiplaw.htm">did not oppose</a> intellectual property (IP). Our Soviet comrades were encouraged to think up inventions, they just has to give the invention to the state! After the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution private ownership in general was abolished but IP was overlooked. This oversight was corrected in 1931 when private ownership of IP was banned and the state automatically inherited all rights to inventions. The inventor received some small remuneration in return, presumably only if the invention was used by the state in some capacity.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-10-22.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-10-22.png','popup','width=491+20,height=239+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-10-22-tm.jpg" height="194" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 10-22" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>AK-47 / AKM clone made in Las Vegas by </em><em><a href="http://www.arsenalinc.com">Arsenal Inc.</a></em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>The Avtomat Kalashnikova 1947<br />
</strong><br />
Fast forward about a decade and a young sergeant named <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Kalashnikov">Mikhail Kalashnikov</a> starts designing weapons for the Red Army. In 1946 his rifle wins a competition for the next standard issue rifle of the Soviet Union. During the following year the military began adopting the rifle and it was given the infamous designation AK-47, now a household name worldwide.</p>
<p>The Soviet Union was quite happy to allow other communist states to produce the rifle, with many other state and non-state entities around the world producing clones.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/800px-flag-of-mozambiquesvg.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/800px-flag-of-mozambiquesvg.png','popup','width=800+20,height=533+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/800px-flag-of-mozambiquesvg-tm.jpg" height="259" width="390" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="800Px-Flag Of Mozambique.Svg" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The flag of Mozambique featuring the AK-47 alongside a hoe and a book.</em></p>
<p><strong>The AK-47 patent. Better late than never.</strong></p>
<p>After the fall of communism the Russian Federation and eight other former Soviet Republics formed the <a href="http://www.eapo.org/index_eng.html">Eurasian Patent Organization</a> (EAPC). <a href="http://www.izhmash.ru/">Izhmash</a>, manufacturer of the AK-74 and AK-10x rifles (AK-47 successors), filed a patent with the EAPC. From the <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fkalashnikov.guns.ru%2Fpatent.html">Google Translation of the patent</a> (emphasis added):</p>
<blockquote><p>Title of invention:<br />
Automatic weapons &#8220;Kalashnikov&#8221;</p>
<p>Patentovlalelets (ltsy):<br />
Open Joint Stock Company &#8220;Izhmash&#8221; (RU)</p>
<p>Inventor (s):</p>
<p>Mikhail T. Kalashnikov, Yuri Alexandrov K.,<br />
Bezborodov Nikolai, Viktor Kalashnikov.<br />
Azariah I. Nesterov, Paranin Valery Nikolaevich (RU)</p>
<p>The Eurasian application N: 970145<br />
Priority of invention:</p>
<p>Date of filing of the Eurasian application: <strong>July 24, 1997</strong><br />
Date of registration of the Eurasian Patent<br />
in the Register of Eurasian patents: October 10, 1997</p></blockquote>
<p>The patent was filed over 50 years after the invention! The patent does not mention when the rifle was actually invented. Under United States law patents expire after 20 years. It seems ridiculous that a company can expect to patent an invention half a century after its invention especially at a time when it is so common that people build it <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/03/amazing-video-showing-the-gun-market-in-durra-pakistan/">by hand in caves</a>!</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/610x-1-tm1.jpg" height="234" width="331" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="610X-1-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Ironically the AK-47 is also the </em><em><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/05/pirate-weaponary/">weapon of choice</a></em><em> for the modern sea pirate.</em></p>
<p><strong>US Government purchases of AK-47 rifle</strong></p>
<p>Prior to the recent decision to switch the Iraqi Army over over to the M16 and M4, the US Government was purchasing a lot of AK-47 rifles to supply the fledging Iraqi Army. Russia was not happy about the US purchasing AK-47 clones from manufactures who were significantly under cutting Izhmash. From <a href="http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=99099">Novinite.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Americans have allowed Bulgaria to built a plant producing the Kalashnikov sub-machine gun to be sold in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Director for Special Assignments of the Russian Rosoboronexport State Corporation Nikolay Demedyuk stated on Wednesday cited by ITAR-TASS.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The Russians stated that the &#8220;Arsenal&#8221; production was undercutting the gun prices on international tenders citing as example a 2003 tender for the supply of 40,000 sub-machine guns for the Iraqi army for USD 65 each won by Arsenal and lost by the Russian &#8220;Kalashnikov&#8221; manufacturer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Russia has claimed it loses $2 billion per year from counterfeit production with only 10% of AK-47 rifles being produced under license.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-12-24.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-12-24.png','popup','width=1100+20,height=758+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-12-24-tm.jpg" height="275" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 12-24" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Iraqi Military Policeman </em><em><a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/dodcmsshare/newsphoto/2007-10/hires_071015-F-6304H-110.jpg">Training</a></em><em> with AK-47 rifle.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Last Month in Turkey</strong></p>
<p>There was a minor diplomatic incident last month at the IDEF &#8216;09 defense expo when the Russian delegation discovered that <a href="http://www.pof.gov.pk">Pakistan Ordnance Factories</a> had AK-47 clones on display. When confronted the Pakistan stated owned defense manufacture refused to remove the display.</p>
<p>Anatoly Aksenov, a senior advisor to the director general of <a href="http://www.roe.ru/">Rosoboronexport</a> (Russia&#8217;s sole export intermediary), said in a <a href="http://www.mosnews.com/military/2009/04/28/1364/">press release</a> &#8220;Russia will ask IDEF-2009’s administration to impose sanctions on Pakistan’s delegation if the counterfeit weapon is not removed from the booth by tomorrow &#8230; is piracy and we will struggle against it.&#8221;. The Turkish Ministry of Defense, who organized the expo, acted swiftly and the following day the rifles were <a href="http://lenta.ru/news/2009/04/30/pakistani/">removed</a> from display. </p>
<p>According to Mr. Aksenov Turkey is looking to purchase Russian short and medium range anti-aircraft systems, which no doubt gave the Russians much leverage with the Turkish Ministry officials.</p>
<p>The Russian media was quick to point out that the World Trade Organization worries itself with Western music, firms and clothing, but not Russian weaponry. From <a href="http://66.102.7.132/translate_c?hl=en&amp;u=http://www.lenta.ru/articles/2009/05/01/kalash/&amp;usg=ALkJrhgMp55gThUfuhfTQI_yf7qLSrS97Q">Lenta.ru</a> (Google Translated):</p>
<blockquote><p>Piracy in the music and film industry, protection of brand clothing manufacturers, food, tobacco and alcohol have long been one of the nabivshih oskominu so when discussing the economy nowadays.  Combating concerned authoritative international organizations such as WTO, and thousands of bureaucrats.  The trials against the creators of file-networks follow one after another and stable outside the top list of hot news. And the weapons you can not only forge in the huge quantities, but also opened it to show, without fear of any sanctions or condemnation, or loss of reputation.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Will this be resolved?</strong></p>
<p>Russia wants to join the World Trade Organization. Prior to joining the diplomats will have to define the parameters for recognition of patents. It is unlikely the WTO members will want to open themselves to lawsuits from Russian firms over 50+ year old inventions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/30/what-do-miley-cyrus-and-the-ak-47-have-in-common/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCAR being deployed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/15/scar-being-deployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/15/scar-being-deployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Army Times (via. Murdoc) report that the 75th Rangers are receiving new FN SCAR rifles:
About 600 members of the 75th Ranger Regiment will soon take the Special Operations Combat Assault Rifle into battle.
The 600 SCARs are the first of 1,800 that U.S. Special Operations Command began fielding in early April, SOCom spokeswoman Air Force [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Army Times (via. <a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/007731.html">Murdoc</a>) <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/05/army_scar_051109w/">report that</a> the 75th Rangers are receiving new <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/scar/">FN SCAR</a> rifles:</p>
<blockquote><p>About 600 members of the 75th Ranger Regiment will soon take the Special Operations Combat Assault Rifle into battle.</p>
<p>The 600 SCARs are the first of 1,800 that U.S. Special Operations Command began fielding in early April, SOCom spokeswoman Air Force Maj. Denise Boyd told Army Times.</p></blockquote>
<p>The first photo I saw of the SCAR in the &#8220;wild&#8221; was when <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004818.html">Defense Tech</a> linked to this Navy photo taken last month <a href="http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=70929">showing</a> a SEAL with the <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">SCAR</span> replica (see update below) slung over this shoulder.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/web-090415-n-6403r-006.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/web-090415-n-6403r-006.jpg','popup','width=600+20,height=428+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/web-090415-n-6403r-006-tm.jpg" height="285" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Web 090415-N-6403R-006" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>090415-N-6403R-006 SEAL BEACH NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, Calif. (<strong>April 15, 2009</strong>) Special warfare combatant-craft crewmen (SWCC) assigned to Special Boat Team (SBT) 12 conduct an equipment check before getting underway for a training exercise at Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Joshua T. Rodriguez (Released)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Turns out that the above photo shows a replica SCAR. From a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:FN_SCAR#SEALs_image">Wikipedia discussion</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I received an email from FN confirming that the image appears to show replica weapons (FN mentioned Independent Studio Services, the same company that the earlier editor did). Actual FN SCAR rifle stocks are solid plastic in “Flat dark earth” color &#8211; solidly that color throughout, not a paint or coating over a darker black color. The FN employee has some of the ISS replica weapons and confirmed that they are manufactured in a solid black base material then painted the flat dark earth on top of that. He also confirmed that ISS has made replica SCARs for the SBS teams for training, and that SBS and SEALs routinely do use replica weapons in this manner to avoid training wear and tear on actual rifles.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to Anon for the link to the Wikipedia discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/15/scar-being-deployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on the SEAL Snipers</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/16/more-details-on-the-seal-snipers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/16/more-details-on-the-seal-snipers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mk11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR-25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOD Buzz has some thoughts on the weapon platform used by the SEAL Snipers who took out the pirates:
