Real Armor Has Curves – CATI CQB review



It’s currently in fashion to disregard steel armor. To be sure, there are some significant differences between steel and ceramic composite armor, but there are a few things that steel can indeed do better than ceramic composite. It tends to be thinner and it produces virtually unmeasurable back face deformation. That means you are a lot more likely to stay in the fight. Steel is more durable than ceramic, but not nearly by the degree that many folks think. It is true that steel armor can be defeated by some threats that ceramic armor in the same rating might stop. But it will stop many threats that will cut through pistol rated armor like it isn’t there.

And that’s where steel really fits in. Not as a direct comparison to a level IV ceramic rifle plate or a level IIIA aramid vest, but as something in between. It gives you a relatively low cost, thin, and durable armor. CATI’s Combat Quad-Bend (CQB) plate has a complex curve that distributes weight better and also provides the capability of discrete wear. If fits in the middle as concealable armor plate that provides more protection than pistol armor but conceals better than ceramic composite rifle armor.



For $300 you get front and back, level III+ frag coated plates and a low profile concealable carrier. These III+ plates can be perforated by more unusual threats such as M855A1 and .30 M2AP, but they will stop M193 and almost any other .223 Rem or 5.56mm ammo as well as 7.62x51mm. While there are threats that will get through, they are not common and the fragmentation coating absorbs fragments from multiple shots. If you want to shave even more off the cost, downgrading from level III+ to level III and skipping the coating will save you $100.



The obvious question is how concealable and how comfortable these plates are, though. There is no question that a thinner, more curved plate is more comfortable and more concealable, but what does that actually look like? Matt at Buffman R.A.N.G.E. put together a video which shows pretty clearly how realistic it is to conceal the CATI CQB.

As you can see, it isn’t completely invisible. Bear in mind that soft armor isn’t totally invisible, either. I’m sure you’ve all seen soft armor under a police officer’s uniform shirt. But this does demonstrate that the CQB can be worn somewhat discretely. Definitely┬áless visible than a thicker plate, a flatter plate, or a MOLLE plate carrier.

I wore one around for a while and did some chores wearing it. The difference between the CQB plate and a flat plate was profound. It was also more comfortable than my single curve level IV plates. It’s not as comfortable as my level IIIA Second Chance vest, though.

Again, there are some not insignificant shortcomings for steel armor so don’t take this as a categorical endorsement for the CATI CQB armor. If you need something lighter, this isn’t for you. If you need a higher threat level, it isn’t for you either. But if you need something durable, affordable, comfortable, and concealable and if you need it to stop most rifle threats, the CQB might be a good choice.


Andrew is a combat veteran of OEF and has performed hundreds of ballistic tests for his YouTube channel, The Chopping Block ( He is an avid firearm collector and competitor and lives with his family in Arizona. If you have any questions, you may email him at


  • SGT Fish

    why in the world would they even offer a non-coated steel plate? Either I’m confused or this company really is selling junk. Also, I’d love to see how they bend the plates, cuz it weakens them A LOT! but maybe they know how to do it

    • Chop Block

      Their “uncoated” plate still has a base coat just for corrosion protection. No frag mitigation, though. As for why? The market provides. End users want a cheaper option. To be honest, the danger presented by fragments coming of an uncoated plate is largely overstated. They could make a painful wound but would be unlikely to kill. I wouldn’t recommend it if you can afford anything better, but if you want armor and you have very little to spend, a flat, 10″x12″, base coat plate is $55. If you are struck in the chest with a rifle round without a plate, you will probably die quickly. If you are struck in the chest with most rifle rounds while wearing a base coat level III plate, you’ll most likely live.

  • SGT Fish

    its not the bent shape that makes it weak, its the process of bending already hardened steel. It pulls and squeezes the steel, changing its properties and creating soft spots. So any armor rating the steel originally had is now not trustworthy. Just like when these steel armor makers advertise laser cut steel to keep the strength, lasers still get hot and weaken the edges. The only good way to do it is with a water jet.

    • Joshua

      That is functionally what I said. Bend the plate cold and you’ve pre-stressed the steel. Bend it hot and kiss the heat treat good bye. either way the plate should be retested. I’d like to see some testing done on it, because I’d like to see a good contoured steel armour plate.

      • Chop Block

        Watch the video in the article and other videos from Buffman.

  • RavishedBoy

    Isn’t the manufacturer supposed to state the Brinell hardness on every steel plate?

    • Don’t think there’s an NIJ standard that states manufacturers must divulge the contents/makeup of their plates. To us consumers it’s good info to have, but sometimes getting manufacturers to tell us what materials they’re using isn’t easy..

      Some companies steel plate ratings are purely marketing in nature..

      • RavishedBoy

        Sometimes you do things not only because you are forced to.
        Then we should avoid those companies whose products are not satisfactorily labeled (as it goes for food).

  • ActionPhysicalMan

    I liked it better when you tested armor by having a guy hit you with a sledgehammer. That was cool:-)

    • Chop Block

      Lol. This is that plate.