<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; .308</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/308/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Winchester SX-AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sx-ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winchester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was very surprised when a reader email me about this new rifle from Winchester. The poor Browning BAR hunting rifle has been through yet another evolution and rebranding.

In early 2008 FN announced a tactical sniper rifle, the FNAR, based on the Browning BAR (FN owns both Browning and Winchester Arms). It added a detachable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very surprised when a reader email me about this new rifle from <a href="http://www.winchesterguns.com/">Winchester</a>. The poor Browning BAR hunting rifle has been through yet another evolution and rebranding.</p>

<p>In early 2008 FN announced a tactical sniper rifle, <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/">the FNAR</a>, based on the Browning BAR (FN owns both Browning and Winchester Arms). It added a detachable magazine, pistol grip and top, bottom and side picatinny rails.</p>

<p>The new SX-AR is a heavy barreled FNAR in a Mossy Oak camo finish but without the side rails and full length top rail (interestingly the bottom rail remains). It comes full circle, taking the tactical FNAR improvements back to the hunting market.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:540px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/531051l-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/531051l-tfb-tm.jpg' title="531051l tfb tm New Winchester SX AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle photo" alt="531051l tfb tm New Winchester SX AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> Winchester SX-AR</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
<table style="margin-top: 1.5em;margin-bottom: 1.5em;border-collapse: collapse;">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color: rgb(209, 223, 209);">
  <th style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Specifications</th>
  <th style="text-align: left;"/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Caliber</td>
  <td>308 Win.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Finish</td>
  <td>Mossy Oak Brush</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Receiver</td>
  <td>Aluminum</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Magazine Capacity</td>
  <td>10 (compatible with 20 round FNAR magazines)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Barrel</td>
  <td>Match grade hammer forged chrome plated heavy contour with recessed target crown</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Barrel Length</td>
  <td>20"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Rate of Twist</td>
  <td>1:12"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Overall Length</td>
  <td>41 1/2"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Length of Pull</td>
  <td>14 1/8"</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">Weight</td>
  <td>9 lbs. 14 oz.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td style="font-weight: bold; padding-right: 25px;">MSRP (Price)</td>
  <td>$1,379.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</p>

<p>This rifle will have been developed to fight the new AR-10 based hunting rifles that have been coming into the market, for example, the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/05/17/remington-model-r-25-new-ar-10-in-243-7mm-08-and-308/">Remington R-25</a>. I suspect the reason it is being rebranded and marketed under Winchester, and not Browning, is so that the risk of the BAR being named in any Assault Weapon Ban (federal or state) is reduced. The Browning BAR can continue to be a "traditional" styled hunting rifle.</p>

<p>For comparison, there are photos of the SX-AR ancestors ...</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/barlightaffut_tm-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/barlightaffut_tm-tfb-tm.jpg' title="barlightaffut tm tfb tm New Winchester SX AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle photo" alt="barlightaffut tm tfb tm New Winchester SX AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>Browning BAR</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  

  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fnm0137mb-tfb.png'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fnm0137mb-tfb-tm.png' title="fnm0137mb tfb tm New Winchester SX AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle photo" alt="fnm0137mb tfb tm New Winchester SX AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>FNAR</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>A big thank you to Reese for emailing me about this new rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Federal loads optimized for M1A, M1 Garand and AR-10 .338 rifles</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/14/new-federal-loads-optimized-for-m1a-m1-garand-and-ar-10-338-rifles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/14/new-federal-loads-optimized-for-m1a-m1-garand-and-ar-10-338-rifles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.338]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30-06]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m1 garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m1a]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal have produced two new loads, under the American Eagle brand, for the M1A (M14) and M1 Garand rifles. The cartridges have staked primers and the powders used were chosen with the rifle&#8217;s specific gas system design in mind.
The M1 (.30-06) load pushes a 150 grain FMJ bullet at 2740 fps fps and the M1A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal have produced two new loads, under the American Eagle brand, for the M1A (M14) and M1 Garand rifles. The cartridges have staked primers and the powders used were chosen with the rifle&#8217;s specific gas system design in mind.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.federalpremium.com/products/details/rifle.aspx?id=810">M1 (.30-06) load</a> pushes a 150 grain FMJ bullet at 2740 fps fps and the <a href="http://www.federalpremium.com/products/details/rifle.aspx?id=809">M1A (7.62&#215;51mm NATO) load</a> a 168 grain Open Tip Match (OTM) bullet at 2650 fps.</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/power-shok-sm.jpg" height="112" width="170" align="right" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Power-Shok-Sm" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p>Also from Federal is a Power-Shok hunting <a href="http://www.federalpremium.com/products/details/rifle.aspx?id=826">load optimized</a> for AR-10 style rifles chambered in .338 Federal. The loads pushes a 200 grain soft point at 2700 fps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/14/new-federal-loads-optimized-for-m1a-m1-garand-and-ar-10-338-rifles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kel-Tec RFB now shipping</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/06/kel-tec-rfb-now-shipping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/06/kel-tec-rfb-now-shipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullpup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kel-Tec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being delayed a few time the Kel-Tec RFB .308 Bullpup is now shipping. 
Kel-Tec:
 We are happy to confirm that the RFB is in production and shipping to distributors (yes, it&#8217;s true!). We are currently shipping small batches, however full-scale production will commence in the coming weeks! On a similar note, we have purchased [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being delayed a few time the Kel-Tec RFB .308 Bullpup is now shipping. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kel-tec-cnc.com/news.htm">Kel-Tec</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> We are happy to confirm that the RFB is in production and shipping to distributors (yes, it&#8217;s true!). We are currently shipping small batches, however full-scale production will commence in the coming weeks! On a similar note, we have purchased three (3) new CNC machines specifically for RFB production.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/images-rfb-cross-view-tm.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/images-rfb-cross-view-tm.jpg','popup','width=400+20,height=112+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/images-rfb-cross-view-tm-tm.jpg" height="112" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Images-Rfb-Cross-View-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/09/kel-tec-rfb-762mm-bullpup-rifle/">More info</a> on the RFB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/06/kel-tec-rfb-now-shipping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMMG G3 Mag Compatible AR-10 Lower</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/06/cmmg-g3-mag-compatible-ar-10-lower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/06/cmmg-g3-mag-compatible-ar-10-lower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CMMG are taking pre-orders for their new stripped lower reliever that is compatible with DPMS Panther Arms .308 AR-10 style upper receivers. The lower uses H&#38;K G3 magazine which can be bought for under $5! 

G3 lower (top)

Some minor modifications are needed to the upper to accommodate the larger magazine. The price is $449.95 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cmmginc.secure-mall.com/shop/?cart=1662282&amp;cat=1&amp;">CMMG</a> are taking pre-orders for their new stripped lower reliever that is compatible with DPMS Panther Arms .308 AR-10 style upper receivers. The lower uses H&#38;K G3 magazine which can be bought for under $5! </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1306-542.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1306-542.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=485+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1306-542-tm.jpg" height="303" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="1306 542 tm CMMG G3 Mag Compatible AR 10 Lower photo" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>G3 lower (top)<br />
</em></p>
<p>Some minor modifications are needed to the upper to accommodate the larger magazine. The price is $449.95 and it can be <a href="http://cmmginc.secure-mall.com/shop/?cart=1662282&amp;cat=38&amp;">ordered online</a>.</p>
<p>Many thanks to Tom for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/06/cmmg-g3-mag-compatible-ar-10-lower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mossberg 100ATR Night Train II</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/12/mossberg-100atr-night-train-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/12/mossberg-100atr-night-train-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100ART]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mossberg have announced a new rifle for 2009 called the 100ATR Night Train II. Oddly enough Mossberg did not include this rifle in their 2009 catalog.

The rifle is a significant upgrade over the original Night Train. It features everything you can see in the above photo: a harris bipod, Barska 6-24 x 60mm variable scope, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mossberg have announced a new rifle for 2009 called the 100ATR Night Train II. Oddly enough Mossberg did not include this rifle in their 2009 catalog.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/1014233.jpg" height="205" width="250" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="1014233 Mossberg 100ATR Night Train II photo" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p>The rifle is a significant upgrade over the original Night Train. It features everything you can see in the above photo: a harris bipod, Barska 6-24 x 60mm variable scope, muzzle brake, neoprene comb raising kit with foam cheek pad inserts. It is a complete system.</p>
<p>It also features a free floating button rifled barrel and the new <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/03/big-news-mossbergs-new-lightning-lba-trigger/">Mossberg LBA trigger</a> to achieve good accuracy.</p>
<p>Specs:</p>
<p>Caliber: .308 Win.<br />
Stock: Synthetic black or camo<br />
Magazine capacity: 4+1<br />
Barrel: 22&#8243;<br />
Weight: 9.6 lbs</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Kim @ Mossberg PR told me that the MSRP is $949 for the camo and $913 for the black. No bad at all considering that you get for that.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: Outdoor Wire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/12/mossberg-100atr-night-train-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LMT MRP 308 rifle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/lmt-mrp-308-rifle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/lmt-mrp-308-rifle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.762x51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LMT (Lewis Machine &#38; Tool) have developed an AR-10 version of their AR-15 CQB MRP rifle called the MTP MRP 308.

Click to expand. Photo Copyright Ken Lunde. Used with permission.

It uses the LMT Monolithic Rail Platform which is a one piece upper receiver and free floating handguard that is machined from sold aluminum.

The AR-15 MRP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMT (<a href="http://www.lewismachine.net/catalog.php" rel="nofollow">Lewis Machine &#38; Tool</a>) have developed an AR-10 version of their AR-15 CQB MRP rifle called the MTP MRP 308.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2009shotshow-01162009-018.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2009shotshow-01162009-018.jpg','popup','width=1000+20,height=664+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2009shotshow-01162009-018-tm.jpg" height="265" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2009Shotshow-01162009-018" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Click to expand. Photo Copyright </em><em><a href="http://lundestudio.com/2009SHOTShow/" rel="nofollow">Ken Lunde</a></em><em>. Used with permission.<br />
</em></p>
<p>It uses the LMT Monolithic Rail Platform which is a one piece upper receiver and free floating handguard that is machined from sold aluminum.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-product-large-l7ra1a-large.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-product-large-l7ra1a-large.jpg','popup','width=1000+20,height=325+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/images-product-large-l7ra1a-large-tm.jpg" height="130" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Product Large L7Ra1A Large" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The AR-15 MRP upper. Click to expand.</em></p>
<p>The name suggests it can handle the higher pressure .308 Winchester round as well as 7.62&#215;51mm NATO (no, <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/03/308-winchester-vs-762x51-nato/" rel="nofollow">they are not the same</a>).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have anymore info on the rifle and do not know if it uses the LMT gas piston system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/lmt-mrp-308-rifle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remington Model 700 Target Tactical</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/remington-model-700-target-tactical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/remington-model-700-target-tactical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target Tactical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when I though tactical bolt actions were going out of fashion and being replaced with autoloaders everyone seems to have launched a new model or line. Savege, Kimber, Ruger and now Remington with their Model 700 Target Tactical.

Model 700 Target Tactical. Click to expand.
The rifle is available chambered in .308 Win. and features:
* Triangular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I though tactical bolt actions were going out of fashion and being replaced with autoloaders everyone seems to have launched a new model or line. <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/21/savages-new-sniper-rifle-model-10-bas/" rel="nofollow">Savege</a>, <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/10/kimber-model-8400-police-tactical/" rel="nofollow">Kimber</a>, <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-tactical/" rel="nofollow">Ruger</a> and now Remington with their Model 700 Target Tactical.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/model700targettactical.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/model700targettactical.jpg','popup','width=645+20,height=115+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/model700targettactical-tm.jpg" height="71" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Model700Targettactical" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
Model 700 Target Tactical. Click to expand.</p>
<p>The rifle is available chambered in .308 Win. and features:</p>
<p>* Triangular barrel<br />
* X-Mark Pro Adjustable trigger (adjustable from 3-5 lbs).<br />
* Tactical style bolt handle.<br />
* 26&#8243; barrel utilizing 5-R tactical target rifling as using on the M24 sniper rifles.<br />
* Bell and Carlson Medalist Varmint/Tactical composite stock (notably not H-S Precision)</p>
<p><strong>Action</strong>: Bolt/Short<br />
<strong>Barrel Length</strong>: 26 inches<br />
<strong>Overall Length</strong>: 45 3/4 inches<br />
<strong>Avg. Weight</strong>: 11 3/4  lbs<br />
<strong>Stock Material</strong>: Composite – Aramid Fiber<br />
<strong>Stock Finish</strong>: OD Green/Black Webbed<br />
<strong>Barrel Finish</strong>: Matte Blue</p>
<p>The MSRP is $1972.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/remington-model-700-target-tactical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact Rifles / Carbines</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-compact-rifles-carbines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-compact-rifles-carbines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.243]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.260]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x39mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7mm-08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawkeye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M77]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new line of Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact Rifles are very very cool. They are 16.5&#8243; carbines chambered in the intermediate .223 Rem, 7.62&#215;39mm and 6.8mm SPC cartridges as well as the .300 Ruger Compact Magnum, .243 Win. 7mm-08, .308 Win. and .260 Rem. 

Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact 6.8mm SPC.
They feature a shorter stock and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new line of Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact Rifles are very very cool. They are 16.5&#8243; carbines chambered in the intermediate .223 Rem, 7.62&#215;39mm and 6.8mm SPC cartridges as well as the .300 Ruger Compact Magnum, .243 Win. 7mm-08, .308 Win. and .260 Rem. </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/firearms-images-products-439l.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/firearms-images-products-439l.jpg','popup','width=590+20,height=300+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/firearms-images-products-439l-tm.jpg" height="203" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Firearms Images Products 439L" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact 6.8mm SPC.</p>
<p>They feature a shorter stock and proportionately shortened forends and buttstocks. This shortened forend makes the rifle look longer than it is in the above photo. The intermediate caliber rifles weight 5 3/4 lbs.</p>
<p>I think these will be big sellers, especially the models chambered in intermediate cartridge where the short barrel will not have a significant impact on performance.</p>
<p>From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>These 16-1/2 inch barreled rifles have an overall length of 35-1/2 inches, making them ideal hunting rifles for rugged terrain and heavy brush. The Hawkeye Compact rifles are available in a Hawkeye Matte Blued with an American walnut stock or the Hawkeye Matte Stainless model with a black laminate stock. The slim American walnut stock offers wrap-around cut checkering on the forearm and more rounded contours on the bottom of the stock and top of the pistol grips.</p>
<p>The Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact rifles are offered in eight short action calibers, including .300 RCM, 7.62X39 and 6.8SPC. The walnut and blued models weigh approximately 5.75 pounds, while their laminate and stainless counterparts average 6.25 pounds each. Magazine capacity is 4 rounds.</p>
<p>The M77 Hawkeye Compact rifles feature the smooth and crisp Ruger LC6™ trigger, Mauser-type controlled feeding and a powerful claw extractor. A 3-position safety, hammer forged steel barrels and Ruger patented scope rings (provided at no charge) that install on the integral mounts and never shoot loose are also standard fare on all Ruger M77 Hawkeye rifles. The steel floorplate, bearing the distinctive Ruger logo, provides easy unloading and eliminates accidental &#8220;dumping&#8221; of ammunition.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-compact-rifles-carbines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruger M77 Hawkeye Tactical</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-tactical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-tactical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.243]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawkeye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M77]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruger really is going tactical this year. The Ruger M77 Hawkeye Tactical is a new line of M77 bolt action rifles.

They feature
* 20&#8243; heavy barrel
* Hogue OverMolded stock
* Harris bipod! Yes, they actually come standard with a harris bipod.
* A newly designed two stage target trigger.
* Built-in magazine, an odd choice for a tactical styled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruger really is going tactical this year. The <a href="http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FAProdResults?function=famid&amp;famid=60&amp;variation=M77%AE%20Hawkeye%AE%20Tactical&amp;bct=Yes&amp;type=Rifle" rel="nofollow">Ruger M77 Hawkeye Tactical</a> is a new line of M77 bolt action rifles.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/firearms-images-products-441l.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/firearms-images-products-441l.jpg','popup','width=590+20,height=300+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/firearms-images-products-441l-tm.jpg" height="203" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Firearms Images Products 441L" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>They feature<br />
* 20&#8243; heavy barrel<br />
* Hogue OverMolded stock<br />
* <strong>Harris bipod</strong>! Yes, they actually come standard with a harris bipod.<br />
* A newly designed two stage target trigger.<br />
* Built-in magazine, an odd choice for a tactical styled rifle.</p>
<p>Three calibers are on offer: .223 Rem., .243 Win. and .308 Win. </p>
<p>Specs for the .308 model:</p>
<p><strong>Capacity</strong>:	4 Rounds<br />
<strong>Finish</strong>: Hawkeye Matte Blued<br />
<strong>Stock</strong>: Black Hogue® OverMolded®<br />
<strong>Barrel Length</strong>:	20&#8243;<br />
<strong>Groove</strong>: 6<br />
<strong>Twist</strong>: 1:10&#8243; RH<br />
<strong>Overall Length</strong>: 40&#8243;<br />
<strong>Weight</strong>: 8 3/4 lbs<br />
<strong>Front Sight(s)</strong>:	None<br />
<strong>Rear Sight(s)</strong>:	None<br />
<strong>Other Features</strong>: Two-Stage Trigger; Three-Position Manual Safety<br />
<strong>Miscellaneous</strong>:  Harris Bipod included.</p>
<p>MSRP is $1138.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/15/ruger-m77-hawkeye-tactical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A summary of infantry rifle caliber discussions and relevant wound ballistics</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/08/a-summary-of-infantry-rifle-caliber-discussions-and-relevant-wound-ballistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/08/a-summary-of-infantry-rifle-caliber-discussions-and-relevant-wound-ballistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.338]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.7.62]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4.6mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.7mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[556]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ This article was written by Sven Ortmann of Personal Defence Weapons Central, an excellent small arms resource. ]
by Sven Ortmann, lastdingo@gmx.de, 2008-01-05
There are too many misleading anecdotes and rumors about military rifle calibers floating in the air (and in the WWW). This short article is meant to help readers with a presentation of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[ This article was written by Sven Ortmann of </em><em><a href="http://www.personaldefenceweapons.com//index.htm">Personal Defence Weapons Central</a></em>, <em>an excellent small arms resource</em>.<em> ]</p>
<p>by Sven Ortmann, </em><em><a href="mailto:lastdingo@gmx.de">lastdingo@gmx.de</a></em><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;">,</span><em> 2008-01-05</p>
<p>There are too many misleading anecdotes and rumors about military rifle calibers floating in the air (and in the WWW). This short article is meant to help readers with a presentation of the results of my secondary source research on the rifle caliber discussion and terminal (wound) ballistics.</p>
<p></em><strong>Caliber: 9&#215;19 mm and .45ACP (= 11.43&#215;23mm)</strong></p>
<p>This is the standard NATO caliber for pistols and a popular caliber for submachineguns. The only ones who seem to have a strong dislike for this caliber seem to be those U.S. Americans who continue to compare it with .45ACP.</p>
<p>The U.S. American problems with the 9&#215;19mm caliber seem to include a mix of emotions (a Colt M1911 in .45ACP feels much more powerful) and poor quality of the U.S. standard issue 9mm pistols. The latter is as far as I know more a magazine production quality problem than a pistol design problem. The origin of .45ACP is said to lie in combat experience around 1900 in the Philippines where determined Philippinos weren&#8217;t stopped reliably by smaller revolver calibers. Tests on live animals in 1904 showed better effects for heavier bullets, but little improvement with velocity. Bullet design has improved a lot since then, and hollowpoint bullets that flatten their nose in soft tissue to increase their diameter are much more effective than simple soft lead bullets. A good 9mm bullet enjoys a similar advantage over a .45ACP soft lead bullet than the latter over a 9mm soft lead bullet. There&#8217;s a fundamental problem, though: There&#8217;s not much difference in effect on the target if you hit the wrong places and the permanent cavities of pistol bullets are all relatively small. Many body parts are simply not essential enough &#8211; their destruction doesn&#8217;t stop a determined opponent immediately; no matter whether you hit with .45ACP or 9&#215;19mm.<br />
<span id="more-4064"></span>A new procurement of pistols could easily be a significant improvement over existing 9&#215;19mm service pistols, though. A new pistol could be designed to use reliably both standard 9&#215;19mm and “hot” 9&#215;19mm loadings (higher pressure). The latter would give some extra punch, especially extra penetration. A further improvement is possible by procurement of better bullets. The Russians have a 9mm semi-jacketed exposed steel core bullet that combines AP effect (hard core) with a hollow-point effect (outer parts of the bullets deform and effectively increase the bullet diameter in soft tissue). Such a bullet has enough penetration capability against a combination of a full pouch and a light kevlar vest. An improvement of pistol accuracy is probably more pressing than the caliber; some sort of shoulder stock and easily visible sights (large iron sights as usual on revolvers, for example) could help.</p>
<p><strong>Caliber: 5.56&#215;45mm NATO</strong></p>
<p>This caliber is at the center of a great and long-lasting controversy. Its opponents call it a varmint caliber and report firefights with multiple hits on the same opponent without satisfactory effect. They compare this caliber very often to the supposedly more effective 7.62&#215;51mm caliber. More about that in the 7.62 chapter. Another problem with 5.56&#215;45mm is its rather unsatisfactory ability to penetrate wooden or wall covers. A dissatisfaction with the standard service rifles/carbines of both the USA and the UK (the British solved their problems with an extensive upgrade) and the use of rather short barrels in the U.S. M4 carbine add to the problems with 5.56&#215;45mm.</p>
<p>The defenders of the caliber remind us that even mutilating wounds by much larger calibers and even explosive warheads cannot reliably stop a determined opponent.</p>
<p>The most terrible problem in the 5.56&#215;45mm caliber discussion is the use of anecdotes. Different barrels, ranges and hit locations produce very different effects, so you will always find anecdotes to support your position on this caliber &#8211; no matter what&#8217;s your position.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s (apparently especially in Germany) a stupid rumor about 5.56&#215;45mm and rifle calibers in general that tells about a nervous shock that can kill even with only small injuries. It&#8217;s nonsense. A short primer on rifle/carbine bullets; they behave differently in soft tissue than most pistol bullets. They don&#8217;t move straight through the tissue all the way. Instead, they begin to turn and usually exit bottom forward. Some bullets break up under the stress of this turn, and the fragmentation increases the destruction of soft tissue very much. A turning bullet doesn&#8217;t create a permanent cavity of much greater diameter than its own length; a disintegrating bullet can create a much, much larger permanent cavity.</p>
<p>The ideal rifle/carbine bullet looks like this; it&#8217;s able to penetrate cover/armor, it begins to turn in soft tissue immediately and it disintegrates into fragments with devastating effect in soft tissue (terminal ballistics). Good sectional density and ballistic coefficient are important for a good effective range (external ballistics). Finally, some people want it to be lead-free to protect the environment and save costs on shooting range maintenance.</p>
<p>So what does a 5.56&#215;45mm bullet really do? Answer; it depends.</p>
<p>The differences between 5.56mm bullets are noteworthy in terms of cover penetration (heavier is better), but all seem to share a rather disappointing &#8220;performance&#8221; in soft tissue. The bullet begins to turn later than desired. This means that frontal hits on skinny opponents are often not very effective because the most destructive part &#8211; the turning and possible fragmentation &#8211; happens too late (the 180° turn isn&#8217;t completed before exit).</p>
<p>The other problem in soft tissue is fragmentation. Fragmentation is necessary to achieve a good deal of damage with the small bullet. This requires a good impact velocity and appropriate bullet design. Short-barrelled weapons don&#8217;t accelerate the bullet to the originally intended velocity, and the velocity drops rapidly with the distance. 5.56&#215;45mm fired from carbines like the M4 carbine produce very little if any fragmentation in soft tissue at distances greater than about 50-100m.</p>
<p>Carbines and assault rifles should be effective to at least 300m, squad sharpshooters (also known as Designated Marksmen) and light machinegunners should be highly effective out to 400m with good effect. 5.56&#215;45mm doesn&#8217;t offer much effect in soft tissue at many relevant ranges unless fired from long barrelled weapons. Barrel lengths of at least 18&#8243; or at the very least 16&#8243; are often recommended. The original M16 assault rifle and many other assault rifle with this caliber have a barrel length of 20&#8243; while the M4 carbine has only a 14.5&#8243; barrel.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s apparently not much potential for improvement in the 5.56&#215;45mm caliber: Heavy bullets for improved cover penetration and long barrels for reliable fragmentation seem to be somewhat successful approaches.</p>
<p><strong>Caliber: PDW cartridges (5.7&#215;28mm and 4.6&#215;30mm)<br />
</strong><br />
These calibers share the same problems as 5.56&#215;45mm, just even more so (they don&#8217;t seem to break up at all).</p>
<p>The short story is like this: Weapons in these calibers are easily controlled in full auto fire due to the low impulse of the cartridges (light bullets). The individual bullets don&#8217;t do much to soft tissue (but more than you would tolerate in your own soft tissue).</p>
<p>The strength of these calibers is the higher hit probability (especially for ill-trained support troops) in comparison to 9&#215;19mm and .45ACP. The higher hit count might make up for the lesser effect of individual bullets. A one-vs-one comparison of the wound ballistic effects is therefore misleading. More hits also add to the chance of hitting something really vital.</p>
<p>There are other, less well-known calibers for PDWs (personal defence weapons) than these two. Some use larger calibers, but they&#8217;re likely all either similar to my description of pistol or PDW caliber wound ballistics.</p>
<p><strong>Caliber: 7.62&#215;51mm NATO<br />
</strong><br />
This is another NATO standard caliber (forced on NATO by the USA against a clearly superior British design). It has been replaced as assault rifle caliber by 5.56&#215;45mm almost completely and was never a carbine caliber. 7.62&#215;51mm is still very widespread as machinegun caliber in NATO armies and is also in use with some sniper/sharpshooter rifles.</p>
<p>The caliber was too powerful for controllable assault rifle full auto fire (well, controllability in bursts was OK within hand grenade range). The cartridges are quite heavy and it&#8217;s difficult to carry many of them into action; a major disadvantage for suppressive fires unless you need to suppress enemies who are behind light cover.</p>
<p>The penetration of cover is usually satisfactory, but armor penetration isn&#8217;t very good for the simple reason that almost all gunshields, armored vehicles and even some heavy body armor were designed to withstand this caliber and its Russian counterpart, 7.62&#215;54mmR. Only expensive SLAP cartridges (saboted light armor penetrating, performance in soft tissue) have a very good penetration capability at short and medium range.</p>
<p>The external ballistics are under criticism for sniping and more powerful calibers (.300WinMag, .338LapuaMag, 9.3&#215;64mm and even .50BMG, for example) with less bullet drop and less wind sensitivity have become important in sniper rifle procurement since the 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>7.62&#215;51mm is often being attributed with a huge and rarely questioned power against soft targets; knockdown power, manstopping power &#8211; no matter how they call it. 7.62&#215;51mm is usually presented as the good example in comparison to 5.56mm. This is &#8211; at least for U.S.-made 7.62&#215;51mm standard service cartridges &#8211; not fully justified. There are significant differences in penetration till the turning movement begins and in fragmentation. The U.S.-made (standard issue) 7.62 bullets aren&#8217;t that much better than 5.56mm bullets (if better at all). They penetrate deeply before turning and don&#8217;t fragment much.</p>
<p>There have been much superior (at least in fragmentation) bullets in service (like the German ones) and there&#8217;s also a 7.62&#215;51mm cartridge/bullet design that fulfills all expectations for soft tissue damage; it begins to turn and fragment very quickly and has a reliable and devastating effect on soft tissue.</p>
<p>Again; you won&#8217;t necessarily stop a determined enemy from firing at you if you don&#8217;t hit the right spots &#8211; no matter what rifle ammunition you use.</p>
<p><strong>Caliber: .50BMG (= 12,7&#215;99mm NATO)<br />
</strong><br />
This caliber is widespread and has loyal fans in the USA and also elsewhere, but it wasn&#8217;t adopted in some NATO forces and has some drawbacks.</p>
<p>It was originally a tank-penetrating caliber for machine guns (M2 Browning, later M2HB). Similar cartridges were used during the World Wars by anti-tank rifles (which were only able to penetrate light armor plates). Tanks got thicker armor plating by the mid-1930&#8217;s, leaving only light armored vehicles and certain vulnerable spots on heavier armored vehicles as vulnerable to .50BMG. This application has been revived in the 1980&#8217;s for long-range and &#8220;anti-material&#8221; sniping.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no very lively discussion about this caliber in the public. Attempts to replace it focused on intermediate sniping cartridges for long-range and armor-penetrating sniping (like .338LapuaMag), 40&#215;54mm HE cartridges for automatic grenade launchers that replaced many M2HB (.50BMG) machine guns on vehicles and finally a high-tech 25mm air-burst HE cartridge in the failed OCSW program.</p>
<p>The primary problems of .50BMG are weight and volume. Both ammunition and weapon are much bigger than their 7.62&#215;51mm counterparts. The ammunition supply for a .50BMG is usually very small in comparison to the 7.62&#215;51mm alternative. .50BMG is also too heavy for dismounted machine gun use on the move; it can be done (with a tripod), but the effort isn&#8217;t justified in most situations.</p>
<p>This caliber is probably only justified if the extra penetration is really necessary. One example: Reconnaissance vehicles need to be able to take on enemy reconnaissance vehicles which are usually armored against 7.62&#215;51mm AP, so something heavier is desirable even for the lightest recce vehicles.</p>
<p>An intermediate machine gun caliber close to the .338LapuaMag sniper cartridge could match the utility of .50BMG in most situations with significantly more ammunition for the same weight and volume.</p>
<p>Both .50BMG and 7.62&#215;51mm are quite well-established and not much under criticism, so there&#8217;s no good reason to expect a new, intermediate caliber standard for machine guns.</p>
<p><strong>Ideal caliber discussions</strong></p>
<p>The &#8220;ideal&#8221; infantry rifle caliber needs to be suitable for rifle, carbine, light machine gun and possibly even squad sharpshooter and medium machine gun applications. Penetration is important, bullet drop and effect at ranges like 400 or 500m is important, soft tissue damage needs to be good and consistent at all ranges and both weight and volume need to allow for a good ammunition load.</p>
<p>Historical and recent conclusions about an ideal infantry caliber almost always agreed on a calibre in the range from 6 to 7 mm. The larger ones tend to have better effect and to be heavier while the smaller calibers in that range tend to offer superior external ballistics (flatter trajectory, more useful at long range).</p>
<p>The optimum is probably close the the center; a 6 or 6.25mm caliber would probably be too close to 5.56mm to convince the 5.56mm critics (maybe for good reasons).</p>
<p>The 6.5mm Grendel and 6.8mm SPC calibers have become famous in the last few years as optimal caliber candidates. Both use conventional cartridge technology &#8211; it may be that confidential details from plastic case technology development would favor something like a 6.5-6.8mm plastic cased cartridge instead.</p>
<p><strong>Links for additional reading (and graphics)<br />
</strong><br />
There are thousands of possible links, but most would lead you to misleading information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rayguncharlie.net/sr/basics/pmrb.html">http://www.rayguncharlie.net/sr/basics/pmrb.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf">http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf<br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://www.firearmstactical.com/wound.htm">http://www.firearmstactical.com/wound.htm<br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://www.recguns.com/Sources/IVF1.html">http://www.recguns.com/Sources/IVF1.html<br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/PDWdebunk.html">http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/PDWdebunk.html<br />
</a><br />
Keep in mind at this link that bullet technology has advanced significantly since 1904:<br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/1904trial.html">http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/1904trial.html<br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/pigboard.html">http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/pigboard.html<br />
</a><br />
Bullet categories:<br />
<a href="http://world.guns.ru/ammo/bullets-e.htm#sjesc">http://world.guns.ru/ammo/bullets-e.htm#sjesc<br />
</a><br />
An overview over PDWs:<br />
<a href="http://www.personaldefenceweapons.com">http://www.personaldefenceweapons.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/08/a-summary-of-infantry-rifle-caliber-discussions-and-relevant-wound-ballistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Savage AccuStock: Game changing stock technology</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/21/savage-accustock-game-changing-stock-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/21/savage-accustock-game-changing-stock-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accustock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accutrigger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precision Carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I try not to use words like &#8220;awesome&#8221; in the title for blog posts, so I substituted it with &#8220;game changing&#8221;. But don&#8217;t let that word change deceive you. I am *really* excited by this new stock coming out of Savage.
The Savage Accutrigger raised the bar on what consumers could realistically expect from a mass-produced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try not to use words like &#8220;awesome&#8221; in the title for blog posts, so I substituted it with &#8220;game changing&#8221;. But don&#8217;t let that word change deceive you. I am *really* excited by this new stock coming out of Savage.</p>
<p>The Savage Accutrigger raised the bar on what consumers could realistically expect from a mass-produced factory trigger.Savage have brought  custom-performance to factory-mass-produced stocks. They call it the AccuStock.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-accustocki.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-accustocki.jpg','popup','width=1280+20,height=347+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-accustocki-tm.jpg" height="108" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images News Accustocki" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-accustockii.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-accustockii.jpg','popup','width=1280+20,height=315+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-accustockii-tm.jpg" height="98" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images News Accustockii" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>Savage explains the technology in their press release:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The AccuStock uses an aluminum spine and 3D Bedding Cradle molded into the stock</strong> in such a manner that it becomes an integral part of the composite stock.</p>
<p>The result is a polymer composite stock that possesses many of the same properties of high-end aftermarket stocks, bringing this high level of performance to the production rifle.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Rigidity</strong> – With its integral aluminum spine that runs from the action down the length of the forearm, the AccuStock is the most rigid factory polymer stock in the marketplace. No matter how hot the weather or the barrel, the forend stays rock-solid and the barrel remains free-floating.</p>
<p><strong>Three-Dimensional Bedding Pressure</strong> – Pillar-bedded and v-block stocks, as good as they are, only apply bedding pressure on one axis, up and down. The AccuStock uses a wedge bolt to push the recoil lug back into the aluminum spine to prevent any movement forward and aft, while the bedding cradle literally squeezes the action from the sides when the action screws are tightened.</p></blockquote>
<p>Initially two rifles will be available with the AccuStock:</p>
<p><strong>Model 10 FCP<br />
</strong><br />
* AccuTrigger<br />
* <strong>Proprietary Muzzle Brake</strong> (new from Savage)<br />
* Detachable Box Magazine<br />
* Oversized Bolt handle<br />
* 24-inch heavy, fluted barrel<br />
* Matte Finish<br />
* Available in 308 Win. And 223 Rem.<br />
* Left-hand models available</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-10fcp.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-10fcp.jpg','popup','width=448+20,height=88+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-10fcp-tm.jpg" height="78" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images News 10Fcp" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Model 10 FCP</em></p>
<p><strong>Model 10 Precision Carbine<br />
</strong><br />
* Camo: <strong>Digital</strong> Green Camo<br />
* 20-in medium-contour barrel<br />
* AccuTrigger<br />
* Detachable Box Magazine<br />
* Oversized Bolt Handle<br />
* Matte Black Metal Finish<br />
* Available in 308 Win. and 223 Rem.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-10precarb.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-10precarb.jpg','popup','width=412+20,height=106+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/images-news-10precarb-tm.jpg" height="102" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images News 10Precarb" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Model 10 Precision Carbine</em></p>
<p>No word on pricing. Unfortunately it is not yet offering rimfire models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/21/savage-accustock-game-changing-stock-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sauer 202 with .22 LR Conversion Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/02/sauer-202-with-22-lr-conversion-kit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/02/sauer-202-with-22-lr-conversion-kit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[202]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5x55mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sauer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;tooms&#8221; posted these photos on the Shooters&#8217; Forum. His modular Sauer 202 take down rifle has a 6.5&#215;55mm and .308 Win. configuration as well as a .22 LR conversion kit. The .22 conversion kit cost the equivalent of US$1000. 
I would assume tooms changes scopes when he switches from the 6.5&#215;55mm or .308 Win. configuration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;tooms&#8221; posted these <a href="http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/6mmbr/vpost?id=3113262">photos</a> on the Shooters&#8217; Forum. His modular Sauer 202 take down rifle has a 6.5&#215;55mm and .308 Win. configuration as well as a .22 LR conversion kit. The .22 conversion kit cost the equivalent of US$1000. </p>
<p>I would assume tooms changes scopes when he switches from the 6.5&#215;55mm or .308 Win. configuration to the .22 LR system. His scope, a Zeiss Victories, costs the equivalent of US$3000. Makes the .22 kit seem a lot less expensive in comparison!</p>
<p>Click to expand the photos:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7018.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7018.jpg','popup','width=639+20,height=427+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7018-tm.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Albums Ii114 Tooms Album Tho 7018" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7070.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7070.jpg','popup','width=640+20,height=428+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7070-tm.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Albums Ii114 Tooms Album Tho 7070" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Look at that wood!<br />
</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7023.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7023.jpg','popup','width=639+20,height=427+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/albums-ii114-tooms-album-tho-7023-tm.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Albums Ii114 Tooms Album Tho 7023" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>More photos at <a href="http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/6mmbr/vpost?id=3113262">Shooters&#8217; Forum</a>. Accurate Shooter <a href="http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/sauer-202-with-22lr-conversion-kit/">discusses</a> the rifle.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/sauer-202-with-22lr-conversion-kit/">Accurate Shooter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/02/sauer-202-with-22-lr-conversion-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCAR 16S and SCAR 17S available next year</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/scar-16s-and-scar-17s-available-next-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/scar-16s-and-scar-17s-available-next-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.762x51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[556]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR-Heavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR-Light]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news, the civilian semi-automatic SCAR will be launched next year (2009).
Both versions will be available: the .223/5.56mm SCAR 16S (civilian equivalent of the SCAR-Light) and the .308/7.62&#215;51mm (civilian equivalent of the SCAR-Heavy).

SCAR-Light carbine (14&#8243; barrel). The civilian model will have a longer barrel.

I have emailed FNH USA for pricing details but they have not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news, the civilian semi-automatic SCAR will be <span style="color:#1919ff;text-decoration:underline;">launched</span> next year (2009).</p>
<p>Both versions will be available: the .223/5.56mm SCAR 16S (civilian equivalent of the SCAR-Light) and the .308/7.62&#215;51mm (civilian equivalent of the SCAR-Heavy).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/fnm0108mb.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/fnm0108mb.jpg','popup','width=652+20,height=211+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/fnm0108mb-tm.jpg" height="129" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Fnm0108Mb" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>SCAR-Light carbine (14&#8243; barrel). The civilian model will have a longer barrel.<br />
</em></p>
<p>I have emailed FNH USA for pricing details but they have not yet got back to me.</p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.fnhusa.com/le/press/detail.asp?id=43">press release</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Experience the civilian-legal semi-auto only version of the rifle chosen by U.S. Special Operations Command as its first new rifle since the early 1960’s. The SCAR 16S is chambered in 5.56X45mm NATO (223 Rem.) while the SCAR 17S fires the 7.62X51mm NATO (308 Win.) cartridge. The innovative gas-operated, short stroke piston system reduces fouling for greater reliability. The side folding polymer stock is fully adjustable for comb height and length of pull and is colored authentic USSOCOM Flat Dark Earth. Both 10 and 30-round detachable box magazines(DBM) are available, and the ambidextrous operating controls instantly adapt the SCAR S-Series to any user.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately they will not come with this &#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/picture-24-4.png" height="125" width="162" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 24-4" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>:</p>
<p>Photo of SCAR 16S:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scar-16s.gif" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scar-16s.gif','popup','width=425+20,height=120+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scar-16s-tm.jpg" height="112" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Scar-16S" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/scar-16s-and-scar-17s-available-next-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marlin XS7 (Short action XL7)</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/22/marlin-xs7-short-action-xl7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/22/marlin-xs7-short-action-xl7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.243]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7mm-08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XL7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xs7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year Marlin introduced the value-for-money XL7 rifle cambered in 25-06, 270 and 30-06. I thought it was odd that they did not offer a short action version. John Snow reports that a short action version will be available shortly in .248, .308 and 7mm-08.

Marlin XL7 (the long action version)

John has the specs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year Marlin <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/01/marlin-xl7/">introduced</a> the value-for-money XL7 rifle cambered in 25-06, 270 and 30-06. I thought it was odd that they did not offer a short action version. <a href="http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/thegunshots/2008/10/new-from-marl-1.html">John Snow</a> reports that a short action version will be available shortly in .248, .308 and 7mm-08.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/xl7c-tm.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/xl7c-tm.jpg','popup','width=450+20,height=110+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/xl7c-tm-tm.jpg" height="97" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Xl7C-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Marlin XL7 (the long action version)<br />
</em></p>
<p><a href="http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/thegunshots/2008/10/new-from-marl-1.html">John</a> has the <a href="http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/thegunshots/2008/10/new-from-marl-1.html">specs</a> and a brief range report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/22/marlin-xs7-short-action-xl7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Browning A-Bolt Target rifles</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/new-browning-a-bolt-target-rifles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/new-browning-a-bolt-target-rifles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-Bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newm .223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browning will be releasing a line of A-Bolt Target rifles.

The rifle will come in three calibers: .223 Rem., .308 Win. and .300 Win. Mag. It is a pity they are not offering more exotic calibers. The stainless model will cost $1489 for .223 and .308 while the .300 will cost $1519.
More info @ Accurate Shooter
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browning will be releasing a line of A-Bolt Target rifles.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/browning03.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/browning03.jpg','popup','width=1400+20,height=299+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/browning03-tm.jpg" height="85" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Browning03" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p>The rifle will come in three calibers: .223 Rem., .308 Win. and .300 Win. Mag. It is a pity they are not offering more exotic calibers. The stainless model will cost $1489 for .223 and .308 while the .300 will cost $1519.</p>
<p>More info @ <a href="http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2008/10/16/browning-produces-new-target-rifles-in-223-308-300-wsm/">Accurate Shooter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/new-browning-a-bolt-target-rifles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sako TRG spotted in South Ossetia</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/10/sako-trg-spotted-in-south-ossetia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/10/sako-trg-spotted-in-south-ossetia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.338]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sako]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Ossetia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The photo below shows a couple of South Ossetia militia. The guy on the right is carrying a Sako TRG. 
It is unlikely Finland would allow arms exports to South Ossetia. It was probably bought on the civilian market and then exported. I cannot imagine that South Ossetia would have many snipers so this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photo below shows a couple of South Ossetia militia. The guy on the right is carrying a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sako_TRG">Sako TRG</a>. </p>
<p>It is unlikely Finland would allow arms exports to South Ossetia. It was probably bought on the civilian market and then exported. I cannot imagine that South Ossetia would have many snipers so this is feasible.</p>
<p>Their squad sharpshooters (or whatever they call them in that part of the world) are probably using the SVD.</p>
<p>I cannot make out if it is a TRG-21 / 22 (.308 Win) or TRG-41 / 42 (.338 Lapua or .300 Win Magnum). I have never seen a photo of a 41/42 without a muzzle break, but I think the 21/22 can have the Sako TRG muzzle break attached, please correct me if I am wrong.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/00gtp4a5.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/00gtp4a5.jpg','popup','width=569+20,height=900+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/00gtp4a5-tm.jpg" height="424" width="268" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="00Gtp4A5" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Click to expand the image</em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em>H/T: <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=139586&amp;page=12">MP.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/10/sako-trg-spotted-in-south-ossetia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shot at Point Blank with .308 and 44 Magnum</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.44]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is crazy and really goes against all firearm safety rules.

Still, they do prove that a .308 is not enough to knock you down, although it makes perfect sense.
Obviously the shock and internal damage of a bullet entering the body with no energy absorbed and distributed by a vest is going to have much greater [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crazy and really goes against all firearm safety rules.</p>
<p><object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/310_1212367354"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/310_1212367354" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object></p>
<p>Still, they do prove that a .308 is not enough to knock you down, although it makes perfect sense.</p>
<p>Obviously the shock and internal damage of a bullet entering the body with no energy absorbed and distributed by a vest is going to have much greater effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20mm Rounds</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/04/14/20mm-rounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/04/14/20mm-rounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lahti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idiot has been reloading 20mm vulcan projectiles in 20&#215;138b brass to fire from his Lahti cannon.

20mm vulcan projectile vs. .308!

Lahti L-39 &#8230; Idiot is one brave man
More photos here and here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kbarrett.cotse.net/idiot/index.php">Idiot</a> has been <a href="http://kbarrett.cotse.net/idiot/index.php">reloading</a> 20mm vulcan projectiles in 20&#215;138b brass to fire from his Lahti cannon.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/picture-18-8.png" height="287" width="272" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Picture 18-8" title="" longdesc="" /><br />
<em>20mm vulcan projectile vs. .308!</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/300px-l39-1.jpg" height="181" width="300" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="300Px-L39-1" title="" longdesc="" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Lahti L-39 &#8230; Idiot is one brave man</em></p>
<p>More photos <a href="http://kbarrett.cotse.net/idiot/index.php?title=20mm_vulcan_projos&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1" title="20mm_vulcan_projos&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">here</a> and <a href="http://kbarrett.cotse.net/idiot/index.php?title=20mm_clean_up_continued&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1" title="20mm_clean_up_continued&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/04/14/20mm-rounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POF-USA P-308</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/21/pof-usa-p-308/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/21/pof-usa-p-308/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x51mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P-308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POF-USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/21/pof-usa-p-308/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The POF-USA P-308 is a interesting rifle. It is a gas piston operated rifle, based on the AR-10/AR-15 design and requires no lubrication.

14.5&#8243; version

They achieve this by plating the upper receiver with silicon nickel and chroming and heat treating the bolt and carrier.

Upper receiver

Here is a video of it in action

In spite of its name, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The POF-USA P-308 is a interesting rifle. It is a gas piston operated rifle, based on the AR-10/AR-15 design and requires <strong>no</strong> lubrication.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/2007-08-26-fd2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/2007-08-26-fd2.jpg','popup','width=695,height=535,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/2007-08-26-fd2-tm.jpg" height="346" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="2007-08-26 Fd2" title="2007 08 26 fd2 tm POF USA P 308 photo" /></a><br />
<em>14.5&#8243; version<br />
</em></p>
<p>They achieve this by plating the upper receiver with silicon nickel and chroming and heat treating the bolt and carrier.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/m.r.r.-full-lenghtc.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/m.r.r.-full-lenghtc.jpg','popup','width=696,height=216,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/m.r.r.-full-lenghtc-tm.jpg" height="139" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="M.R.R. Full Lenght(C)" title="m.r.r. full lenghtc tm POF USA P 308 photo" /></a><br />
<em>Upper receiver<br />
</em></p>
<p>Here is a video of it in action</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xqFQHy6-g2g&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xqFQHy6-g2g&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>In spite of its name, it is chambered in 7.62X51mm, not .308 (yes, there is a <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/09/03/308-winchester-vs-762x51-nato/">difference</a>).</p>
<p>More info at <a href="http://www.pof-usa.com/p308/P-308-14-MRR-CF-308.htm">POF-USA</a> and <a href="http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=1097">Defense Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/21/pof-usa-p-308/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kel-Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/09/kel-tec-rfb-762mm-bullpup-rifle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/09/kel-tec-rfb-762mm-bullpup-rifle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x51mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullpup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Efficiency Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kel-Tec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppressor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/09/kel-tec-rfb-762mm-bullpup-rifle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kel-Tec displayed their new RFB 7.62&#215;51mm (.308) bullpup rifle at SHOT Show. SMGLee took some great photos.

With suppressor, nice!
Wikipedia has this to say about the rifle:
The Kel-Tec RFB High Efficiency Rifle (Rifle, Forward-ejection, Bullpup) is a gas-operated semi-automatic rifle with a tilting breechblock locking mechanism, manufactured by Kel-Tec Industries of Florida. It loads the 7.62&#215;51mm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kel-Tec displayed their new RFB 7.62&#215;51mm (.308) bullpup rifle at SHOT Show. <a href="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/member.php?u=2234" target="_top">SMGLee</a> took some great photos.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/kel-tec-rfb-7.62mm-bullpup-rifle-tm1.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Kel-Tec-Rfb-7.62Mm-Bullpup-Rifle-Tm" title="kel tec rfb 7.62mm bullpup rifle tm1 Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>With suppressor, nice!</em></p>
<p>Wikipedia has this to say about the rifle:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Kel-Tec RFB High Efficiency Rifle (Rifle, Forward-ejection, Bullpup) is a gas-operated semi-automatic rifle with a tilting breechblock locking mechanism, manufactured by Kel-Tec Industries of Florida. It loads the 7.62&#215;51mm NATO (.308 Winchester) cartridge and uses metric FAL magazines. The rifle uses a patented forward-ejection system via a tube placed over the barrel that ejects the spent case forwards, over the handguard of the rifle.</p>
<p>The rifle is a forward ejecting semi-automatic firearm chambered in 7.62 mm NATO (.308 Winchester), utilizing a short-stroke gas piston. To avoid the sloppy trigger pull typical of bullpup style firearms, the RFB utilizes a floating linkage bar between the sear and the hammer, allowing the sear to remain above the trigger. The weapon is fully ambidextrous, much in the style of the French FAMAS bullpup assault rifle. The RFB accepts FN FAL style magazines, and is delivered without iron sights. A mil-spec Picatinny rail is standard.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is a video of the rifle, clearly showing the forward ejection.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t9Xqa2vwq60&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t9Xqa2vwq60&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Kel-Tec plans to offer three different four versions each with a different barrel length:</p>
<ul>
<li>Carbine (18&#8243;),</li>
<li>Sporter (24&#8243;),</li>
<li>Target (32&#8243; heavy barrel, or 26&#8243; stainless steel barrel)</li>
</ul>
<p>The rifle is expected <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">this quarter (1st quarter 2008)</span> in the forth quarter, see the comments by dogon1013.</p>
<p>More images after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-1675"></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Click to enlarge the images.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0125.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0125.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0125-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0125" title="dscn0125 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0124.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0124.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0124-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0124" title="dscn0124 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0121.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0121.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0121-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0121" title="dscn0121 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0120.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0120.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0120-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0120" title="dscn0120 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0123.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0123.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0123-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0123" title="dscn0123 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0122.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0122.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0122-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0122" title="dscn0122 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0119-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0119-1.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0119-1-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0119 1" title="dscn0119 1 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0118-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0118-1.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0118-1-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0118 1" title="dscn0118 1 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0131.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0131.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0131-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0131" title="dscn0131 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0130.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0130.jpg','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dscn0130-tm.jpg" height="337" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Dscn0130" title="dscn0130 tm Kel Tec RFB 7.62mm bullpup rifle photo" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/09/kel-tec-rfb-762mm-bullpup-rifle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FNAR 7.62&#215;51mm</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x51mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FN have a new 7.62&#215;51mm (.308) autoloader called the FNAR. It is only available in 7.62&#215;51mm and comes in two models Light barrel and Heavy barrel.  It uses AR-10 magazines. (UPDATE: Owners report AR-10 magazines CANNOT be used).

FNAR Light
The FNAR puts autoloading speed and bolt-action accuracy in your hands. Every FNAR rifle must meet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FN have a new 7.62&#215;51mm (.308) autoloader called the FNAR. It is only available in 7.62&#215;51mm and comes in two models Light barrel and Heavy barrel. <del> It uses AR-10 magazines.</del> (<strong>UPDATE</strong>: Owners report AR-10 magazines CANNOT be used).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/fnar-light.png','popup','width=700,height=212,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/fnar-light.png"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/fnar-light-tm.jpg" border="1" alt="Fnar Light" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="450" height="136" title="fnar light tm FNAR 7.62x51mm photo" /></a><br />
FNAR Light</p>
<blockquote><p>The FNAR puts autoloading speed and bolt-action accuracy in your hands. Every FNAR rifle must meet a 1 MOA or better accuracy specification, just like the FN SPR precision rifles. The receiver is constructed of aircraft grade alloy for light weight and strength. The fluted barrel is offered in a choice of light or heavy contours and features a hard chrome lining and recessed target crown for accuracy and long life.</p></blockquote>
<p>The action looks like it is based on the Browning BAR (not to be confused with the Browning Automatic RIfle, which is completely different), a sporting auto-loader. Browning is owned by FN.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/barlightaffut.jpg','popup','width=650,height=128,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/barlightaffut.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/barlightaffut-tm.jpg" border="1" alt="Barlightaffut" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="450" height="88" title="barlightaffut tm FNAR 7.62x51mm photo" /></a><br />
<em>Browning BAR Light<br />
</em></p>
<p>These excellent photos were take by <a href="http://talonarms.com/">TalonArms.com</a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shot2008010.jpg','popup','width=640,height=426,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shot2008010.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shot2008010-tm.jpg" border="1" alt="Shot2008010" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="450" height="300" title="shot2008010 tm FNAR 7.62x51mm photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shot2008008.jpg','popup','width=640,height=426,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shot2008008.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shot2008008-tm.jpg" border="1" alt="Shot2008008" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="450" height="300" title="shot2008008 tm FNAR 7.62x51mm photo" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desert Tactical Arms Stealth Recon Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.243]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.300 win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.338 LM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullpup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desert Tactical Arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DT SRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealth Recon Scout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At SHOT Desert Tactical Arms announced their Stealth Recon Scout (DT SRS) sniper weapon system. It is a bolt action bullpup rifle.
It features
*  1/2 MOA accuracy is standard
*  11 inches shorter than conventional rifles
*  Quick Caliber conversion between 243 win, 308 win, 300 win, and 338 LM
*  Rugged, it was designed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At SHOT Desert Tactical Arms announced their Stealth Recon Scout (DT SRS) sniper weapon system. It is a bolt action bullpup rifle.</p>
<p>It features</p>
<p>*  1/2 MOA accuracy is standard<br />
*  11 inches shorter than conventional rifles<br />
*  Quick Caliber conversion between 243 win, 308 win, 300 win, and 338 LM<br />
*  Rugged, it was designed and built to be as tough as any other system out there.<br />
*  Adjustable trigger 1-5 lbs and you can also enable or disable the second stage on the trigger, as well you can reduce your trigger pull length to whatever you want.</p>
<blockquote><p>The 338LM pictured below (with bipod, scope mount, sling, and S&#38;B 5-25x) is 15.75 lbs and has an overall length of 37.5&#8243;. The 308 WIN (22&#8243; fluted barrel) is approx 3 lbs lighter with an overall length of 31.5&#8243;, making it the shortest sniper rifle in the world to my knowledge, yet you can still mount the bipod the same distance forward on the rifle that you can on a standard McMillan stock.</p>
<p>We actually beefed up the barrel and bolt camming area up by 39% over the original DSR-1. Every operational sniper that has handled the rifles have said they are the most comfortable rifles they have ever handled.</p>
<p>The trigger is excellent, I can assure everyone of that and those going to the shot show will get to try it.</p>
<p>Postal, your hilarious, no black eyes with this gun. The bolt has a 60 degree lift and six lugs. The bolt manipulation is about 2-3 inches rearward of a normal bolt gun, It feels very natural and you don&#8217;t loose your cheek weld during operation. Your technique changes slightly but it is very accommodating. If you shoot the SRS left handed then you have to roll your head over slightly to manipulate the bolt.</p>
<p>We won&#8217;t be making a lefty, at least not for a while, sorry.</p></blockquote>
<p>.338 LM with 26&#8243; barrel+muzzlebrake next to an M4</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb42d318dfd8300000026102azogllk5zsu.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb42d318dfd8300000026102azogllk5zsu.jpg','popup','width=480,height=321,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb42d318dfd8300000026102azogllk5zsu-tm.jpg" height="300" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="47B8Df08B3127Cceb42D318Dfd8300000026102Azogllk5Zsu" title="47b8df08b3127cceb42d318dfd8300000026102azogllk5zsu tm Desert Tactical Arms Stealth Recon Scout photo" /></a></p>
<p>Some more photos (rifle chambered in .338 LM)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb42d48403cda00000025102azogllk5zsu.jpg" height="400" width="268" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="47B8Df08B3127Cceb42D48403Cda00000025102Azogllk5Zsu" title="47b8df08b3127cceb42d48403cda00000025102azogllk5zsu Desert Tactical Arms Stealth Recon Scout photo" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb42d4312fd2500000035102azogllk5zsu.jpg" height="400" width="268" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="47B8Df08B3127Cceb42D4312Fd2500000035102Azogllk5Zsu" title="47b8df08b3127cceb42d4312fd2500000035102azogllk5zsu Desert Tactical Arms Stealth Recon Scout photo" /><br />
Prices:</p>
<p>Shot Show Prices will be (Tentative):<br />
SRS 338LM $3585 (26&#8243; fluted barrel includes DTA muzzlebrake)<br />
SRS 300WIN $3450 (26&#8243; fluted barrel no brake)<br />
SRS 243WIN $3275 (24&#8243; fluted barrel)<br />
SRS 308WIN $3275 (22&#8243; fluted barrel)</p>
<p>Conversion kits (includes bolt, barrel, barrel ext, and magazine)<br />
338LM $1480 (includes DTA Muzzlebrake)<br />
300WIN $1265<br />
243WIN $1205 (if you already have a 308win bolt you can deduct $300)<br />
308WIN $1155</p>
<p>Some more photos</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca02bdd700000026102azogllk5zsu.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca02bdd700000026102azogllk5zsu.jpg','popup','width=480,height=321,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca02bdd700000026102azogllk5zsu-tm.jpg" height="300" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="47B8Df08B3127Cceb4D5Ca02Bdd700000026102Azogllk5Zsu" title="47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca02bdd700000026102azogllk5zsu tm Desert Tactical Arms Stealth Recon Scout photo" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca013ce400000026102azogllk5zsu.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca013ce400000026102azogllk5zsu.jpg','popup','width=480,height=321,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca013ce400000026102azogllk5zsu-tm.jpg" height="300" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="47B8Df08B3127Cceb4D5Ca013Ce400000026102Azogllk5Zsu" title="47b8df08b3127cceb4d5ca013ce400000026102azogllk5zsu tm Desert Tactical Arms Stealth Recon Scout photo" /></a></p>
<p>Desert Tactical Arms have not website, this information was gathered from googleing (this <a href="http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;Number=458181&amp;nt=2&amp;fpart=1">thread</a> and this <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&amp;f=2&amp;t=236057">thread</a>). </p>
<p>Hopefully an official website will be put online. If you are from Desert Tactical Arms, please email me with your website address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAL Noise Suppressed vs. Unsuppressed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/10/fal-noise-suppressed-vs-unsuppressed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/10/fal-noise-suppressed-vs-unsuppressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYCLONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suppressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/10/fal-noise-suppressed-vs-unsuppressed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting comparison between a suppressed .308 FAL vs. an Unsuppressed FAL.
The unsuppressed shot comes right at the end of the video.

They were using a AAC Cyclone 7.62MM Suppressor:

The CYCLONE is a thread-mounting silencer for 7.62mm bolt action and semi-automatic rifles. Constructed entirely from welded 300 series stainless steel, the 8.38&#8243; Lg x 1.50&#8243; diameter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting comparison between a suppressed .308 FAL vs. an Unsuppressed FAL.</p>
<p>The unsuppressed shot comes right at the end of the video.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wMIomwkvyBQ&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wMIomwkvyBQ&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>They were using a AAC Cyclone 7.62MM Suppressor:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/cyclone.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/cyclone.jpg','popup','width=640,height=427,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/cyclone-tm.jpg" height="300" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Cyclone" title="cyclone tm FAL Noise Suppressed vs. Unsuppressed photo" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>The CYCLONE is a thread-mounting silencer for 7.62mm bolt action and semi-automatic rifles. Constructed entirely from welded 300 series stainless steel, the 8.38&#8243; Lg x 1.50&#8243; diameter CYCLONE is the most compact and durable 7.62mm rifle silencer on the market. The computer optimized baffle stack of the CYCLONE delivers a substantial frequency shift, and the resulting muzzle report is indistinguishable from the ballistic crack of the projectile in flight. The weapon&#8217;s flash signature is completely eliminated, and recoil is reduced to the extent the shooter can actually see bullet impact through the scope. The slight added weight of the CYCLONE will assist in reducing barrel harmonics which can equate to a significant increase in accuracy with many host-weapons.</p></blockquote>
<p>More on the suppressor <a href="http://www.impactguns.com/store/AAC-CYCLONE.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/10/fal-noise-suppressed-vs-unsuppressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remington Model 700 XCR Compact Tactical.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/remington-model-700-xcr-compact-tactical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/remington-model-700-xcr-compact-tactical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XCR Compact Tactical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/remington-model-700-xcr-compact-tactical/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new .308 / .223 tactical rifle from Remington. I am looking forward to reading reviews about it.
When it comes to tactical firearms, there&#8217;s no more trusted name in the game than Remington.  In rugged endurance, our Model 700 XCR Compact Tactical Rifle truly stretches the limits.
Our Model 700 XCR Compact Tactical Rifle, features [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new .308 / .223 tactical rifle from Remington. I am looking forward to reading reviews about it.</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to tactical firearms, there&#8217;s no more trusted name in the game than Remington.  In rugged endurance, our Model 700 XCR Compact Tactical Rifle truly stretches the limits.</p>
<p>Our Model 700 XCR Compact Tactical Rifle, features a 416 stainless steel barreled action with Black TriNyteÂ® PVD coating, providing a diamond-hard layer of defense against the elements. It features a OD Green stock with black webbing, wide tactical-style barrel fluting for rapid cooling, hinged floorplate magazine, and dual front swivel studs and rear stud.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/images-products-firearms-centerfire-700-xcr-compacttac-410.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/images-products-firearms-centerfire-700-xcr-compacttac-410.jpg','popup','width=410,height=73,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/images-products-firearms-centerfire-700-xcr-compacttac-410-tm.jpg" height="80" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Products Firearms Centerfire 700 Xcr Compacttac 410" title="images products firearms centerfire 700 xcr compacttac 410 tm Remington Model 700 XCR Compact Tactical. photo" /></a></p>
<p>Black TriNyteÂ® PVD coating</p>
<p>OD Green stock</p>
<p>Hinged floorplate magazine, Dual front swivel studs and rear stud</p>
<p>Barrel is free-floating with LTR-style fluting</p>
<p>Tactical-style 1 in 9&#8243; twist (223 caliber)</p>
<p>Tactical-style 1 in 12&#8243; twist (308 caliber)</p>
<p>20&#8243; barrel</p>
<p>Chambered in .223 and .308</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/remington-model-700-xcr-compact-tactical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kimber Tactical</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/kimber-tactical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/kimber-tactical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kimber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/kimber-tactical/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year Kimber is introducing a tactical series of rifles. These rifles will come in three models.
Entering the tactical rifle market is no stretch for Kimber. Accuracy standards are already exceeded by lightweight hunting rifles, with durability proven in game fields around the world
LPT (Light Police Tactical)


Black laminated stock with panel stippling.
Mil-spec Picatinny rail.
Scope rail [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year Kimber is introducing a tactical series of rifles. These rifles will come in three models.</p>
<blockquote><p>Entering the tactical rifle market is no stretch for Kimber. Accuracy standards are already exceeded by lightweight hunting rifles, with durability proven in game fields around the world</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>LPT (Light Police Tactical)<br />
</strong><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/lpt.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/lpt.jpg','popup','width=550,height=196,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/lpt-tm.jpg" height="160" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Lpt" title="lpt tm Kimber Tactical photo" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>Black laminated stock with panel stippling.</li>
<li>Mil-spec Picatinny rail.</li>
<li>Scope rail secured with HD 8-40 screws.</li>
<li>Oversize bolt handle.</li>
</ul>
<p>Specs</p>
<p><strong>Caliber</strong>: .308 Win.</p>
<p><strong>Approximate Weight</strong>: 8lbs. 7oz.<br />
<strong>Overall Length (inches):</strong> 43.25</p>
<p><strong>Stock</strong>:<br />
Sling swivel studs 3<br />
Front swivel stud only for bipod.<br />
Recoil pad (black) thickness (inches): 0.5 inches<br />
Length of pull: 13.75 inches<br />
Drop at heel: 1.75 inches<br />
Drop at comb: 0.25 inches</p>
<p><strong>Barrel</strong>:<br />
Length: 24 inches<br />
Heavy sporter contour<br />
Finish: Matte blue<br />
Twist rate (right hand): 12<br />
Grooves: 4<br />
Fluting<br />
Match grade chamber</p>
<p><strong>Action</strong>:<br />
Full length Mauser claw extractor<br />
Finish: Matte blue<br />
Magazine capacity: 5<br />
Pillar bedding<br />
Glass bedding<br />
3-position Model 70-type safety</p>
<p><strong>Trigger</strong>:<br />
Adjustable<br />
Factory setting (pull) pounds: 3-3.5</p>
<p><strong>Retail Price</strong>: 	$1258.00</p>
<p><strong>Tactical</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The Model 8400 Tacticalâ„¢ .308 Win. is based on the heavier Model 8400â„¢ action with an oversized bolt handle and knob. Specialized features include a heavy match grade barrel and McMillan stock with stippled texture. All metal surfaces are finished in matte black, and the stock incorporates a third sling swivel stud.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/tactical.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/tactical.jpg','popup','width=550,height=196,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/tactical-tm.jpg" height="160" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Tactical" title="tactical tm Kimber Tactical photo" /></a><br />
I like the stock <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile Kimber Tactical photo" /> </p>
<ul>
<li>McMillan A-5 stock with black/grey/green marble finish.</li>
<li>Mil-spec Picatinny rail with 20-minutes of elevation.</li>
<li>Scope rail secured with HD 8-40 screws.</li>
<li>Oversize bolt handle.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Caliber</strong>:  	.308 Win.</p>
<p><strong>Specs</strong></p>
<p>Approximate Weight: 9lbs. 4oz.<br />
Overall Length (inches): 43.5</p>
<p><strong>Stock</strong>:<br />
Sling swivel studs 5<br />
Front swivel stud only for bipod.<br />
Recoil pad (black) thickness (inches): 1 inch<br />
Length of pull: 13.63 inches<br />
Drop at heel: 0.43 inches<br />
Drop at comb: 0.38 inches</p>
<p><strong>Barrel</strong>:<br />
Length: 24 inches<br />
Bull contour<br />
Finish: Matte blue<br />
Twist rate (right hand): 12<br />
Grooves: 4<br />
Match grade chamber</p>
<p><strong>Action</strong>:<br />
Full length Mauser claw extractor<br />
Finish: Matte blue<br />
Magazine capacity: 5<br />
Glass bedding<br />
3-position Model 70-type safety</p>
<p><strong>Trigger</strong>:<br />
Adjustable<br />
Factory setting (pull) pounds: 3-3.5</p>
<p><strong>Retail Price</strong>: 	$1836.00</p>
<p><strong>Advanced Tactical</p>
<p></strong><br />
<blockquote>The Model 8400 Advanced Tacticalâ„¢ is also chambered in .308 Win. Primary metal surfaces are coated in the premium KimPro II Dark Earth finish that is both self-lubricating and extremely resistant to wear and the elements. A McMillan fully-adjustable stock with a sling swivel stud and four flush swivel cups plus a premium hard case is standard.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/advancedtactical.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/advancedtactical.jpg','popup','width=550,height=196,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/advancedtactical-tm.jpg" height="160" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Advancedtactical" title="advancedtactical tm Kimber Tactical photo" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>McMillan A-5 stock in desert camo.</li>
<li>Mil-spec Picatinny rail with 20-minutes of elevation.</li>
<li>Scope rail secured with HD 8-40 screws.</li>
<li>Oversize bolt handle.</li>
</ul>
<p>Specs</p>
<p><strong>Caliber</strong>:  	.308 Win.<br />
<strong>Approximate Weight: </strong>9lbs. 13oz.<br />
<strong>Overall Length (inches)</strong>: Adjustable</p>
<p><strong>Stock</strong>:<br />
Sling swivel studs 5<br />
Front swivel stud only for bipod.<br />
Recoil pad (black) thickness (inches): 1 inch<br />
Length of pull: Adjustable<br />
Drop at heel: Adjustable<br />
Drop at comb: Adjustable</p>
<p><strong>Barrel</strong>:<br />
Length: 24 inches<br />
Bull contour<br />
Twist rate (right hand): 12<br />
Grooves: 4<br />
Match grade chamber</p>
<p><strong>Action</strong>:<br />
Full length Mauser claw extractor<br />
Magazine capacity: 5<br />
Glass bedding<br />
3-position Model 70-type safety</p>
<p><strong>Trigger</strong>:<br />
Adjustable<br />
Factory setting (pull) pounds: 3-3.5</p>
<p><strong>Retail Price</strong>: 	$2497.00</p>
<p>More <a href="http://www.kimberamerica.com/rifles/tactical/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/04/kimber-tactical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kimber’s Advanced Tactical Rifle Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/21/kimber%e2%80%99s-advanced-tactical-rifle-kit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/21/kimber%e2%80%99s-advanced-tactical-rifle-kit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 06:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolt action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kimber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McMillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/21/kimber%e2%80%99s-advanced-tactical-rifle-kit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GunBlast.com reviews Kimber’s Advanced Tactical Rifle Kit

As neat as the kit is, though, if the rifle isn’t good it’s just window dressing.  Kimber’s Advanced Tactical Rifle is chambered for the .308 round, the standard for law enforcement and many military applications.    Probably the first thing most shooters will notice with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.gunblast.com/LT_Kim-Tac.htm">GunBlast.com</a></em> reviews Kimber’s Advanced Tactical Rifle Kit</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-lt-kim-tac-kim-tac-6.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-lt-kim-tac-kim-tac-6.jpg','popup','width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-lt-kim-tac-kim-tac-6-tm.jpg" height="150" width="200" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Lt Kim-Tac Kim-Tac-6" title="images lt kim tac kim tac 6 tm Kimber’s Advanced Tactical Rifle Kit photo" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>As neat as the kit is, though, if the rifle isn’t good it’s just window dressing.  Kimber’s Advanced Tactical Rifle is chambered for the .308 round, the standard for law enforcement and many military applications.    Probably the first thing most shooters will notice with the Advanced Tactical is the McMillan A-5 stock in desert camo. It is very striking in appearance, but it also incorporates a lot of really useful tactical features.</p>
<p>For example, it incorporates five sling swivel studs, one of which is only for bipod attachment. The others, however, offer the ability to attach a sling in various positions using quick detach swivel connectors. Since the rifle weighs close to 10 lbs without scope and bipod, a good sling is a necessity.</p>
<p>The choice of attachment points allows a tactical marksman to tighten up to use the sling for shooting from the seated or kneeling position or even from off hand but or have the option for switching attachment points for ease of carry. Length of pull is adjustable through removal or addition of spacers beneath the recoil pad.  Drop at heel and drop at comb are adjustable as well.  I also like the flat on the forearm which allows use of a sand bag or other rest.</p></blockquote>
<p>More <a href="http://www.gunblast.com/LT_Kim-Tac.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/21/kimber%e2%80%99s-advanced-tactical-rifle-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 round .308 drum magazine for H&amp;K G3, PTR 91, SW91 and FAL</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/14/50-round-308-drum-magazine-for-hk-g3-ptr-91-sw91-and-fal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/14/50-round-308-drum-magazine-for-hk-g3-ptr-91-sw91-and-fal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K G3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTR 91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SW91]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/14/50-round-308-drum-magazine-for-hk-g3-ptr-91-sw91-and-fal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very cool! But it weights 6.5 Lbs / 2.95 kg when loaded!


Of course if it is not reliable then it is just dead weight!
More here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool! But it weights 6.5 Lbs / 2.95 kg when loaded!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/gun-add-internet-resized.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/gun-add-internet-resized.jpg','popup','width=893,height=294,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/gun-add-internet-resized-tm.jpg" height="148" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Gun Add Internet Resized" title="gun add internet resized tm 50 round .308 drum magazine for H&K G3, PTR 91, SW91 and FAL photo" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/img-1132-op-800x712.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/img-1132-op-800x712.jpg','popup','width=800,height=712,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/img-1132-op-800x712-tm.jpg" height="400" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Img 1132 Op 800X712" title="img 1132 op 800x712 tm 50 round .308 drum magazine for H&K G3, PTR 91, SW91 and FAL photo" /></a></p>
<p>Of course if it is not reliable then it is just dead weight!</p>
<p>More <a href="http://alliedarmament.homestead.com/50rounddrum.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/14/50-round-308-drum-magazine-for-hk-g3-ptr-91-sw91-and-fal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIA M-10 infomation</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/03/aia-m-10-infomation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/03/aia-m-10-infomation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.303]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x39]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lee-enfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/03/aia-m-10-infomation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read many shooting magazines from around the world and I came across this advertisement in an Australian magazine. It shows what must to be the current AIA M-10 range being produced.
I scanned it into the computer. Click the image below to enlarge it.

Australian International Arms (AIA) calls the M-10 the the 5th generation Lee-Enfield, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read many shooting magazines from around the world and I came across this advertisement in an Australian magazine. It shows what must to be the current AIA M-10 range being produced.</p>
<p>I scanned it into the computer. Click the image below to enlarge it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/aia-ad-compressed.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/aia-ad-compressed.jpg','popup','width=2000,height=1326,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/aia-ad-compressed-tm.jpg" alt="Aia Ad Compressed" border="1" height="268" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="402" title="aia ad compressed tm AIA M 10 infomation photo" /></a></p>
<p>Australian International Arms (AIA) calls the M-10 the the 5th generation Lee-Enfield, read more about it <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/08/22/the-5th-generation-lee-enfield/">here</a>.</p>
<p>I fired up Skype and actually tried calling one of the Australian companies at the bottom of the advert to see if I could get any more information about the rifles. Unfortunately after trying two numbers I realized my rough timezone calculations were a bit off. Checking a timezone website confirmed this!</p>
<p>It is a pity they do not offer the 7.62&#215;39 version anymore. Not at all practical but a 30 round AK-47 magazine on a bolt action rifle would be &#8230; unique! Although the special edition M10-B3 that has a M134 mini-gun barrel is very cool <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' title="icon biggrin AIA M 10 infomation photo" /> </p>
<p>I have no new information about their availability in the US.</p>
<p>A photo of the M10 No4 MK4 Classic:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/albums-y17-marlon1985-marlonwithno4mk4.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/albums-y17-marlon1985-marlonwithno4mk4.jpg','popup','width=576,height=384,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/albums-y17-marlon1985-marlonwithno4mk4-tm.jpg" alt=" Albums Y17 Marlon1985 Marlonwithno4Mk4" border="1" height="219" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="329" title="albums y17 marlon1985 marlonwithno4mk4 tm AIA M 10 infomation photo" /></a></p>
<p>A photo of the M10-B2 Match:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/forums-icons-forum-pictures-000674-674275.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/forums-icons-forum-pictures-000674-674275.jpg','popup','width=1632,height=1224,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/forums-icons-forum-pictures-000674-674275-tm.jpg" alt=" Forums Icons Forum Pictures 000674 674275" border="1" height="245" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="326" title="forums icons forum pictures 000674 674275 tm AIA M 10 infomation photo" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-340"></span><br />
Some more photos:<br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/picture-18-2.png" alt="Picture 18-2" border="1" height="261" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="321" title="picture 18 2 AIA M 10 infomation photo" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/picture-17-2.png" alt="Picture 17-2" border="1" height="157" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="163" title="picture 17 2 AIA M 10 infomation photo" /><br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/picture-16-2.png" alt="Picture 16-2" border="1" height="162" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="167" title="picture 16 2 AIA M 10 infomation photo" /><br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/picture-20.png" alt="Picture 20" border="1" height="264" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="283" title="picture 20 AIA M 10 infomation photo" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/03/aia-m-10-infomation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
