<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Firearm Blog &#187; .17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/tag/17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>H&amp;K MP7</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2010/02/03/hk-mp7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2010/02/03/hk-mp7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4.6mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=10890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted because everybody love the MP7. My first impression was that it is much bigger in real life than in photos. While it is a sexy gun, the .17 cal (4.6x30mm) cartridge does not inspire me with confidence.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:540px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hk_mp7-tfb.JPG'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hk_mp7-tfb-tm.JPG' title=" H&K MP7 photo" alt=" H&K MP7 photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>Posted because everybody love the MP7. My first impression was that it is much bigger in real life than in photos. While it is a sexy gun, the .17 cal (4.6x30mm) cartridge does not inspire me with confidence.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:540px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hk_mp7_suppressor-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hk_mp7_suppressor-tfb-tm.jpg' title="hk mp7 suppressor tfb tm H&K MP7 photo" alt="hk mp7 suppressor tfb tm H&K MP7 photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2010/02/03/hk-mp7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glock Gen4 Unveiled!</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/25/glock-gen4-unveiled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/25/glock-gen4-unveiled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gen4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=10199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed's Public Safety, a dealer that which calls itself "Georgia's #1 GLOCK Dealer and GLOCK Law Enforcement Distributor", has published photos of the Glock 22 Gen4. I am sure Glock's PR people are pretty annoyed right about now!

So just to summarize all the point about the Glock Gen4 ...


Initially Glock 17 (9mm) and Glock 22 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.edspublicsafety.com/">Ed's Public Safety</a>, a dealer that which calls itself "Georgia's #1 GLOCK Dealer and GLOCK Law Enforcement Distributor", has published photos of the Glock 22 Gen4. I am sure Glock's PR people are pretty annoyed right about now!</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/18069_213625401588_147550831588_3255417_3613995_n-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/18069_213625401588_147550831588_3255417_3613995_n-tfb-tm.jpg' title="18069 213625401588 147550831588 3255417 3613995 n tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" alt="18069 213625401588 147550831588 3255417 3613995 n tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>Glock 22 Gen4</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/glock_22_gen_4-tfb.jpg' title="glock 22 gen 4 tfb Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" alt="glock 22 gen 4 tfb Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" />
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>Gen4 Dual Recoil Spring. Note magazine has two cut-outs to accommodate swappable mag release.</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/g22_gen4-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/g22_gen4-tfb-tm.jpg' title="g22 gen4 tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" alt="g22 gen4 tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>How the backstrap attaches. Tool provided with gun. Backstraps are marked "M" (medium) and "L" (large).</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/glock22_g22_gen4_pistol-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/glock22_g22_gen4_pistol-tfb-tm.jpg' title="glock22 g22 gen4 pistol tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" alt="glock22 g22 gen4 pistol tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/18069_213783996588_147550831588_3256283_6753327_n-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/18069_213783996588_147550831588_3256283_6753327_n-tfb-tm.jpg' title="18069 213783996588 147550831588 3256283 6753327 n tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" alt="18069 213783996588 147550831588 3256283 6753327 n tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>The new RTF3 texture</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:540px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/18069_214510066588_147550831588_3258893_1148475_n_1-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/18069_214510066588_147550831588_3258893_1148475_n_1-tfb-tm.jpg' title="18069 214510066588 147550831588 3258893 1148475 n 1 tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" alt="18069 214510066588 147550831588 3258893 1148475 n 1 tfb tm Glock Gen4 Unveiled!  photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'> Gen4 frame (Top) and 3rd Gen Frame (Bottom)</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>So just to summarize all the point about the Glock Gen4 ...</p>

<ul>
<li>Initially Glock 17 (9mm) and Glock 22 (.40 S&#038;W) will be available. Compact models will follow later in 2010.</li>
<li>Features duel recoil spring which should increase reliability.</li>
<li>Features Swappable backstraps.</li>
<li>Magazine release swappable between left and right.</li>
<li>Old magazines still work, but only when mag release is on left side.</li>
<li>Gen4 slide is clearly marked as "Gen4".</li>
<li>Retail price for G17 and G22 Gen4 is about $700 (<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/21/glock-gen-4-pricing-dealer-leo-and-msrp/">actual prices</a> will be lower than this).</li>
<li>Glock will cease sales of the 3rd Generation and RTF models.</li>
</ul>

<p><em>[Hat Tip: <a href="http://pistol-training.com/">Pistol Training</a>]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/25/glock-gen4-unveiled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Remington .17 HMR Model 597 controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-remington-17-hmr-model-597-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-remington-17-hmr-model-597-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rimfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[597]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=9866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been much controversy over the Model 597 (.17 HMR) buyback.

For those of you not familiar with the buy back, I will summarize. Back in August Remington finally acknowledged that their .17 HMR semi-automatics had serious issues. They offered a $250 coupon, which could be used towards the purchase of another Remington firearm, for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been much controversy over <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/19/remington-17-hmr-recall-buyback-ammunition-and-model-597/">the Model 597 (.17 HMR) buyback</a>.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/7_tm-tfb.jpg' title="7 tm tfb The Remington .17 HMR Model 597 controversy photo" alt="7 tm tfb The Remington .17 HMR Model 597 controversy photo" />
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>Split case neck. A <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/">common problem with .17 HMR Model 597 rifles</a>.</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>For those of you not familiar with the buy back, I will summarize. Back in August Remington finally acknowledged that their .17 HMR semi-automatics had serious issues. They offered a $250 coupon, which could be used towards the purchase of another Remington firearm, for each 597 that was returned to them. A $10 coupon was also offered for each box of ammunition returned. Since then there has been a lot of anger and confusion.</p>

<p><strong>The confusion regarding the .17 HMR cartridge.</strong></p>

<p>This buy back does not mean that the .17 HMR is unsafe in your bolt action, single shot or lever action rifles. The problems occur in semi-automatic rifles. Matt Groom <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/19/remington-17-hmr-recall-buyback-ammunition-and-model-597/#comment-13356">explained in the comments</a> ...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>With any bottle necked round, the pressure generated in the body of the case has to be compressed slightly to flow through the smaller diameter of the case neck. This is why the shoulder usually moves forward a tiny bit on rifle cartridges. The gases also accellerate as they travel through the neck area, which can cause the neck to soften and split. This all happens very fast, and is one reason why nearly everything with a bottle neck is fired from a locked breech. The PPSh and other Soviet SMGs are the only things I can think of that use a bottle neck in a blowback action before the modern .17 caliber rimfires came out, and I think those used steel cases.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This was likely the reason that Ruger never launched their once advertised, but never seen, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_10/17">10/17 rifles</a>.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:200px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/ammo_17hmr_pkg-tfb.jpg' title="ammo 17hmr pkg tfb The Remington .17 HMR Model 597 controversy photo" alt="ammo 17hmr pkg tfb The Remington .17 HMR Model 597 controversy photo" />
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:400px; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>Hornady .17 HMR V-Max</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>In September Hornady, who originally developed the cartridge, posted this noticed on their website ...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Recently there have been notices placed on several web sites warning about the use of 17HMR ammunition in semi-automatic firearms. Statements are to the effect of do not use 17HMR ammunition in semi-auto firearms or serious injury may result and do not use unless or until you have contacted the manufacturer of your firearm. Every ammunition manufacturer determines the warning it believes is appropriate for its product.</p>
  
  <p>First and foremost, the safety of our customers is our primary concern, and the same is true for all other SAAMI member companies. We are making this statement to hopefully reduce confusion, answer questions and clarify issues.</p>
  
  <p>We believe 17HMR ammunition is manufactured to the highest standard of care and quality and performs within the specifications established for 17HMR ammunition and is consistent with SAAMI standards for ALL ammunition.</p>
  
  <p>We are not firearms manufacturers and we believe the firearms manufacturers are solely the ones responsible for determining if and how they should market and sell a model or type of firearm. WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTACT THE MANUFACTURER OF YOUR FIREARM TO DETERMINE IF IT IS SAFE TO USE 17HMR AMMUNITION IN YOUR SPECIFIC TYPE AND MODEL OF FIREARM.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So there you have it. It is safe, but be wary of using the round in a semi-automatic.</p>

<p><strong>The controversy regarding the buy back.</strong></p>

<p>Many owners of recently purchased .17 597 rifles are understandably unhappy about the buy back. Some have paid hundreds of dollars more for the rifle than what Remington is offering in the buy back scheme.</p>

<p>In the comments Rand <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/#comment-15145">said</a> ...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>A few points, then: 1) Remington’s buy-back offer represents $10 less than what a gun dealer who is unaware that the thing has been recalled will offer for a gun that has blown out its magazine. So you could say it’s a pretty lousy buy-back offer, but you could also say that it’s about right, since you wouldn’t be able to get much more for the gun by selling to someone else. Either way, Remington is not doing anybody any favors.</p>
  
  <p>2) If you read Remington’s recall notice (which I also found when I Googled the thing), you’ll see that it does not admit that there is anything inherently wrong with the round OR the rifle. It says Remington has been “notified” by its “supplier” of 17 HMR ammo that the ammo is unsafe for use in semi-automatic rifles. So Remington offers to buy back its ammo. Then it says, essentially, that because it’s recalling its .17 HMR ammo, it’s also recalling its Model 597 rifles in .17 HMR. But why recall the rifles when the problem is the ammo? This is classic CYA legal language, pure and simple. I was in fact shooting Hornady ammo in my son’s rifle when it blew out the magazine.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Overseas customers are worse off as they have to pay much higher prices for their rifles, but are being offered the same buy back. Pat Gallagher <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/#comment-18814">said</a> ...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I live in Ireland were we are screwed cost wise for just about everything, I bought a Remy 597 in .17hmr about 12 months ago.I paid 700.00 euro for it, approx 1040.00us dollars and am being offered the same deal as you guys recall value, and you guys are pissed!.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Shooters affected by the buy back have been emailing and snail-mailing Remington, complaining to the BBB, <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/remingtonarmsrecall">organizing an online petition</a> and threatening legal action.</p>

<p>In the comments Joe argued that, on the whole, Remington <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/25/why-remington-recalled-the-17-hmr-model-597/#comment-18796">are being fair</a> ...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Having worked at Remington for over 40 years and retired I know that the company does everything possible to produce a quality product. As with any other industry sometimes new products don’t live up to expectations for one reason or another,the 597 .17 being a good example.I am also aware that no matter what reconciliation is offered it won’t satisfy everybody. many of the issues raised in the forum are justified and I think the company will be fair in their response.The thing that bothers me is the talk of lawyers and lawsuits. With Washington filled with antigun politicians we as gun owners should not be so quick to hobble a company that is in the forefront of protecting the 2nd Ammendment. You may say that I am biased but I would feel the same if it was Winchester,Mossberg or any other American gun maker.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>What can Remington do to make this right?</strong></p>

<p>I am going to write an email to my contact at the Freedom Group's Public Relations department and propose that Remington offer to replace any 597 purchased in the past X years with the closest equivalent .22 LR model. Customers could choose to have their 597 replaced or to take the $250 coupon. Sure this is not a perfect solution but I think it is more fair than the current situation.</p>

<p><strong>Do you think Remington is being fair or not?</strong></p>

<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2370922.js"></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/11/the-remington-17-hmr-model-597-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DSEi 09: Glock 17 with Thumb Safety</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/17/dsei-09-glock-17-with-thumb-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/17/dsei-09-glock-17-with-thumb-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dsei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Glock 17 pistol, with thumb safety, was designed by Glock for use by the British Army. It was on display at DSEi '09.

This is not the first Glock designed with a manual safety. Glock has previously designed a Glock 17 for the Tasmanian Police force that featured a standard 1911-style thumb safety.

This safety works [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Glock 17 pistol, with thumb safety, was designed by Glock for use by the British Army. It was on display at DSEi '09.</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glock_17_thumb_safety-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glock_17_thumb_safety-tfb-tm.jpg' title="glock 17 thumb safety tfb tm DSEi 09: Glock 17 with Thumb Safety photo" alt="glock 17 thumb safety tfb tm DSEi 09: Glock 17 with Thumb Safety photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>Safety in the on position (the safety is the button above the magazine release)</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>This is not the first Glock designed with a manual safety. Glock has previously designed a <a href="http://www.glockfaq.com/content.aspx?ckey=Glock_FAQ_Rare_and_Collectible_Glocks#g17s">Glock 17 for the Tasmanian Police force</a> that featured a standard 1911-style thumb safety.</p>

<p>This safety works differently. In order to engage the safety, it is pushed through the frame with the thumb, much like the magazine release. Disengaging the safety is done with the trigger finger.</p>

<p>At first I thought what a ridiculous mechanism this was until it was explained to me that the SA-80, the British Army service rifle, has a very similar safety which is manipulated in the same way. Glock designed this safety so that it would be familiar to British troops. Very clever!</p>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:244px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/sa_80-tfb.jpg' title="sa 80 tfb DSEi 09: Glock 17 with Thumb Safety photo" alt="sa 80 tfb DSEi 09: Glock 17 with Thumb Safety photo" />
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:488px; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SA-80">SA-80</a> </span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<p>One problem I do see is an operator going for the magazine release and accidentally engaging the safety. At best it would make the magazine change take longer, at worst the operator could forget to disengage the safety and pull the trigger at a bad guy only to find nothing happens.</p>

<p>I do not know if the British Army are considering replacing their current service pistols or if Glock is just making sure they have a model ready if they do in the future.</p>

<p>Big thank you to Lusaka for the information and photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/17/dsei-09-glock-17-with-thumb-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/17/gamo-tactical-socom-air-rifles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/17/gamo-tactical-socom-air-rifles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from the questionable name of SOCOM being applied to air rifles, I really like the styling of these new rifles. Three models will eventually be available but only the Socom Extreme is currently available to be purchased.


  The SOCOM EXTREME was created for an all new level in long distance air gun shooting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the questionable name of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOCOM">SOCOM</a> being applied to air rifles, I really like the styling of these new rifles. <a href="http://www.gamousa.com/family.aspx?family=Socom%20Series&#038;familyID=82">Three models</a> will eventually be available but only the Socom Extreme is currently available to be purchased.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The <strong>SOCOM EXTREME</strong> was created for an all new level in long distance air gun shooting and hunting.</p>
  
  <p>Gamo took their famous 1250 powerplant and re-tuned the beast to deliver a stunning velocity of over 1650 fps using the new PBA Platinum .177 ammo. The powerplant was matched to a precision steel, composite jacketed bull barrel which also helps reduce the larger cocking force. The precision barreled action is mated to a newly designed tactical, light weight composite stock. This specially engineered stock has a long tapered sure grip forend which leads back to pistol grip with palm swell for quick steady mounting. The buttstock features an ergonomically shaped cheekpiece which works for right and left handed shooters. Each SOCOM EXTREME air rifle is fitted with a special 3-9x50 Scope with red, green and blue illuminated glass etched reticle securely anchored by the Gamo solid one-piece mount. The composite stock reduces gun weight to a manageable 9 lbs compared to a heavier wood stock air rifle.</p>
  
  <p><strong>MSRP $399.95</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gamo_socom_extreme-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gamo_socom_extreme-tfb-tm.jpg' title="gamo socom extreme tfb tm Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles photo" alt="gamo socom extreme tfb tm Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>SOCOM EXTREME</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The <strong>SOCOM TACTICAL</strong> is the ultimate air rifle for high performance flexibility for day or night shooting. The Tactical composite stock has a custom molded forepiece and palm swell grip area for maximum control. The fully adjustable tactical comb has a raised cheekpiece and allows for an instant sight picture adjustment using the optical or the included fiber optic fixed sights. The receiver is topped with a precision 3-9x40 AR Scope anchored by a solid Gamo one-piece rail mount. The scope is fitted with a powerful, fully adjustable precision laser and light which quickly readies the SOCOM TACTICAL for night operations. The 26" barrel is made of precision rifled steel and is shrouded in a fully composite jacketed fluted polymer bull barrel. The barrel on the SOCOM TACTICAL is also fitted with the Gamo ND52, Noise Dampening Technology muzzle dampner. Combined with outstanding velocity at nearly 1300 fps with new PBA Platinum .177 ammo. The Tactical is fully capable of handling any backyard varmint incursions 52% quieter than a standard spring air rifle.</p>
  
  <p><strong>MSRP $329.95</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gamo_socom_tactical-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gamo_socom_tactical-tfb-tm.jpg' title="gamo socom tactical tfb tm Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles photo" alt="gamo socom tactical tfb tm Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>SOCOM TACTICAL</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The <strong>SOCOM CARBINE</strong> is specially configured to offer quick mounting and target acquisition. Its Gamo power plant is tuned to deliver a sizzling velocity of nearly 1300 fps with the new PBA Platinum ammo through a short, composite jacketed, precision rifled .177 cal steel barrel. The 3-9x40 precision AR scope is securely anchored to the receiver by the solid, one-piece Gamo mount. The long eye relief and brilliantly clear optic work in tandem with the special all-weather composite stock with sure-grip forend, palm swell pistol grip and adjustable comb with cheekpiece. The shooter can instantly adjust the stock for his or her comfort.</p>
  
  <p><strong>MSRP $329.95</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<p>
  <div class='main_image_container' style='margin-bottom:1.5em;margin-top:1.5em;'>
     <div class='inner_image_container' style='width:400px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>
     
       <a rel='thumbnail' class='tfb_thumbnail' href='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gamo_socom_carbine-tfb.jpg'>
          <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gamo_socom_carbine-tfb-tm.jpg' title="gamo socom carbine tfb tm Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles photo" alt="gamo socom carbine tfb tm Gamo Tactical SOCOM Air Rifles photo" />
        </a>
    
    </div>
    <div class='inner_text_container'>
      <span class='image_caption' style='font-style:italic; width:100%; text-align:center; display:block;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;'>SOCOM CARBINE</span>
    </div>
  </div>
  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/17/gamo-tactical-socom-air-rifles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remington .17 HMR Recall / Buyback: Ammunition and Model 597</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/19/remington-17-hmr-recall-buyback-ammunition-and-model-597/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/19/remington-17-hmr-recall-buyback-ammunition-and-model-597/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rimfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[597]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remington have decided to recall and buyback all .17 HMR Model 597. They have also announced they will buyback any Remington .17 HMR that was purchased for use in any semi-auto rifle.
If you have a semi-automatic firearm chambered for 17 HMR ammunition, immediately discontinue use of Remington 17 HMR ammunition.  If you have any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remington have decided to recall and buyback all .17 HMR Model 597. They have also announced they will buyback any Remington .17 HMR that was purchased for use in any semi-auto rifle.</p>
<blockquote><p>If you have a semi-automatic firearm chambered for 17 HMR ammunition, immediately discontinue use of Remington 17 HMR ammunition.  If you have any Remington 17 HMR ammunition that you wish to return to Remington contact the Remington Consumer Service number below.  Do not return the ammunition to the dealer.  Remington will provide you with a $10.00 coupon for each complete box of 50 rounds of Remington branded 17 HMR ammunition you return to Remington.  This coupon will be good for the purchase of any Remington ammunition at your local dealer.</p>
<p>In light of the ammunition manufacturer’s notice, it is very important that you immediately stop using your Remington Model 597 17 HMR semi-automatic rifle.  If you own a Remington Model 597 17 HMR semi-automatic rifle and wish to return it to Remington please contact the below Remington Consumer Service Number.  In return for your Remington Model 597 17 HMR synthetic stock semi-automatic rifle, Remington will provide you a coupon valued at $200.00 good for the purchase of a replacement Remington firearm.  If you have a laminate stock Remington Model 597 17 HMR semi-automatic rifle, Remington will provide you a coupon valued at $250.00 good for the purchase of a replacement Remington firearm.  Remington will also reimburse you for the actual postage to return your Model 597 17 HMR semi-automatic rifle to Remington.</p>
<p>Please allow up to 6 weeks after Remington receives your Model 597 17 HMR semi-automatic rifle or your Remington branded 17 HMR ammunition for the appropriate coupons to arrive.  Instructions for redemption of the coupons will be contained on the coupon.</p>
<p>For any consumer questions or instructions on how to return of your Model 597 17 HMR semi-automatic rifle or your Remington branded 17 HMR ammunition, please contact the Remington Consumer Service Department at 1-800-243-9700, Prompt #3.</p></blockquote>
<p>Problem with the Model 597 and .17 HMR is not uncommon. Gun manufacturers seem to have a very hard time in trying to convert .22 blow back actions to the more powerful .22 Magnum and it&#8217;s child cartridge the .17 HMR.</p>
<p>A reader of TFB recently had the exploding-597 problem (darn &#8230; I lost he photos he emailed me) and Remington said they would refund the purchase price, instead of fixing it. I did not read too much into their response at the time, but in hindsight I can see now that they were considering this action a couple of months ago.</p>
<p>I think Remington have taken the right action. I hope they let this offer stand for sometime so that all potentially dangerous guns can be returned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/08/19/remington-17-hmr-recall-buyback-ammunition-and-model-597/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mossberg big muzzle brake coming to .17 and .22 rifles!</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/mossberg-big-muzzle-brake-coming-to-17-and-22-rifles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/mossberg-big-muzzle-brake-coming-to-17-and-22-rifles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[702]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[817]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muzzle brake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plinkster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rimfire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mossberg&#8217;s big muzzle brake, which I call the BFMB  (Big &#8220;Fraking&#8221; Muzzle Brake), first seen on the Mossberg 500 Roadblocker shotgun is coming to the Plinkster line of semi-automatic and bolt action .22 and .17 HRM rifles. Four models will be available with the BFMB.
Click to expand the photos.

