<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>KRISS CRB/SO and SBR/SO Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/01/kriss-crbso-and-sbrso-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/01/kriss-crbso-and-sbrso-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KRISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically a non-safety recall but a gun that fails to work in the face of danger is a safety issue!


  It has come to our attention that KRISS CRB/SO and SBR/SO models with SN's between 1100 - 1633 MAY experience ejection issues due to an out-of-spec ejector. Typically, the symptom is consistent failure to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically a non-safety recall but a gun that fails to work in the face of danger is a safety issue!</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>It has come to our attention that KRISS CRB/SO and SBR/SO models with SN's between 1100 - 1633 MAY experience ejection issues due to an out-of-spec ejector. Typically, the symptom is consistent failure to eject (FTE). THIS IS NOT A SAFETY ISSUE. If you are the owner of a KRISS CRB/SO or SBR/SO within this SN range, there is a small chance your ejector may be defective.  THIS IS NOT A FACTORY RECALL.  IF YOU ARE EXPERIENCING FREQUENT FTE'S, KRISS-TDI will work with those original owners of KRISS firearms who are covered under our Lifetime Warranty on defects of materials and workmanship and your KRISS Certified Dealer to refit your firearm with a new ejector at no cost to you. WE WILL REFIT ONLY THOSE FIREARMS THAT HAVE DEMONSTRATED THE FTE BEHAVIOUR. Owners of used firearms who purchased their firearms from private parties and not KRISS Certified Dealers, the Lifetime Warranty does not apply to your firearm as it was purchased used. HOWEVER, we will make a repair kit available to you at no cost as a one-time exception to our original owner Lifetime Warranty program. Owners: for a full description of the problem and how to determine if your firearm is affected, please click here. KRISS Dealers, for full information on the KRISS Ejector Refit Program, please click here.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>More info at <a href="http://www.kriss-tdi.com/?utm_source=MailingList&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=KRISS+2009-09-17">TDI's website</a>.</p>

<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://jovianthunderbolt.blogspot.com/2009/09/kriss-recall.html">New Jovian Thunderbolt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/01/kriss-crbso-and-sbrso-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Remington recalled the .17 HMR Model 597</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rimfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17 hmr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[597]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were wondering why Remington would recall their entire line of .17 HMR Model 597 rifles just take a look at these photos which show a magazine and cases fired from a .17 HMR Model 597. This type of damage was not uncommon! 

Cracked Remington 597 magazine


Blown out case head.


