DIY 3D Scanning used to make AK grip

Normally Strike Industries' design with produces with CAD software and rapid prototypers (3D printers) but decided to take a different approach for an AK grip they wanted to produce. They handmade a number of grips and asked people to try them. They picked the most popular grip and then used free 3D scanning software and a digital camera to convert the grip to a 3D model.

They used Autodesk 123D Catch to create the model. 123D Catch takes a number of static photographs of an object or scene and uses them to create a 3D model. It is free and no special equipment, other than a standard digital camera, is needed to use it. If anyone tries modeling a gun with it, please let me know.

Related Posts

5 Responses to “DIY 3D Scanning used to make AK grip”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Kennywrote on December 18th, 2011 at 11:48 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Yes, this will not provide a model with acceptable dimensions and tolerances for mechanical components.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Ianresponded to Kenny on December 20th, 2011 at 1:40 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Generally the scanned image isn’t used for direct manufacture, but rather as a basis to compare a proper model to. I can’t say that that will be the situation here, but that has been my personal experience with 3D scanners.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Buster charliewrote on December 17th, 2011 at 12:29 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I can say from experience that you will not get accurate enough models to make parts that need accuracy in the thousandths, but I don’t see why it wouldn’t work for grips and stocks and other roughing work.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Deojewrote on December 16th, 2011 at 5:10 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d like to see a how hard it is to do a firearm. Maybe I’ll give it a try.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  4. Lancewrote on December 16th, 2011 at 5:06 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Interesting

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Deojewrote on December 16th, 2011 at 5:10 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d like to see a how hard it is to do a firearm. Maybe I’ll give it a try.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  2. Kennywrote on December 18th, 2011 at 11:48 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Yes, this will not provide a model with acceptable dimensions and tolerances for mechanical components.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Ianresponded to Kenny on December 20th, 2011 at 1:40 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Generally the scanned image isn’t used for direct manufacture, but rather as a basis to compare a proper model to. I can’t say that that will be the situation here, but that has been my personal experience with 3D scanners.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Buster charliewrote on December 17th, 2011 at 12:29 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I can say from experience that you will not get accurate enough models to make parts that need accuracy in the thousandths, but I don’t see why it wouldn’t work for grips and stocks and other roughing work.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Lancewrote on December 16th, 2011 at 5:06 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Interesting

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment