<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; m4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/m4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does cut defense budget mean the M4 is here to stay?</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/16/does-cut-defense-budget-mean-the-m4-is-here-to-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/16/does-cut-defense-budget-mean-the-m4-is-here-to-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Times reports that there have been cuts a defense spending bill ...


  Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and training for U.S. troops, including those fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Times <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/15/troop-funds-diverted-to-pet-projects/">reports</a> that there have been cuts a defense spending bill ...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and training for U.S. troops, including those fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to an analysis.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Lance, I think correctly, pointed out to me that this attitude of cutting defense spending to the max, probably guarantees that the M4 and M16 are not going anywhere anytime soon.</p>

<p>Many thanks to <a href="http://thegunzone.com/">Daniel Watters</a> for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/16/does-cut-defense-budget-mean-the-m4-is-here-to-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truth behind the recent M4 controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/the-truth-behind-the-recent-m4-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/the-truth-behind-the-recent-m4-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I blogged about the M4 reliability controversy story that was originally reported by the Associated Press. At best the writer of the AP article exaggerated many the points. The leaked draft of the of the analysis of the Battle of Wanat reads quite differently.

The AP infers that the barrels of many of the weapons [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/12/more-reports-on-m4-limitations-do-the-marines-have-the-right-idea/">blogged about</a> the M4 reliability controversy story that was <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,563883,00.html">originally reported</a> by the Associated Press. At <strong>best</strong> the writer of the AP article exaggerated many the points. The <a href="http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/">leaked draft</a> of the of the analysis of the Battle of Wanat reads quite differently.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/800px_m4firing_with_casing_in_air-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/800px_m4firing_with_casing_in_air-tfb-tm.jpg' title="800px m4firing with casing in air tfb tm The truth behind the recent M4 controversy photo" alt="800px m4firing with casing in air tfb tm The truth behind the recent M4 controversy photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>The M4 Carbine</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>The AP infers that the barrels of many of the weapons were getting white hot. From the AP article:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The platoon-sized unit of U.S. soldiers and about two dozen Afghan troops was shooting back with such intensity <strong>the barrels on their weapons turned white hot</strong>.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There is only one reference to a gun getting white hot in the draft report, and it is a SAW not a M4 Carbine:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Specialist Bogar fired <strong>approximately six hundred rounds at a cyclic rate of fire</strong> from his SAW when that weapon became overheated, and eventually jammed the bolt forward. Specialist Stafford noted, “Bogar was still in our hole firing quite a bit. Then Bogar’s SAW jammed. <strong>Basically it just got way overheated</strong>, because he opened the feed tray cover and I remember him trying to get it open and it just looked like the bolt had welded itself inside the chamber. <strong>His barrel was just white hot</strong>.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In fact, it is not even possible that an M4 barrel can heat up to the point of being white hot. M4 barrels are made from  Alloy Steel 4150. The <a href="http://www.steelforge.com/alloys/?alloy=4150">melting point of this steel</a> is 1426 degrees Celsius. For steel to go white, it <a href="http://www.7now.com/tempering_steel.htm">needs to be over 1400 degrees Celsius</a>.</p>

<p>The Ground Precautionary Message ACALA #97-03<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup>, from November 1996, clearly states that if an M4 barrel reaches just 737 degrees Celcius, the barrel will be weaked to the point where burst.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>(3) BURST BARRELS RESULT WHEN THE WEAPONS ARE FIRED UNDER VERY EXTREME FIRING SCHEDULES AND THE BARREL TEMPERATURE EXCEEDS 1360 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. WHEN THE BARREL REACHES THESE EXTREME TEMPERATURES, THE BARREL STEEL WEAKENS TO THE POINT THAT THE HIGH PRESSURE GASES BURST THROUGH THE SIDE OF THE BARREL APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES IN FRONT OF THE CHAMBER. THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You are not going to see an M4 barrel white hot because by that point it would have exploded!</p>

<p>The AP also infers that the M4 Carbine is designed to handle a high rate of fire</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The high rate of fire appears to have put a number of weapons out of commission, even though the guns <strong>are tested and built to operate in extreme conditions</strong>.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This is also not true. From the Ground Precautionary Message[^1]:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>(B) <strong>FIRING 140 ROUNDS, RAPIDLY AND CONTINUOUSLY, WILL RAISE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE BARREL TO THE COOK-OFF POINT</strong>. AT THIS TEMPERATURE, ANY LIVE ROUND REMAINING IN THE CHAMBER FOR ANY REASON MAY COOK-OFF (DETONATE) IN AS SHORT A PERIOD AS 10 SECONDS.</p>
  
  <p>...</p>
  
  <p>(D) <strong>SUSTAINED RATE OF FIRE FOR THE M16 SERIES RIFLES AND M4 SERIES CARBINES IS 12-15 ROUNDS PER MINUTE</strong>. THIS IS THE ACTUAL RATE OF FIRE THAT A WEAPON CAN CONTINUE TO BE FIRED FOR AN Indefinite LENGTH OF TIME WITHOUT SERIOUS OVERHEATING.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No operator should empty more than 4 magazines rapidly. The AP quotes the draft report:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>My weapon was overheating. I had shot about 12 magazines by this point already and it had only been about a half hour or so into the fight. I couldn’t charge my weapon and put another round in because it was too hot, so I got mad and threw my weapon down.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I sympathize with the solider and would not dare to presume to question his actions in combat. He did what he had to do in the heat of the moment, but I cannot think of any current weapon in the M4 class that can sustain continuous fire. To make such a weapon it would need to have a heavy quick change barrel and maybe also include a heat sink. I doubt any soldiers will want to trade in their M4 for a heavy automatic rifle.</p>

<p>Many thanks to Jay, aka. jdun1911, for his research into this controversy. He should get all the credit for this blog post.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: I just want to clarify a point mentioned by commenters below. If the solider fired his 12 magazines evenly over a 30 minute period he should have had no overheating problems (assuming the Army GPM info is correct). What we do not know is the period of continuous fire. As Bram, who has seen combat, said "Time moves very differently while under fire. It’s impossible to judge how fast those soldiers were actually firing.".</p>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:1">
<p>I do not make a .mil link to the GPM but it is widely published on the internet. It can be read in full <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/12/more-reports-on-m4-limitations-do-the-marines-have-the-right-idea/#comment-16040">on The Firearm Blog</a>. I did verify, on a .mil website, <a href="https://safety.army.mil/Portals/multimedia/docs/magazines/countermeasure/1997_issues/cmapr97.pdf">that this GPM does exist</a>.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/the-truth-behind-the-recent-m4-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More reports on M4 limitations. Do the Marines have the right idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/12/more-reports-on-m4-limitations-do-the-marines-have-the-right-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/12/more-reports-on-m4-limitations-do-the-marines-have-the-right-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leaked US Army report about the Battle of Wanat criticizes the reliability of the M4. On July 13, 2008 200 Taliban fighters attacked 48 US and 24 Afghan troops. Outnumbered 2.7 to 1 the M4 Carbines, which the troops were carrying, could not function reliably under the sustained fire they were required to put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A leaked US Army report about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wanat">Battle of Wanat</a> criticizes the reliability of the M4. On July 13, 2008 200 Taliban fighters attacked 48 US and 24 Afghan troops. Outnumbered 2.7 to 1 the M4 Carbines, which the troops were carrying, could not function reliably under the sustained fire they were required to put downrange. Fox News <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,563883,00.html">reports</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The platoon-sized unit of U.S. soldiers and about two dozen Afghan troops was shooting back with such intensity the barrels on their weapons turned white hot. The high rate of fire appears to have put a number of weapons out of commission, even though the guns are tested and built to operate in extreme conditions.</p>
  
  <p>...</p>
  
  <p>"My weapon was overheating,” McKaig said, according to Cubbison’s report. "I had shot about 12 magazines by this point already and it had only been about a half hour or so into the fight. I couldn’t charge my weapon and put another round in because it was too hot, so I got mad and threw my weapon down."</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/10/11/more-problems-being-reported-with-m4/">Snowflakes In Hell</a>, via <a href="http://michaelbane.blogspot.com/2009/10/coming-back-around.html">Michael Bane's</a> blog, correctly points out that assault rifles are not machine guns:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>No assault rifle is going to stand up to sustained automatic fire. They aren’t machine guns, and even a machine gun needs to have its barrel changed out if it’s been firing a lot.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The M4 has a very short 14.5" barrel and a relatively lightweight barrel profile. This allows the barrel to heat up much faster than a longer and heavier rifle or machine gun barrel. When the barrel of a closed-bolt gun gets very hot, cook-offs,when a round is ignited from the heat in the chamber, become a significant problem ... not to mention the fact that a soldier cannot fire a gun that is to hot to hold!</p>

<p>The Marines have been criticized by many for their plans to introduce an Infantry Automatic Rifle (IAR) into the mix of weapons issued to their troops. The IAR is not intended to replace the SAW but would be deployed alongside it, giving some riflemen a light weight weapon that can sustain automatic fire.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/picture_4_20-tfb.png'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/picture_4_20-tfb-tm.png' title="picture 4 20 tfb tm More reports on M4 limitations. Do the Marines have the right idea? photo" alt="picture 4 20 tfb tm More reports on M4 limitations. Do the Marines have the right idea? photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>FN IAR. Switches from closed-bolt to open-bolt when automatically when barrel temperature increases.</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>The Army would do well to look into the concept.</p>

<p>At the end of last year the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/23/potential-marine-iar-designs-down-to-four/">Marines announced they were awarding contracts</a> for the development of IAR prototypes to Colt, H&#038;K and FN. Since then I have heard nothing about the IAR.</p>

<p>There are discussions about the M4 failure at Wanat over at <a href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/10/11/more-problems-being-reported-with-m4/">Snowflakes In Hell</a>, via <a href="http://michaelbane.blogspot.com/2009/10/coming-back-around.html">Michael Bane's</a> blog and <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/10/11/reports-of-us-weapons-failing/#comments">SaysUncle</a>.</p>

<p>Many thanks to Jerry, Caedis, Lee and Lance for emailing me links about this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/12/more-reports-on-m4-limitations-do-the-marines-have-the-right-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surefire Micro and Mini Suppressors</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/05/surefire-micro-and-mini-suppressors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/05/surefire-micro-and-mini-suppressors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suppressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppressor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surefire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surefire are attempting to carve out a new niche with their two new "tactical" suppressors. These tiny suppressors only add a few inches to an M4 Carbine or Colt Commando. Gear Scout reports:


  Surefire snuck out two new 5.56mm suppressors at Modern Day Marine Expo. The Mini and the Micro are stubby little suckers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surefire are attempting to carve out a new niche with their two new "tactical" suppressors. These tiny suppressors only add a few inches to an M4 Carbine or Colt Commando. Gear Scout <a href="http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/10/02/new-surefire-supressors/">reports</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Surefire snuck out two new 5.56mm suppressors at Modern Day Marine Expo. The Mini and the Micro are stubby little suckers that add barely 3.6 and 2.6 inches to a weapon’s muzzle but cut down weapon signature and improve unit communication.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There is nothing magical about suppressors and they are bound to the same laws of physics as everything else. While suppressor manufactures are continuously tweaking their cans in order to maximize the sound reduction vs. weight / size ratio, ultimately if you shrink a suppressor you will reduce its effectiveness.</p>

<p>I doubt these will be sold to civilians. I cannot think of a single good reason why a civilian would want to purchase one of these particular suppressors, when a suppressor a few inches longer will give much better performance.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: I may have come across as anti-suppressor. I am not. <strong>I own two</strong> and hope to buy a third within a year. They are incredibly useful and there is no reason why civilian sales should be restricted.  But these particular suppressors are tiny - smaller than my .22 Rimfire suppressor - the sound reduction would be minimal. I would call it a "sound reducer" rather than a "sound suppressor". What I meant to say is that I cannot think why a civilian would pay for these particular suppressors.</p>

<p>Many thanks to Jesse for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/05/surefire-micro-and-mini-suppressors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Umarex has licensed H&amp;K 416, MP5, and MP7 for .22 LR clones.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/18/umarex-has-licensed-hk-416-mp5-and-mp7-for-22-lr-clones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/18/umarex-has-licensed-hk-416-mp5-and-mp7-for-22-lr-clones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umarex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president of HK-USA mentioned in an interview that H&#038;K has sold a license to Umarex for the production of .22 LR rifles patterned and branded after the H&#038;K 416, MP5 and MP7. From HKPRO forums:


  .22's: HK has licensed Umarex to produce .22-cal versions of the 416, MP5, and MP7. At least some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president of HK-USA mentioned in an interview that H&#038;K has sold a license to Umarex for the production of .22 LR rifles patterned and branded after the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/hk-mr556-and-mr762-civilian-hk416-and-hk417/">H&#038;K 416</a>, MP5 and MP7. From <a href="http://hkpro.com/forum/showthread.php?t=108123">HKPRO forums</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>.22's: HK has licensed Umarex to produce .22-cal versions of the 416, MP5, and MP7. At least some of these should be on display by SHOT Show in January 2010. It has not yet been determined which models will be released first.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>At this years SHOT Show Umarex <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/13/colt-umarex-m4-carbine-22-tactical-rimfire-ar-15/">unveiled a licensed rifle</a> patterned after and branded the Colt M4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/18/umarex-has-licensed-hk-416-mp5-and-mp7-for-22-lr-clones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benelli Shotgun Extended Charging Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/28/benelli-shotgun-extended-charging-handle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/28/benelli-shotgun-extended-charging-handle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shotguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Point Firearms have just started selling a great looking over-sized charging handle for the Benelli M1, M2, M3 and M4 shotguns. It is machined from aluminum and simply bolts onto the existing charging handle.

Benelli M4 with Extended Charging handle. 

On Point are selling them for $30.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Point Firearms have just <a href="http://www.onpointsupply.com/cart.php?target=product&amp;product_id=76719&amp;category_id=3381">started selling</a> a great looking over-sized charging handle for the Benelli M1, M2, M3 and M4 shotguns. It is machined from aluminum and simply bolts onto the existing charging handle.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/images_benelli_m4_charging_handle_2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/images_benelli_m4_charging_handle_2.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=480+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/images_benelli_m4_charging_handle_2-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Benelli M4 Charging Handle 2" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Benelli M4 with Extended Charging handle.</em> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/images_benelli_m4_charging_handle_3.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/images_benelli_m4_charging_handle_3.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=480+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/images_benelli_m4_charging_handle_3-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Benelli M4 Charging Handle 3" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>On Point <a href="http://www.onpointsupply.com/cart.php?target=product&amp;product_id=76719&amp;category_id=3381">are selling them</a> for $30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/28/benelli-shotgun-extended-charging-handle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army M4 vs. Marine M16A4</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/27/army-m4-vs-marine-m16a4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/27/army-m4-vs-marine-m16a4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting article at Human Events about the US Army culture favoring the M4, while the Marines culture being pro-M16A4.
Two years ago when I was in Iraq, I noticed there were essentially two different primary infantry weapons (the M16 automatic rifle and the also-automatic M4 carbine) carried by America’s two primary ground forces [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33255">interesting article</a> at Human Events about the US Army culture favoring the M4, while the Marines culture being pro-M16A4.</p>
<blockquote><p>Two years ago when I was in Iraq, I noticed there were essentially two different primary infantry weapons (the M16 automatic rifle and the also-automatic M4 carbine) carried by America’s two primary ground forces &#8212; the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Army.</p>
<p>Marines for the most part were carrying the M16. The Army on the other hand was primarily carrying the M4: a shorter, lighter version of the M16 with a collapsible-stock.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33255">Say Uncle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/27/army-m4-vs-marine-m16a4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Weapons of District 9</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/27/the-weapons-of-district-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/27/the-weapons-of-district-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strange guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ak-47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mgl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ntw-20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpg-7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vektor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ I have done my best to ensure there are no spoilers in this blog post, but read forth at your own risk and DON'T read the comments that are below the blog post. All pictures are from the trailers and promotional material, not the movie itself. ]
Two readers emailed me saying that many of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[ I have done my best to ensure there are no spoilers in this blog post, but read forth at your own risk and DON'T read the comments that are below the blog post. All pictures are from the trailers and promotional material, not the movie itself. ]</em></p>
<p>Two readers emailed me saying that many of the weapons I mentioned in my <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/5-weapons-that-shouldve-been-in-transformers-2/">5 Weapons that should&#8217;ve been in Transformers 2</a> post were used in new hit sci-fi movie District 9. I was considering seeing the movie, but after hearing this I decided I had to go. It was fantastic! Despite being a low budget production, they must have hired a very competent weapons consultant. The weapons used were appropriate for the task at hand and were used correctly, something few action, or even historical, movies do right.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/district9poster.jpg" height="410" width="278" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="District 9 Poster" title="District 9 Poster" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Where can I buy this target?</em></p>
<p>There are three main human factions in the movie. The Multi-National United is organization styled after the UN.  The Mercenaries (I can&#8217;t remember what they are called in the movie) are private military contractors styled after the likes of Blackwater (Xe). The Gangsters live among the aliens and are involved in the arms trade.</p>
<p>The movie is set in South Africa so it is no surprise that many of the weapons used in the movie are weapons produced by the South African defense industry.</p>
<p><strong>Multi-National United (MNU)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://world.guns.ru/assault/as26-e.htm">Vektor CR-21</a> &#8211; This is the &#8220;white&#8221; gun used by the MNU. The 5.56 mm CR-21 is a bullpup version of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R4_assault_rifle">Vektor R4</a>. The R4 is the South African licensed-built version of the Israeli Galil (an AK-47 derivative).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-3-32.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-3-32.png','popup','width=282+20,height=264+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-3-32-tm.jpg" height="374" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="cr-21" title="cr-21" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>CR-21</em></p>
<p>R1 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_FAL">FN FAL</a>) &#8211; The R1 was the South African licensed-built FN FAL. In the movie it is used by airborne snipers.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-16-12.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-16-12.png','popup','width=650+20,height=421+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-16-12-tm.jpg" height="259" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="fn fal" title="fn fal" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>R1 / FN FAL<br />
</em></p>
<p>Unknown Pump Action Shotgun &#8211; A pump action shotgun is used by a minor character. I could not identify it.</p>
<p><strong>Mercenaries</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R4_assault_rifle">Vektor R5</a> &#8211; This is the carbine version of the Vektor R4 rifle. The R5 has a 13.1&#8243; barrel.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-11-32.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-11-32.png','popup','width=571+20,height=385+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-11-32-tm.jpg" height="269" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="vektor r5" title="vektor r5" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Vektor R5.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Colt M4 with M203 &#8211; Some troops appear to be using the M4 Carbine and M203 grenade launcher.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-19-13.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-19-13.png','popup','width=390+20,height=337+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-19-13-tm.jpg" height="345" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="m4 carbine m203" title="m4 carbine m203" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Colt M4/M203<br />
</em></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_Minimi">FN Minimi</a> &#8211; Better known as the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-13-25.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-13-25.jpg','popup','width=318+20,height=385+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-13-25-tm.jpg" height="363" width="300" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="FN Minimi" title="FN Minimi" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>FN Minimi<br />
</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/5-weapons-that-shouldve-been-in-transformers-2/">PMP Neopup PAW</a> &#8211; I am pretty sure this awesome semi-automatic grenade launcher was used briefly.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/5-weapons-that-shouldve-been-in-transformers-2/">Denel NTW-20</a> &#8211; This South African made 20mm rifle was used too good effect.</p>
<p>Unknown Machine Pistol &#8211; A machine pistol or submachine gun was used in one scene, but I could not identify it. <strong>UPDATE</strong>: Commenters point out that it was the <a href="http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg50-e.htm">BXP</a>.</p>
<p>Unknown Pistol &#8211; I could not identify the pistols carried by the mercs. <strong>UPDATE</strong>: IMFDB <a href="http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/District_9">says it was</a> a   Beretta 92FS.</p>
<p><strong>Gangsters</strong></p>
<p>AK-47 &#8211; Not introduction needed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/5-weapons-that-shouldve-been-in-transformers-2/">RPG-7</a> &#8211; Again, no introduction need. Used realistically in the film.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-17-12.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-17-12.png','popup','width=608+20,height=438+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Picture-17-12-tm.jpg" height="288" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 17-12" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>RPG-7</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/5-weapons-that-shouldve-been-in-transformers-2/">Milkor MGL</a> &#8211; I was surprised to see the gangsters packing this. I only saw it in one scene.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1911">M1911 pistol</a> &#8211; I am pretty sure a 1911 clone is used by one of the gangsters.</p>
<p><strong>Aliens</strong></p>
<p>Unknown weaponry <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile The Weapons of District 9 photo" /> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/district-9-20090803103101522_640w.jpg" height="246" width="325" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="District 9 Alien Assault Rifle" title="District 9 Alien Assault Rifle" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Alien Assault Rifle</em></p>
<p>While watching the movie I tried to keep track of what guns they were using. I probably missed many and I had trouble identifying some. Please post a comment below if noticed any mistakes or omissions I have made or identify any of the unknown weapons listed.</p>
<p>Thanks to Cory and Raymond for their emails regarding the movie weapons.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: More info at <a href="http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/District_9">IMFDB</a> (Spoiler alert). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/27/the-weapons-of-district-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benelli MR1 Carbine (Civilian Beretta Rx4 Storm)</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/22/benelli-mr1-carbine-civilian-beretta-rx4-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/22/benelli-mr1-carbine-civilian-beretta-rx4-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.56mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beretta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MR1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rx4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benelli, not wanting to miss out, has entered the lucrative black rifle market with Benelli MR1 Carbine, a 5.56mm gas piston operated rifle.



Benelli MR1 Carbine

The MR1 Carbine is the civilian version of the Beretta Rx4 Storm (which never took off). Benelli, a subsidiary of Beretta, designed the ARGO gas system used by the MR1/Rx4 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benelli, not wanting to miss out, has entered the lucrative black rifle market with Benelli MR1 Carbine, a 5.56mm gas piston operated rifle.</p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/MR1Ext.Mag-Silo.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/MR1Ext.Mag-Silo.jpg','popup','width=2178+20,height=613+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/MR1Ext.Mag-Silo-tm.jpg" height="112" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Mr1Ext.Mag-Silo" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Benelli MR1 Carbine</em></p>

<p>The MR1 Carbine is the civilian version of the Beretta Rx4 Storm (which never took off). Benelli, a subsidiary of Beretta, designed the ARGO gas system used by the MR1/Rx4 and manufactured both the MR1 and the Rx4 Storm.</p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Beretta_RX4.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Beretta_RX4.jpg','popup','width=531+20,height=389+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Beretta_RX4-tm.jpg" height="293" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Beretta Rx4" title="" longdesc="" /></a>
<em>Beretta RX4 Storm with accessories. The collapsible stock is not available currently on the RX4.
</em></p>

<p>What differentiates the MR1 from other 5.56mm rifles is the gas system it uses. Originally the Auto-Regulating Gas System (ARGO) was designed for the Benelli M4 Super 90, better known by its US Military designation, the M1014 Joint Service Combat Shotgun. Benelli then adapted the system for their ARGO line of hunting rifles (branded the R1 in the United States). In 2005 the Beretta Rx4 Storm, a tactical version of the ARGO rifle, was introduced and marketed to law enforcement. As far as I know the Rx4 has never been available in a select fire variant but they decided to market it to civilians as the Benelli MR1.</p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Benelli_m4_2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Benelli_m4_2.jpg','popup','width=665+20,height=130+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Benelli_m4_2-tm.jpg" height="78" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Benelli M4 2" title="" longdesc="" /></a>
<em>Benelli M4 Super 90 / M1014</em></p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ARGOELZOOM.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ARGOELZOOM.jpg','popup','width=1520+20,height=320+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ARGOELZOOM-tm.jpg" height="84" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Argoelzoom" title="" longdesc="" /></a>
<em>Benelli ARGO EL
</em></p>

<p>The ARGO gas system has an interesting short stroke piston design. Gas is trapped very close to the chamber. The high pressure gas ensures reliable cycling regardless of ammunition. This means that it can cycle any shotgun shells, regardless of the load. For a rifle it means the barrel can be very short and a suppressor could be fitted without any cycling issues. This gun is just asking to be converted into a Short Barreled Rifle!</p>

<p>The gas is then fed into an expansion chamber. The pressure in the chamber drives the piston assembly, which has dual rods. The high pressure is regulated by a release value. These diagrams should illustrate how the system works.</p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Benelli-ARGO-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Benelli-ARGO-1.jpg','popup','width=435+20,height=267+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Benelli-ARGO-1-tm.jpg" height="245" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Benelli Argo-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ARGO-System.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ARGO-System.jpg','popup','width=396+20,height=197+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ARGO-System-tm.jpg" height="198" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Argo System" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>

<p>The receiver is made of aluminum, it is fully compatible with AR-15 magazines (including the 100 round drums) and, like all Benelli shotguns and rifles, the main spring is placed inside the butt stock - meaning a folding stock is not an option, although hopefully an M1014 folding stock will be made available.</p>

<p>MR1 Specifications:</p>

<p><strong>Caliber</strong>: 5.56mm NATO / .223 Rem.
<strong>Barrel</strong>: 16". Hard chrome lined. 1:9 twist.
<strong>Rear Sights</strong>: Military-style Aperture
<strong>Weight</strong>: 7.9 lbs.</p>

<p>The MSRP is $1299. I think they have priced it right. Although not cheap, and they can do better than the one five round magazine they ship with it, I doubt they could sell it much cheaper.</p>

<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/MR1-Std.Mag.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/MR1-Std.Mag.jpg','popup','width=2141+20,height=550+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/MR1-Std.Mag-tm.jpg" height="102" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Mr1-Std.Mag" title="" longdesc="" /></a>
<em>MR1 with 5 round magazine.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/22/benelli-mr1-carbine-civilian-beretta-rx4-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast Money interviews S&amp;W CEO</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/16/fast-money-interviews-sw-ceo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/16/fast-money-interviews-sw-ceo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNBC&#8217;s Fast Money show talks to Michael Golden, CEO of Smith &#38; Wesson, about the gun market and how S&#38;W is faring.


He says that the gun market is cooling but S&#38;W&#8217;s M&#38;P rifles and tactical rifles are selling well. I do not dispute that S&#38;W is doing well, but I find it hard to believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC&#8217;s Fast Money show talks to Michael Golden, CEO of Smith &#38; Wesson, about the gun market and how S&#38;W is faring.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object id="cnbcplayer" height="380" width="400" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" ><param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><param name="quality" value="best"/><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"/><param name="salign" value="lt"/><param name="movie" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1182841871/code/cnbcplayershare"/><embed name="cnbcplayer" PLUGINSPAGE="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" height="380" width="400" quality="best" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" salign="lt" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1182841871/code/cnbcplayershare" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><br />
</object></p>
<p>He says that the gun market is cooling but S&#38;W&#8217;s M&#38;P rifles and tactical rifles are selling well. I do not dispute that S&#38;W is doing well, but I find it hard to believe S&#38;W, or Ruger, will be able to maintain their current stock prices. Both stocks have more than doubled since February courtesy of the gun buying frenzy.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/z.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/z.png','popup','width=512+20,height=288+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/z-tm.jpg" height="225" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Z" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>Golden mentions the M4 competition. I expect they will have sometime more interesting up their sleeve than the M&#38;P4, a pretty standard direct gas impingement M4 clone, which the Military Times <a href="http://www.militarytimes.com/multimedia/photo/replacing_the_m4/">reported</a> a while back that S&#38;W would be entering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/16/fast-money-interviews-sw-ceo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colt&#8217;s exclusive M4 production right ends</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/09/colts-exclusive-m4-production-right-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/09/colts-exclusive-m4-production-right-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of this month the M4 technical data has been transfered to the Army. The Army can now purchase M4 carbines from companies other than Colt, which up to know was the exclusive producers of the M4. Army Times reports:
As of July 1, the Army has taken control of the design rights to the M4 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of this month the M4 technical data has been transfered to the Army. The Army can now purchase M4 carbines from companies other than Colt, which up to know was the exclusive producers of the M4. Army Times <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/07/army_carbine_070609w/">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>As of July 1, the Army has taken control of the design rights to the M4 carbine from its sole maker, Colt Defense LLC. Translation: With an uncertain budget looming, the service is free to give other gun companies a crack at a carbine contract.</p>
<p>The transition of ownership of the M4 technical data package marks the end of an era and Colt’s exclusive status as the only manufacturer of the M4 for the U.S. military for the past 15 years.</p></blockquote>
<p>What does this mean for Colt as a company? Not a lot. They will continue to be a supplier and will probably be able to manufacture the M4 cheaper than competitors when / if any more M4 carbines are purchased.</p>
<p>Over at <a href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/07/08/army-takes-control-of-m4-design/">Snowflakes in Hell</a> Daniel E. Watters, an expert, said that the Army will still have to pay in royalties to Colt for every non-Colt M4 purchased. The technical specs are owned by Colt. Anyone wanting to supply M4s to overseas customers will need to get a license from Colt.</p>
<p>Colt has a <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/12/colts-new-ar-15-firearms/">few</a> different <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/colt-sub-compact-weapon-scw-photos/">next-gen carbines</a> ready for the carbine competition later this year which could result in a selection of an M4 replacement.</p>
<p>There is also a discussion about this at <a href="http://www.gunpundit.com/3122.php">Gun Pundit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/09/colts-exclusive-m4-production-right-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M4 barrel fell off</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/m4-barrel-fell-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/m4-barrel-fell-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;FREEFALLE7&#8243;, a Ranger Instructor, posted the above photo at AR15.com. A student, on arrival at the Swamp phase of Ranger School, showed him his M4 and said &#8220;my barrel fell off&#8221;. His punishment for not telling an instructor at the Mountain phase (the previous phase) about the broken M4 was to be given a M240, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/368242851.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/368242851.jpg','popup','width=800+20,height=600+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/368242851-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="368242851 tm M4 barrel fell off photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;FREEFALLE7&#8243;, a Ranger Instructor, posted the <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&amp;f=118&amp;t=449676">above photo at AR15.com</a>. A student, on arrival at the Swamp phase of Ranger School, showed him his M4 and said &#8220;my barrel fell off&#8221;. His punishment for not telling an instructor at the Mountain phase (the previous phase) about the broken M4 was to be given a M240, which weights 27 lbs, as a replacement.</p>
<p>Keith J came up with a plausible theory of how this happened</p>
<blockquote><p>Salt water in the threads. Steel rusts. Steel in contact with aluminum. Aluminum then oxidizes, reducing the rust to iron dust. Joint remains tight until it is abused, then it just falls apart.</p>
<p>This all started when the barrel was installed and it was tightened a bit too much, causing the anodizing to crack</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course this would have happened over a long period of time and use.</p>
<p>Thanks to Jay for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/m4-barrel-fell-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraqi Special Forces M4</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/03/iraqi-special-forces-m4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/03/iraqi-special-forces-m4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 11:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first photo I have seen showing an Iraqi solider with a M4 Carbine with all the goodies that go with it.

A Soldier from Al Anbar&#8217;s 9th Battalion, Iraqi Special Operations Forces, storms an entryway during close-quarter combat training on April 4 in Al Asad, Iraq. The ISOF Soldiers are being trained and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first photo I have seen showing an Iraqi solider with a M4 Carbine with all the goodies that go with it.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/25q3tiw-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/25q3tiw-1.jpg','popup','width=602+20,height=799+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/25q3tiw-1-tm.jpg" height="530" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="25Q3Tiw-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>A Soldier from Al Anbar&#8217;s 9th Battalion, Iraqi Special Operations Forces, storms an entryway during close-quarter combat training on April 4 in Al Asad, Iraq. The ISOF Soldiers are being trained and advised by U.S. Special Operations Forces. &#8220;The training will make them better and we are happy to be included,&#8221; said the 9th BN commander. &#8220;We are capable to make the area safe.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Photo by Sgt. Brandon Pomrenke : Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force &#8211; Arabian Peninsula) </p></blockquote>
<p>The Iraqi Army are slowing migrating from AK-47s to M16s and it looks like their Special Forces are getting M4 carbines for good measure. I am pleased to see they are getting the equipment they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/03/iraqi-special-forces-m4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese CQ M4 being sold in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/15/chinese-cq-m4-being-sold-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/15/chinese-cq-m4-being-sold-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norinco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian gun dealers are importing the civilian version of the Norinco CQ 5.56mm Type A, a clone of the Colt M4. It pretty much a straight clone of the M4A1, complete with 14.5&#8243; barrel, the biggest difference being that the civilian version that is being imported is semi-automatic only.
Click to expand the photos (photo from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian gun dealers are importing the civilian version of the Norinco CQ 5.56mm Type A, a clone of the Colt M4. It pretty much a straight clone of the M4A1, complete with 14.5&#8243; barrel, the biggest difference being that the civilian version that is being imported is semi-automatic only.</p>
<p>Click to expand the photos (photo from<em> </em><a href="http://www.leverarms.com/">LeverArms.com</a>)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-11.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-11.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=523+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-1-tm1.jpg" height="203" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M4-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-41.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-41.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=719+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-4-tm1.jpg" height="280" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M4-4" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-181.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-181.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=768+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/m4-18-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M4-18" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>The rifle seems to be well received by Canadian shooters, although the finish is said be be poor. Of the Norinco manufactured firearms I have seen, they tend to be poorly finished. The badly scratched finish can be seen in this photo:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-3-251.png" height="311" width="295" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 3-25" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p>This video shows the firearm being used (iron sights and Magpul stock has been installed):</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IXr5wmtcxwY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IXr5wmtcxwY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.leverarms.com/M4.html">LeverArms.com</a> are <a href="http://www.leverarms.com/M4.html">selling it for</a> C$899.00, which seems like a good price for a M4 clone, although I am not sure what M4 AR-15s normally sell for in Canada. Canada is likely the only country where it is being sold to civilians.</p>
<p>Thanks to Dennis for information about the rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/15/chinese-cq-m4-being-sold-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel Defense M4 Carbine</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/09/daniel-defense-m4-carbine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/09/daniel-defense-m4-carbine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Defense, known for manufacturing AR-15 parts, have produced their first complete rifle.

Daniel Defense M4 Carbine

The carbine features:
* their own in-house manufactured lower receiver
* 1:7 16&#8243; barrel
* Daniel Defense Omega X 12.0 FSP rail that extends forward of the front sight / gas block
* Daniel Defense A1.5 rear sight.
* Magpul stock.
* Daniel Defense forward grip

I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.danieldefense.com">Daniel Defense</a>, known for manufacturing AR-15 parts, have produced their first complete rifle.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-5-231.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-5-231.png','popup','width=625+20,height=254+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-5-23-tm1.jpg" height="162" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 5-23" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Daniel Defense M4 Carbine<br />
</em></p>
<p>The carbine features:</p>
<p>* their own in-house manufactured lower receiver<br />
* 1:7 16&#8243; barrel<br />
* Daniel Defense Omega X 12.0 FSP rail that extends forward of the front sight / gas block<br />
* Daniel Defense A1.5 rear sight.<br />
* Magpul stock.<br />
* Daniel Defense forward grip</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/daniel-defense-inc-browse-rifles-m4-carbine1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/daniel-defense-inc-browse-rifles-m4-carbine1.jpg','popup','width=634+20,height=416+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/daniel-defense-inc-browse-rifles-m4-carbine-tm1.jpg" height="262" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Daniel Defense, Inc | Browse | Rifles | M4 Carbine" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>I like the look of the A1.5 rear sight.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Promotional video:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P8hhhfPMtFQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/P8hhhfPMtFQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>No word on pricing.</p>
<p>More info at <a href="http://www.ddm4.com">DDM4.com</a></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> MSRP seems to be $1600. See randomhero58&#8217;s comment below.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.tactical-life.com/online/products/daniel-defenses-m4-carbine/">Tactical Life</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/09/daniel-defense-m4-carbine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colt / Umarex M4 Carbine .22 Tactical Rimfire AR-15</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/13/colt-umarex-m4-carbine-22-tactical-rimfire-ar-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/13/colt-umarex-m4-carbine-22-tactical-rimfire-ar-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rimfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umarex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colt and Umarex have teamed up to produce the Colt M4 .22 Tactical Rimfire. The is probably the only real &#8220;Colt M4&#8243; you will ever be allowed to own!
I am not 100% sure they are in fact AR-15s. UMAREX USA uses well known brand-names such as Beretta, Ruger and Walther to sell their airguns. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colt and Umarex have teamed up to produce the Colt M4 .22 Tactical Rimfire. The is probably the only real &#8220;Colt M4&#8243; you will ever be allowed to own!</p>
<p>I am not 100% sure they are in fact AR-15s. <a href="http://www.umarexusa.com/">UMAREX USA</a> uses well known brand-names such as Beretta, Ruger and Walther to sell their airguns. This could easily be a AR-15 patterned rifle much like the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/30/gsg-5-22-mp5-pattern-rifle/">.22 GSG MP5</a> or <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/16/gsg-22-kalashnikov-ak/">GSG AK</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-colt-colt-umarex-22lr-m4-carbine-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-colt-colt-umarex-22lr-m4-carbine-1.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=360+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-colt-colt-umarex-22lr-m4-carbine-1-tm.jpg" height="225" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Colt Colt Umarex 22Lr M4 Carbine 1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>There will be four different models.</p>
<p><strong>Colt M4 Carbine</strong></p>
<p>* 16&#8243; Barrel<br />
* M4 collapsible style stock<br />
* A4 flat top upper recoever<br />
* detachable carry handle<br />
* A2 flash hider<br />
* A2 pistol grip<br />
* 30 round magazine<br />
* Weight: 5.95 lbs</p>
<p><strong>Colt M4 OPS</strong> (includes the following extras):<br />
* Rear BUIS (Backup iron sight)<br />
* Free floated aluminum picatinny rail handguard</p>
<p><strong>Colt M16</strong> (includes the following extras):</p>
<p>* 20&#8243; barrel</p>
<p><strong>Colt M16 SPR</strong>  (includes the following extras):</p>
<p>* 20&#8243; barrel<br />
* Free floated aluminum picatinny rail handguard<br />
* Flip up read and front sights</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-colt-colt-umarex-22lr-m4-carbine-3.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-colt-colt-umarex-22lr-m4-carbine-3.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=360+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-colt-colt-umarex-22lr-m4-carbine-3-tm.jpg" height="225" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Colt Colt Umarex 22Lr M4 Carbine 3" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>Fake suppressors will also be available as seen in the above photo.</p>
<p>It will be officially announced at SHOT Show 2009.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.onpointsupply.com/cart.php?target=main">OnPointFirearms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/13/colt-umarex-m4-carbine-22-tactical-rimfire-ar-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>182</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq looking to buy $148 million worth of M16, M4 and M203.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/15/iraq-looking-to-buy-148-million-worth-of-m16-m4-and-m203/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/15/iraq-looking-to-buy-148-million-worth-of-m16-m4-and-m203/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m203]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the ASD Network:
The Government of Iraq has requested a possible sale of (80,000) M16A4 5.56MM Rifles, (25,000) M4 5.56MM Carbines, (2,550) M203 40MM Grenade Launchers, spare and repair parts, support equipment, publications and technical data, personnel training and training equipment, contractor engineering and technical support services, and other related elements of logistics support. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.asd-network.com/press_detail_B.asp?ID=18735&amp;NID=283303">ASD Network</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Government of Iraq has requested a possible sale of (80,000) M16A4 5.56MM Rifles, (25,000) M4 5.56MM Carbines, (2,550) M203 40MM Grenade Launchers, spare and repair parts, support equipment, publications and technical data, personnel training and training equipment, contractor engineering and technical support services, and other related elements of logistics support. The estimated cost is $148 million.</p></blockquote>
<p>The M203 will <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/">start being replaced</a> next year. It looks like they will end up in Iraqi service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/15/iraq-looking-to-buy-148-million-worth-of-m16-m4-and-m203/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Del-Ton Inc. now producing AR-15s</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/11/del-ton-inc-now-producing-ar-15s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/11/del-ton-inc-now-producing-ar-15s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Del-Ton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Del-Ton is selling a range of their own AR-15s under the brand name DTI. These rifles were originally announced at the beginning of the year and are now being distributed by American Tactical Imports.

The above pictured M4gery is the DTI-4 and features:
a 16&#8243; barrel with M4 profile, 1&#215;9 twist, 6 positon M4 stock, CAR handguards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Del-Ton is selling a range of their own AR-15s under the brand name DTI. These rifles were originally announced at the beginning of the year and are now being distributed by American Tactical Imports.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rftm16-0-2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rftm16-0-2.jpg','popup','width=850+20,height=490+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rftm16-0-2-tm.jpg" height="230" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Rftm16-0-2" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>The above pictured M4gery is the DTI-4 and features:</p>
<blockquote><p>a 16&#8243; barrel with M4 profile, 1&#215;9 twist, 6 positon M4 stock, CAR handguards with single heat shields, and A2 Flash Hider. The rifle also comes with a hard case, sling, 2 30rd mags and a buttstock cleaning kit.</p></blockquote>
<p>The price is $750.00.</p>
<p>The entire Del-Ton DTI range can be seen <a href="http://www.del-ton.com/AR_15_Rifles_s/2.htm">here</a>.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: Outdoor Wire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/11/del-ton-inc-now-producing-ar-15s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of possible M4 replacements</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/list-of-possible-m4-replacements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/list-of-possible-m4-replacements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MilitaryTimes has listed the contenders for the M4 replacement. They are:
AR-15 Platform (Direct Gas Impingement):

* Colt ACC Monolithic
* Troy Industries M7A1 (can use either DI or piston system)
* Sabre Defense Industries M5
* S&#38;W MP-4
* Precision Reflex PRI (Upper receiver only. Attaches to M4 lower).
AR-15 Platform (Piston):

* LWRC International M6A4 IAR
* H&#38;K 416
* Knight&#8217;s Armament SR-15
* [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MilitaryTimes has <a href="http://www.militarytimes.com/multimedia/photo/replacing_the_m4/">listed the contenders</a> for the M4 replacement. They are:</p>
<p><strong>AR-15 Platform (Direct Gas Impingement):<br />
</strong><br />
* Colt ACC Monolithic<br />
* Troy Industries M7A1 (can use either DI or piston system)<br />
* Sabre Defense Industries M5<br />
* S&#38;W MP-4<br />
* Precision Reflex PRI (Upper receiver only. Attaches to M4 lower).</p>
<p><strong>AR-15 Platform (Piston):<br />
</strong><br />
* LWRC International M6A4 IAR<br />
* H&#38;K 416<br />
* Knight&#8217;s Armament SR-15<br />
* Superior Arms S-15<br />
* Barrett REC7 PDW<br />
* Patriot Ordnance P416</p>
<p><strong>Not based on the AR platform:<br />
</strong><br />
* Bushmaster/Magpul ACR<br />
* Sig Sauer 556 Classic<br />
* Robinson Armament XCR<br />
* FN SCAR</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/cid-1-0d2aa28c0d2a9fa8006ec0548525-tm1.jpg" height="180" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Cid-1-0D2Aa28C0D2A9Fa8006Ec0548525-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Sig 556 Classic</em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>I am not sure if this list is complete. The <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/">Beretta ARX-160 Carbine</a> is conspicuously missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/25/list-of-possible-m4-replacements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip of the day: Don&#8217;t fire a waterlogged AR-15!</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/18/tip-of-the-day-dont-fire-a-waterlogged-ar-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/18/tip-of-the-day-dont-fire-a-waterlogged-ar-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[416]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video clip is from a marketing video made by H&#38;K comparing the 10&#8243; barreled HK 416 with the M4 when fired full of water, immediately after being submerged.

It is a pointless comparison. Obviously Stoner did not design the AR-15 platform to be fired waterlogged. If he had it would be piston driven. Still, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video clip is from a <a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=391_1226951027">marketing video</a> made by H&#38;K comparing the 10&#8243; barreled HK 416 with the M4 when fired full of water, immediately after being submerged.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/r3TMh1qkjFk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/r3TMh1qkjFk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>It is a pointless comparison. Obviously Stoner did not design the AR-15 platform to be fired waterlogged. If he had it would be piston driven. Still, it is interesting to see what happens.</p>
<p>H/T: MP.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/18/tip-of-the-day-dont-fire-a-waterlogged-ar-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beretta ARX-160 Carbine</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arx-160]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beretta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new ARX-160 Carbine is Beretta&#8217;s entry into the M4 replacement competition. Photos by SMG-Lee

M16 magazine, folding iron sights


Folding stock
UPDATE:
Originally I called this rifle the NRX after misreading the logo. It is in the ARX-160. Below is a photo (from MP.net) of the ARX-160 carbine (left) and the rifle version (right). Both have the new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new ARX-160 Carbine is Beretta&#8217;s entry into the M4 replacement competition. Photos by SMG-Lee</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a class="tfb_thumbnail" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dscn0829.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=768+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dscn0829.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dscn0829-tm.jpg" border="1" alt="Dscn0829" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="400" height="300" title="dscn0829 tm Beretta ARX 160 Carbine photo" /></a><br />
<em>M16 magazine, folding iron sights</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a class="tfb_thumbnail" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dscn0827.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=637+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dscn0827.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dscn0827-tm.jpg" border="1" alt="Dscn0827" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="400" height="248" title="dscn0827 tm Beretta ARX 160 Carbine photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a class="tfb_thumbnail" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/smglee-ausa-huge-dscn0830.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=768+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/smglee-ausa-huge-dscn0830.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/smglee-ausa-huge-dscn0830-tm.jpg" border="1" alt=" Smglee Ausa Huge Dscn0830" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="400" height="300" title="smglee ausa huge dscn0830 tm Beretta ARX 160 Carbine photo" /></a><br />
<em>Folding stock</em></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong></p>
<p>Originally I called this rifle the NRX after misreading the logo. It is in the ARX-160. Below is a photo (from <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?p=2478788">MP.net</a>) of the ARX-160 carbine (left) and the rifle version (right). Both have the new Beretta grenade launcher attached.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a class="tfb_thumbnail" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/rotate4pn71.jpg','popup','width=800+20,height=533+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/rotate4pn71.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/rotate4pn7-tm1.jpg" border="1" alt="Rotate4Pn7" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="400" height="266" title="rotate4pn7 tm1 Beretta ARX 160 Carbine photo" /></a></p>
<p>A big thanks to <a href="http://www.gunsandhunting.com/forum/blog/edfriedman2/index.php?showentry=25">Ed</a> who was kind enough to let me know about my mistake after he spoke to Beretta. He and has more <a href="http://www.gunsandhunting.com/forum/blog/edfriedman2/index.php?showentry=25">info</a> on the rifle/carbine.</p>
<p>Apparently the Italian Special Forces will be adopting it in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paraguay army using Chinese M4 clone (CQ 5.56)</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/09/03/paraguay-army-using-chinese-m4-clone-cq-556/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/09/03/paraguay-army-using-chinese-m4-clone-cq-556/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CQ 5.56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norinco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraguay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paraguay has apparently bought the relatively new Norinco CQ 5.56, M4A1 clones.

The caption of the above photo, translated from Spanish:
Soldiers of the Joint Detachment of Empleo Inmediato (DECEI) marching past with carbines Norinco CQ-M4 of 5.56 mm Are copies of Colt M-4A1 made in China and equipped with viewfinders of not known model. The DECEI [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paraguay has apparently bought the relatively new Norinco CQ 5.56, M4A1 clones.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/20080902-8bf1d5b4dd0b73e8d838jxqo7bzunae3.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/20080902-8bf1d5b4dd0b73e8d838jxqo7bzunae3.jpg','popup','width=648+20,height=491+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/20080902-8bf1d5b4dd0b73e8d838jxqo7bzunae3-tm.jpg" height="303" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="20080902 8Bf1D5B4Dd0B73E8D838Jxqo7Bzunae3" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>The caption of the above photo, translated from Spanish:</p>
<blockquote><p>Soldiers of the Joint Detachment of Empleo Inmediato (DECEI) marching past with carbines Norinco CQ-M4 of 5.56 mm Are copies of Colt M-4A1 made in China and equipped with viewfinders of not known model. The DECEI depends on the Commando of Special Troops of the Army.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-40478-2003126050985240946-fs.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-40478-2003126050985240946-fs.jpg','popup','width=585+20,height=403+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-40478-2003126050985240946-fs-tm.jpg" height="275" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Image 40478 2003126050985240946 Fs" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>According to Wikipedia:</p>
<blockquote><p>This variant introduced in the year 2006 in several Defense expos worldwide, including the MILIPOL, is a copy of the American M4A1 assault carbine. It features a telescoping stock, a removable carrying handle mounted on a Picatinny rail, and a 368,3 millimetres (14,5 inches) barrel. The CQ Type A carbine variant is claimed to be able to stabilize both M193 &#8220;Ball&#8221; and SS-109/M-885 variants of the 5.56 mm cartridge, as would be expected from a rifle with a 1:9 barrel rifling twist. It will quickly accept the installation of grenade launchers due to the quick attachment/detachment handguard design and to the step-cut barrel.</p></blockquote>
<p>H/T: china police @ <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?p=3517388#post3517388">MP.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/09/03/paraguay-army-using-chinese-m4-clone-cq-556/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steyr AUG A4 (ADI Austeyr F88 A4)</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/28/steyr-aug-a4-adi-austeyr-f88-a4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/28/steyr-aug-a4-adi-austeyr-f88-a4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austeyr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m320]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steyr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt recently comment on this post about the Australian AUG A4 (ADI Austeyr F88 A4):
To clear up “125″ issues and confusion the A3 varient is to be upgraded to allow the firing of GLA and underslung shot gun attachment with the trigger finger. There is much speculation on INF 2012 weapon systems and the steyr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt recently comment on this <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/27/new-zealand-defense-force-upgrading-steyr-augs/#comment-2710">post</a> about the Australian AUG A4 (ADI Austeyr F88 A4):</p>
<blockquote><p>To clear up “125″ issues and confusion the A3 varient is to be upgraded to allow the firing of GLA and underslung shot gun attachment with the trigger finger. There is much speculation on INF 2012 weapon systems and the steyr will look marketly different. What is concrete is that what changes happen to the weapons system the it must have the same range or better and must not be any heavier than current weight with modifications. There is a photo around of an ugly australian modified A3, this is not the new rifle and was a test bed system and was a demo only. The ADF rumour mill is leaning more to the AUG A4 design as now Australia owns the rights of all world wide styer production and also pattened designs from Austria.</p></blockquote>
<p>I had not idea that the A4 existed. I did some Googling and found some photos in a brochure from <a href="http://www.thalesgroup.com.au/pdfs/steyr_a4.pdf">ADI</a>, the Australian arms and ammunition manufacturer. They may be the &#8220;test&#8221; A4 that Matt mentioned in Matt&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-4-17.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-4-17.png','popup','width=578+20,height=225+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-4-17-tm.jpg" height="155" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 4-17" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-5-12.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-5-12.png','popup','width=538+20,height=220+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-5-12-tm.jpg" height="163" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 5-12" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a pretty ugly design. It looks like someone attacked an AUG with a hacksaw, screwdriver and a few picatinny rails. Especially in contrast to the AUG A3 (from <a href="http://www.steyr-arms.at/index.php?id=72">steyr-arms.at</a>):</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/g8hb0601.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/g8hb0601.jpg','popup','width=884+20,height=552+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/g8hb0601-tm.jpg" height="249" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="G8Hb0601" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Where is the grenade launcher trigger?</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/7dabc304f2-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/7dabc304f2-1.jpg','popup','width=550+20,height=361+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/7dabc304f2-1-tm.jpg" height="262" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="7Dabc304F2-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>I would be surprised if the Australians upgrade their A1/A2 AUGs to use the M203 when the M320 will go into production later this year (according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XM320">Wikipedia</a>).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/xm320-m4.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/xm320-m4.jpg','popup','width=560+20,height=462+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/xm320-m4-tm.jpg" height="330" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xm320-M4" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M4 with M320</em><em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/28/steyr-aug-a4-adi-austeyr-f88-a4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackwater&#8217;s new AR-15: BW15</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/08/blackwaters-new-ar-15-bw15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/08/blackwaters-new-ar-15-bw15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bw15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blackwater announced that they will soon be selling AR-15s. Customers will choose what features they want and the Blackwater Armory will build it.

Blackwater BW-15

The public seemed poised to receive Blackwater’s new BW15 rifle after handling two samples that featured the Blackwater logo. “We’ve had a lot of people ask how they can get one, said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackwater announced that they will soon be selling AR-15s. Customers will choose what features they want and the Blackwater Armory will build it.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-7-11.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-7-11.png','popup','width=460+20,height=253+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-7-11-tm.jpg" height="220" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 7-11" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Blackwater BW-15<br />
</em></p>
<blockquote><p>The public seemed poised to receive Blackwater’s new BW15 rifle after handling two samples that featured the Blackwater logo. “We’ve had a lot of people ask how they can get one, said Alan Alligood, Blackwater armorer.” Blackwater’s highly trained and ex-perienced armorers take the basic M4 to the next level by offering custom rifles that are built exactly to the customer’s wishes.</p>
<p>“We have a hard time helping people understand that we are not offering a line or series of guns. We build want they want. Each one may be different,” says Armory Chief Bill Kirkland. In a business where the firearms industry is saturated with variations and types of ARs, the BW15 represents a truly unique approach. The rifles can only be ordered through the Blackwater Armory, making them very exclusive and highly desirable.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have emailed Blackwater for more information &#8230;  lets see if they respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/08/blackwaters-new-ar-15-bw15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The M4/.223 debate continues</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/24/the-m4223-debate-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/24/the-m4223-debate-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.233]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aviation Week reports that last week the U.S. Army’s Program Executive Office Soldier, Brig. Gen. Mark Brown weighed in on the M4/.223 issue:
“I don’t think we need an unhealthy, discordant debate over the current carbine because I don’t think the current carbine is a long-lived solution anyway. However, the M4 carbine has been continuously improved. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a9a7e9e78-976f-4318-989f-f1c1b0fb4fe3">Aviation Week</a> reports that last week the U.S. Army’s Program Executive Office Soldier, Brig. Gen. Mark Brown weighed in on the M4/.223 issue:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I don’t think we need an unhealthy, discordant debate over the current carbine because <strong>I don’t think the current carbine is a long-lived solution anyway</strong>. However, the M4 carbine has been continuously improved. It has 68 substantial engineering design changes and about 380 total engineering design changes, so it’s become a modular system. It’s very accurate, it’s the most accurate of the carbines, it’s the lightest of the carbines, and it’s the shortest of the carbines. We’re very pleased with it, and we expect it to be the Army’s carbine of record, for a little while.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/24/the-m4223-debate-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese interpol photos</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/27/chinese-interpol-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/27/chinese-interpol-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ak-103]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CQ-M4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norinco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/27/chinese-interpol-photos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MilitaryPhotos.net has some interesting photos of the Chinese International Criminal Police Organization.
Some interesting suppressed AKs, they look like AK-103&#8217;s but could be something else, and what is probably a Norinco CQ (M16A1 clone) or CQ-M4 (you guessed it, an M4 clone).
Although, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if these were airsofters (btw, I have nothing against airsoft).




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=127662">MilitaryPhotos.net</a> has some interesting photos of the Chinese International Criminal Police Organization.</p>
<p>Some interesting suppressed AKs, they look like AK-103&#8217;s but could be something else, and what is probably a Norinco CQ (M16A1 clone) or CQ-M4 (you guessed it, an M4 clone).</p>
<p>Although, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if these were airsofters (btw, I have nothing against airsoft).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005447922407316181-fs.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005447922407316181-fs.jpg','popup','width=500,height=375,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005447922407316181-fs-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2005447922407316181 Fs" title="2005447922407316181 fs tm Chinese interpol photos photo" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005482523202820974-fs.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005482523202820974-fs.jpg','popup','width=500,height=375,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005482523202820974-fs-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2005482523202820974 Fs" title="2005482523202820974 fs tm Chinese interpol photos photo" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005402237985479510-fs.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005402237985479510-fs.jpg','popup','width=500,height=332,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2005402237985479510-fs-tm.jpg" height="298" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2005402237985479510 Fs" title="2005402237985479510 fs tm Chinese interpol photos photo" /></a><br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2000544313641378600-fs.jpg" height="525" width="373" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2000544313641378600 Fs" title="2000544313641378600 fs Chinese interpol photos photo" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/27/chinese-interpol-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M4 may get tougher barrel, better mags</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/22/m4-may-get-tougher-barrel-better-mags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/22/m4-may-get-tougher-barrel-better-mags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/22/m4-may-get-tougher-barrel-better-mags/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Army Times

One of the upgrades that may be coming in the future is a more reliable magazine. The test revealed that 239 of the 882 stoppages M4 suffered were magazine-related.
The hope is that upgrades, such as stronger springs, will increase the magazine&#8217;s ability to feed rounds more effectively, Radcliffe said. If all goes well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/12/army_m4_hearing_071217w/">Army Times</a></p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/myadmin-files-photogallery-57708-united-states-army-soldier-09-tm1.jpg" height="147" width="196" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Myadmin-Files-Photogallery-57708-United-States-Army-Soldier-09-Tm" title="myadmin-files-photogallery-57708-united-states-army-soldier-09-tm.jpg" /></p>
<blockquote><p>One of the upgrades that may be coming in the future is a more reliable magazine. The test revealed that 239 of the 882 stoppages M4 suffered were magazine-related.</p>
<p>The hope is that upgrades, such as stronger springs, will increase the magazine&#8217;s ability to feed rounds more effectively, Radcliffe said. If all goes well in testing, the improved magazines could be ready by next spring.</p>
<p>Another upgrade under consideration is a &#8220;hammer-forged&#8221; barrel, Brown said.</p></blockquote>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think that they were actually planning on replacing the M4 when they announced the testing. Even without magazine stoppages the M4 performed <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/19/m4-beaten-by-piston-carbines/">very badly</a>.</p>
<p>DID has a very <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m4-carbine-controversy-03289/#updates">comprehensive article</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Even with extreme dust test III&#8217;s 98.6 percent success rate there was a total of 863 class 1 and 2 weapon/magazine stoppages with 19 class 3 stoppages. During extreme dust test II conducted during the summer, there were 296 total class 1 and 2 stoppages and 11 class 3 stoppages.</p>
<p>A class 1 stoppage is one a Soldier can clear within 10 seconds; a class 2 stoppage is one a Soldier can clear, but requires more than 10 seconds; and, class 3 is a stoppage that requires an armorer to clear.&#8221;</p>
<p>DID will simply point out that 10 seconds can be a rather fatally long time when people are shooting at you, and at your friends. So, what happens when the Extreme Dust Test III stoppages are broken out by weapon?</p>
<p>The M4 Carbine is the Army&#8217;s existing weapon.</p>
<p>    * 882 jams, 1 jam every 68 rounds, again using heavy lubrication. In addition all 10 of the M4 barrels needed to be replaced, and a number of their parts were replaced during the test. None of the cold hammer forged HK416 and XM-8 barrels needed replacement.</p>
<p>The HK416 is a modified M4 carbine, which can be and has been converted from existing rifles. Used by US Special Forces.</p>
<p>    * 233 jams, 1 jam every 257 rounds, 3.77x more reliable than the M4.</p>
<p>FN SCAR is US special Forces&#8217; new weapon, designed by SOSOCM. It just went into production in late 2007.</p>
<p>    * 226 jams, 1 jam every 265 rounds, 3.85x more reliable than the M4</p>
<p>XM-8 is a developmental rifle. It&#8217;s an advanced version of HK&#8217;s G36, a rifle in wide use by many NATO armies. The US Army cancelled the XM-8 weapons family 2 years ago.</p>
<p>    * 127 jams, I jam every 472 rounds, 6.95x more reliable than the M4.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/005331.html">Murdoc Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/22/m4-may-get-tougher-barrel-better-mags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M4 beaten by piston carbines</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/19/m4-beaten-by-piston-carbines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/19/m4-beaten-by-piston-carbines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[416]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/19/m4-beaten-by-piston-carbines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Army dust test results are out. As you can see above the M4 has fared very badly.
Weapons officials at the Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., exposed Colt Defense LLC&#8217;s M4, along with the Heckler &#38; Koch XM8, FNH USA&#8217;s Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle and the H&#38;K 416 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/dust.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/dust.jpg','popup','width=500,height=380,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/dust-tm.jpg" height="341" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dust" title="dust tm M4 beaten by piston carbines photo" /></a><br />
The Army dust test results are out. As you can see above the M4 has fared very badly.</p>
<blockquote><p>Weapons officials at the Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., exposed Colt Defense LLC&#8217;s M4, along with the Heckler &#38; Koch XM8, FNH USA&#8217;s Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle and the H&#38;K 416 to sandstorm conditions from late September to late November, firing 6,000 rounds through each test weapon.</p>
<p> When the test was completed, ATEC officials found that the M4 performed &#8220;significantly worse&#8221; than the other three weapons, sources told Army Times.</p>
<p>Officials tested 10 each of the four carbine models, firing a total of 60,000 rounds per model. Here&#8217;s how they ranked, according to the total number of times each model stopped firing:</p>
<p>        * XM8: 127 stoppages.<br />
        * MK16 SCAR Light: 226 stoppages.<br />
        * 416: 233 stoppages.<br />
        * M4: 882 stoppages.</p>
<p>The results of the test were &#8220;a wake-up call,&#8221; but Army officials continue to stand by the current carbine, said Brig. Gen. Mark Brown, commander of Program Executive Office Soldier, the command that is responsible for equipping soldiers.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can bet H&#38;K, FN and Magpul are happy about these results!</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/005325.html">Murdoc Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/19/m4-beaten-by-piston-carbines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malaysia licensed to make M4 carbines</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/07/malaysia-licensed-to-make-m4-carbines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/07/malaysia-licensed-to-make-m4-carbines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/07/malaysia-licensed-to-make-m4-carbines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malaysia is apparently switching from Steyr rifles to Colt M4 Carbines.

The Deputy Prime Minister has said a Malaysian company, SME Ordnance (SMEO), has a license to manufacture the M4 for use locally and possibly for export in the future.
 &#8220;We took this decision as we want to enable our soldiers to be soldiers of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malaysia is <a href="http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/5/nation/19381084&amp;sec=nation">apparently</a> switching from Steyr rifles to Colt M4 Carbines.<br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/m4-carbine.jpg" height="246" width="88" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M4 Carbine" title="m4 carbine Malaysia licensed to make M4 carbines photo" /></p>
<p>The Deputy Prime Minister has said a Malaysian company, SME Ordnance (SMEO), has a license to manufacture the M4 for use locally and possibly for export in the future.</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;We took this decision as we want to enable our soldiers to be soldiers of the future, equipped with the latest modern technology&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting. I don&#8217;t think Colt will allow export to North America. Export will probably be limited to South East Asian countries.</p>
<p>More <a href="http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/5/nation/19381084&amp;sec=nation">here</a>.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.thegunblogs.com/node/676#comment-608?PHPSESSID=4116e472318cc572e260abe8af691a3b">Rustmeister @ The Gun Blogs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/07/malaysia-licensed-to-make-m4-carbines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking at purchasing an M4? Check this comparison chart out first</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/24/looking-at-purchasing-an-m4-check-this-comparison-chart-out-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/24/looking-at-purchasing-an-m4-check-this-comparison-chart-out-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6920]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP4-C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR1251X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armalite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCWA3F 16M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bushmaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K3B-M4-A3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M&P15 CMMG 16" M4 Carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-15A4C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M4 Light Carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noveske]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Rivers Arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sabre Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XR15-A3 M4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/24/looking-at-purchasing-an-m4-check-this-comparison-chart-out-first/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across an M4 comparison chart. Its compares the Colt 6920, LMT, Noveske M4 Light Carbine, Sabre Defense XR15-A3 M4, S&#38;W M&#38;P15 CMMG 16&#8243; M4 Carbine, Stag Model 1, Bushmaster BCWA3F 16M, Rock Rivers Arms AR1251X, Armalite M-15A4C, Olympic K3B-M4-A3 and DPMS AP4-C.
Click to enlarge.

The latest version of this chart can be found here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across an M4 comparison chart. Its compares the Colt 6920, LMT, Noveske M4 Light Carbine, Sabre Defense XR15-A3 M4, S&#38;W M&#38;P15 CMMG 16&#8243; M4 Carbine, Stag Model 1, Bushmaster BCWA3F 16M, Rock Rivers Arms AR1251X, Armalite M-15A4C, Olympic K3B-M4-A3 and DPMS AP4-C.</p>
<p>Click to enlarge.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/070810-ar-chart.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/070810-ar-chart.jpg','popup','width=680,height=690,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/070810-ar-chart-tm.jpg" height="456" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="070810-Ar-Chart" title="070810 ar chart tm Looking at purchasing an M4? Check this comparison chart out first photo" /></a></p>
<p>The latest version of this chart can be found <a href="http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=6642">here on m4carbine.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/24/looking-at-purchasing-an-m4-check-this-comparison-chart-out-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beautiful M4 Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/01/beuatiful-m4-poster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/01/beuatiful-m4-poster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/02/beuatiful-m4-poster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(Click for a bigger version)
This beautiful poster has been designed by Mark Fingar and can be purchased here.
Accessories include:
Colt M4
(SOPMOD STYLE) with KAC RAS Handguard &#38; KAC Vertical Grip.
Optics &#38; Iron Sights:
ACOG
EOTech 552
Aimpoint COMPM2 &#38; 3X Magnifier
Leupold CQ/T MK4
Nightforce NXS Riflescope
Trijicon AccuPoint
Trijicon Reflex
Colt C-MORE Tactical Sight
A3 Detachable Carry Handle
LaRue Tactical IronDot
Troy BUIS
Matech BUIS
A.R.M.S. #40 BUIS
LaRue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/m4-poster.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/m4-poster.jpg','popup','width=770,height=1024,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/m4-poster-tm.jpg" alt="M4 Poster" border="1" height="442" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="331" title="m4 poster tm Beautiful M4 Poster photo" /></a></p>
<p>(Click for a bigger version)</p>
<p>This beautiful poster has been designed by Mark Fingar and can be purchased <a href="http://www.markfingar.com/Product.htm">here</a>.</p>
<p>Accessories include:</p>
<p>Colt M4<br />
(SOPMOD STYLE) with KAC RAS Handguard &amp; KAC Vertical Grip.</p>
<p>Optics &amp; Iron Sights:<br />
ACOG<br />
EOTech 552<br />
Aimpoint COMPM2 &amp; 3X Magnifier<br />
Leupold CQ/T MK4<br />
Nightforce NXS Riflescope<br />
Trijicon AccuPoint<br />
Trijicon Reflex<br />
Colt C-MORE Tactical Sight<br />
A3 Detachable Carry Handle<br />
LaRue Tactical IronDot<br />
Troy BUIS<br />
Matech BUIS<br />
A.R.M.S. #40 BUIS<br />
LaRue BUIS<br />
LMT BUIS<br />
Troy Front Sight<br />
PRI Front Sight</p>
<p>Lasers:<br />
PEQ-2A<br />
PAQ-4C<br />
DBAL-A2<br />
OTAL<br />
VITAL-2</p>
<p>Lights:<br />
Surefire L72<br />
Surefire M910<br />
Insight M6<br />
Surefire Millennium<br />
Surefire Scout</p>
<p>Silencers &amp; DD&#8217;s:<br />
Knight&#8217;s Armament M4QD<br />
YHM Phantom, and QD Flash Hider<br />
GemTech M496D<br />
Surefire M4FA556-BK<br />
Ops Inc CQB 15th Model</p>
<p>M203 Grenade Launcher<br />
with AN/PSQ-18A Day/Night Sight</p>
<p>Night Vision:<br />
PVS-22<br />
PVS-14 &amp; Magnifier<br />
PVS-17</p>
<p>Misc Hardware:<br />
LMT SOPMOD Stock<br />
Magpul CTR Stock<br />
Colt M4Stock<br />
LaRue Tactical Free-Floating Handguard<br />
TangoDown Vertical Grip<br />
TangoDown Battle Grip<br />
Magpul MIAD Grip<br />
Magpul Magazine Pull<br />
Harris Bipod with LaRue QD mount</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/albums-y44-mfingar-detail-02.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/albums-y44-mfingar-detail-02.jpg','popup','width=1008,height=686,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/albums-y44-mfingar-detail-02-tm.jpg" alt=" Albums Y44 Mfingar Detail 02" border="1" height="311" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="454" title="albums y44 mfingar detail 02 tm Beautiful M4 Poster photo" /></a></p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://the-download-munkey.blogspot.com/2007/09/military-tuesday-m4-carbine-accessories.html">The Download Munkey</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/01/beuatiful-m4-poster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lego Guns</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/27/lego-guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/27/lego-guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/28/lego-guns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do your kids play with Lego? Then treat them to life-like Lego guns!

A company called BrickArms sells Lego guns based on real guns. To image to the right is a WWII Sergeant armed with a M1A1 and his trusty 1911.
Other guns available are the MP5, M4, S&#38;W 500 and more
  
even a briefcase uzi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do your kids play with Lego? Then treat them to life-like Lego guns!</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-15-4.jpg" height="156" width="134" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 15-4" title="picture 15 4 Lego Guns photo" /></p>
<p>A company called BrickArms sells Lego guns based on real guns. To image to the right is a WWII Sergeant armed with a M1A1 and his trusty 1911.</p>
<p>Other guns <a href="http://www.brickarms.com">available</a> are the MP5, M4, S&#38;W 500 and more</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/mp5-black-s.gif" height="69" width="119" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Mp5 Black S" title="mp5 black s Lego Guns photo" /> <img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/m4-black-s.gif" height="64" width="143" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M4 Black S" title="m4 black s Lego Guns photo" /> <img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/sw500-black.gif" height="60" width="117" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Sw500 Black" title="sw500 black Lego Guns photo" /></p>
<p>even a briefcase uzi <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' title="icon biggrin Lego Guns photo" /><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-16-1.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-16-1.png','popup','width=491,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-16-1-tm.jpg" height="100" width="102" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 16-1" title="picture 16 1 tm Lego Guns photo" /></a></p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://the-download-munkey.blogspot.com/2007/02/brickarms-lego-for-gun-nut.html">The Download Munkey</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/27/lego-guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who uses the M16 / M4 / AR-15 / C7 / C8</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/21/who-uses-the-m16-m4-ar-15-c7-c8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/21/who-uses-the-m16-m4-ar-15-c7-c8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/21/who-uses-the-m16/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The M16 has been in service for over 40 years and I did some research to see which governments now use it. I decided to create a map showing who uses the M16/M4, AR-15 (civilian version)and the  C7/ C8 (Canadian version).
This is what I came up with (click the image to increase the size)

Some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M16 has been in service for over 40 years and I did some research to see which governments now use it. I decided to create a map showing who uses the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_rifle">M16</a>/<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Carbine">M4</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15">AR-15</a> (civilian version)and the  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_Canada_C7_rifle">C7/ C8</a> (Canadian version).</p>
<p>This is what I came up with (click the image to increase the size)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/m16-world-map21.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/m16-world-map21.png','popup','width=999,height=507,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/m16-world-map2-tm1.jpg" height="228" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M16 World Map2" title="m16 world map2 tm1 Who uses the M16 / M4 / AR 15 / C7 / C8 photo" /></a></p>
<p>Some of the countries, such as the UK, only use M16/M4/AR-15/C7/C8 rifles for their special forces. Presumably because the AR-15 platform has no end of customizations available.</p>
<p>Here is a complete list of countries (from the Colt <a href="http://www.colt.com/mil/customers.asp">website</a>. The above map is more detailed than the Colt map):</p>
<p>Argentina, Australia, The Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Botswana, Bosnia and Hercegovina, Brazil, Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, East Timor, Estonia, Fiji, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq ,Ireland, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Maldives, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Norway, Laos, Nigeria, Netherlands, Oman,Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Portugal, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Vietnam and Venezuela.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong></p>
<p>Added Georgia, who are <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/18/the_russians_finally_show_some_taste_in_firearms/">adopting the M4</a>, and Afghanistan, who have been <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/20/afghan-army-gets-canadian-c7-rifles/">given C7 rifles</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/21/who-uses-the-m16-m4-ar-15-c7-c8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animation comparing H&amp;k 416 Carbine and M4 Carbine</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/animation-comparing-hk-416-carbine-and-m4-carbine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/animation-comparing-hk-416-carbine-and-m4-carbine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hk416]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/animation-comparing-hk-416-carbine-and-m4-carbine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This animation shows how both the 416 and M4 operate and explains the differences between the M4/M16/AR15 direct-gas impingement system and the H&#38;K 416 piston system.
View the animation here. Below is a screenshot.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/projects/flash/2007_02_20_carbine/">animation</a> shows how both the 416 and M4 operate and explains the differences between the M4/M16/AR15 direct-gas impingement system and the H&#38;K 416 piston system.</p>
<p>View the animation <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/projects/flash/2007_02_20_carbine/">here</a>. Below is a screenshot.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-19-1.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-19-1.png','popup','width=866,height=400,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/picture-19-1-tm.jpg" height="258" width="559" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 19-1" title="picture 19 1 tm Animation comparing H&k 416 Carbine and M4 Carbine photo" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/animation-comparing-hk-416-carbine-and-m4-carbine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than M4, but you canâ€™t have one</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/better-than-m4-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-have-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/better-than-m4-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-have-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hk416]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/better-than-m4-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-have-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ArmyTimes has written about how the army is stuck with the M16/M4 while spec ops are moving to the H&#38;K 416:

Delta Force worked with a gun maker to come up with a better weapon. The 416 is now considered in many circles to be the best carbine in the world, but the regular Army [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.armytimes.com">ArmyTimes</a> has <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/02/atCarbine070219/">written about</a> how the army is stuck with the M16/M4 while spec ops are moving to the H&#38;K 416:</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/416studio10.jpg" height="148" width="337" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" 416Studio10" title="416studio10 Better than M4, but you canâ€™t have one photo" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Delta Force worked with a gun maker to come up with a better weapon. The 416 is now considered in many circles to be the best carbine in the world, but the regular Army is sticking with the M4 and M16.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Members of the elite unit linked up with German arms maker Heckler &#38; Koch, which replaced the M4&#8217;s gas system with one that experts say significantly reduces malfunctions while increasing parts life. After exhaustive tests with the help of Delta, the H&#38;K 416 was ready in 2004.</p>
<p>Members of the elite commando unit &#8211; formally known as 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta &#8211; have been carrying it in combat ever since.</p>
<p>The 416 is now considered in many circles to be the best carbine in the world &#8211; a weapon that combines the solid handling, accuracy and familiarity of the M4 with the famed dependability of the rugged AK47.</p>
<p>For the foreseeable future, however, the Army is sticking with the M4 and M16 for regular forces.</p></blockquote>
<p>More <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/02/atCarbine070219/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/09/better-than-m4-but-you-can%e2%80%99t-have-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