And let’s not get carried away with the sea state, says DT contributor Joe Buff. A multi-thousand ton destroyer is a pretty stable platform in any but the most tumultuous sea states and makes dialing in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOD Buzz <a href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/04/14/seal-sniper-details-trickle-in/">has some thoughts</a> on the weapon platform used by the SEAL Snipers who took out the pirates:</p>
<blockquote><p>And let’s not get carried away with the sea state, says DT contributor Joe Buff. A multi-thousand ton destroyer is a pretty stable platform in any but the most tumultuous sea states and makes dialing in a shot on an admittedly tossing life raft more doable — a smart platform for the Team to operate from.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well sure a big ship is a more stable platform, but that does not make it any less of a feat of marksmanship. Missing could have meant the difference between the American captain surviving and being executed by the frightened pirates.</p>
<blockquote><p>We also have some information — unconfirmed, though we’re working on it — about how the shots were taken and what was used. Our firearms expert Eric Poole who writes for Tactical-Life posits that the snipers were using the MK-11 .308 sniper system manufactured by Knights Armament Co. This weapon is awesome, by the way (I’ve shot it a few times myself) and, if this is indeed what the shooters used, would mark a major, high-profile departure from legacy thinking about sniping which holds bolt-action rifles as the Gold Standard or marksmanship.</p></blockquote>
<p>I also said <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/13/sniping-pirates/">that I though the Mk 11</a> was the likely weapons system. </p>
<p>Bolt actions and semi-auto&#8217;s can both be made accurate enough. Bolt actions can be made more accurate cheaper, but semi-autos give a much better rate of fire. The Army is <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/">sticking with the M24</a> Sniper Weapons System, based on the Remington 700 bolt action, for now because of cost.</p>
<blockquote><p>Poole figures the DevGru frogmen removed the “overpowered” standard-issue Leupold scopes and opted for the Aimpoint CCO augmented by the PVS-14 night vision monocular. Though the SEAL version of the MK-11 Mod 0 is issued with suppressors, it’s unclear whether the operators used them, but I’d bet a million bucks they did.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point about scopes. The range was relatively close, so I don&#8217;t think the sound suppression of a suppressor would make a huge difference to the situation, but the decrease in recoil would be advantageous when making followup shots at a moving target. I think it is safe to assume these guys know now their weapons performs when suppressed (unlike video games, in real life suppressors make no change to the external ballistics of the projectile, but it does change the weight balance of the firearm)</p>
<blockquote><p>One other question (among many) remains open…were there three shots or four? Poole reasons, and Allen and I agree, that someone had to shoot through the lifeboat window first, then fire the kill shots. My limited knowledge of ballistics leads me to believe the snipers could not rely on the effectiveness of the one window shot to actually strike the target where it was aimed based in the potential deflection of hitting that probably plastic (glass) window.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are a lot of things we do not know.</p>
<p>Thanks to Paul for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/16/more-details-on-the-seal-snipers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sniping Pirates</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/13/sniping-pirates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/13/sniping-pirates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR-25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The captain held in a lifeboat by pirates off the coast of Somalia has been rescued by the US Navy after snipers took out his captors. CNN reports:
U.S. Navy snipers fatally shot three pirates holding an American cargo-ship captain hostage after seeing that one of the pirates &#8220;had an AK-47 leveled at the captain&#8217;s back,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The captain held in a lifeboat by pirates off the coast of Somalia has been rescued by the US Navy after snipers took out his captors. CNN <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/africa/04/12/somalia.pirates/index.html">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. Navy snipers fatally shot three pirates holding an American cargo-ship captain hostage after seeing that one of the pirates &#8220;had an AK-47 leveled at the captain&#8217;s back,&#8221; a military official said Sunday.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The three pirates, who were armed with AK-47 rifles, were killed by shooters who were aboard the Bainbridge, Gortney said.</p>
<p>The on-scene commander gave the shooters approval to open fire after seeing that &#8220;one of the pirates had an AK-47 leveled at the captain&#8217;s back,&#8221; Gortney said.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is some incredible shooting!</p>
<p>Earlier this year <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/marine-scout-snipers-providing-anti-pirate-protection/">a team of Marine Scout Snipers were deployed</a> to the region for counter piracy work. They are armed with the SR-25 (Mk 11) 7.62&#215;51mm semi-automatic, an AR-10 style rifle. They may well have been the men that were deployed to take out the pirates.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/090117-m-6412j-010-tm.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/090117-m-6412j-010-tm.jpg','popup','width=400+20,height=266+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/090117-m-6412j-010-tm-tm.jpg" height="266" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="090117-M-6412J-010-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>A scout sniper fires an MK-11 rifle from a HH-60H Sea Hawk helicopter<br />
</em></p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/04/12/more-details-on-the-rescue/">Snow Flakes in Hell</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/13/sniping-pirates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOD banning sale of fired brass</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/16/dod-banning-sale-of-fired-brass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/16/dod-banning-sale-of-fired-brass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defense Logistics Agency, the DOD logistics support agency, has decreed that all fired brass sold off by US Military will need to be mutilated (ie. turned in scrap brass). thanegrooms @ ar15.com has been keeping a forum thread updated with news about this unfortunate development. From an email he received:
Please take a moment to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.dla.mil/default.aspx">Defense Logistics Agency</a>, the DOD logistics support agency, has decreed that all fired brass sold off by US Military will need to be mutilated (ie. turned in scrap brass). thanegrooms @ ar15.com has been keeping a <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&amp;f=5&amp;t=844248">forum thread updated</a> with news about this unfortunate development. From an email he received:</p>
<blockquote><p>Please take a moment to note important changes set forth by the Defense Logistics Agency:</p>
<p>Recently it has been determined that fired munitions of all calibers, shapes and sizes have been designated to be Demil code B. As a result and in conjunction with DLA&#8217;s current Demil code B policy, this notice will serve as official notification which requires Scrap Venture (SV) to implement mutilation as a condition of sale for all sales of fired munitions effective immediately. This notice also requires SV to immediately cease delivery of any fired munitions that have been recently sold or on active term contracts, unless the material has been mutilated prior to sale or SV personnel can attest to the mutilation after delivery. A certificate of destruction is required in either case.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/12608970.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/12608970.jpg','popup','width=472+20,height=354+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/12608970-tm.jpg" height="245" width="326" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="12608970 tm DOD banning sale of fired brass photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>One fired brass military brass </em><em><a href="http://cgi.govliquidation.com/auction/view?id=2263403&amp;convertTo=USD">being auctioned</a></em><em>. Will now require mutilation.<br />
</em></p>
<p>The NRA is aware of the situation and are hoping to have a waiver put in place so that fired brass .50 and smaller in caliber will not be required to undergo mutilation.<br />
Follow any new developments <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&amp;f=5&amp;t=844248">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: I pulled this blog post pending confirmation due to concern this was just a misunderstanding concerning existing rules/regulations and I did not want to alarm anyone. Unfortunately this is not the case. <a href="http://twitter.com/babj615">Andy Byers</a> sent me a twitter message to say that <a href="http://georgia-arms.com/">Georgia Arms have confirmed</a> it. From their <a href="http://georgia-arms.com/">website</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Due to new government regulations concerning the purchasing of surplus brass, we are removing sales of all 223 and all 308 until further notice.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Cannoneer has more info and links <a href="http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/the-right-to-keep-and-bear-ammunition/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/16/dod-banning-sale-of-fired-brass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide Bomber Simulation Vest</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/06/suicide-bomber-simulation-vest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/06/suicide-bomber-simulation-vest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bomber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Naval Air Warfare Center funded a patent application, published two weeks ago, with the innocuous title of &#8220;Military Training Device&#8221;. The device turns out to be a suicide vest simulator for the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES) training system.