Split Case

Thanks to Joe for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were wondering why Remington would recall their entire line of .17 HMR Model 597 rifles just take a look at these photos which show a magazine and cases fired from a .17 HMR Model 597. This type of damage was not uncommon! </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/4-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/4-1.jpg','popup','width=3000+20,height=1692+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/4-1-tm.jpg" height="225" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="4 1 tm Why Remington recalled the .17 HMR Model 597 photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Cracked Remington 597 magazine</em><em><br />
</em><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/5-2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/5-2.jpg','popup','width=486+20,height=504+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/5-2-tm.jpg" height="305" width="294" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="5 2 tm Why Remington recalled the .17 HMR Model 597 photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Blown out case head.</em><em><br />
</em><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/7.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/7.jpg','popup','width=1338+20,height=822+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/7-tm.jpg" height="245" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="7 tm Why Remington recalled the .17 HMR Model 597 photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Split Case</em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>Thanks to Joe for the photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knight Rifles Recall Revolution and Revolution II muzzleloaders</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/knight-rifles-recall-revolution-and-revolution-ii-muzzleloaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/knight-rifles-recall-revolution-and-revolution-ii-muzzleloaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blackpowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight Rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muzzleloader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knight Rifles have recalled the Revolution or Revolution II because of concerns that it could discharge when closing the action. Only the trigger assembly needs to be returned.
Knight Rifles has received a small number of reports from the field of Revolution muzzleloading rifles accidentally discharging as the user closed the action. While there were no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knight Rifles have recalled the Revolution or Revolution II because of concerns that it could discharge when closing the action. Only the trigger assembly needs to be returned.</p>
<blockquote><p>Knight Rifles has received a small number of reports from the field of Revolution muzzleloading rifles accidentally discharging as the user closed the action. While there were no reports of personal injury, we asked those customers to return their rifles to us for inspection. Although we were unable to duplicate the claimed accidental firings in most of the rifles, we have instituted this recall for ALL Revolution and Revolution II rifles to allow us to inspect and repair the trigger mechanisms. Even if you have never had a problem with your Revolution or Revolution II rifle, you should not use your rifle until you have returned it to us for inspection and repair under the recall program. This recall only applies to Revolution and Revolution II rifles, and does not apply to any other models of Knight muzzleloaders.</p>
<p>If you own a Knight Revolution or Knight Revolution II you should immediately stop using your rifle(s) and discontinue any further use until your trigger assembly(s) have been inspected by our designated Knight Rifles factory personnel and returned to you by Knight Rifles. This recall ONLY requires that your trigger assembly be returned and inspected.</p>
<p>If you own more than one Knight Revolution rifle affected by this recall, click the &#8220;Add another rifle&#8221; button and indicate the model and serial number for each rifle. The form below should be filled out completely. When completed the &#8220;submit&#8221; button will initiate a process whereby a trigger assembly return kit (complete with prepaid return labels and all required packaging material) will be sent to your address. The trigger assembly return kit will be sent to your address by USPS and should arrive 7 to 10 business days after the date when the return request was received. When this trigger assembly return kit arrives please follow all of the included instructions.</p>
<p>Thank you for your cooperation,<br />
Knight Rifles</p></blockquote>
<p>More information <a href="http://www.knightrifles.com/revolutionrecall/">available here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/knight-rifles-recall-revolution-and-revolution-ii-muzzleloaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAFETY WARNING: Advanced Long-Range Systems (ALS) .50 BMG AR-15 Upper</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/19/saftey-warning-advanced-long-range-systems-als-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/19/saftey-warning-advanced-long-range-systems-als-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saftey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advanced Long-Range Systems (ALS) have issued a warning:
Advanced Long-Range Systems has identified a condition that may exist with the bolt supplied with the ALS 50 caliber conversion which may allow the gun to fire out of battery.
As all the facts are not yet in, and purely as a safety precaution, ALS is asking owners of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advanced Long-Range Systems (ALS) have issued a warning:</p>
<blockquote><p>Advanced Long-Range Systems has identified a condition that may exist with the bolt supplied with the ALS 50 caliber conversion which <strong>may allow the gun to fire out of battery</strong>.</p>
<p>As all the facts are not yet in, and purely as a safety precaution, ALS is asking owners of its rifle uppers to <strong>suspend shooting this product until further notice</strong>.</p>
<p>It is our goal to provide safe and accurate products.  We are currently working on a solution.  Please, bear with us, it may take up to sixty days to complete this task.  We will resolve this issue and make it right with our customers.</p>
<p>Once additional information is available, you can rest assured that it will be passed along on our website, in VHP Magazine, and the relevant firearms discussion forums.</p></blockquote>
<p>A .50 BMG firing out of battery could easily be deadly, not just for the operator but potentially for spectators or the person in the next lane at the range!</p>
<p>More info <a href="http://www.50bmg.net/pilot.asp?pg=recall">here</a>.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://suburbansdomain.blogspot.com/2009/07/als-50bmg-upper-safety-notice-and.html">Suburban&#8217;s Domain</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/19/saftey-warning-advanced-long-range-systems-als-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colt 1911 Pistols Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/01/colt-1911-pistols-recalled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/01/colt-1911-pistols-recalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saftey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colt have recalled six different of their 1911 models. The Slide Lock Safety and Recoil Spring Guide Pad were not build to spec and could wear and break prematurely.  The recalled pistol were sold since March 2007.
1911 WWI Replica (O1911)            From: 4597WMK  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colt have recalled six different of their 1911 models. The Slide Lock Safety and Recoil Spring Guide Pad were not build to spec and could wear and break prematurely.  The recalled pistol were sold since March 2007.</p>
<blockquote><p>1911 WWI Replica (O1911)            From: 4597WMK           To: 5414WMK<br />
1918 WWI Replica (O1918)            From: 1001WWI            To: 3431WWI<br />
New Agent (O7810D)                     From: GT01001             To: GT04505<br />
Combat Elite (O8011XSE)               From: CG10000E           To: CG11293E<br />
Defender (O7000D)                        From: DR33036             To: DR35948<br />
Talo Night Defender (O7000NDF)     From: NDF0001             To: NDF0400</p></blockquote>
<p>More <a href="http://www.coltsmfg.com/recall.aspx">information available</a> at Colt.</p>
<p>Xavier, a fellow gun blogger, is <a href="http://xavierthoughts.blogspot.com/2009/06/colt-recall.html">having to send in</a> three pistols back to Colt because of the recall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/01/colt-1911-pistols-recalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S&amp;W 22A Pistol Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smith and Wesson have announced a recall of the S&#38;W 22A Pistol.
Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist in certain model 22-A pistols. Based on our ongoing product review, we have determined that the slides of certain pistols manufactured from August 1, 2008 to February 19, 2009, may not meet the design [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith and Wesson <a href="http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CustomContentDisplay?langId=-1&amp;storeId=10001&amp;catalogId=10001&amp;content=750501&amp;sectionId=10506">have announced</a> a recall of the S&#38;W 22A Pistol.</p>
<blockquote><p>Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist in certain model 22-A pistols. Based on our ongoing product review, we have determined that the slides of certain pistols manufactured from August 1, 2008 to February 19, 2009, may not meet the design specification. This can create a situation where insufficient headspace exists creating a risk of unintended discharge.</p>
<p><strong>STOP USING YOUR PISTOL AND RETURN IT TO SMITH &#38; WESSON AT ONCE.</strong></p>
<p>Any unintended discharge of a firearm has the potential for causing injury, and we ask that you stop using your pistol immediately</p></blockquote>
<p>Over at <a href="http://gunnuts.net/2009/06/19/smith-wesson-22a-recall/">GunNuts</a>, VegasChris posted a <a href="http://s614.photobucket.com/albums/tt228/VegasChris/Kaboom/">link to photos</a> of his 22A pistol which self-destructed</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/frameassemblyrearviewbrokenpieceout.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/frameassemblyrearviewbrokenpieceout.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=768+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/frameassemblyrearviewbrokenpieceout-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Frameassemblyrearviewbrokenpieceout" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>You can see the raw metal where the piece was blown off<br />
</em></p>
<p>Hat Tip: Caleb @ <a href="http://gunnuts.net/2009/06/19/smith-wesson-22a-recall/">Gun Nuts Media</a><br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S&amp;W Safety Recall: Walther PPK and PPK/s pistols</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/sw-safety-recall-walther-ppk-and-ppks-pistols/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/sw-safety-recall-walther-ppk-and-ppks-pistols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walther]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There seems to be a problem with the PPK hammer block in newly manufactured PPK pistols. The press release:
Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist in certain PPK and PPK/S pistols which may permit a round to be discharged without the trigger being pulled. When the manual safety is disengaged, Smith &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be a problem with the PPK hammer block in newly manufactured PPK pistols. The press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist in certain PPK and PPK/S pistols which may permit a round to be discharged without the trigger being pulled. When the manual safety is disengaged, Smith &#38; Wesson&#8217;s Product Engineering Group has determined that the possibility exists in certain firearms that lowering the hammer may cause a chambered round to fire.</p>
<p>This recall applies to all Walther PPK and PPK/S pistols manufactured by Smith &#38; Wesson from March 21, 2002, until February 3, 2009. The Serial Numbers of the pistol subject to this recall are as follows:</p>
<p>BAB 0010-BAB 9999<br />
BAC 0000-BAC 9999<br />
BAD 0000-BAD 9999<br />
LTD 0000-LTD 0499<br />
PPK 0001-PPK 1500<br />
BAE 0000-BAE 9999<br />
BAF 0000-BAF 9999<br />
WLE 0001-WLE 0459<br />
BAH 0000-BAH 9999<br />
BAJ 0000-BAJ 9999<br />
BAK 0000-BAK 9999<br />
REP 0026-REP 0219<br />
BAL 0000-BAL 5313<br />
BAM 0000-BAM 1320</p>
<p>STOP USING YOUR PISTOL AND RETURN IT TO SMITH &#38; WESSON AT ONCE.</p>
<p>Any unintended discharge of a firearm has the potential for causing injury, and we ask that you stop using your pistol immediately.</p>
<p>To facilitate the repair of your pistol, please contact Smith &#38; Wesson&#8217;s customer service department to receive instructions for the return of your pistol to Smith &#38; Wesson.</p>
<p>When you return your pistol to Smith &#38; Wesson, we will replace the existing hammer block feature with a new part at no cost to you. Your firearm will be returned as quickly and efficiently as possible.</p>
<p>To receive a UPS pre-paid billable stamp and shipping instructions to arrange for the modification of your pistol click here or contact Smith &#38; Wesson directly at 1-800-331-0852.</p>
<p>IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS RECALL, PLEASE CONTACT SMITH &#38; WESSON AT 1-800-331-0852 or email us at PPK_S@smith-wesson.com.</p></blockquote>
<p>More information at <a href="http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CustomContentDisplay?langId=-1&amp;storeId=10001&amp;catalogId=10001&amp;content=62303&amp;sectionId=10506">S&#38;W</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/sw-safety-recall-walther-ppk-and-ppks-pistols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S&amp;W i-Bolt rifle recall</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/16/sw-i-bolt-rifle-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/16/sw-i-bolt-rifle-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important safety recall on i-Bolt rifles:
Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist with the bolt supplied with some rifles that would allow the striker to become disengaged from its locking tabs during cycling of the bolt, allowing the rifle to fire without the trigger being pulled. In the interest of consumer safety, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important safety recall on i-Bolt rifles:</p>
<blockquote><p>Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist with the bolt supplied with some rifles that would <strong>allow the striker to become disengaged from its locking tabs during cycling of the bolt, allowing the rifle to fire without the trigger being pulled.</strong> In the interest of consumer safety, we are initiating this recall to allow for the prompt inspection and, if necessary, the repair and replacement of each bolt.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>This recall applies to the bolts of <strong>all i-Bolt rifles manufactured by Smith &#38; Wesson prior to December 1, 2008.</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Please contact Smith &#38; Wesson directly at 1-800-331-0852 or at ibolt@smith-wesson.com to arrange for the inspection and repair, if necessary, of your bolt.</p></blockquote>
<p>More info at <a href="http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CustomContentDisplay?storeId=10001&amp;catalogId=10001&amp;content=59303&amp;sectionId=10506">Smith &#38; Wesson</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/16/sw-i-bolt-rifle-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruger LCP Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruger: This is getting really old. Both your new pistols have been recalled. How do you expect us to trust you?
The press release:
SOUTHPORT, Conn.&#8211;(BUSINESS WIRE)&#8211;Sturm, Ruger &#38; Company, Inc. (NYSE:RGR &#8211; News) announces that it has recently received a small number of reports from the field indicating that LCP pistols can discharge when dropped onto [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruger: This is getting really old. Both your new pistols have been recalled. How do you expect us to trust you?</p>
<p>The press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>SOUTHPORT, Conn.&#8211;(BUSINESS WIRE)&#8211;Sturm, Ruger &#38; Company, Inc. (NYSE:RGR &#8211; News) announces that it has recently received a small number of reports from the field indicating that LCP pistols can <strong>discharge when dropped onto a hard surface with a round in the chamber</strong>. Although no injuries have been reported, we are firmly committed to safety and will retrofit all older LCP pistols (described below). The retrofit involves <strong>installation of an</strong> <strong>upgraded hammer</strong> <strong>mechanism</strong> at no charge to the customer.</p>
<p>As a responsible manufacturer, we want to make our customers aware of this FREE safety upgrade. All LCP pistols bearing the prefix “370” (that is, serial number 370-xxxxx) may be affected. LCP owners can sign up for the safety upgrade or obtain additional information by:</p>
<p>* Visiting our LCP recall website at www.ruger.com/lcprecall<br />
* E-mail: LCPrecall@ruger.com<br />
* Fax: 928-541-8873<br />
* Calling the LCP Recall hotline at 1-800-784-3701</p>
<p>The new parts are being built and we will retrofit LCP pistols on a first-come, first-served basis as soon as they are available. When Ruger is ready to retrofit a consumer’s pistol, Ruger will send a shipping label and package with instructions for the FREE return of the LCP pistol to our factory in Prescott, Arizona. Ruger will install the new hammer mechanism, plus some other functional upgrades that have been added since the LCP’s introduction, at no charge to the consumer and the pistol will be returned at Ruger expense. <strong>All owners will receive a FREE LCP magazine with the new finger grip extension as a “thank you” for their patience and cooperation</strong>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruger SR9 recall update: will now feature Glock style trigger blade</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/07/17/ruger-sr9-recall-update-will-now-feature-glock-style-trigger-blade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/07/17/ruger-sr9-recall-update-will-now-feature-glock-style-trigger-blade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR9]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruger have updated information on their website about the SR9 recall:

Click to expand or click here to download PDF.
According to Tom, who posted a comment on the SR9 blog entry, Ruger has said that they will be servicing 1000 pistols a week:
Just received an email from Ruger that the boxes are being shipped. They plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruger have updated information on their website about the SR9 recall:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-4-14.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-4-14.png','popup','width=706+20,height=904+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-4-14-tm.jpg" height="512" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 4-14" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
Click to expand or click <a href="http://ruger.com/SR9Recall/PDF/7-08Update.pdf">here</a> to download PDF.</p>
<p>According to Tom, who posted a comment on the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/ruger-sr9-new-polymer-framed-9mm/">SR9 blog entry</a>, Ruger has said that they will be servicing 1000 pistols a week:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just received an email from Ruger that the boxes are being shipped. They plan to service 1000 SR9? per week. They are sending out boxes in the order we registered with Ruger.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/thegunshots/2008/07/sr9-recall-upda.html">John Snow</a> and commenters <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/ruger-sr9-new-polymer-framed-9mm/">Tom and David</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/07/17/ruger-sr9-recall-update-will-now-feature-glock-style-trigger-blade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
