<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microstamping not working out so well</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/11/microstamping-not-working-out-so-well/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/11/microstamping-not-working-out-so-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microstamping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistols]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the Cali politicians overestimated the technology in its current form. The Sign On San Diego reports (emphasis mine)
California Attorney General Jerry Brown has not certified the law, which is required before it can take effect as scheduled on Jan. 1, and his aides could not say when that may happen. 
&#8230;
“The problem I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the Cali politicians overestimated the technology in its current form. The Sign On San Diego <a href="http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/aug/10/1n10guncodes235322-casing-code-issues-snag-handgun/">reports</a> (emphasis mine)</p>
<blockquote><p>California Attorney General Jerry Brown has not certified the law, which is required before it can take effect as scheduled on Jan. 1, and his aides could not say when that may happen. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>“The problem I have with this is it can&#8217;t be done,” said Kevin Reid, Ruger&#8217;s general counsel. “The legislation says<strong> it has to work 100 percent of the time</strong> and there is nobody, nobody including Todd Lizotte himself, who would say it will always work.” </p></blockquote>
<p>I think the last thing the Attorney General wants is for the law challenged in court because compliance is impossible.</p>
<blockquote><p>Many firearms companies are struggling to comply with California&#8217;s 2006 mandate that all new handgun models include a loaded chamber indicator and a mechanism that prevents firing when a magazine is removed.</p>
<p>In the more than three years since, just one new semiautomatic model has been approved by the state. Two others are pending, Gasparac said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Aside from the Ruger SR-9, no new models of semi-auto handguns have been approved in the past three years! I would be surprised if a month goes by without a new handgun model going on sale in the United States. I remember reading that even cosmetic changes, such as a different finish, to a pistol count as a whole new model that must be certified for sale in the state.</p>
<p>Learn more about <a href="http://blog.joehuffman.org/CommentView,guid,18ee4bbe-5cb8-4bdb-83d9-a032fe5d6157.aspx#commentstart">Microstamping at Joe Huffman&#8217;s blog</a>.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com/2009/08/california-micro-stamping-law-hits.html">Ride Fast &#38; Shoot Straight.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/11/microstamping-not-working-out-so-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excellent article about Open Carry in California</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/22/excellent-article-about-open-carry-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/22/excellent-article-about-open-carry-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Diego Reader has published a very well written article about open carry in California, which is legal as long as the gun is unloaded. The author, Rosa Jurjevics, who had never fired a gun let alone carried openly, met up with a few open carry enthusiast at a boardwalk at Pacific Beach. After giving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Diego Reader has published a <a href="http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2009/jul/15/cover/">very well written article</a> about open carry in California, which is legal as long as the gun is unloaded. The author, Rosa Jurjevics, who had never fired a gun let alone carried openly, met up with a few open carry enthusiast at a boardwalk at Pacific Beach. After giving her a lesson on the legalities of OC and how to deal with the police, they handed her a Ruger Single Six.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cover_lead_t245.jpg" height="276" width="245" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Cover Lead T245" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p>Kudos to the Rosa for writing an article that did not portray those who open carry as extremists or agitators, but simply as a group of people who choose to exercise their legal right to carry openly, and who hope that their constitutional right to carry will be recognized in the future.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/21/oc/">Say Uncle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/22/excellent-article-about-open-carry-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel Defense DDXV: California compliant AR-15</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/daniel-defense-ddxv-california-compliant-ar-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/daniel-defense-ddxv-california-compliant-ar-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDXV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I learnt from Caleb at Gun Nuts that Daniel Defense are launching a new AR-15. The Daniel Defense DDXV Carbine is an entry level version of the DDM4 which was launched earlier this year. The main difference is that the DDXV has a standard M4-style butt stock and plastic handguards rather than a fancy stock [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learnt from <a href="http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/02/daniel-defense-ddxv-carbine/">Caleb at Gun Nuts</a> that Daniel Defense are launching a new AR-15. The Daniel Defense DDXV Carbine is an entry level version of the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/09/daniel-defense-m4-carbine/">DDM4</a> which was launched earlier this year. The main difference is that the DDXV has a standard M4-style butt stock and plastic handguards rather than a fancy stock and rail system.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/585.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/585.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=365+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/585-tm.jpg" height="142" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="585 tm Daniel Defense DDXV: California compliant AR 15 photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Daniel Defense DDXV<br />
</em></p>
<p>Daniel Defense are making a California specific version that requires a tool, in this case a bullet tip, to be used when changing magazines. This allows it to be Cali-legal, although somewhat decreases its utility as a self-defense weapon. The California version also includes a 10 round Magpul PMAG magazine instead of a 30 round magazine.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/358.png" height="262" width="159" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="358 Daniel Defense DDXV: California compliant AR 15 photo" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>10 round Magpul PMAG. Same size as the standard 30 round magazine.</em></p>
<p>It will retail for about $1150 and should be available later this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/04/daniel-defense-ddxv-california-compliant-ar-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruger SR9 now California and Massachusetts legal</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/27/ruger-sr9-now-california-and-massachusetts-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/27/ruger-sr9-now-california-and-massachusetts-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR9]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the press release:
Southport, CT- November 26, 2008 &#8211; Sturm, Ruger &#38; Company, Inc. (NYSE:RGR) is pleased to announce that the Ruger® SR9® pistol has been placed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale within the State of California, as well as the Massachusetts Approved Firearms Roster. The SR9 pistol, chambered for 9mm Luger, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.downrange.tv/artman2/publish/industry/376.shtml">press release</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Southport, CT- November 26, 2008 &#8211; Sturm, Ruger &#38; Company, Inc. (NYSE:RGR) is pleased to announce that the Ruger® SR9® pistol has been placed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale within the State of California, as well as the Massachusetts Approved Firearms Roster. The SR9 pistol, chambered for 9mm Luger, was introduced last October and is the first striker-fired pistol from Ruger.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you are thinking about getting an SR9 read the comments on the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/ruger-sr9-new-polymer-framed-9mm/">SR9 post</a>. It is a wealth of information.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2007-12-17b-2-tm1.jpg" height="240" width="258" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2007-12-17B-2-Tm1" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Ruger SR9 Blackened stainless version<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/27/ruger-sr9-now-california-and-massachusetts-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello Kitty AR-15</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/30/hello-kitty-ar-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/30/hello-kitty-ar-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hello Kitty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/30/hello-kitty-ar-15/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t like pink guns but I must say that the detail on this California legal AR-15 is amazing! I wonder if it is real or a photoshop.
Click to expand the photo.

More about it at RifleGear
Hat Tip: Gizmodo
UPDATE
It is real!
Pre assembled:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/31/worst-looking-glock-i-have-ever-seen/">pink guns</a> but I must say that the detail on this California legal AR-15 is amazing! I wonder if it is real or a photoshop.</p>
<p>Click to expand the photo.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/kittyrifle.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/kittyrifle.jpg','popup','width=1023,height=553,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/kittyrifle-tm.jpg" height="243" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Kittyrifle" title="kittyrifle tm Hello Kitty AR 15 photo" /></a></p>
<p>More about it at <a href="http://blog.riflegear.com/archive/2007/12/26/hello-kitty-ar-15---evil-black-rifle-meets-cute-and.aspx">RifleGear</a></p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/338916/hello-kitty-expands-upon-arsenal-with-ar+15-rifle">Gizmodo</a></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong></p>
<p>It is real!</p>
<p>Pre assembled:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/blogimages-hellokittyparts.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/blogimages-hellokittyparts.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=685,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/blogimages-hellokittyparts-tm.jpg" height="300" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Blogimages Hellokittyparts" title="blogimages hellokittyparts tm Hello Kitty AR 15 photo" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/30/hello-kitty-ar-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