The proposed MILES equipped &#8220;explosive&#8217;&#8221; clothing.

The original MILES system was developed in the 1980&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US <a href="http://www.navair.navy.mil/nawcwd/">Naval Air Warfare Center</a> funded a <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220090053679%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20090053679&amp;RS=DN/20090053679">patent</a> application, published two weeks ago, with the innocuous title of &#8220;Military Training Device&#8221;. The device turns out to be a suicide vest simulator for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_Integrated_Laser_Engagement_System">Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System</a> (MILES) training system.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/suicide_vest/fig1.jpg" height="296" width="265" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Fig1" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>The proposed MILES equipped &#8220;explosive&#8217;&#8221; clothing.<br />
</em></p>
<p>The original MILES system was developed in the 1980&#8217;s to provide a realistic force-on-force training system for the US Army. The system utilized an array of sensors on soldiers clothing, equipment and vehicles. When a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_cartridge">blank cartridge</a> is fired from a MILES equipped rifle, the laser is activated and transmits information about the shooter, his weapon and ammunition. If a laser hits a sensor, the software calculates if the shot was a kill based on the range and what ammunition was being used. MILES is in use by many armed forces including the Australian, British, Czech, Irish, Israeli, Turkish and Canadian armies.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/suicide_vest/file-m4-with-miles-2007-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia.jpg" height="234" width="390" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="File M4-With-Miles-2007.Jpg - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>M4 with MILES gear attached. Camp Shelby Joint Force Training Center.<br />
From </em><em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M4-with-MILES-2007.jpg">Wikipedia</a></em><em>.<br />
</em></p>
<p>The <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220090053679%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20090053679&amp;RS=DN/20090053679">patent application</a>, number 20090053679, describes a system where clothing is covered in light generating devices, such as LEDs, that when activated broadcast the appropriate MILES codes for a kill over a wide area. Sensors in the &#8220;blast&#8221; zone would then calculate the distance from the &#8220;explosion&#8221; and see if it resulted in a kill. <a href="http://www.publictechnology.net/print.php?sid=12136">Previous</a> simulation systems for suicide bombers have just generated smoke and sound effects.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/suicide_vest/pat20090053679pdf-page-5-of-8.jpg" height="329" width="272" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Pat20090053679.Pdf (Page 5 Of 8)" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>The Kill Logic<br />
</em></p>
<p>The system also allows for defensive action against suicide bombers. Sensors would also be placed on the bomber and certain hits would be able to disable the bomb &#8211; something the Israelis have <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/05/israelandthepalestinians.international">demonstrated is possible</a> in real life.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/suicide_vest/fig3.jpg" height="337" width="242" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Fig3" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Bomber armed with M16?!?!<br />
</em></p>
<p>The patent goes out of its way to be politically correct. The words &#8220;suicide bomber&#8221; are only used once. From the patent, emphasis mine:</p>
<blockquote><p>[0040]In act 112, electrical circuit 18 disables offensive capabilities of military training device 10. In the particular embodiment described above in which multiple integrated laser engagement system 14 includes light generating devices 16a as well as light detectors 16b, light generating devices 16a may be inhibited from further operation until the current military training maneuver is completed. In this manner, <strong>a particular trainee simulating a suicide bomber may be disabled from inflicting damage to other trainees</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a very interesting system and I look forward to seeing it develop. Providing training with this level of realism can only help the troops stationed in parts of the world where suicide attacks are likely to happen.</p>
<p>Many thanks to <a href="http://www.thegunzone.com">Daniel Watters</a> for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/06/suicide-bomber-simulation-vest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glock&#8217;s struggling to keep up with US demand.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/05/glocks-struggling-to-keep-up-with-us-demand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/05/glocks-struggling-to-keep-up-with-us-demand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to OnPointSupply Glock&#8217;s factory in in Smyrna, GA are unable to keep up with overwhelming demand. The factory is running two 8 hour shifts and producing 4000 pistols a day! 
They have started to import Glock 19 pistols from Austria to meet the demand. These pistols can be identified by the Austrian proof mark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.onpointfirearms.com/blog/2009/03/03/austrian-proof-marks-on-glock-19/">OnPointSupply</a> Glock&#8217;s factory in in Smyrna, GA are unable to keep up with overwhelming demand. The factory is running two 8 hour shifts and producing 4000 pistols a day! </p>
<p>They have started to import Glock 19 pistols from Austria to meet the demand. These pistols can be identified by the Austrian proof mark which is an eagle next to the letters NPv (&#8221;Nitro Powder proofed&#8221;). Austrian guns are proofed with loads that are 30% more powerful that regular loads.</p>
<p>These photos are from a Glock 19 offered for sale at the <a href="http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1007698">GlockTalk forum</a>: </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/g19-slidemarking-small-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/g19-slidemarking-small-1.jpg','popup','width=800+20,height=562+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/g19-slidemarking-small-1-tm.jpg" height="281" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="G19 Slidemarking Small-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/g19-framemarking-small.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/g19-framemarking-small.jpg','popup','width=800+20,height=571+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/g19-framemarking-small-tm.jpg" height="285" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="G19 Framemarking Small" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/05/glocks-struggling-to-keep-up-with-us-demand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assault Weapons Ban 2.0 is on its way in</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/27/assault-weapons-ban-20-is-on-its-way-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/27/assault-weapons-ban-20-is-on-its-way-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorney General Eric Holder has confirmed that the Obama administration will be reintroducing the &#8220;Assault&#8221; Weapons Ban. ABC reports:
The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.
&#8220;As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Eric Holder has confirmed that the Obama administration will be reintroducing the &#8220;Assault&#8221; Weapons Ban. ABC <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6960824&amp;page=1">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.</p>
<p>&#8220;As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to re institute the ban on the sale of assault weapons,&#8221; Holder told reporters.</p></blockquote>
<p>No surprises.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>:</p>
<p>From <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-tosses-cold-water-on-reviving-assault-weapon-ban-2009-02-26.html">The Hill</a> (Link from Tom and <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2009/02/26/pelosi-on-the-assault-weapons-ban/">SayUncle</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>Attorney General Eric Holder raised the prospect Wednesday that the administration would push to bring back the ban. But Pelosi (D-Calif.) indicated on Thursday that he never talked to her. The Speaker gave a flat “no” when asked if she had talked to administration officials about the ban.</p>
<p>“On that score, I think we need to enforce the laws we have right now,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference. “I think it&#8217;s clear the Bush administration didn’t do that.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you believe that? I think the attorney general tipped his hand it a bit early.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://sensiblyprogressive.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-awb-sooner-rather-than-later.html">Sensibly Progressive in Politically Correct America</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/27/assault-weapons-ban-20-is-on-its-way-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine snipers upgrade from WWII era M49 spotting scope</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/18/marine-snipers-upgrade-from-wwii-era-m49-spotting-scope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/18/marine-snipers-upgrade-from-wwii-era-m49-spotting-scope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m49]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense Industry Daily reports that the Marines are getting a new spotting scope called the Scout Sniper Observation Telescopes (SSOT). The SSOT is a variant of the Horus Vision Leupold spotting scope system designed specifically for snipers.

Horus Vision Leupold spotting scope

I was amazed that the M49, the standard military spotting scope, was designed during WWII!

Picture [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/SSOT-Spotter-Scopes-to-Replace-USMCs-M49s-05288/">Defense Industry Daily</a> reports that the Marines are getting a new spotting scope called the Scout Sniper Observation Telescopes (SSOT). The SSOT is a variant of the <a href="http://www.horusvision.com/leupold.php">Horus Vision Leupold spotting scope</a> system designed specifically for snipers.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pr-3-leupold.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pr-3-leupold.jpg','popup','width=342+20,height=190+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pr-3-leupold-tm.jpg" height="222" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Pr 3 Leupold" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Horus Vision Leupold spotting scope<br />
</em></p>
<p>I was amazed that <a href="http://www.seilerinst.com/mltry/m49obtl.asp">the M49</a>, the standard military spotting scope, was designed during WWII!</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/picture-6-23.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/picture-6-23.png','popup','width=413+20,height=242+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/picture-6-23-tm.jpg" height="234" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 6-23" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Picture of M49 from War Department manual TM 9-1556 published in 1944.</em></p>
<p>In my personal opinion, optics are one of the two major improvements in firearm technology since WWII (the other being ammunition component improvements). While I am sure the current M49&#8217;s exceed the mil specs from the 1940s it is only 20x in power and has no reticle.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: According to Allen, a Marine vet and analyst at <a href="http://columbiagroup.com">The Columbia Group</a>, The Marines will be using a standard Gen II Mil-Dot reticle, not the Horus reticle described below.</p>
<p>The Horus Vision Leupold, as the name suggests, is made with Leupold optics, and offers 12.7-38.1x zoom. Its main feature is the reticles. Unlike standard mil-dot these show a 2d-grid which allows for precise calculations of holdover and, in the case of a spotter for a sniper, calculating speed of moving objects.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/horus.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/horus.jpg','popup','width=397+20,height=392+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/horus-tm.jpg" height="267" width="271" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Horus" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Horus H36 reticle.<br />
</em></p>
<p>This promotion video shows how it works. The video is showing the Horus line of rifle scopes, not the spotting scope, but the idea is the same.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_nWQ6OI2Ggk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_nWQ6OI2Ggk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>
<p>Defense Industry Daily has <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/SSOT-Spotter-Scopes-to-Replace-USMCs-M49s-05288/">more info</a> and details of the contact awarded to Horus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/18/marine-snipers-upgrade-from-wwii-era-m49-spotting-scope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine scout snipers providing anti-pirate protection</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/marine-scout-snipers-providing-anti-pirate-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/marine-scout-snipers-providing-anti-pirate-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Marines are back doing what they do best &#8211; kicking pirates ass. Marine Scout Snipers are being deployed to provide protection for counter-piracy teams in and around the Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, Indian Ocean and Red Sea. Navy.mil reports:
The nine-member sniper team brings multiple capabilities to CTF 151, including its ability to operate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Marines are back doing what they do best &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War">kicking pirates ass</a>. Marine Scout Snipers are being deployed to provide protection for counter-piracy teams in and around the Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, Indian Ocean and Red Sea. Navy.mil <a href="http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=41919">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The nine-member sniper team brings multiple capabilities to CTF 151, including its ability to operate from an aerial platform with a variety of different weapons systems. The scout snipers use a Mk-11, which is the 762 sniper rifle; a 50-caliber M107 special application scoped rifle (SASR); and several different sets of optics to aid them in carrying out their mission.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have the ability to stand off of a target, visually see what is on the target and report that information to the VBSS teams so they understand &#8212; before they&#8217;re boarding &#8212; the number of personnel, if there are any weapons on board, if there are any type of foulings on the deck, if their hook point is obtainable, and, basically, <strong>give them a warm and fuzzy</strong> <strong>feeling that they&#8217;re not out alone out here, that they have snipers watching over them 100 percent of the time</strong>,&#8221; explained Benkie.</p></blockquote>
<p>Emphases mine. That must be a good feeling <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile Marine scout snipers providing anti pirate protection photo" /> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090117-m-6412j-010.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090117-m-6412j-010.jpg','popup','width=561+20,height=374+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/090117-m-6412j-010-tm.jpg" height="266" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="090117-M-6412J-010" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>More <a href="http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=41919">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/marine-scout-snipers-providing-anti-pirate-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Para Ordnance moving HQ stateside</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/25/para-ordnance-moving-hq-stateside/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/25/para-ordnance-moving-hq-stateside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Para]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian pistol manufacturer Para Ordnance are moving their headquarters and manufacturing to Charlotte NC. Charlotte Business Journal reports:
The company leased a Pineville facility and estimates 35 to 40 jobs will be filled, mostly in manufacturing and machining.
Para Chief Executive Thanos Polyzos says the company wanted to establish a U.S. headquarters to be eligible for more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian pistol manufacturer Para Ordnance are moving their headquarters and manufacturing to Charlotte NC. Charlotte Business Journal <a href="http://charlotte.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2009/01/26/story5.html">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The company leased a Pineville facility and estimates 35 to 40 jobs will be filled, mostly in manufacturing and machining.</p>
<p>Para Chief Executive Thanos Polyzos says the company wanted to establish a U.S. headquarters to be eligible for more military and law-enforcement contracts.</p></blockquote>
<p>How much of its manufacturing, if any, will remain in Canada is not clear.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: JR @ <a href="http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/">Keyboard and a .45</a> has just point out that this also allows them to get round any import restrictions, now or in the future.</p>
<p><em>Hat Tip: I can&#8217;t remember where I saw this link! If it was your blog let me know</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/25/para-ordnance-moving-hq-stateside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod Touch mounted on M110 Sniper Rifle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/20/ipod-touch-mounted-on-m110-sniper-rifle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/20/ipod-touch-mounted-on-m110-sniper-rifle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x51mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR-25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have seen some cool iPhone applications come out for shooting sports. But nothing comes close to the sheer awesomeness of the Knights Armaments M110 iPod Touch mount and accompanying ballistics software.
The M110 is the 7.62&#215;51mm semi-automatic sniper system which won the Army&#8217;s competition to replace the aging M24 bolt action sniper system. While it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have seen some cool <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/external-ballistics-calculator-for-iphone-isnipe/">iPhone</a> <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/11/shot-timer-for-iphone-and-my-future-iphone-app-predictions/">applications</a> come out for shooting sports. But nothing comes close to the sheer awesomeness of the Knights Armaments M110 iPod Touch mount and accompanying ballistics software.</p>
<p>The M110 is the 7.62&#215;51mm semi-automatic sniper system which won the Army&#8217;s competition to replace the aging M24 bolt action sniper system. While it <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/">will not replace the M24 in the near future</a>, the system is seeing action in Iraq and Afghanistan.</p>
<p>The rifle is based on the SR-25, which in turn is based on the Stoners&#8217; AR-10 design.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.knightarmco.com">Knights Armaments</a>  have developed a mounting system for the iPod Touch that attaches to a side mounted picatinny rail. The mount attaches to an <a href="http://www.otterbox.com/ipod-touch">Otterbox</a> protective case.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/dscn2379.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/dscn2379.jpg','popup','width=800+20,height=480+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/dscn2379-tm.jpg" height="240" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn2379" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Click to expand. Photo </em>ⓒ<em> Chen &#8220;SMGLee&#8221; Lee. Used with permission.<br />
</em><br />
<a href="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/dscn2376.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/dscn2376.jpg','popup','width=800+20,height=576+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/dscn2376-tm.jpg" height="288" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn2376" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Click to expand. Photo </em>ⓒ<em> Chen &#8220;SMGLee&#8221; Lee. Used with permission.<br />
</em><br />
<a href="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/bulletflight-images-pic1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/bulletflight-images-pic1.jpg','popup','width=600+20,height=400+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/bulletflight-images-pic1-tm.jpg" height="266" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Bulletflight Images Pic1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>KAC contracted Runaway technologies to build an external ballistics calculator for the iPod Touch / iPhone named Bullet Flight. It is your standard ballistics application. You can set firearm / ammunition profiles, then call up the saved profile and enter your environment information, for example, distance, wind direction, elevation and temperature.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/bulletflight-images-img-0018.jpg" height="236" width="164" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Bulletflight Images Img 0018" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://static1.thefirearmblog.com/ipod_rifle/bulletflight-images-img-0016.jpg" height="263" width="183" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Bulletflight Images Img 0016" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p>The application is <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=300903039&amp;mt=8">available from the iTunes store</a> for $11.99. It is a lot more expensive than the $4.99 <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/external-ballistics-calculator-for-iphone-isnipe/">iSnipe application</a>.</p>
<p>We may yet see an iPhone on the battlefield <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile iPod Touch mounted on M110 Sniper Rifle photo" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/20/ipod-touch-mounted-on-m110-sniper-rifle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beretta scores biggest handgun contract since WWII</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/beretta-scores-biggest-handgun-contract-since-wwii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/beretta-scores-biggest-handgun-contract-since-wwii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92FS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beretta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Army have awarded Beretta a contract for 450,000 Beretta Model 92FS pistols for US military customers throughout the world. If all pistols and parts are shipped, the total value of the contract will be $220 million! 
That works out as $489 per pistol and spare parts.
From the press release:
The contract was awarded along [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Army have awarded Beretta a contract for <strong>450,000</strong> Beretta Model 92FS pistols for US military customers throughout the world. If all pistols and parts are shipped, the total value of the contract will be $220 million! </p>
<p>That works out as $489 per pistol and spare parts.</p>
<p>From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>The contract was awarded along with a first delivery order for 20,000 pistols intended for the Iraqi military. Delivery of pistols against the contract has already begun.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are honored to see the quality and performance of the Beretta Model 92FS pistol continue to be acknowledged in this dramatic way,&#8221; commented Cav. Ugo Gussalli Beretta, President of Beretta U.S.A. &#8220;It is clear that the Beretta 9mm pistol still sets the standard for military users throughout the world.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/300px-two-f-22a-raptor-in-column-flight-noise-reduced.jpg" height="240" width="300" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-Two F-22A Raptor In Column Flight - (Noise Reduced)" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Two F-22 Raptor cost about the same as 450,000 Beretta Model 92FS&#8217;s!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/beretta-scores-biggest-handgun-contract-since-wwii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.45-70 Gardner Gun replica</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/03/45-70-gardner-gun-replica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/03/45-70-gardner-gun-replica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[45-70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gardner Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAI (Special Interest Arms), who have been previously mentioned on the blog, have developed a replica Gardner Gun.

Click to expand
From Wikipedia:
The Gardner gun was an early type of machine gun. It had one or two barrels, was fed from a vertical magazine or hopper and was operated by a crank. When the crank was turned, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAI (Special Interest Arms), who have been <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/01/enfield-with-ar-stock-and-pistol-grip/">previously mentioned</a> on the blog, have developed a replica Gardner Gun.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/100-6214.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/100-6214.jpg','popup','width=616+20,height=816+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/100-6214-tm.jpg" height="367" width="277" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="100 6214" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Click to expand</em></p>
<p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardner_gun">Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Gardner gun was an early type of machine gun. It had one or two barrels, was fed from a vertical magazine or hopper and was operated by a crank. When the crank was turned, a feed arm positioned a cartridge in the breech, the bolt closed and the weapon fired. Turning the crank further opened the breechblock and extracted the spent round.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chinn02.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chinn02.jpg','popup','width=1056+20,height=864+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chinn02-tm.jpg" height="327" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Chinn02" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>From &#8220;</em><em><a href="http://www.gardnerguns.com/Chinn/chinn01_gardner_on_stand.htm">The Machine Gun</a></em><em>&#8221; By Chinn Naval Bureau of Ordnance Publication<br />
</em></p>
<p>The original Gardener gun could have as many barrels as the customer desired although the two barrel variety is most common. Never used by the US during wartime the Gardener was popular with both the British Army and the Royal Navy.</p>
<p>The SIA &#8220;Model of 1885&#8243; .45-70 Gardner Gun is the two barrel, water cooled, variety and is capable of firing 500 rounds/minute. SIA expects to be able to take orders between Feb and March this year. The gun carries an estimated price of  <strong>$29,950.00</strong>.</p>
<p>A while back I wrote about what <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/10/what-i-would-carry-at-sea/">I would want to carry at sea</a>. I have changed my mind. I want a Gardener gun. If it worked for the Royal Navy I am sure it would work for me <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile .45 70 Gardner Gun replica photo" /> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/100-6215.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/100-6215.jpg','popup','width=616+20,height=816+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/100-6215-tm.jpg" height="379" width="286" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" 100 6215" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/03/45-70-gardner-gun-replica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATK gets $50 million contact to upgrade army ammo plant</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/02/atk-gets-50-million-contact-to-upgrade-army-ammo-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/02/atk-gets-50-million-contact-to-upgrade-army-ammo-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alliant Lake City Small Caliber Ammunition Co., LLC is a subsidiary of Alliant Techsystems (ATK) who among other things manufacture military and commercial ammunition. They own the CCI and Federal premium brands. In the fiscal year 2008 ATK&#8217;s annual report says &#8220;military small-caliber ammunition business again delivered more than 1.4 billion rounds to our nation’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alliant Lake City Small Caliber Ammunition Co., LLC is a subsidiary of Alliant Techsystems (ATK) who among other things manufacture military and commercial ammunition. They own the CCI and Federal premium brands. In the <span style="font-family:Arial;">fiscal year 2008</span> ATK&#8217;s annual report says &#8220;<span style="font-family:Arial;">military small-caliber ammunition business again delivered more than 1.4 billion rounds to our nation’s armed forces.&#8221;.<br />
</span><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-5-15.png" height="58" width="138" align="right" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 5-15" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
ATK won the government owned Lake City Army Ammunition Plant operating contract in 2000 and took over from Olin (Winchester) in 2001 who were the operating contract since 1985.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.defenselink.mil//contracts/contract.aspx?contractid=3933">DefenseLink.mil</a> (December 30 2008):</p>
<blockquote><p>Alliant Lake City Small Caliber Ammunition Co., LLC, Independence, Mo., was awarded on Dec 29, 2008 a $49,236,000 firm fixed price requirements contract for modernization and upgrade of small caliber production equipment. Work will be performed at the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, Independence, Mo., with an estimated completion date of Sep 30, 2009. One bid was solicited and one bid received. U.S. Army Sustainment Command, Rock Island, Ill., is the contracting activity (DAAA09-00-D-0016).</p></blockquote>
<p>ATK is sure doing well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/02/atk-gets-50-million-contact-to-upgrade-army-ammo-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photos of confiscated guns at Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/25/photos-of-confiscated-at-marine-corps-air-station-beaufort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/25/photos-of-confiscated-at-marine-corps-air-station-beaufort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murdoc @ GunPundit reports:
Since there has been a rash of weapons related incidents recently, the Provost Marshals Office has made it a priortity to emphasize safety among the Marines, Sailors and civilians aboard the Tri-Command area.
According to Randy Walz, the services officer with PMO, numerous weapons to include a Russian AK-47, rifles, shotguns, assorted ammunition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1859.php">Murdoc @ GunPundit</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>Since there has been a rash of weapons related incidents recently, the Provost Marshals Office has made it a priortity to emphasize safety among the Marines, Sailors and civilians aboard the Tri-Command area.</p>
<p>According to Randy Walz, the services officer with PMO, numerous weapons to include a Russian AK-47, rifles, shotguns, assorted ammunition and large knives were confiscated during the past weekend.</p></blockquote>
<p>Photos of the confiscated guns at <a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1859.php">GunPundit</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/25/photos-of-confiscated-at-marine-corps-air-station-beaufort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FN IAR</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/23/fn-iar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/23/fn-iar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.56mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FN IAR is based on the SCAR. It has a rate of fire of 650 RPM and weights in at 10.4 lbs.

FN IAR. Click to expand.
One very interesting features is that it switches automatically from closed bolt to open bolt depending on the chamber temperature. From FNH-USA:
 Today FN offers the new Infantry Automatic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FN IAR is based on the SCAR. It has a rate of fire of 650 RPM and weights in at 10.4 lbs.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-4-20.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-4-20.png','popup','width=693+20,height=235+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-4-20-tm.jpg" height="135" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 4-20" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>FN IAR. Click to expand.</em></p>
<p>One very interesting features is that it switches automatically from closed bolt to open bolt depending on the chamber temperature. From <a href="http://www.fnhusa.com/mil/products/firearms/model.asp?fid=FNF063&amp;gid=FNG023&amp;mid=FNM0157">FNH-USA</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> Today FN offers the new Infantry Automatic Rifle (IAR), a unique, highly-adaptable, modular selective fire weapon system that fills the roles of both individual battle rifle and squad automatic weapon in one light, compact package. The magazine-fed FN IAR is capable of firing from a closed bolt in both semi-automatic and fully-automatic modes, <strong>yet automatically transitions into open-bolt operation in semi-automatic or fully-automatic before reaching cook-off temperature for a chambered cartridge</strong>. </p></blockquote>
<p>I do not think the temperature switch would be electronic. Most likely there is a piece of metal that expands when heated and causes a switch from closed to open bolt.</p>
<p>Again, a bit thanks to <a href="http://www.thegunzone.com/556dw.html">Daniel Watters</a> for pointing this out to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/23/fn-iar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>82nd Airborne prototype weapons testing</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/17/82nd-airborne-prototype-weapons-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/17/82nd-airborne-prototype-weapons-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Package about the 82nd Airborne Division testing new weapons currently being released and prototypes. Provided by 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division Public Affairs.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Package about the 82nd Airborne Division testing new weapons currently being released and prototypes. Provided by 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division Public Affairs.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Wf_XDb2U5u8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Wf_XDb2U5u8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/17/82nd-airborne-prototype-weapons-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marines duck hunting with 5.56mm?</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/12/marines-duck-hunting-with-556mm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/12/marines-duck-hunting-with-556mm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.56mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GunPundit stumbled across a photo at Marines.mil with a caption that suggests that some Marines are hunting ducks with 5.56mm NATO rounds and/or 5.56mm blanks.
My take on it: They reckoned punt guns are pretty cool for duck hunting but rifle grenades (fired with a blank round) are even better!
(Just joking)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1745.php#comment-3300">GunPundit</a> stumbled across a <a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1745.php#comment-3300">photo at Marines.mil</a> with a caption that suggests that some Marines are hunting ducks with 5.56mm NATO rounds and/or 5.56mm blanks.</p>
<p>My take on it: They reckoned <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/08/30/punt-guns/">punt guns</a> are pretty cool for duck hunting but rifle grenades (fired with a blank round) are even better!</p>
<p>(Just joking)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/12/marines-duck-hunting-with-556mm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Generation Grenade Sight from EOTech</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/10/next-generation-grenade-sight-from-eotech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/10/next-generation-grenade-sight-from-eotech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARDEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOTech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grenade launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EOTech have developed a next-generation grenade sight at the request of the Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC). SMGLee grabbed some exclusive shots of it.


The reticle tracks up and down as the weapon is raised or lowered. How cool is that? I don&#8217;t have a grenade/flare/golf ball launcher but I want one!
More photos at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eotech-inc.com/">EOTech</a> have developed a next-generation grenade sight at the request of the Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC). SMGLee grabbed some exclusive shots of it.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/smglee-clt2-huge-dscn1299.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/smglee-clt2-huge-dscn1299.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=678+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/smglee-clt2-huge-dscn1299-tm.jpg" height="264" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Smglee Clt2 Huge Dscn1299" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/smglee-clt2-huge-dscn1311.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/smglee-clt2-huge-dscn1311.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=758+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/smglee-clt2-huge-dscn1311-tm.jpg" height="296" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Smglee Clt2 Huge Dscn1311" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>The reticle tracks up and down as the weapon is raised or lowered. How cool is that? I don&#8217;t have a grenade/flare/golf ball launcher but I want one!<br />
More photos at <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?p=3751873#post3751873">MP.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/10/next-generation-grenade-sight-from-eotech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40mm M320 grenade launcher will be replace M203 next year</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m203]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m320]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Army Times reports that the H&#38;K developed M320 will being replacing the M203 in February next year.
The Army plans to begin fielding the first of 71,600 new replacement launchers in February for a cost of about $3,500 each, Audette said. Fielding of the M320 will likely be completed by 2015, Audette said.
..
Each M320 will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Army Times <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/11/army_grenade_112008w/">reports</a> that the H&#38;K developed M320 will being replacing the M203 in February next year.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Army plans to begin fielding the first of <strong>71,600 new replacement launchers in February</strong> for a cost of about <strong>$3,500 each</strong>, Audette said. Fielding of the M320 will <strong>likely be completed by 2015</strong>, Audette said.</p>
<p>..</p>
<p>Each M320 will come with a <strong>laser range finder and a sophisticated sight</strong> that even lets soldiers know if they aren&#8217;t holding the launcher right.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320glm.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320glm.jpg','popup','width=600+20,height=380+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320glm-tm.jpg" height="253" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xm320Glm" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M320 with stock and laser range finder sighting system.<br />
</em></p>
<p>The unit weights 3.57 &#8211; 3.89 lbs depending on what rifle it is being mounted on.The stock pictured above adds an extra lb bringing the weight up to 4.8 lbs.</p>
<p>Benefits over the M230 are:</p>
<p>- The barrel swings out allowing larger rounds than the M203. Useful for less than lethal rounds.</p>
<p>- Laser range finder and new electronic sight system which also indicates if the launcher is being held incorrectly.</p>
<p>- Double action trigger</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320-m4-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320-m4-1.jpg','popup','width=560+20,height=462+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320-m4-1-tm.jpg" height="330" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xm320-M4-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M320 mounted under M4.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M3 Grease Gun possibly still in service</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submachine gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murdoc uncovered a story which mentions that the US Army still has the WWII era M3 &#8220;grease gun&#8221; submachine gun in service for select units such as vehicle crews, engineers and radio operators.

M3. Photo from Wikipedia.

Interesting if true.
There is a discussion about it here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoc <a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/006763.html">uncovered</a> a story which mentions that the US Army still has the WWII era M3 &#8220;grease gun&#8221; submachine gun in service for select units such as vehicle crews, engineers and radio operators.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/300px-m3-grease-gun-jeff-kubina.jpg" height="199" width="300" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-M3 Grease Gun (Jeff Kubina)" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>M3. Photo from Wikipedia.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Interesting if true.</p>
<p>There is a discussion about it <a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/006763.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of possible M4 replacements</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/list-of-possible-m4-replacements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/list-of-possible-m4-replacements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MilitaryTimes has listed the contenders for the M4 replacement. They are:
AR-15 Platform (Direct Gas Impingement):

* Colt ACC Monolithic
* Troy Industries M7A1 (can use either DI or piston system)
* Sabre Defense Industries M5
* S&#38;W MP-4
* Precision Reflex PRI (Upper receiver only. Attaches to M4 lower).
AR-15 Platform (Piston):

* LWRC International M6A4 IAR
* H&#38;K 416
* Knight&#8217;s Armament SR-15
* [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MilitaryTimes has <a href="http://www.militarytimes.com/multimedia/photo/replacing_the_m4/">listed the contenders</a> for the M4 replacement. They are:</p>
<p><strong>AR-15 Platform (Direct Gas Impingement):<br />
</strong><br />
* Colt ACC Monolithic<br />
* Troy Industries M7A1 (can use either DI or piston system)<br />
* Sabre Defense Industries M5<br />
* S&#38;W MP-4<br />
* Precision Reflex PRI (Upper receiver only. Attaches to M4 lower).</p>
<p><strong>AR-15 Platform (Piston):<br />
</strong><br />
* LWRC International M6A4 IAR<br />
* H&#38;K 416<br />
* Knight&#8217;s Armament SR-15<br />
* Superior Arms S-15<br />
* Barrett REC7 PDW<br />
* Patriot Ordnance P416</p>
<p><strong>Not based on the AR platform:<br />
</strong><br />
* Bushmaster/Magpul ACR<br />
* Sig Sauer 556 Classic<br />
* Robinson Armament XCR<br />
* FN SCAR</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/cid-1-0d2aa28c0d2a9fa8006ec0548525-tm1.jpg" height="180" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Cid-1-0D2Aa28C0D2A9Fa8006Ec0548525-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Sig 556 Classic</em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>I am not sure if this list is complete. The <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/">Beretta ARX-160 Carbine</a> is conspicuously missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/list-of-possible-m4-replacements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wearable gun shot locators</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/wearable-gun-shot-locators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/wearable-gun-shot-locators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boomerang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense update has an interesting article about the wearable Boomerang Warrior acoustic shooter detection system. 

Part of the wearable system. Photo from Defense Update.

If the entire system was ever made small enough to fit into a wristwatch I think it would become an essential hunting tool and could prevent accidental shootings.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense update has an <a href="http://www.defense-update.com/features/2008/november/231108_sniper_detection.html">interesting article</a> about the wearable Boomerang Warrior acoustic shooter detection system. </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/boomerang-warrior.jpg" height="253" width="240" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Boomerang Warrior" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Part of the wearable system. Photo from Defense Update.</em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>If the entire system was ever made small enough to fit into a wristwatch I think it would become an essential hunting tool and could prevent accidental shootings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/wearable-gun-shot-locators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M72 LAW making a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/m72-law-making-a-comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/m72-law-making-a-comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m72]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense Industry daily reports that the Marines have procured 7750 LAWs  (M72A7) from Nammo Talley Defense for a total of $15.5 million (which works out to be $2000/unit).
Nammo Talley Defense, Inc. in Mesa, AZ received a $15.5 million firm-fixed-price contract for 7,750 LAW M72A7 portable rockets from Marine Corps Systems Command in Quantico, VA, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense Industry daily <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/USMC-Replenishes-M72A7-LAW-Stocks-Orders-7750-05170/">reports</a> that the Marines have procured 7750 LAWs  (M72A7) from Nammo Talley Defense for a total of $15.5 million (which works out to be $2000/unit).</p>
<blockquote><p>Nammo Talley Defense, Inc. in Mesa, AZ received a $15.5 million firm-fixed-price contract for 7,750 LAW M72A7 portable rockets from Marine Corps Systems Command in Quantico, VA, in order to replenish stockpiles.</p></blockquote>
<p>The short (unextended length of 0.67 m) low cost and low weight (5.5 lbs) 66mm one-shot rocket system is useful in urban environments against buildings and lightly armored vehicles, such as those found in Iraq/Afghanistan. </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/usaf-m72-law.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/usaf-m72-law.jpg','popup','width=493+20,height=207+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/usaf-m72-law-tm.jpg" height="167" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Usaf M72 Law" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M72 LAW</em><em><br />
</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/m72-law-making-a-comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurgents using Chinese armor-piercing bullets</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/insurgents-using-chinese-armor-piercing-bullets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/insurgents-using-chinese-armor-piercing-bullets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M948]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M993]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human Events has an interesting article about the use of Chinese armor-piercing bullets in Iraq and Afghanistan by insurgents.
China&#8217;s robust arms industry has been able to duplicate U.S.-made, armor-piercing rounds, and the bullets are being found with the enemy in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Two government sources tell HUMAN EVENTS the sniper ammunition is sending alarm bells [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29530">Human Events</a> has an <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29530">interesting article</a> about the use of Chinese armor-piercing bullets in Iraq and Afghanistan by insurgents.</p>
<blockquote><p>China&#8217;s robust arms industry has been able to <strong>duplicate U.S.-made, armor-piercing rounds</strong>, and the bullets are being found with the enemy in Afghanistan and Iraq.</p>
<p>Two government sources tell HUMAN EVENTS the sniper ammunition is sending alarm bells through the Pentagon as it hurries to keep pace by producing improved body armor for soldiers, Marines, airmen and sailors.</p>
<p>The sources said the Chinese munitions are not thought capable of defeating the super-hard ceramic plates that now protect service members against smalls-arms fire, including armor-piercing bullets.</p></blockquote>
<p>I know very little about AP ammunition. Does anyone know if M948 (7.62mm Saboted Light Armor Penetrator) or M993 (7.62mm AP) can penetrate Type IV ballistic vests and a ceramic plate insert?</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/picture-35-1.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/picture-35-1.png','popup','width=738+20,height=514+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/picture-35-1-tm.jpg" height="278" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 35-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>AP bullets. Click to expand. Image from </em><em><a href="http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Minisi.pdf">DTIC.mil</a></em><em>.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Defense Review <a href="http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;amp;file=article&amp;amp;sid=1198">discusses</a> the implications of this and its potential impact on the mythical XSAPI armor plates that are in development.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;amp;file=article&amp;amp;sid=1198">Defense Review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/insurgents-using-chinese-armor-piercing-bullets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Lease on Life for M14</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military.com has an interesting article on the M14:
The growing need to equip these new marksmen with accurized rifles prompted the Army to reconsider the role of the venerable M-14 rifle for the war on terror. Back in Desert Storm, armorers from the 10th Special Forces group took M-14s equipped with a match barrels and fitted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.military.com/news/article/new-lease-on-life-for-the-beloved-m14.html">Military.com</a> has an <a href="http://www.military.com/news/article/new-lease-on-life-for-the-beloved-m14.html">interesting article</a> on the M14:</p>
<blockquote><p>The growing need to equip these new marksmen with accurized rifles prompted the Army to reconsider the role of the venerable M-14 rifle for the war on terror. Back in Desert Storm, armorers from the 10th Special Forces group took M-14s equipped with a match barrels and fitted a gas piston on them for optimal performance, re-designating it the M-25. They replaced the stock with a McMillan M1A fiberglass one, developed a scope mount and added a Bausch &#38; Lomb 10&#215;40mm fixed-power optic or a Leupold Mark 4.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1348.php">Murdoc @ GunPundit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How not to shoot a Humvee</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/14/how-not-to-shoot-a-humvee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/14/how-not-to-shoot-a-humvee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurgent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An insurgent in Iraq attempts to destroy a Humvee with an RPG.

This video is the insurgent equivalent of the famously stupid &#8220;Girl Shoots Herself in the face&#8221; video (youtube has taken it offline).
Hat Tip: Charlie @ Ammo, Guns and War
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An insurgent in Iraq attempts to destroy a Humvee with an RPG.</p>
<p><object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/44d_1211647625"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/44d_1211647625" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object></p>
<p>This video is the insurgent equivalent of the famously stupid &#8220;Girl Shoots Herself in the face&#8221; video (youtube has taken it offline).</p>
<p>Hat Tip: Charlie @ <a href="http://ammogunsandwar.blogspot.com/2008/11/video-guide-how-to-shoot-rpg.html">Ammo, Guns and War</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/14/how-not-to-shoot-a-humvee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very intense A-10 video</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/very-intense-a-10-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/very-intense-a-10-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video is very intense. The beeping you hear is the ground proximity warning (under 1000 ft). The video player incorrectly states the length, it is only 5 minutes long.

There is a discussion about the video at MP.net
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video is very intense. The beeping you hear is the ground proximity warning (under 1000 ft). The video player incorrectly states the length, it is only 5 minutes long.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width='464' height='353'><param name='movie' value='http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/Main.swf' /><param name='FlashVars' value='conf=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/playerConfigEmbed/809.xml&#038;guide=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/guide/809.xml&#038;banner=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/banner.xml&#038;commercial=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/commercial/809.xml' /><embed src='http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/Main.swf' quality='high' width='464' height='353' FlashVars='conf=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/playerConfigEmbed/809.xml&#038;guide=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/guide/809.xml&#038;banner=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/banner.xml&#038;commercial=http://www.apacheclips.com/flv_player/data/commercial/809.xml' align='middle' allowScriptAccess='sameDomain' type='application/x-shockwave-flash'></embed></object></p>
<p>There is a discussion about the video at <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=145553">MP.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/very-intense-a-10-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine Infantry Automatic Rifle (IAR) program</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/marine-infantry-automatic-rifle-iar-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/marine-infantry-automatic-rifle-iar-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marine Corps Times has an interesting article on the IAR competition. It seems the Army is not interested in a lightweight automatic rifle.
That’s why the Army, which also uses the M249, has ruled out a soldier version of the Marine IAR.
“We are not considering adopting an auto rifle for the infantry squad,” said Col. Robert [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marine Corps Times has an <a href="http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2008/09/marine_iar_091308/">interesting article</a> on the IAR competition. It seems the Army is not interested in a lightweight automatic rifle.</p>
<blockquote><p>That’s why the Army, which also uses the M249, has ruled out a soldier version of the Marine IAR.</p>
<p>“We are not considering adopting an auto rifle for the infantry squad,” said Col. Robert Radcliffe, director of the Infantry Center’s Directorate of Combat Developments at Fort Benning, Ga.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The plan is to buy 4,100 IARs and reduce the number of SAWs in the Corps from 10,000 to 8,000, Cantwell said.</p>
<p>“We are still going to maintain SAWs in the company,” he said. “Only 2,000 SAWs will be replaced. The reminder will be kept as an organizational weapon for when commanders need them.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/marine-infantry-automatic-rifle-iar-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Army to upgrade M24 Rifles</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.7.62]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remington will be upgrading the 3000 M24 rifles during 2009 at a cost of $3 million. I was quite surprised to hear this after all the noise about bolt action rifles not being good enough and that semi-automatic was the only way to go. The M24 Sniper Weapons System (SWS) is based on the Remington [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remington will be upgrading the 3000 M24 rifles during 2009 at a cost of $3 million. I was quite surprised to hear this after all the noise about bolt action rifles not being good enough and that semi-automatic was the only way to go. The M24 Sniper Weapons System (SWS) is based on the Remington 700 rifle and chambers the 7.62&#215;51mm NATO.</p>
<blockquote><p>M-24 Sniper Weapons systems have been fielded to the U.S. armed services since 1987. Remington has been maintaining these weapons in Ilion, New York, and will be responsible for M-24 upgrades in the future. Remington&#8217;s proposal to upgrade the M-24 sniper rifle would save the federal government nearly $6 million dollars.</p></blockquote>
<p>No word if the systems 10×42 Leupold Ultra M3A scope will be upgraded to something fancier and more expensive.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/m24-sws.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/m24-sws.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=375+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/m24-sws-tm.jpg" height="234" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M24 Sws" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>Hat Tip: Tactical Wire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afgans been getting bad ammunition</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/afgans-been-getting-bad-ammunition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/afgans-been-getting-bad-ammunition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/afgans-been-getting-bad-ammunition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NY Times (emphasis mine):
But to arm the Afghan forces that it hopes will lead this fight, the American military has relied since early last year on a fledgling company led by a 22-year-old man whose vice president was a licensed masseur.
With the award last January of a federal contract worth as much as nearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/world/asia/27ammo.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1">NY Times</a> (emphasis mine):</p>
<blockquote><p>But to arm the Afghan forces that it hopes will lead this fight, the American military has relied since early last year on a fledgling company led by a <strong>22-year-old man</strong> whose vice president was a licensed masseur.</p>
<p>With the award last January of a federal contract worth as much as nearly $300 million, the company, AEY Inc., which operates out of an unmarked office in Miami Beach, became the main supplier of munitions to Afghanistan&#8217;s army and police forces.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/300px-yugo-7.62x39-m67-2.jpg" height="225" width="300" align="right" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-Yugo 7.62X39 M67-2" title="" longdesc="" /></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Since then, the company has provided ammunition that is more than 40 years old and in decomposing packaging, according to an examination of the munitions by The New York Times and interviews with American and Afghan officials. Much of the ammunition comes from the aging stockpiles of the old Communist bloc, including stockpiles that the State Department and NATO have determined to be unreliable and obsolete, and have <strong>spent millions of dollars to have destroyed</strong>.</p>
<p>In purchasing munitions, the contractor has also worked with middlemen and a shell company on a <strong>federal list of entities suspected of illegal arms trafficking</strong>.</p>
<p>Moreover, tens of millions of the rifle and machine-gun cartridges were <strong>manufactured in China,</strong> making their procurement a <strong>possible violation of American law</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is a long article. Somewhat sensationalist. Looks like some kids (18, 22 and 25 years old) found a source of soviet ammo and sold it. This is the kind of story that they will make into a move.</p>
<p>Read it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/world/asia/27ammo.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>:</p>
<p>This photo from the US Army shows the state of the boxes of ammo they were receiving</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/33728198ss8.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/33728198ss8.jpg','popup','width=512+20,height=385+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/33728198ss8-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="33728198Ss8" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/03/five-for-fig-14.html">Danger Room</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/afgans-been-getting-bad-ammunition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Army looking for lighter .50 machine gun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/03/us-army-looking-for-lighter-50-machine-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/03/us-army-looking-for-lighter-50-machine-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/03/us-army-looking-for-lighter-50-machine-gun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Army and Special Operations Command are stepping up efforts to procure a lighter, modernized .50-caliber machine gun more easily transported than the standard 85-pound M2.

The goal is not to replace the M2, a combat fixture for 70 years, but to augment the inventory with a .50-caliber weapon that brings the same firepower at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The U.S. Army and Special Operations Command are stepping up efforts to procure a lighter, modernized .50-caliber machine gun more easily transported than the standard 85-pound M2.</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/180px-m2-24th-meu.jpg" height="129" width="180" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="180Px-M2 - 24Th Meu" title="180px m2 24th meu US Army looking for lighter .50 machine gun photo" /></p>
<blockquote><p>The goal is not to replace the M2, a combat fixture for 70 years, but to augment the inventory with a .50-caliber weapon that brings the same firepower at less than half the weight, Army officials said here at the Feb. 27-29 winter convention of the Association of the U.S. Army. Early models of the Light Weight .50-caliber (LW50) are expected to be delivered this year.</p></blockquote>
<p>More info at <a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/005503.html">Murdoc Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/03/us-army-looking-for-lighter-50-machine-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MP5K briefcase guns found in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/18/mp5k-briefcase-guns-found-in-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/18/mp5k-briefcase-guns-found-in-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp5k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/18/mp5k-briefcase-guns-found-in-iraq/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murdoc @ GunPundit found a photo of 3rd Infantry Division troops examining a pile of H&#38;K MP5K briefcase guns presumably in Iraq.

I have always thought this type of gun would appeal to tin pot dictators like Saddam. Why not just conceal the MP5K under a coat and then have the advantage of sights, trigger control, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/293.php">Murdoc @ GunPundit</a> found a photo of 3rd Infantry Division troops examining a pile of H&#38;K MP5K briefcase guns presumably in Iraq.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shock-images-sa-image-060629-3m.jpg" height="286" width="400" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Shock Images Sa Image 060629 3M" title="shock images sa image 060629 3m MP5K briefcase guns found in Iraq photo" /></p>
<p>I have always thought this type of gun would appeal to tin pot dictators like Saddam. Why not just conceal the MP5K under a coat and then have the advantage of sights, trigger control, quick magazine change etc.</p>
<p>More <a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/293.php">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/18/mp5k-briefcase-guns-found-in-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/05/magpul-folding-carbine-fmg-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/05/magpul-folding-carbine-fmg-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goblin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magpul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pp-90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/05/magpul-folding-carbine-fmg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the latest Magpul creation. It is a folding carbine. Similar to the Ares FMG and PP-90. It appears to use some glock parts uses the Glock action, magazines and laser systems.
A couple of video demostrations:


Some photos from GlockTalk.com:



It looks very cool!
Compare with other FMG type firearms
The original Ares FMG which was designed by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the latest Magpul creation. It is a folding carbine. Similar to the Ares FMG and PP-90. It <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">appears to use some glock parts</span> uses the Glock action, magazines and laser systems.</p>
<p>A couple of video demostrations:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iZMxqkFvYrY&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iZMxqkFvYrY&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gc1j9ySbFKw&#038;rel=1&#038;border=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gc1j9ySbFKw&#038;rel=1&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object></p>
<p>Some photos from <a href="http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9798835&amp;postcount=12">GlockTalk.com</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg.jpg','popup','width=750,height=563,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Magpul Fmg" title="magpul fmg tm Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-1.jpg','popup','width=750,height=563,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-1-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Magpul Fmg 1" title="magpul fmg 1 tm Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-2.jpg','popup','width=825,height=619,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/magpul-fmg-2-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Magpul Fmg 2" title="magpul fmg 2 tm Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></a></p>
<p>It looks very cool!</p>
<p>Compare with other FMG type firearms</p>
<p>The original Ares <a href="http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg70-e.htm">FMG</a> which was designed by Eugene Stoner:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/fmg.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/fmg.jpg','popup','width=600,height=265,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/fmg-tm.jpg" height="198" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Fmg" title="fmg tm Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></a></p>
<p>the <a href="http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg10-e.htm">PP-90</a>, designed by the KBP design bureau in Tula:<span style="text-decoration:underline;"><br />
</span><br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/pp-90-1.jpg" height="230" width="400" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Pp-90 1" title="pp 90 1 Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></p>
<p>the Ukrainian <a href="http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg43-e.htm">Goblin</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/goblin.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/goblin.jpg','popup','width=400,height=187,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/goblin-tm.jpg" height="210" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Goblin" title="goblin tm Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></a></p>
<p>And although very different the <a href="http://www.kel-tec-cnc.com/sub2000.html">Kel-Tec SUB-2000</a> (this folds for storage, not rapid deployment).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/sub2000.gif" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/sub2000.gif','popup','width=500,height=200,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/sub2000-tm.jpg" height="179" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Sub2000" title="sub2000 tm Magpul Folding Carbine FMG 9 photo" /></a><br />
I will update this page as more information becomes available.</p>
<p><strong>UDPATE:<br />
</strong><br />
According to this <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&amp;f=150&amp;t=670270">thread</a>, it is called the FMG9 and Magpul do not have plans to put it into production, at this point it is just a prototype&#8230; although I am sure James Bond will get his hands on one for his next movie!</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</p>
<p></strong>Another video demo</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HYqHe7-zKAc&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HYqHe7-zKAc&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: From <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&amp;f=124&amp;t=158618&amp;page=2">ar15.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The advantage to the FMG9 over previous versions are&#8230;</p>
<p>1. One button, spring loaded action.<br />
2. Light weight, color coded plastic (can be molded as a non gun color)<br />
3. Closed bolt, safe action (others were open bolt SMGs, ours can be carried with a round in the chamber).<br />
4. Proven Glock action with stock Glock factory magazines and laser systems.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hat Tip for the update: <a href="http://crypticsubterranean.blogspot.com/2008/02/fmg-reality.html">Cryptic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/05/magpul-folding-carbine-fmg-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The youngest M16 in existence</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/the-youngest-m16-in-existence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/the-youngest-m16-in-existence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/the-youngest-m16-in-existence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GunsAmerica has the 7th production M16 listed for sale. It is listed for $295,000!

Without a doubt the most famous and most documented Armalite/Colt M16 in existence, serial no 106 manufactured in 1959 (the 7th production gun) and of course the earliest known gun to exist. Yes, this is the gun that Gen Curtis LeMay shot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GunsAmerica has the 7th production M16 listed for sale. It is listed for <strong>$295,000</strong>!</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-11-14.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-11-14.jpg','popup','width=629,height=218,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-11-14-tm.jpg" height="155" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 11-14" title="picture 11 14 tm The youngest M16 in existence photo" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Without a doubt the most famous and most documented Armalite/Colt M16 in existence, serial no 106 manufactured in 1959 (the 7th production gun) and of course the earliest known gun to exist. Yes, this is the gun that Gen Curtis LeMay shot the coconuts and melons with at the cocktail party and then turned to the Cooper-McDonald rep and said,&#8221;I want 10,000 of them and I want them yesterday!&#8221;. It is said this gun was also shot by Pres Kennedy (off the Presidential Yacht), Batista, MacNamarra, Diem, and a host of other important people. Traveling to Viet Nam twice, its history is part of America&#8217;s History, and I feel there is no other gun in existence as important as this firearm &#8211; at least as far as 20th century military firearms are concerned.</p></blockquote>
<p>The original black rifle was not all that black!</p>
<p>It is listed <a href="http://www.gunsamerica.com/976990960/Guns/Rifles/Class-3-Rifles/THE_M16_THAT_STARTED_IT_ALL.htm#">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/the-youngest-m16-in-existence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History of Steyr Mannlicher in the USA</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/history-of-steyr-mannlicher-in-the-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/history-of-steyr-mannlicher-in-the-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steyr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/history-of-steyr-mannlicher-in-the-usa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steyr have published a press release, of all things, detailing their history in the US. I think this was nothing more than an attempt at getting some attention during SHOT Show. I am mentioning it as it may interest some readers.


Read the press release here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-4-9.png" height="30" width="153" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 4-9" title="picture 4 9 History of Steyr Mannlicher in the USA photo" />Steyr have published a press release, of all things, detailing their history in the US. I think this was nothing more than an attempt at getting some attention during SHOT Show. I am mentioning it as it may interest some readers.</p>
<p style="text-align:right;">
<p style="text-align:right;">
<p>Read the press release <a href="http://www.steyr-mannlicher.com/en/press/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/02/history-of-steyr-mannlicher-in-the-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Captured M1</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/30/a-captured-m1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/30/a-captured-m1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/30/a-captured-m1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A Soldier displays an M-1 rifle discovered in a suspected insurgent&#8217;s home
From MilitaryPhotos.net
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/armymil-2008-01-25-144303.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/armymil-2008-01-25-144303.jpg','popup','width=799,height=531,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/armymil-2008-01-25-144303-tm.jpg" height="300" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Armymil-2008-01-25-144303" title="armymil 2008 01 25 144303 tm A Captured M1 photo" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>A Soldier displays an M-1 rifle discovered in a suspected insurgent&#8217;s home</p></blockquote>
<p>From <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=127791&amp;page=2">MilitaryPhotos.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/30/a-captured-m1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Trails Behind World In Aptitude Of Child Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/us-trails-behind-world-in-aptitude-of-child-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/us-trails-behind-world-in-aptitude-of-child-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/us-trails-behind-world-in-aptitude-of-child-soldiers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the theonion.com (a satire site):
After a shocking new study finds U.S. children lag far behind their international peers in subjects like rifle assembly and mine defusing. 
&#8220;An average Sudanese child can field strip a Type-81 assault rifle by the time he is in seventh grade. An American child could not until he enlisted in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/index">theonion.com</a> (a satire site):</p>
<blockquote><p>After a shocking new study finds U.S. children lag far behind their international peers in subjects like rifle assembly and mine defusing. </p>
<p>&#8220;An average Sudanese child can field strip a Type-81 assault rifle by the time he is in seventh grade. An American child could not until he enlisted in the military&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BNQTqC0gXoQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BNQTqC0gXoQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/us-trails-behind-world-in-aptitude-of-child-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fraudster advising US goverment on arms control</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/fraudster-advising-us-goverment-on-arms-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/fraudster-advising-us-goverment-on-arms-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/fraudster-advising-us-goverment-on-arms-control/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former World Bank chief Paul Wolfowitz has been appointed head of an influential panel advising the US government on arms control.
Mr Wolfowitz was ousted from the Bank last year over a scandal involving payments to his girlfriend, who was also a bank employee at the time.
More here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Former World Bank chief <strong>Paul Wolfowitz has been appointed head of an influential panel advising t</strong><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-9-13.jpg" height="151" width="143" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 9-13" title="picture 9 13 Fraudster advising US goverment on arms control photo" /><strong>he US government on arms control</strong>.</p>
<p>Mr Wolfowitz was ousted from the Bank last year over a <strong>scandal involving payments to his girlfriend</strong>, who was also a bank employee at the time.</p></blockquote>
<p>More <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7208286.stm">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/25/fraudster-advising-us-goverment-on-arms-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Army buys another 25,403 M9 pistols</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/us-army-buys-another-25403-m9-pistols/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/us-army-buys-another-25403-m9-pistols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beretta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/us-army-buys-another-25403-m9-pistols/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the recent purchase of 10,000 M9 pistols by the US Army and Navy, Beretta has announced a new multi-year contact to supply the Army with another 25,403 M9 pistols.

From the press release
Beretta has just announced that it has been awarded a multi-year contract by the U.S. Army to deliver M9 pistols to servicemen and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/14/us-military-buys-more-m9-pistols/">recent purchase</a> of 10,000 M9 pistols by the US Army and Navy, Beretta has announced a new multi-year contact to supply the Army with another 25,403 M9 pistols.</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/300px-m9-pistolet-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/300px-m9-pistolet-1.jpg','popup','width=300,height=201,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/300px-m9-pistolet-1-tm.jpg" height="150" width="223" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-M9-Pistolet-1" title="300px m9 pistolet 1 tm US Army buys another 25,403 M9 pistols photo" /></a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.berettausa.com/media/download.cfm?d_id=179">press release</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Beretta has just announced that it has been awarded a multi-year contract by the U.S. Army to deliver M9 pistols to servicemen and women as part of the U.S. Government commitment to ensure the operational safety and readiness of U.S. Armed Services worldwide.</p>
<p>The contract is for 25,403 M9 pistols with deliveries starting in June 2008 and continuing until February 2010. The U.S. Army also reserves the right to purchase additional M9 pistols as needed to meet their needs. All of these M9 pistols will continue to be manufactured at the Beretta U.S.A. facility located in Accokeek, Maryland.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/us-army-buys-another-25403-m9-pistols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
