<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; m320</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/m320/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>40mm M320 grenade launcher will be replace M203 next year</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m203]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m320]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Army Times reports that the H&#38;K developed M320 will being replacing the M203 in February next year.
The Army plans to begin fielding the first of 71,600 new replacement launchers in February for a cost of about $3,500 each, Audette said. Fielding of the M320 will likely be completed by 2015, Audette said.
..
Each M320 will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Army Times <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/11/army_grenade_112008w/">reports</a> that the H&#38;K developed M320 will being replacing the M203 in February next year.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Army plans to begin fielding the first of <strong>71,600 new replacement launchers in February</strong> for a cost of about <strong>$3,500 each</strong>, Audette said. Fielding of the M320 will <strong>likely be completed by 2015</strong>, Audette said.</p>
<p>..</p>
<p>Each M320 will come with a <strong>laser range finder and a sophisticated sight</strong> that even lets soldiers know if they aren&#8217;t holding the launcher right.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320glm.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320glm.jpg','popup','width=600+20,height=380+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320glm-tm.jpg" height="253" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xm320Glm" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M320 with stock and laser range finder sighting system.<br />
</em></p>
<p>The unit weights 3.57 &#8211; 3.89 lbs depending on what rifle it is being mounted on.The stock pictured above adds an extra lb bringing the weight up to 4.8 lbs.</p>
<p>Benefits over the M230 are:</p>
<p>- The barrel swings out allowing larger rounds than the M203. Useful for less than lethal rounds.</p>
<p>- Laser range finder and new electronic sight system which also indicates if the launcher is being held incorrectly.</p>
<p>- Double action trigger</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320-m4-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320-m4-1.jpg','popup','width=560+20,height=462+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/xm320-m4-1-tm.jpg" height="330" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xm320-M4-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M320 mounted under M4.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/40mm-m320-grenade-launcher-will-be-replace-m203-next-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steyr AUG A4 (ADI Austeyr F88 A4)</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/28/steyr-aug-a4-adi-austeyr-f88-a4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/28/steyr-aug-a4-adi-austeyr-f88-a4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austeyr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m320]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steyr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt recently comment on this post about the Australian AUG A4 (ADI Austeyr F88 A4):
To clear up “125″ issues and confusion the A3 varient is to be upgraded to allow the firing of GLA and underslung shot gun attachment with the trigger finger. There is much speculation on INF 2012 weapon systems and the steyr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt recently comment on this <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/27/new-zealand-defense-force-upgrading-steyr-augs/#comment-2710">post</a> about the Australian AUG A4 (ADI Austeyr F88 A4):</p>
<blockquote><p>To clear up “125″ issues and confusion the A3 varient is to be upgraded to allow the firing of GLA and underslung shot gun attachment with the trigger finger. There is much speculation on INF 2012 weapon systems and the steyr will look marketly different. What is concrete is that what changes happen to the weapons system the it must have the same range or better and must not be any heavier than current weight with modifications. There is a photo around of an ugly australian modified A3, this is not the new rifle and was a test bed system and was a demo only. The ADF rumour mill is leaning more to the AUG A4 design as now Australia owns the rights of all world wide styer production and also pattened designs from Austria.</p></blockquote>
<p>I had not idea that the A4 existed. I did some Googling and found some photos in a brochure from <a href="http://www.thalesgroup.com.au/pdfs/steyr_a4.pdf">ADI</a>, the Australian arms and ammunition manufacturer. They may be the &#8220;test&#8221; A4 that Matt mentioned in Matt&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-4-17.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-4-17.png','popup','width=578+20,height=225+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-4-17-tm.jpg" height="155" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 4-17" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-5-12.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-5-12.png','popup','width=538+20,height=220+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-5-12-tm.jpg" height="163" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 5-12" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a pretty ugly design. It looks like someone attacked an AUG with a hacksaw, screwdriver and a few picatinny rails. Especially in contrast to the AUG A3 (from <a href="http://www.steyr-arms.at/index.php?id=72">steyr-arms.at</a>):</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/g8hb0601.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/g8hb0601.jpg','popup','width=884+20,height=552+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/g8hb0601-tm.jpg" height="249" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="G8Hb0601" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Where is the grenade launcher trigger?</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/7dabc304f2-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/7dabc304f2-1.jpg','popup','width=550+20,height=361+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/7dabc304f2-1-tm.jpg" height="262" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="7Dabc304F2-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>I would be surprised if the Australians upgrade their A1/A2 AUGs to use the M203 when the M320 will go into production later this year (according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XM320">Wikipedia</a>).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/xm320-m4.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/xm320-m4.jpg','popup','width=560+20,height=462+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/xm320-m4-tm.jpg" height="330" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xm320-M4" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>M4 with M320</em><em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/28/steyr-aug-a4-adi-austeyr-f88-a4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