Model 817 with scope, thumbhole stock [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mossberg&#8217;s big muzzle brake, which I call the BFMB  (<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/08/mossberg-500-roadblocker-the-most-badass-pump-action-shotgun-ever/">Big &#8220;Fraking&#8221; Muzzle Brake</a>), first seen on the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/08/mossberg-500-roadblocker-the-most-badass-pump-action-shotgun-ever/">Mossberg 500 Roadblocker</a> shotgun is coming to the Plinkster line of semi-automatic and bolt action .22 and .17 HRM rifles. Four models will be available with the BFMB.</p>
<p>Click to expand the photos.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-brake-tip-down38177-817tdownbrakevarscope-1-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-brake-tip-down38177-817tdownbrakevarscope-1-1.jpg','popup','width=1808+20,height=434+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-brake-tip-down38177-817tdownbrakevarscope-1-1-tm.jpg" height="96" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Plinkster Brake Tip Down38177 817Tdownbrakevarscope-1-1" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Model 817 with scope, thumbhole stock and tip down stock (used as forward hand grip)</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-702-brake-37151-702withmuzzlebrake-2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-702-brake-37151-702withmuzzlebrake-2.jpg','popup','width=1808+20,height=374+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-702-brake-37151-702withmuzzlebrake-2-tm.jpg" height="82" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Plinkster 702 Brake 37151 702Withmuzzlebrake-2" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Model 702 autoloader</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-802-brake-37130-802withbrakerimfirescope-2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-802-brake-37130-802withbrakerimfirescope-2.jpg','popup','width=1808+20,height=387+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-802-brake-37130-802withbrakerimfirescope-2-tm.jpg" height="85" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Plinkster 802 Brake 37130 802Withbrakerimfirescope-2" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>Model 802</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-817-brake-bipod-38176-817withbrakescopebipod-3.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-817-brake-bipod-38176-817withbrakescopebipod-3.jpg','popup','width=1808+20,height=465+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/plinkster-817-brake-bipod-38176-817withbrakescopebipod-3-tm.jpg" height="102" width="400" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Plinkster 817 Brake Bipod 38176 817Withbrakescopebipod-3" title="" longdesc="" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Model 817 with scope and bipod.</em></p>
<p>From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Muzzle brakes are now available on the following models: the standard 702 Plinkster® (.22 LR autoloading), the scoped 802 Plinkster™ (.22 LR bolt-action with 4x scope) and the scoped model 817 (.17 HMR with 3-9&#215;40 scope). In addition, muzzle brakes will be fit onto a scoped model 817 with a thumbhole stock and Tipdown forend (.17HMR with 3-9&#215;40 scope), and lastly, an 817 (.17HMR) will offer a complete package of a muzzle brake plus an upgraded 4-16&#215;50 scope featuring sun shade, flip open lens protectors and a bi-pod.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have questioned the effectiveness of muzzle brakes on a low powered cartridge, such as the .22 LR, many times on the blog but this sure looks cool. Do I want one? <strong>Hell yes I do</strong> <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="icon smile Mossberg big muzzle brake coming to .17 and .22 rifles! photo" /> </p>
<p>Thanks to Kim for the photos.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mossberg-cartoon-2.png" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mossberg-cartoon-2.png','popup','width=560+20,height=687+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false" class="tfb_thumbnail"><img rel="thumbnail" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mossberg-cartoon-2-tm.jpg" height="362" width="295" align="" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Mossberg Cartoon 2" title="" longdesc="" /></a><br />
<em>The difference is subtle.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/mossberg-big-muzzle-brake-coming-to-17-and-22-rifles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rossi Youth Matched Pair Set in a matte nickel finish</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/23/rossi-youth-matched-pair-set-in-a-matte-nickel-finish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/23/rossi-youth-matched-pair-set-in-a-matte-nickel-finish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.410]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/23/rossi-youth-matched-pair-set-in-a-matte-nickel-finish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rossi have launched a new youth matched pair rifle with a matte nickel finish.


It comes in a .17HMR/.410 and .22LR/.410 versions.
New for 2008 Rossi is excited to offer a popular Matched Pair Set in a matte nickel finish. The set includes a .17 HMR or .22 LR rifle barrel with adjustable fiber optic front sights [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rossi have launched a new youth matched pair rifle with a matte nickel finish.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s411175bs.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s411175bs.jpg','popup','width=576,height=161,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s411175bs-tm.jpg" height="125" width="450" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="S411175Bs" title="s411175bs tm Rossi Youth Matched Pair Set in a matte nickel finish photo" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">
<p>It comes in a .17HMR/.410 and .22LR/.410 versions.</p>
<blockquote><p>New for 2008 Rossi is excited to offer a popular Matched Pair Set in a matte nickel finish. The set includes a .17 HMR or .22 LR rifle barrel with adjustable fiber optic front sights and .410 gauge shotgun barrel with brass bead front sights.</p>
<p>Ideal for first-time hunters, this Matched Pair is the perfect gun for varmint hunting or a fun day at the range. The package ships with a custom carrying case and dual-purpose strap. In addition the rifle barrel is drilled and tapped to hold the included scope mount base and hammer extension.</p>
<p>The Rossi Matched Pair line has set the standard for 2-barrel guns. The combination long gun package in unequalled, having been recognized as the best &#8220;youth-size&#8221; gun. Rossi starts with one of its popular single shot rifles, then hand fits a shotgun barrel to create the Matched Pair. The result is a highly reliable rifle with adjustable fiber optic sights and a button rifled barrel for enhanced accuracy, which quickly swaps barrels to become the favorite shotgun.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ever since I first used a Rossi rifle I have been meaning to get one. In my opinion they look great and I love the simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/23/rossi-youth-matched-pair-set-in-a-matte-nickel-finish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Savage 93R17 BTVS .17 HMR</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/11/review-of-savage-93r17-btvs-17-hmr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/11/review-of-savage-93r17-btvs-17-hmr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/11/review-of-savage-93r17-btvs-17-hmr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Shooting Times (UK):

I have always been a sucker for a good thumbhole stock and enjoy using the smaller calibre rifles for their ease of shooting, light recoil and level of performance that is more than sufficient for an evening&#8217;s rabbit foray.
The .17 HMR fills many requirements in this area and the new offering from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Shooting Times (UK):</p>
<blockquote><p>
I have always been a sucker for a good thumbhole stock and enjoy using the smaller calibre rifles for their ease of shooting, light recoil and level of performance that is more than sufficient for an evening&#8217;s rabbit foray.</p>
<p>The .17 HMR fills many requirements in this area and the new offering from stalwart Savage Arms ticks all the boxes regarding looks and performance. The Savage name has always stood for good quality at a fair price, but some models had that utilitarian look which wasn&#8217;t as appealling.</p>
<p>Not so with the new 93R17 model &#8211; you can see the pedigree yet appreciate the refinements, giving the shooter the complete package.
</p></blockquote>
<p>More <a href="http://www.shootingtimes.co.uk/guns/147026/Savage_93R17_BTVS_17_HMR.html">here</a>.<br />
<img src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/savage-93r17btvs.jpg" alt=" Savage 93R17Btvs" border="1" height="88" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="450" title="savage 93r17btvs Review of Savage 93R17 BTVS .17 HMR photo" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/11/review-of-savage-93r17-btvs-17-hmr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
