<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; archery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/archery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SeigeWorks &#8220;American&#8221; Longbow</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/02/seigeworks-american-longbow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/02/seigeworks-american-longbow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Albert A Rasch has written a review (Part 1 and Part 2) on SeigeWorks &#8220;American&#8221; Longbow. These beautiful traditional style bows, without all the ugly gears and pulley that modern compound bows feature, really appeals to me.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert A Rasch has written a review (<a href="http://trochronicles.blogspot.com/2009/08/range-reviews-siegework-creations.html">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://trochronicles.blogspot.com/2009/09/range-reviews-seigeworks-creations.html">Part 2</a>) on <a href="http://www.siegeworkcreations.com/">SeigeWorks</a> &#8220;American&#8221; Longbow. These beautiful traditional style bows, without all the ugly gears and pulley that modern compound bows feature, really appeals to me.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/american-longbow.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/american-longbow.jpg','popup','width=586+20,height=440+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/american-longbow-tm.jpg" height="300" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="American Longbow" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/02/seigeworks-american-longbow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AR-15 &#8220;Assault&#8221; Crossbow upper: PSE TAC 15</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/ar-15-assault-crossbow-upper-pse-tac-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/ar-15-assault-crossbow-upper-pse-tac-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossbow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words fail me. First there was the blackpowder AR, then the Chainsaw AR &#8230;
AR 15 lower receiver, 170lbs built in easy cocking mechanism 3 rails. 425 grain arrow 420 fps. TAC 15 Tactical Assault Crossbow



I think this finally ends the 5.56mm vs. 6.8mm vs. 7.62mm debate. Clearly a 425 grain bolt beats them all!
Actually &#8220;tactical&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words fail me. First there was the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/08/black-powder-ar-15/">blackpowder AR</a>, then the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/01/bayonets-are-so-2007/">Chainsaw AR</a> &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>AR 15 lower receiver, 170lbs built in easy cocking mechanism 3 rails. 425 grain arrow 420 fps. TAC 15 Tactical Assault Crossbow</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;text-indent:20pt;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img093.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img093.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=819+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img093-tm.jpg" height="319" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Albums Jj151 Erikbarnes25 Img093" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;text-indent:20pt;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img095.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img095.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=819+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img095-tm.jpg" height="319" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Albums Jj151 Erikbarnes25 Img095" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;text-indent:20pt;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img096.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img096.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=819+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/albums-jj151-erikbarnes25-img096-tm.jpg" height="319" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Albums Jj151 Erikbarnes25 Img096" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>I think this finally ends the 5.56mm vs. 6.8mm vs. 7.62mm debate. Clearly a 425 grain bolt beats them all!</p>
<p>Actually &#8220;tactical&#8221; crossbows have been around for a long time. Special forces were <a href="http://militaryanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/12/crossbow.html">known to use them</a> as weapons or as zip line launchers. I would be surprised if they are still in use as weapons. </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/oc8twxe4pf0-stx8ixf-foi-aaaaaaaaamo-y4rnt9n7lra-s1600-marines5.jpg" height="358" width="146" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="  Oc8Twxe4Pf0 Stx8Ixf-Foi Aaaaaaaaamo Y4Rnt9N7Lra S1600 Marines5" title="__oC8TwXe4PF0_STX8IXf-fOI_AAAAAAAAAMo_y4RNT9n7lRA_s1600_Marines5.jpg" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>Indian </em><em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Guards">Black Cat</a></em><em> commando with crossbow.</em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>Hat Tip: Shawn B for the info. Photos from <a href="http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/jj151/erikbarnes25">erikbarnes25</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/ar-15-assault-crossbow-upper-pse-tac-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twinbow II crossbow</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/10/twinbow-ii-crossbow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/10/twinbow-ii-crossbow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossbow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twinbow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twinbow II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Twinbow II is an interesting, and beautifully designed, crossbow made by Swiss Crossbow.

Click to expand.
It can be cocked in three seconds and fire a bolt at a speed of 370 feet/sec [ I know nothing about crossbows so I am not sure how revolutionary a 3 second cocking action is].
This video demostrates how it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Twinbow II is an interesting, and beautifully designed, crossbow made by <a href="http://www.swisscrossbow.ch/html/twinbow_II.asp">Swiss Crossbow</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/photos-crossbow-xl-armbrust-twinbow-ii-1230.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/photos-crossbow-xl-armbrust-twinbow-ii-1230.jpg','popup','width=1024+20,height=619+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/photos-crossbow-xl-armbrust-twinbow-ii-1230-tm.jpg" height="241" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Photos Crossbow Xl Armbrust-Twinbow Ii-1230" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Click to expand.</em></p>
<p>It can be cocked in three seconds and fire a bolt at a speed of 370 feet/sec <em>[ I know nothing about crossbows so I am not sure how revolutionary a 3 second cocking action is]</em>.</p>
<p>This video demostrates how it works the action works.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gRyXv2J3Jrw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gRyXv2J3Jrw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.brenzovich.com/">Brenzovich</a> are importing the Twinbow but I am not sure who is actually selling it in the US. <a href="http://www.aiacrossbow.com/crossbow/twinbowii/">Arrow In Apple</a> are selling it in Europe for 1449 Euros.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-20-2.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-20-2.png','popup','width=999+20,height=510+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-20-2-tm.jpg" height="203" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 20-2" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: James has written an <a href="http://www.hellinahandbasket.net/2009/01/new_crossbow_technology.htm">interesting post</a> on how this crossbow compares to regular crossbows. It is worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/10/twinbow-ii-crossbow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medieval Archery</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/05/medieval-archery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/05/medieval-archery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medieval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/05/medieval-archery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across a fascinating article discussing medieval archery, specifically the English victory over the French at the battle of Agincourt in 1415 which was won by the English longbow archers.


  Henry had approximately 5,000 archers at Agincourt, and a stock of about 400,000 arrows. Each archer could shoot about ten arrows a minute, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across a fascinating article discussing medieval archery, specifically the English victory over the French at the battle of Agincourt in 1415 which was won by the English longbow archers.</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-battle.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-battle.jpg','popup','width=533,height=568,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-battle-tm.jpg" height="206" width="192" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Battle" title="images battle tm Medieval Archery photo" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
  Henry had approximately <strong>5,000 archers</strong> at Agincourt, and a stock of about <strong>400,000 arrows</strong>. Each archer could shoot about ten arrows a minute, so the army only had enough ammunition for about eight minutes of shooting at maximum fire power. However, this fire power would have been devastating. Fifty thousand arrows a minute &#8211; over <strong>800 a second</strong> &#8211; would have hissed down on the French cavalry, killing hundreds of men a minute and wounding many more. The function of a company of medieval archers seems to have been equivalent to that of a machine-gunner, so in modern terms we can imagine Agincourt as a battle between old-fashioned cavalry, supported by a few snipers (crossbow-men) on the French side, against a much smaller army equipped with machine guns. Perhaps from this point of view the most remarkable fact about the battle is that the French ignored the very great military advantages of the longbow.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the article <a href="http://www.stortford-archers.org.uk/medieval.htm">here</a>. Just ignore the math!</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/05/medieval-archery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
