C&R Trigger Pull Test

    My last trigger pull test of modern sporting rifles and assault rifles (the test included some assault rifles of the proper definition) was very eye opening and seemingly well received. I really wanted to expand upon this by delving into more categories; C&R long guns, C&R pistols, shotguns, and modern pistols. I simply don’t have enough C&R pistols, shotguns, or modern pistols to put to the test, so I looked at my C&R rack and thought it would make for a great test!

    IMG_1461

    Testing parameters would be the same:

    1. The same gauge used in the review would be used on all rifles
    2. Three attempts would be made on all rifles
    3. The median of the three tests would be collected as data

    The rifles were placed with their stocks on a flat surface and all tested by my friend Patrick while I photographed the rifles (he has no vested interest in any rifle performing better than any other, but neither do I really).

    Information to take into account:

    • Some of these rifles may have fired thousands of rounds, surely altering their original trigger pull weight and characteristics.
    • I do not believe these have had trigger work done. I have broken down and inspected most of them with a loupe to check for polishing or other alterations.
    • Remember, there is more to a good trigger than just the weight.
    Anyways, on with some results.
    First up was an English Lee Enfield No. 1 MK III:

    IMG_1465IMG_1467

    German Mauser K98k:

    IMG_1470IMG_1472

    Czech Mauser VZ. 24:

    IMG_1473IMG_1475

    Springfield M1 Garand:

    IMG_1476IMG_1477

    Chinese Type 56 SKS:

    IMG_1480IMG_1481

    Swedish Mauser M96 (dated 1904 and shot many, many times):

    IMG_1483IMG_1486

    Swiss M96/11:

    IMG_1487IMG_1488

    Swiss K31:

    IMG_1492IMG_1493

    Russian Mosin Nagant M91/30:

    IMG_1495IMG_1498

    Chinese Type 53 (Mosin Nagant copy):

    IMG_1499IMG_1500

    Egyptian Rasheed:

    IMG_1502IMG_1506

    French MAS 36:

    IMG_1507IMG_1508

    French MAS 49/56:

    IMG_1511IMG_1512

    Swedish AG/42b “Ljungman”:

    IMG_1516IMG_1518

    Yugoslavian Mauser 24/47:

    IMG_1519IMG_1523

    Steyr M95 Carbine:

    IMG_1524IMG_1527

     

    The following were more for fun.

    M1919:

    IMG_1528IMG_1529

    Thompson M1A1:

    IMG_1532IMG_1535

    Reising M50 (if you needed anymore proof that these suck):

    IMG_1536IMG_1538

    German MP43:

    IMG_1540IMG_1543

     

    Data was compiled and sorted from lightest weight to heaviest:

    Gun: Pounds, Ounces Ounces Pounds
    Swedish Mauser 2,15.3 47.3 2.95625
    M96/11 3,1.1 49.1 3.06875
    K31 4,3.1 67.1 4.19375
    Sturmgewehr MP43 4,3.5 67.5 4.21875
    Hakim 4,6.2 70.2 4.3875
    Enfield 5,6 86 5.375
    AG42B 5,12 92 5.75
    Garand 6,6 102 6.375
    SKS 6,7.5 103.5 6.46875
    Steyr M95 6,15.5 111.5 6.96875
    Mauser K98k 7,0 112 7
    Yugo Mauser 7,2 114 7.125
    M91/30 7,14.5 126.5 7.90625
    MAS 36 7,15.5 127.5 7.96875
    MAS 49/56 8,8 136 8.5
    Type 53 9,0 144 9
    M1919 10,9 169 10.5625
    Czech Mauser 11,4 180 11.25
    Thompson M1A1 11,4 180 11.25
    Reising M50 11,13.5 189.5 11.84375

     

    And this fancy graph should help as well:

    graph

    Some observations:

    • Not all Mausers are created equal
    • While some triggers are lighter than others, the pull can be awful and mushy (looking at you, Nagants)
    • The average (with select-fire or full auto guns removed) was 6.52 pounds or 104 ounces
    • Swedish Mausers rock and it is no wonder that this is my favorite of the C&R bolt gun I have (it might have something to do with all that Swedish blood in my veins)

    I like performing these tests and I would really like the next installment to be modern handguns. I hope you enjoyed this test!

    Alex C.

    Alex is a Senior Writer for The Firearm Blog and Director of TFBTV.


    Advertisement