<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; PPK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/ppk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>S&amp;W Safety Recall: Walther PPK and PPK/s pistols</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/sw-safety-recall-walther-ppk-and-ppks-pistols/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/sw-safety-recall-walther-ppk-and-ppks-pistols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walther]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There seems to be a problem with the PPK hammer block in newly manufactured PPK pistols. The press release:
Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist in certain PPK and PPK/S pistols which may permit a round to be discharged without the trigger being pulled. When the manual safety is disengaged, Smith &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be a problem with the PPK hammer block in newly manufactured PPK pistols. The press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Smith &#38; Wesson has identified a condition that may exist in certain PPK and PPK/S pistols which may permit a round to be discharged without the trigger being pulled. When the manual safety is disengaged, Smith &#38; Wesson&#8217;s Product Engineering Group has determined that the possibility exists in certain firearms that lowering the hammer may cause a chambered round to fire.</p>
<p>This recall applies to all Walther PPK and PPK/S pistols manufactured by Smith &#38; Wesson from March 21, 2002, until February 3, 2009. The Serial Numbers of the pistol subject to this recall are as follows:</p>
<p>BAB 0010-BAB 9999<br />
BAC 0000-BAC 9999<br />
BAD 0000-BAD 9999<br />
LTD 0000-LTD 0499<br />
PPK 0001-PPK 1500<br />
BAE 0000-BAE 9999<br />
BAF 0000-BAF 9999<br />
WLE 0001-WLE 0459<br />
BAH 0000-BAH 9999<br />
BAJ 0000-BAJ 9999<br />
BAK 0000-BAK 9999<br />
REP 0026-REP 0219<br />
BAL 0000-BAL 5313<br />
BAM 0000-BAM 1320</p>
<p>STOP USING YOUR PISTOL AND RETURN IT TO SMITH &#38; WESSON AT ONCE.</p>
<p>Any unintended discharge of a firearm has the potential for causing injury, and we ask that you stop using your pistol immediately.</p>
<p>To facilitate the repair of your pistol, please contact Smith &#38; Wesson&#8217;s customer service department to receive instructions for the return of your pistol to Smith &#38; Wesson.</p>
<p>When you return your pistol to Smith &#38; Wesson, we will replace the existing hammer block feature with a new part at no cost to you. Your firearm will be returned as quickly and efficiently as possible.</p>
<p>To receive a UPS pre-paid billable stamp and shipping instructions to arrange for the modification of your pistol click here or contact Smith &#38; Wesson directly at 1-800-331-0852.</p>
<p>IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS RECALL, PLEASE CONTACT SMITH &#38; WESSON AT 1-800-331-0852 or email us at PPK_S@smith-wesson.com.</p></blockquote>
<p>More information at <a href="http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CustomContentDisplay?langId=-1&amp;storeId=10001&amp;catalogId=10001&amp;content=62303&amp;sectionId=10506">S&#38;W</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/sw-safety-recall-walther-ppk-and-ppks-pistols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walther PPK .380 ACP</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/25/walther-ppk-380-acp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/25/walther-ppk-380-acp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.380]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walther]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zack @ The Next Chapter has reviewed his 1967 .380 ACP Walther PPK :

Suppose that I did not own this PPK; some might ask if I would I run out to purchase a Walther PPK over all other handguns available for home defense or concealed carry. No, I probably would not, but I certainly would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jamesazacharyjr.blogspot.com/2008/11/walther-ppk-380-acp.html">Zack @ The Next Chapter</a> has <a href="http://jamesazacharyjr.blogspot.com/2008/11/walther-ppk-380-acp.html">reviewed</a> his 1967 .380 ACP Walther PPK :<br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ppkblog.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ppkblog.jpg','popup','width=400+20,height=261+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ppkblog-tm.jpg" height="116" width="177" align="right" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Ppkblog" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Suppose that I did not own this PPK; some might ask if I would I run out to purchase a Walther PPK over all other handguns available for home defense or concealed carry. No, I probably would not, but I certainly would not fault anyone who did choose one; the PPK is a fine little pistol.</p></blockquote>
<p>More <a href="http://jamesazacharyjr.blogspot.com/2008/11/walther-ppk-380-acp.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/25/walther-ppk-380-acp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
