Crimson Trace M72 LAW Laser Attachment

Crimson Trace has developed a laser aiming attachment for the M72 Light Anti-Tank Weapon (LAW). Because the LAW launcher tube is disposable the laser module uses quick detach mount so that the operator can easily attach is before firing and remove it before disposing of the tube.

Ian Harrison mentioned that the laser module was in service, somewhere, but would not say which country or service has adopted it.

Related Posts

27 Responses to “Crimson Trace M72 LAW Laser Attachment”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Mikewrote on February 01st, 2012 at 6:35 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Needs a MAGPUL AVG and an AIMPOINT micro red-dot-sight. More Picatinny…got to have more Picatinny.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Josh Bwrote on February 01st, 2012 at 4:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So much for fire and forget!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  3. PLUSwrote on February 01st, 2012 at 4:06 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like the panzerfaust3′s firecontrol, but this may very easy to be forgotten……..

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Rusty Raywrote on February 01st, 2012 at 12:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cool. Also needs a flash hider and a bayonet..;-)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Charles222wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 11:11 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    We had several for the platoon on my third deployment, (LAWs, not these lasers)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  6. Joshwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 6:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Too bad these aren’t legal in Canada… yet. :)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Wwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 1:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    it has been interesting that we have seen a re-fielding of older anti-armor weaponry in afghanistan. It makes sense, due to the LAW being lighter and cheaper than the AT4 and Javelin, though still effective against enemy personnel behind cover or machine gun nests. The M67 recoilless rifle is also being reused with flechette ammunition, which is highly ideal in conducting ambushes or rooting out infantry in the mountains.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  8. SpudGunwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 1:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    If the M72 is making a come back and being upgraded to fire ‘smarter’ munitions, then an IR laser might be a good addition.

    Though, I’m not sure what happens to your night vision when one of these things goes off.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  9. Westwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 10:39 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is there a bottom rail for a shotgun??

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
  10. gir6543wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 10:32 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    anyone else see the irony of having a top shot winner presenting an aide for aiming firearms? :p

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  11. James G.wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 9:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Dumb question. If the LAW is a one-time-use deal how do you know if the laser sight is zeroed?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 28 Thumb down 0
    • Amuse Boucheresponded to James G. on February 01st, 2012 at 12:29 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The same way they know the iron sights are zeroed?

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • Steve (The Firearm Blog)responded to James G. on February 01st, 2012 at 3:45 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Good question. I have never fired one, but my understanding is that they are being used as bunker busters (blowing up houses/wall that guerrillas are using as cover). 50 – 100 MOA accuracy is probably good enough.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  12. Davidwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d hate to be the troop that forgets to recover the laser after firing and discarding the tube lol

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
    • Some guyresponded to David on February 01st, 2012 at 8:04 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Could you imagine the mess? Sticking what will likely be a sensitive item (laser) on a disposable weapons system can only end in FLIPLs

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Mikewrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:32 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I was thinking the same thing….. that’s got to be the season 1 winner from Top Shot.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  14. William C.wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    A lot of LAWs have been dug up for use in Afghanistan, I believe somebody actually started making new models too.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • 032125responded to William C. on January 31st, 2012 at 8:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Makes sense, if there were any left.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  15. Nick Chenwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:19 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Isnt he the guy who won Top Shot?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • 032125responded to Nick Chen on January 31st, 2012 at 10:16 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      No, that’s Lucius Malfoy. He’s done playing around with magic. We’ll see if Harry can magic away 475fps of HEDP.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
  16. 032125wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:15 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Who is still using LAWs? My unit had a box of dummy LAWs that had been sitting in a Conex since the late 80′s that was a sort of running joke.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4
    • John doeresponded to 032125 on January 31st, 2012 at 9:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Hehe we used two of em in Afghanistan when fob was under attact

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
      • 032125responded to John doe on January 31st, 2012 at 10:12 am Link To Comment |

        Where did they come from? We hadn’t had any live LAWs in seriously 20 years. They were all shot off when the AT-4s arrived.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
      • MacKresponded to John doe on January 31st, 2012 at 10:29 am Link To Comment |

        @032125 I believe someone in Canada is still manufacturing them for the CA. But I wouldnt be surprised if they didnt have tons of LAWS left over from the 70′s and 80′s stocked in some bunker they forgot about til the ATF needed to sell them to the cartels (oops) or DOD found them useful in AFG.

        This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
    • Joe Schmoeresponded to 032125 on January 31st, 2012 at 1:55 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The Israeli’s still use them.

      Each soldier carries usually at least one A4 or A6 model. They weigh next to nothing (~2-3KG) for the capability they offer and they can just strap to the side of nearly any pack. Plus, they cost only a few hundred dollars and are throw away vs. having to launch a $75k ATGM (and still carry the aiming device) or $500k Hellfire.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • ParatrooperJJresponded to 032125 on February 01st, 2012 at 3:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      New models have been developed and are in service with US forces.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • northorresponded to 032125 on February 03rd, 2012 at 12:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      We still use them in the norwegian army. I believe kongsberg are the main producers these days. At least they own the licence

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. James G.wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 9:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Dumb question. If the LAW is a one-time-use deal how do you know if the laser sight is zeroed?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 28 Thumb down 0
    • Steve (The Firearm Blog)responded to James G. on February 01st, 2012 at 3:45 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Good question. I have never fired one, but my understanding is that they are being used as bunker busters (blowing up houses/wall that guerrillas are using as cover). 50 – 100 MOA accuracy is probably good enough.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
    • Amuse Boucheresponded to James G. on February 01st, 2012 at 12:29 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The same way they know the iron sights are zeroed?

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  2. Davidwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d hate to be the troop that forgets to recover the laser after firing and discarding the tube lol

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
    • Some guyresponded to David on February 01st, 2012 at 8:04 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Could you imagine the mess? Sticking what will likely be a sensitive item (laser) on a disposable weapons system can only end in FLIPLs

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Westwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 10:39 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is there a bottom rail for a shotgun??

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
  4. gir6543wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 10:32 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    anyone else see the irony of having a top shot winner presenting an aide for aiming firearms? :p

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  5. Nick Chenwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:19 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Isnt he the guy who won Top Shot?

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • 032125responded to Nick Chen on January 31st, 2012 at 10:16 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      No, that’s Lucius Malfoy. He’s done playing around with magic. We’ll see if Harry can magic away 475fps of HEDP.

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
  6. William C.wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    A lot of LAWs have been dug up for use in Afghanistan, I believe somebody actually started making new models too.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • 032125responded to William C. on January 31st, 2012 at 8:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Makes sense, if there were any left.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  7. Mikewrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:32 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I was thinking the same thing….. that’s got to be the season 1 winner from Top Shot.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  8. Wwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 1:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    it has been interesting that we have seen a re-fielding of older anti-armor weaponry in afghanistan. It makes sense, due to the LAW being lighter and cheaper than the AT4 and Javelin, though still effective against enemy personnel behind cover or machine gun nests. The M67 recoilless rifle is also being reused with flechette ammunition, which is highly ideal in conducting ambushes or rooting out infantry in the mountains.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  9. Josh Bwrote on February 01st, 2012 at 4:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    So much for fire and forget!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  10. SpudGunwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 1:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    If the M72 is making a come back and being upgraded to fire ‘smarter’ munitions, then an IR laser might be a good addition.

    Though, I’m not sure what happens to your night vision when one of these things goes off.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  11. PLUSwrote on February 01st, 2012 at 4:06 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like the panzerfaust3′s firecontrol, but this may very easy to be forgotten……..

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Mikewrote on February 01st, 2012 at 6:35 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Needs a MAGPUL AVG and an AIMPOINT micro red-dot-sight. More Picatinny…got to have more Picatinny.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Joshwrote on January 31st, 2012 at 6:27 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Too bad these aren’t legal in Canada… yet. :)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Rusty Raywrote on February 01st, 2012 at 12:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cool. Also needs a flash hider and a bayonet..;-)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Charles222wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 11:11 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    We had several for the platoon on my third deployment, (LAWs, not these lasers)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  16. 032125wrote on January 31st, 2012 at 8:15 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Who is still using LAWs? My unit had a box of dummy LAWs that had been sitting in a Conex since the late 80′s that was a sort of running joke.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4
    • John doeresponded to 032125 on January 31st, 2012 at 9:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Hehe we used two of em in Afghanistan when fob was under attact

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
      • MacKresponded to John doe on January 31st, 2012 at 10:29 am Link To Comment |

        @032125 I believe someone in Canada is still manufacturing them for the CA. But I wouldnt be surprised if they didnt have tons of LAWS left over from the 70′s and 80′s stocked in some bunker they forgot about til the ATF needed to sell them to the cartels (oops) or DOD found them useful in AFG.

        This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
      • 032125responded to John doe on January 31st, 2012 at 10:12 am Link To Comment |

        Where did they come from? We hadn’t had any live LAWs in seriously 20 years. They were all shot off when the AT-4s arrived.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
    • Joe Schmoeresponded to 032125 on January 31st, 2012 at 1:55 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      The Israeli’s still use them.

      Each soldier carries usually at least one A4 or A6 model. They weigh next to nothing (~2-3KG) for the capability they offer and they can just strap to the side of nearly any pack. Plus, they cost only a few hundred dollars and are throw away vs. having to launch a $75k ATGM (and still carry the aiming device) or $500k Hellfire.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • ParatrooperJJresponded to 032125 on February 01st, 2012 at 3:12 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      New models have been developed and are in service with US forces.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • northorresponded to 032125 on February 03rd, 2012 at 12:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      We still use them in the norwegian army. I believe kongsberg are the main producers these days. At least they own the licence

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment