<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; Artillery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/artillery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor!</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/16/worlds-largest-gun-suppressor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/16/worlds-largest-gun-suppressor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suppressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strange guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[155mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppressor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This photo, taken at a German Army artillery range, is not a fake.

I know what you are thinking: "WTF!".It was build to reduce noise to communities nearby. The vehicle pictured is the M109G 155mm self-propelled howitzer.

Many thanks to Sven for emailing it to me.

UPDATE: Thanks to Mark for these images of another German tank suppressor.

UPDATE: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photo, taken at a German Army artillery range, is not a fake.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/155mm_suppressor-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/155mm_suppressor-tfb-tm.jpg' title="155mm suppressor tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" alt="155mm suppressor tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> The side expansion chambers will be to accommodate the blast of the cannon's muzzle brake.</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>I know what you are thinking: "WTF!".It was build to reduce noise to communities nearby. The vehicle pictured is the M109G 155mm self-propelled howitzer.</p>

<p>Many thanks to <a href="http://defense-and-freedom.blogspot.com/">Sven</a> for emailing it to me.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Thanks to Mark for these images of another German tank suppressor.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ifl_schalldaempfer_sch_368o-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ifl_schalldaempfer_sch_368o-tfb-tm.jpg' title="ifl schalldaempfer sch 368o tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" alt="ifl schalldaempfer sch 368o tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ifl_schalldampfer_76fs-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ifl_schalldampfer_76fs-tfb-tm.jpg' title="ifl schalldampfer 76fs tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" alt="ifl schalldampfer 76fs tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/picture_5-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/picture_5-tfb-tm.jpg' title="picture 5 tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" alt="picture 5 tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Daniel found a <a href="http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=56QlAAAAEBAJ">US patent</a> that German defense firm Rheinmetall GmbH has on the design of cannon silencers.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cannon_suppressor-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cannon_suppressor-tfb-tm.jpg' title="cannon suppressor tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" alt="cannon suppressor tfb tm Worlds Largest Gun Suppressor! photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/16/worlds-largest-gun-suppressor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First use of standardized munitions at sea</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/first-use-of-standardized-munitions-at-sea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/first-use-of-standardized-munitions-at-sea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the Age of Sail ships tended to carry many different types of cannons. The weapons mix was determined by the Captains preferences and what was available in the navel shipyard when the ship was being outfitted. Each cannon was crewed by the same set of men so they knew what had to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Sail">Age of Sail</a> ships tended to carry many different types of cannons. The weapons mix was determined by the Captains preferences and what was available in the navel shipyard when the ship was being outfitted. Each cannon was crewed by the same set of men so they knew what had to be done to get the best out of it. Marine archaeologists<br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/300px-loutherbourg-spanish-armada.jpg" height="198" width="254" align="right" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-Loutherbourg-Spanish Armada" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
 have discovered that the cannons on a English warship wreckage, dating back to the time of the famous defeat of the Spanish Armada, carried only one sized cannon ball and two of the recovered cannons both had the same bore size. The <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7899831.stm">BBC reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This marked the beginning of a kind of mechanisation of war,&#8221; says naval historian Professor Eric Grove of Salford University.</p>
<p>&#8220;The ship is now a gun platform in a way that it wasn&#8217;t before.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The new research follows the discovery of the first wreck of an Elizabethan fighting ship off Alderney in the Channel Islands, thought to date from around 1592, just four years after the Spanish Armada.</p>
<p>The ship was a pinnace, a small ship carrying 12 guns, two of which have been recovered.</p></blockquote>
<p>The BBC article has a lot of hype calling them &#8220;superguns&#8221;. I am an avid reader of novels set in that period and have read a lot of the period history, I can&#8217;t see anything  impressive about the gun itself, rather how it was used and its superior logistics.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7899831.stm">BBC article</a> more info and a video of a replica cannon modeled on those found in the wreckage.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/24/2337202&amp;from=rss">Slashdot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/25/first-use-of-standardized-munitions-at-sea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JR&#8217;s Nano-Mortar</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/05/26/jrs-nano-mortar-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/05/26/jrs-nano-mortar-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blackpowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JR (A Keyboard and a .45) has built a nano-mortar. A beautiful design. Nano artillery at its finest!

1&#8243; long and 0.710&#8243; high.

More photos here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR (<a href="http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/2008/05/nano-mortar-first-look.html">A Keyboard and a .45</a>) has built a nano-mortar. A beautiful design. <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/22/smallest-blackpowder-artillery-ever-made/">Nano artillery</a> at its finest!</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/picture-11-151.png" border="1" alt="Picture 11-15" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="163" height="141" title="picture 11 151 JRs Nano Mortar photo" /><br />
<em>1&#8243; long and 0.710&#8243; high.<br />
</em></p>
<p>More photos <a href="http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/2008/05/nano-mortar-first-look.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/05/26/jrs-nano-mortar-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smallest blackpowder artillery ever made</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/22/smallest-blackpowder-artillery-ever-made/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/22/smallest-blackpowder-artillery-ever-made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 05:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blackpowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/22/smallest-blackpowder-artillery-ever-made/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blackpowder cannon enthusiasts over at the Graybeard forums came up with some amazing pieces of artillery.
CU_Cannon built the &#8220;Nano-mortar&#8221;. It fires .177&#8243; BBs. The bed it sits on is 1&#8243; long.
Click to expand the images.

The Nano-mortar

Here is a video of it in action


Blueprints
Cal.45 built a 3mm mortar called the &#8220;Pico &#8220;Mortar&#8221;

The &#8220;Pico Mortar&#8221;

The pico [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blackpowder cannon enthusiasts over at the Graybeard forums <a href="http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/topic,106154.120.html">came up</a> with some amazing pieces of artillery.</p>
<p>CU_Cannon built the &#8220;Nano-mortar&#8221;. It fires .177&#8243; BBs. The bed it sits on is 1&#8243; long.</p>
<p>Click to expand the images.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nanomortar3.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nanomortar3.jpg','popup','width=666+20,height=449+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nanomortar3-tm.jpg" height="269" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Nanomortar3" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The Nano-mortar<br />
</em></p>
<p>Here is a video of it in action</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kQKyBDNMsyE&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kQKyBDNMsyE&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nanomortardrawing.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nanomortardrawing.jpg','popup','width=804+20,height=438+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nanomortardrawing-tm.jpg" height="217" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Nanomortardrawing" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Blueprints</em></p>
<p>Cal.45 built a 3mm mortar called the &#8220;Pico &#8220;Mortar&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/picomortar1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/picomortar1.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=480+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/picomortar1-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picomortar1" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The &#8220;Pico Mortar&#8221;<br />
</em></p>
<p>The pico mortar was build solely with a drill-press, some files and emery paper. It fires 3mm shot pellets (0.118 inch diameter) and has a maximum load of 0.2 grains of blackpowder. It has a barrel length of 8mm (0.315&#8243;) and can fire 6 meters (20 feet)</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyways. I started with a load of about 0.2gr Swiss #2 but this did just a sizzling sound, so from the next shots on I used Swiss #1 (which is even finer in granulation: about 0.011 to 0.015 inch) which produced a nice snapping. Cheesy.</p>
<p>The touch hole is 0.5 millimeters = close to 0.02 inch (that makes it about 16% of the bore diameter (if one may still call it so).</p>
<p>Priming was done by filling the touch hole granule by granule; sweaty hands help maneuvering these tiny particlesin place.</p>
<p>First I wanted to enlarge the touch hole to fuse diameter and keep the rest at the smaller diameter (to keep some pressure) but the wall thickness is that small, that this wasnot possible.</p>
<p>Ignition with a lighter proofed to be better than trying to do it with a match: the flame produces soot but therefore does not function (kept them as size reference on the photo though).</p>
<p>Whatever. At first I thought that the shot would barely leve the muzzle: wrong!</p>
<p><strong>Firing from the kitchen table I shot dimples into the door! This was 2.5 meters (8.2 feet) away</strong>! By the trajectory (angle of the mortar and height of impact) this means an estimated firing distance of 6 meters (about 20 feet): I would never have guessed this to be possible with a piece that has a barrel length of just 8 millimeters (0.315 inch).</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/images-cal45-picofire.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/images-cal45-picofire.jpg','popup','width=632+20,height=406+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/images-cal45-picofire-tm.jpg" height="256" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Cal45 Picofire" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The &#8220;Pico Mortar&#8221; being fired<br />
</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/sketch.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/sketch.jpg','popup','width=787+20,height=430+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/sketch-tm.jpg" height="218" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Sketch" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>&#8220;Pico Mortar&#8221; blueprints</em></p>
<p>Rickk built the &#8220;Nano Cannon&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/im-cannon-nano2.jpg" height="240" width="320" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Im Cannon Nano2" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>The &#8220;Nano Cannon&#8221;<br />
</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Now I know what only the others who have made one know&#8230; what the tremendous roar they make sounds like  Grin</p>
<p>Bore is 3/16 (.186), so it will take a BB. Fuse is 5/64, so it will takes 1/16 fuse.</p>
<p>Trunions, as well as cascable, are 3/16 inch steel rod pressed into shallow 3/16  holes and then brazed in place.</p>
<p>All the work was done on my drill press, with some help from an angle grinder and a file for shaping.</p>
<p>It needs a pit more polishing, but I just couldn&#8217;t wait to fire it ! Total time into is so far is about 2 hours.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/im-cannon-nano4.jpg" height="228" width="320" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Im Cannon Nano4" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>The &#8220;Nano Cannon&#8221; with carriage<br />
</em></p>
<blockquote><p>I found the smoldering paper towel pieces about 15 feet away, and the gun recoils back about 6 inches!</p>
<p>BTW, for BB caliber, Q-tips make excellent cleaning rods.</p></blockquote>
<p>Terry C. built the the very first micro-gonne. A <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/24/history-of-early-firearms-handgonnes-and-matchlocks/">hand gonne</a> is a hand held cannon. It fires #4 buckshot.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/picture.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/picture.jpg','popup','width=500+20,height=375+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/picture-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>the micro-gonne<br />
</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/7c94e0d4-cbb9-4919-90cf-45a96f1ba128-picture.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/7c94e0d4-cbb9-4919-90cf-45a96f1ba128-picture.jpg','popup','width=500+20,height=375+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/7c94e0d4-cbb9-4919-90cf-45a96f1ba128-picture-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" {7C94E0D4-Cbb9-4919-90Cf-45A96F1Ba128} Picture" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The micro hand gonne being fired. Note the wooden rod attached.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Victor build a bigger scale hand gonne:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/dscf2490.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/dscf2490.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=480+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/dscf2490-tm.png" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscf2490" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/22/smallest-blackpowder-artillery-ever-made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AKs mounted on Chineses artillery barrels</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/11/aks-mounted-on-nk-artillery-barrels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/11/aks-mounted-on-nk-artillery-barrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/11/aks-mounted-on-nk-artillery-barrels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: It is Chinese Artillery, not North Korean. Sorry, my mistake. Apparently those are Chinese characters in the background. Thanks Danger Zone for the correction.

A photo in the NK AAA article I recently blogged about show AKs mounted on artillery barrels. The theories on MilitaryPhotos.net are that they could be:

Crude Sights
Used to fire tracers
Used to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: It is Chinese Artillery, not North Korean. Sorry, my mistake. Apparently those are Chinese characters in the background. Thanks Danger Zone for the correction.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s60plauu7.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s60plauu7.jpg','popup','width=700,height=325,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s60plauu7-tm.jpg" alt="S60Plauu7" border="1" height="208" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="450" title="s60plauu7 tm AKs mounted on Chineses artillery barrels photo" /></a></p>
<p>A photo in the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/10/fascinating-article-on-north-korean-anti-aircraft-artillery/">NK AAA article</a> I recently blogged about show AKs mounted on artillery barrels. The theories on MilitaryPhotos.net are that they could be:</p>
<ul>
<li>Crude Sights</li>
<li>Used to fire tracers</li>
<li>Used to fire bullets during training instead of artillery rounds to save cost.</li>
</ul>
<p>The only other explanation I can think of is that they are just stowed away up there. Although I don&#8217;t see how the operators could climb up a hot barrel to fetch it during combat.</p>
<p>Anyone know what they are really there for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/11/aks-mounted-on-nk-artillery-barrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fascinating article on North Korean Anti-Aircraft Artillery</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/10/fascinating-article-on-north-korean-anti-aircraft-artillery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/10/fascinating-article-on-north-korean-anti-aircraft-artillery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/10/fascinating-article-on-north-korean-anti-aircraft-artillery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planeman has written a fascinating article, &#8220;Bluffer&#8217;s guide: Fortress North Korea&#8221;, about North Korean AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery). It has has lots of 3D diagrams and google earth satellite photos. It is well worth reading.

AAA Coverage of Pyongyang

It is a classic example of how the internet enables the use unclassified information to create detailed reports on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planeman has written a fascinating article, &#8220;Bluffer&#8217;s guide: Fortress North Korea&#8221;, about North Korean AAA (Anti-Aircraft Artillery). It has has lots of 3D diagrams and google earth satellite photos. It is well worth reading.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dprkcapital2xg9.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dprkcapital2xg9.jpg','popup','width=921,height=662,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dprkcapital2xg9-tm.jpg" height="323" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dprkcapital2Xg9" title="dprkcapital2xg9 tm Fascinating article on North Korean Anti Aircraft Artillery photo" /></a><br />
<em>AAA Coverage of Pyongyang<br />
</em></p>
<p>It is a classic example of how the internet enables the use unclassified information to create detailed reports on topics normally only accessible by intelligence personal.</p>
<p>Read it <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=128528" target="_top">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/10/fascinating-article-on-north-korean-anti-aircraft-artillery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>32-Megajoule Rail Gun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/15/32-megajoule-rail-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/15/32-megajoule-rail-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail gun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/15/32-megajoule-rail-gun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like every other red-blooded American boy, I enjoy the notion of propelling a piece of lead at up to Mach 8 and at &#8220;extreme&#8221; ranges. That&#8217;s why I was glad to hear that BAE Systems has delivered a rail gun capable of such feats, and that the US Navy signed for the package

Not exactly a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Like every other red-blooded American boy, I enjoy the notion of propelling a piece of <strong>lead at up to Mach 8</strong> and at &#8220;extreme&#8221; ranges. That&#8217;s why I was glad to hear that BAE Systems has delivered a rail gun capable of such feats, and that the US Navy signed for the package</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/picture-13-7.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/picture-13-7.png','popup','width=306,height=166,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/picture-13-7-tm.jpg" height="150" width="276" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 13-7" title="picture 13 7 tm 32 Megajoule Rail Gun photo" /></a></p>
<p>Not exactly a firearm but I won&#8217;t discriminate against any device that can hurl lead and twice the speed of a .204 Ruger <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile 32 Megajoule Rail Gun photo" /> </p>
<blockquote><p>Mind you, the Navy isn&#8217;t like pissing its pants for joy that it gets to play with a 32-megajoule rail gun. This is America, after all. What the Navy really wants is a 64-megajoule rail gun. But since that might take 13 years and would require, yep, 6 million amps per shot, the Navy&#8217;s gonna have to quit bitching and enjoy the toys it has, at least for now</p></blockquote>
<p>More @ Gizmodo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/11/15/32-megajoule-rail-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
