Review: Hatsan .30 Carnivore QE Air Rifle

IMG_1290

“Big bore” and “air rifle” are not two combinations I see in a sentence very often, but new releases in the air rifle world are pushing bores and performance higher and higher. Hatsan of Turkey is part of that crowd, having recently released the “Carnivore” line of big-bore air rifles in .30 and .357 (9mm) sizes. When asked if we wanted to review one, we simply could turn down the chance to see if .22LR would finally be knocked off its perch.

*TFB was shipped the .30 version for review. 

Out of the Box and First Impressions:

IMG_1278

IMG_1280

My first thought upon receiving the box was “Holy Smokes! This thing is long!” The box itself was almost 48″ long, which did not fit in my muscle car. I had to recline the front seat to get the box in the car to bring it home and once there, the rifle is about as long as the box would imply. The QE Carnivore is nearly 40″ long with the sound moderator.

IMG_1282

However, the heft is solid. Trying to twist various portions of the rifle was met with solid resistance and no squeaking. Balance is directly over the middle rubberized hand supports, which is farther forward than I would like on a firearm, but par for the course with airguns.

The stock itself is a single-piece molded affair with multiple rubber additions to increase handling. The grip also includes rubber inserts. The stock is fully adjustable, putting a PRS to shame in terms of movement, but is harder to adjust. The stock relies on friction for its adjustments. LOP and the comb both rely on two metal rods with flat-head pressure locks. The butt-pad position is adjustable with a hex key.

IMG_1304

The receiver itself is a glossy black metal extrusion, milled for its various functions. The rail on top actually has two dovetails to ensure compatibility with most modern scope mounts, picatinny or weaver. The magazine release is forward on the receiver and locks/unlocks HK-style. The bolt itself is in the rear on the right hand side about 3″ above the trigger. The safety is annoyingly on the left-hand side of the receiver and is automatically reset with each shot. This annoyance is compounded as the shooter has to break their form to disengage the safety, which means-follow-up shots take longer with a higher chance of missing.

IMG_1293

IMG_1299

Also included in the box are wrenches for adjustment, o-rings (which I was happy to see, more on that later), the instruction manual (which is almost all written, would love to see a few more pictures, especially for the complex adjustments and filling), and two magazines (one was installed in the air rifle). The second magazine is a nice touch, as most airguns have had only the one.

Troubles Filling:

Not fully versed in all things airgun, I thought this rifle was going to be like the others previously through for review, going up to 300 PSI using a hand-pump. I was wrong. The Carnivore works on pressures that are greater by orders of magnitude over standard .22 and .17 pellet guns we have previously tested. Looking at the gauge, it was labeled to 3,000 PSI.

IMG_1298

Thus, to test the rig, I had to head out and track down a scuba or paintball shop, of which the paintball shops would not fill it due to the unique fill method. One rotates a cover at the end of the tank which reveals a passageway where to fill you stick in a rod with two o-rings to seal and fill the reservoir. This is not an ideal solution ( the paintball shop I went to would not fill it for this reason), which was compounded by marring at one end of the passageway. This cut an o-ring and led to leaking.

Once replaced (replacements were in the box, we went in from the other side and it worked without issue. However, to keep myself shooting, I was forced to rent an 88ci tank and various adapters to transfer air to the reservoir when shooting.

At the Range:

After tracking down a scuba shop (relatively rare in the MidWest USA), I filled up the tank and rented a 4,500 PSI donor system so that I could shoot the Carinivore more than the 21 shots Hatsan claims it will last. Heading to the local indoor range, I set up for accuracy testing using a Hawke 3-9×40 rimfire scope (with 1/4 MOA clicks). All shooting was done in the sitting position, using a Caldwell adjustable front rest and bean bag rear.

Ammunition used for testing was JSB Diablo .30 Match pellets. I shot 3 groups of 7 rounds (using the magazine capacity as the limiter) on standard 5-target sheet. I fired 3 complete courses of fire, re-charging the cylinder and letting it cool to ambient temperature prior to the next string.

IMG_1295

Groups varied between .75″ center-to-center and up to 1.4″ maximum spread, normally varying across the vertical plane. This indicates slight inconsistencies in velocity, but they presented themselves only in the last magazine, indicating shooters should use only the first two magazines for ultimate accuracy. Eliminating the last magazine from results, across all three strings of fire, groups averaged .92″ center-to-center. To borrow a technical term, “not to shabby” and more than enough accuracy to take out a squirrel or rabbit at conventional engagement distances.

Noise control from the QE or Quiet Energy system was excellent. Hatsan claims that even at full power, the Carnivore should be less than 100 dB. My ears would agree and when all those “dirty” powder-shooters left and left me to my own devices, I removed my ears and indoors there was nary an issue.

IMG_1296

Where the Carnivore really stands out is the trigger. Its a two-stage affair and compared to the Benjamin Armada we reviewed previously, this was a  night and day difference. Fully adustable (although a pain to do so), the trigger has a long take-up prior to the second-stage wall. The second stage breaks about 4.5 lbs with little creep. I dare say this is a marksman’s trigger, but its distance from the grip would make short-fingered shooters stretch.

IMG_1308

The Good:

  • Accurate – 1″ at 50 Yards which is what I would expect at a minimum from an air rifle.
  • Quiet – Hatsan claims less than 100 dB with the Quiet Energy System. When alone in the range by myself, I removed my ears without issue.
  • Trigger is excellent. Adjustable two-stage affair. The gold plating is silly, but acceptable.
  • Fully adjustable stock for LOP- Comb Height, and Butt Plate Position
  • Equal to or greater energy on target than much 22 LR ammunition.

The Notable:

  • You are not likely to find .30 cal air rifle ammo anywhere at your local store.
  • Rotary magazine is reported to be temperamental in other reviews – make sure to press the pellet so the skirt is fully seated into rotary magazine.
  • Unlike Benjamin, the magazine does not notify you of shots remaining, but is decidedly easier to load.
  • Lasted all 21 shots on a single tank without issue. Drops noticeably into the 4th magazine.

The Bad:

  • Requires a scuba shop or a donor paintball tank to refill. If you do not have one nearby, or are not wanting to invest in the infrastructure needed for a high-PSI air rifle, this is not for you.
  • Long air rifle, especially with the included sound moderator.
  • I strongly dislike automatic safeties, this one in particular as it requires the shooter to break their shooting grip to engage or disengage.

IMG_1292

Final Thoughts:

I am divided on the rifle as a package, principally due to its logistics. It uses .30 pellets, which are hard to source anywhere other than the internet. Then, to get the velocities required on the big bore rounds, it requires a 3,000 PSI source, which means you need the infrastructure or are making exceedingly regular trips to your local scuba-shop which can fill the tank.

If you are an air rifleman and understand the strengths and weaknesses of the platform, I recommend the Carnivore. Its fully adjustable, accurate, and deadly. However, if you are a powder-based rifleman or someone new to air rifles, this is not the platform to invest in on the logistics alone. With 22LR available again in the US, to me, this is niche platform.

For those looking for an air rifle with big-bore capabilities, the Carnivore is an excellent performer. The air rifle pushes .30 caliber pellets subsonic with equal to or greater energy than most 22LR loads. Accuracy is equal to or greater than 22 in most cases, and the report of the air rifle with the moderator is not likely to scare prey, if you miss.



Nathan S.

One of TFB’s resident Jarheads, Nathan now works within the firearms industry. A consecutive Marine rifle and pistol expert, he enjoys local 3-gun, NFA, gunsmithing, MSR’s, & high-speed gear. Nathan has traveled to over 30 countries working with US DoD & foreign MoDs.

Nathan can be reached at Nathan.S@TheFirearmBlog.com

The above post is my opinion and does not reflect the views of any company or organization.


Advertisement

  • jeff k

    man , thanks for going through all that trouble just to review this for us !!! on a side note whats the velocity you achieved? just curious

  • Tassiebush

    As well as the alternative to .22lr niche, another use I have read of in the US is for Urban hunting. As they aren’t legally treated as firearms they aren’t as restricted in where you can use them. That’s my understanding anyhow.
    In my opinion airgun manufacturers are limiting their market a fair bit by always seemingly going for high psi levels which require specialized double stage pumps or scuba tanks. The olden days pnuematic big bores like the girandoni (probably what Lewis and Clark had) got by on far lower psi levels like 500-750psi yet still allowed large numbers of shots between charges. The main difference is that they had locks that held the valve open for longer and long barrels helped things along too. Modern ones have quicker locktimes and need way more pressure to get their results. Sure they’ll outperform old ones but they incur a lot of inconvenience for modest improvements.

    • CrankyFool

      Just a reminder: Check your local regulations. For example, in my neighborhood, air guns are considered firearms for the purpose of “discharging a firearm” regulations.

      • My county has a similar law. I’ve had to caution many friends who bought an airgun for lolz and use it for fun that they are breaking the law by discharging it, and could be in some trouble if a cop sees them doing it.

      • Tassiebush

        Yes absolutely check local rules.

    • ghost

      Benjamin hand pumped air rifles, .177, one shot, have taken many a rabbit and squirrel for the dinner table in the time before Kroger or HEB. Yes, dear hearts, there was a time when hunting was not a sport.

      • Tassiebush

        I think a lot of guns have lost their practical focus due to hunting becoming sport focused rather than a subsistence necessity or even a lifestyle choice. The focus on performance over robustness and high support needs of airguns really demonstrates this.

  • ghost

    The next infantry light rifle/ammo upgrade. Now, if they could do something about the recoil, and make a carbine version to fit in trucks. (yes, I know, air rifles have been used before in military service.)

  • kipy

    Good thing Ralphie didn’t want one of these bad boys for Christmas

  • MrEllis

    They make some freaky SBR shotguns too.

  • Porty1119

    PCPs (precharged pneumatic air rifles) are not for everyone. They require substantial support infrastructure, as shown in this review. I prefer multipump, spring piston, or even CO2, but I’m also working on a student’s budget.

    A better replacement for a rimfire rifle would be a mid-range breakbarrel, spring or gas ram (will be making my first foray into gas rams with a Hatsan .22 or .25 within the next few months) in .22 or maybe .25. This will be excellent against varmints out to fifty yards maximum, with dramatically decreased noise, overpenetration, and general hazard downrange. Air rifles are precision instruments, but I would choose a decent one over a rimfire nearly any day of the week.

  • tompinto

    Very helpful review; thank you for taking the time.

  • Giolli Joker

    “When alone in the range by myself, I removed my ears without issue.”
    Good thing you were alone, and by yourself, because such a gross act of self mutilation would have sure attracted attention by the authorities…

    • DaveP.

      Lee Press-On Ears.

  • DIR911911 .

    no velocity measurements? o well , seems way more of a pain than good old load and shoot.

  • thedonn007

    What size game can you hunt with this?

    • ghost

      I do not mean to sound defeatist, but I would not hunt anything bigger than a rabbit or squirrel. Anything bigger I would use rifle or shotgun. It’s a purely personal thing, I just do not trust an air rifle to make a clean kill on larger game. Buy a .22 rifle to start with if you have a choice for small game. That’s just me.

  • CRUZaderDEETZ

    If interested in air rifles, get a Benjamin 392 or 397 to scratch the itch. Follow-up shots aren’t really possible with it, but it’s manual of arms forces you to appreciate each shot.

  • Just say’n

    Umm…I didn’t think you were supposed to use regular scopes on air guns because the forward recoil can destroy them? Or is that just piston air rifles?

    • Southpaw89

      That would just be piston, the pre charged pneumatic rifles like this are reported to have very mild recoil. And since no spring is being flung backwards to compress the air, all you will get is the opposite reaction of the pellet traveling forward.

  • Southpaw89

    Are you actually limited to pellets, or could you also use .30 caliber balls, or lightweight bullets used in handguns? I guess the bore of the rifle would decide that, but I wouldn’t be surprised if you could use them, though you might have to resign to single shot operation.

  • Kyle

    That sounds like an awful lot of hassle when I can just pull my old man’s Sheridan Blue Streak out of the closet and just hand pump the thing five or six times. We never did like cansiter fed air rifles though so I am slightly biased.

    • Shmoe

      Every kid should have a Sheridan! I’ve still got a Silver Streak! Great for garden rabbits.

  • Shmoe

    Um, Nathan? Let me first say, I like you and I like TFB. But, as someone who knows something about air-rifles (no expert, mind you), reading a “review” by someone who apparently knows less about them is a bit…odd. For example, I don’t own a PCP rifle, but I know how to fill one (you’ll want a caddy tank and usually something called a Foster adaptor).

    Words like: “Philistine” or “dilettante” come to mind. Did I mention how much I enjoy your other stuff? I do. And in most of it I feel like I’m learning something from someone who knows more than me or we’re covering new ground together, Might I suggest that a “first impression” of a big-bore air rifle might have been more appropriate than a product review? I mean, I wasn’t even aware that Hatsan had moved into “big-bores”, and now I am! Great! Thanks! To you and TFB! But for a long form review you might bring in someone from the airgunning community.

    I’m honestly interested in what you, and the wider gun community, think about this stuff, But for product reviews I find that someone with…more points of reference can have a more in depth. accurate review. I simply feel I can’t know wether your review was accurate or not, or missed something glaring,

    Let me repeat, I really like this blog, and all it’s contributors. Keep on doing what you do best! And thanks!