Colt LE6920MP with Magpul MOE Accessories

Colt Defense is the latest AR-15 maker to offer a rifle shipped from the factory with Magpul MOE accessories. The LE6920MP is a Colt 6920 with a MOE vertical grip (MVG), MOE hand guard, Magpul MBUS rear sight, MOE-K hand grip, MOE trigger guard, MOE stock and two 30-round Magpul PMAGs.

colt le6920mp tfb Colt LE6920MP with Magpul MOE Accessories photo

Colt will offer models with Magpul furniture in black, flat dark earth and olive drab. The LE6920MPG-B features green anodized receivers and Magpul furniture in black.

Related Posts

36 Responses to “Colt LE6920MP with Magpul MOE Accessories”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Candice Rasconwrote on January 01st, 2012 at 2:41 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hello, I think that I saw you visited my blog thus I came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to enhance my web site!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Chockblockwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I remember that Colt worked with the Clinton Administration to help push various gun bans in exchange for their sweet contracts to supply the M-4.

    The worm has turned and now they jump on the civilian AR bandwagon.

    Just as their improved AR is a piston rifle, after they sent a letter to the Army times bemoaning the HK-416 and raging against piston ARs.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
    • Domestic Squirrelresponded to Chockblock on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:15 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Do you have citation to back up the claim Colt worked wit gov gun ban policies in exchange for contracts?

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  3. Sianwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 2:09 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Some things that I just don’t understand why they still exist:

    civilian AR barrels with the m203 notch
    16″ uppers with carbine gas instead of midlength

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
    • NikonMikonresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 4:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I agree, wtf @ m203 notches. Seriously.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
    • Reverend Clintresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 4:45 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Red Jacket has pretty much the same gun, all magpul furniture, and it too has the 203 notch… i just laughed when i saw it.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • Williamresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 4:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Civilians can own M203′s, so the notch COULD be used, and I’ve only ever had carbine length gas systems and they have never failed me, so why follow the internets be-all, end-all opinion?

      Ultimately, people buy the M4 clones when they want the gun that is as close to what’s issued as possible. Nobody is issued a midlength in the military.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Sianresponded to William on December 01st, 2011 at 2:29 pm Link To Comment |

        if they wanted what the military has, they’d be buying 14.5″ barrels instead of 16″.

        I have no problem with carbine gas+14.5″

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • jdunresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 9:23 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Four reasons why the barrel have a notch.
      1. Standard AR barrel which are inexpensive.
      2. Easy to obtain.
      3. Reduce weight
      4. Consumers wants the closest thing to what the military use.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
  4. greasyjohnwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 12:28 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    That’s weird. Magpul’s in with Remington, I’d expect a conflict of interest.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. 18Dwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 11:50 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Seriously? Colt needs to get with the times. S&W and Bushmaster already have this model at about 30% less $. This does nothing for Colt or Magpul.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
    • JMDresponded to 18D on December 01st, 2011 at 6:36 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Some people want these accessories on a decent quality rifle, however….

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
      • Wresponded to JMD on December 02nd, 2011 at 7:02 pm Link To Comment |

        “Some people want these accessories on a decent quality rifle, however…”

        and how exactly is colt more decent than any other AR manufacturer??? Mil-spec? not hardly. very few rifles produced by cold are indeed certified “Mil-Spec” (doing so would be prohibitively expensive).

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • jdunresponded to 18D on December 01st, 2011 at 9:28 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      This is Colt and not S&W or Bushmaster. Colt command a higher price for their rifles. Colts AR are consistently endorsed by firearms instructors.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • 18Dresponded to jdun on December 01st, 2011 at 11:06 am Link To Comment |

        Firearms instructors consistently endorse other companies such as BCM, Daniel Defense, LMT, H&K, LWRCI, S&W, KAC, LaRue, etc.. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a modern firearms instructor using a Colt. The reason being is that Colt has lacked innovation in the commercial market. They are also overpriced for the product they are putting out.

        This “new” Magpul model is evidence of Colt’s misunderstanding of the modern market. The “MOE” model was something shooters wanted 3 yrs ago. To see Colt release this model as one of their newest items is kinda funny. It’s just an LE6920 with Magpul furniture for $1,350.00. If they wanted to come out with something modern, they should have done better than this.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
      • jdunresponded to jdun on December 01st, 2011 at 11:20 am Link To Comment |

        It is true that firearms instructors endorsed other products but one thing is consistent is that they support Colt AR. People like Pat Roger and the likes will always recommend Colt above anything else.

        Consumers didn’t want MOE hand guards or buttstock. What they wanted was the latest light weight rail system and CTR. The MOE stuffs are just an inexpensive alternative to the standard furniture. It will be replace sooner or later with better accessories by the buyer.

        Other than the MOE pistol grip, I think the MOE product line are junk. A downgrade from the standard version.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
      • JMDresponded to jdun on December 01st, 2011 at 2:35 pm Link To Comment |

        Colt has been, is, and will continue to be the standard by which all other military-pattern ARs are judged.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • Wresponded to jdun on December 08th, 2011 at 10:43 am Link To Comment |

        “Colt has been, is, and will continue to be the standard by which all other military-pattern ARs are judged.”

        hardly. perhaps you haven’t heard of Lewis Machine & Tool or Noveske…

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Lancewrote on November 30th, 2011 at 8:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The price Colt sells there rifles at nearly twice more than Bushmaster or Olympic Arms they should included Magpul accessories…… And a 1000rds of 5.56mm ammo and a RCO-M4 ACOG scope too!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6
    • Williamresponded to Lance on December 01st, 2011 at 4:58 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      These Colts have been going for about $1250, where have you seen a Bushy for $250?

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • jdunresponded to William on December 01st, 2011 at 9:32 am Link To Comment |

        Lance is correct in the fact that Colt’s AR cost twice as much. You can now get a decent complete AR for sub $550 (S&W) san the rear sight. If you’re a LEO you can get a S&W AR below $475 san the rear sight.

        With that said Colt does command the respect of the gun community.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • 18Dresponded to William on December 01st, 2011 at 11:08 am Link To Comment |

        Where have you seen a place where $250 x 2 = $1,250? LMAO!

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
    • Lanceresponded to Lance on December 01st, 2011 at 8:57 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Seen Bushmaster M-4s and Olympic Arms for $600-$700 dollars,

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • Williamresponded to Lance on December 02nd, 2011 at 2:51 am Link To Comment |

        His post originally said $1000 more. If you replace the “twice” with “$1000″ his grammar makes sense. I’m guessing it was edited so he didn’t look like a fool. Also, add up the cost of the accessories he’s mentioned; that’s $1500-1700 for the RCO and 1k rounds of ammo. Sounds like a Colt hater to me

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • Wresponded to Lance on December 08th, 2011 at 10:45 am Link To Comment |

        for once, i agree with you lance. The rifles you mentioned will not do anything less than a colt will.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Lanceresponded to Lance on December 01st, 2011 at 9:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I agree Jdun id love to have Colts just as a contractor I cant afford one.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  7. Nathanielwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 4:55 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Decent move on Colt’s part. Weren’t they going to discontinue civilian sales of the LE6920?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  8. Jasonwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 4:49 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Welcome to 2009, Colt.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • greasyjohnresponded to Jason on December 01st, 2011 at 3:08 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      It’s such a sad story. Right now their Magnum Carry and Detective Special could be flourishing in the concealed market, and the Python could be flying off the shelf with free publicity from The Walking Dead, but all they do is sell variations of three different designs for a much higher markup than the competition.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Wresponded to greasyjohn on December 08th, 2011 at 10:46 am Link To Comment |

        its certainly a case of the Izhmash symptom: state-sponsored industry fattened with contract money not needing innovation to stay afloat.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. cc19wrote on November 30th, 2011 at 3:59 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Simple. I can dig it.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  10. Reverend Clintwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 3:30 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    love my magpul hanguard and grip.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
    • justinresponded to Reverend Clint on December 01st, 2011 at 12:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Stock is good too. Nice and light compared to the standard collapsible stocks. But wasn’t Colt making their own stock in this pattern to replace the old 6 position stock?

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
    • jdunresponded to Reverend Clint on December 01st, 2011 at 9:37 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Personally I think it is a downgrade from the standard furniture. The only thing thing that I consider an upgrade is the MOE pistol grip in that setup.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  11. Chockblockwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 3:21 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    This is big. If police departments and federal agencies snap these up Magpull will have recovered cash from the ACR fiasco.

    Expect sales of those handguards and stock to explode as well.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • jdunresponded to Chockblock on December 01st, 2011 at 9:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Magpul didn’t lose anything than unrealized profits. It was Bushmaster that got killed in the ACR deal.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  1. Sianwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 2:09 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Some things that I just don’t understand why they still exist:

    civilian AR barrels with the m203 notch
    16″ uppers with carbine gas instead of midlength

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
    • Williamresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 4:56 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Civilians can own M203′s, so the notch COULD be used, and I’ve only ever had carbine length gas systems and they have never failed me, so why follow the internets be-all, end-all opinion?

      Ultimately, people buy the M4 clones when they want the gun that is as close to what’s issued as possible. Nobody is issued a midlength in the military.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Sianresponded to William on December 01st, 2011 at 2:29 pm Link To Comment |

        if they wanted what the military has, they’d be buying 14.5″ barrels instead of 16″.

        I have no problem with carbine gas+14.5″

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • NikonMikonresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 4:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I agree, wtf @ m203 notches. Seriously.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
    • jdunresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 9:23 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Four reasons why the barrel have a notch.
      1. Standard AR barrel which are inexpensive.
      2. Easy to obtain.
      3. Reduce weight
      4. Consumers wants the closest thing to what the military use.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
    • Reverend Clintresponded to Sian on December 01st, 2011 at 4:45 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Red Jacket has pretty much the same gun, all magpul furniture, and it too has the 203 notch… i just laughed when i saw it.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  2. Jasonwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 4:49 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Welcome to 2009, Colt.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • greasyjohnresponded to Jason on December 01st, 2011 at 3:08 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      It’s such a sad story. Right now their Magnum Carry and Detective Special could be flourishing in the concealed market, and the Python could be flying off the shelf with free publicity from The Walking Dead, but all they do is sell variations of three different designs for a much higher markup than the competition.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Wresponded to greasyjohn on December 08th, 2011 at 10:46 am Link To Comment |

        its certainly a case of the Izhmash symptom: state-sponsored industry fattened with contract money not needing innovation to stay afloat.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Candice Rasconwrote on January 01st, 2012 at 2:41 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Hello, I think that I saw you visited my blog thus I came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to enhance my web site!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Reverend Clintwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 3:30 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    love my magpul hanguard and grip.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
    • justinresponded to Reverend Clint on December 01st, 2011 at 12:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Stock is good too. Nice and light compared to the standard collapsible stocks. But wasn’t Colt making their own stock in this pattern to replace the old 6 position stock?

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
    • jdunresponded to Reverend Clint on December 01st, 2011 at 9:37 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Personally I think it is a downgrade from the standard furniture. The only thing thing that I consider an upgrade is the MOE pistol grip in that setup.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  5. greasyjohnwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 12:28 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    That’s weird. Magpul’s in with Remington, I’d expect a conflict of interest.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Nathanielwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 4:55 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Decent move on Colt’s part. Weren’t they going to discontinue civilian sales of the LE6920?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  7. cc19wrote on November 30th, 2011 at 3:59 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Simple. I can dig it.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  8. Chockblockwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 3:21 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    This is big. If police departments and federal agencies snap these up Magpull will have recovered cash from the ACR fiasco.

    Expect sales of those handguards and stock to explode as well.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • jdunresponded to Chockblock on December 01st, 2011 at 9:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Magpul didn’t lose anything than unrealized profits. It was Bushmaster that got killed in the ACR deal.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  9. 18Dwrote on November 30th, 2011 at 11:50 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Seriously? Colt needs to get with the times. S&W and Bushmaster already have this model at about 30% less $. This does nothing for Colt or Magpul.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
    • JMDresponded to 18D on December 01st, 2011 at 6:36 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Some people want these accessories on a decent quality rifle, however….

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
      • Wresponded to JMD on December 02nd, 2011 at 7:02 pm Link To Comment |

        “Some people want these accessories on a decent quality rifle, however…”

        and how exactly is colt more decent than any other AR manufacturer??? Mil-spec? not hardly. very few rifles produced by cold are indeed certified “Mil-Spec” (doing so would be prohibitively expensive).

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • jdunresponded to 18D on December 01st, 2011 at 9:28 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      This is Colt and not S&W or Bushmaster. Colt command a higher price for their rifles. Colts AR are consistently endorsed by firearms instructors.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • jdunresponded to jdun on December 01st, 2011 at 11:20 am Link To Comment |

        It is true that firearms instructors endorsed other products but one thing is consistent is that they support Colt AR. People like Pat Roger and the likes will always recommend Colt above anything else.

        Consumers didn’t want MOE hand guards or buttstock. What they wanted was the latest light weight rail system and CTR. The MOE stuffs are just an inexpensive alternative to the standard furniture. It will be replace sooner or later with better accessories by the buyer.

        Other than the MOE pistol grip, I think the MOE product line are junk. A downgrade from the standard version.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
      • 18Dresponded to jdun on December 01st, 2011 at 11:06 am Link To Comment |

        Firearms instructors consistently endorse other companies such as BCM, Daniel Defense, LMT, H&K, LWRCI, S&W, KAC, LaRue, etc.. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a modern firearms instructor using a Colt. The reason being is that Colt has lacked innovation in the commercial market. They are also overpriced for the product they are putting out.

        This “new” Magpul model is evidence of Colt’s misunderstanding of the modern market. The “MOE” model was something shooters wanted 3 yrs ago. To see Colt release this model as one of their newest items is kinda funny. It’s just an LE6920 with Magpul furniture for $1,350.00. If they wanted to come out with something modern, they should have done better than this.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
      • Wresponded to jdun on December 08th, 2011 at 10:43 am Link To Comment |

        “Colt has been, is, and will continue to be the standard by which all other military-pattern ARs are judged.”

        hardly. perhaps you haven’t heard of Lewis Machine & Tool or Noveske…

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • JMDresponded to jdun on December 01st, 2011 at 2:35 pm Link To Comment |

        Colt has been, is, and will continue to be the standard by which all other military-pattern ARs are judged.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  10. Chockblockwrote on December 01st, 2011 at 9:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I remember that Colt worked with the Clinton Administration to help push various gun bans in exchange for their sweet contracts to supply the M-4.

    The worm has turned and now they jump on the civilian AR bandwagon.

    Just as their improved AR is a piston rifle, after they sent a letter to the Army times bemoaning the HK-416 and raging against piston ARs.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
    • Domestic Squirrelresponded to Chockblock on December 02nd, 2011 at 9:15 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Do you have citation to back up the claim Colt worked wit gov gun ban policies in exchange for contracts?

      This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  11. Lancewrote on November 30th, 2011 at 8:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The price Colt sells there rifles at nearly twice more than Bushmaster or Olympic Arms they should included Magpul accessories…… And a 1000rds of 5.56mm ammo and a RCO-M4 ACOG scope too!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6
    • Williamresponded to Lance on December 01st, 2011 at 4:58 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      These Colts have been going for about $1250, where have you seen a Bushy for $250?

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • 18Dresponded to William on December 01st, 2011 at 11:08 am Link To Comment |

        Where have you seen a place where $250 x 2 = $1,250? LMAO!

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
      • jdunresponded to William on December 01st, 2011 at 9:32 am Link To Comment |

        Lance is correct in the fact that Colt’s AR cost twice as much. You can now get a decent complete AR for sub $550 (S&W) san the rear sight. If you’re a LEO you can get a S&W AR below $475 san the rear sight.

        With that said Colt does command the respect of the gun community.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • Lanceresponded to Lance on December 01st, 2011 at 8:57 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      Seen Bushmaster M-4s and Olympic Arms for $600-$700 dollars,

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • Williamresponded to Lance on December 02nd, 2011 at 2:51 am Link To Comment |

        His post originally said $1000 more. If you replace the “twice” with “$1000″ his grammar makes sense. I’m guessing it was edited so he didn’t look like a fool. Also, add up the cost of the accessories he’s mentioned; that’s $1500-1700 for the RCO and 1k rounds of ammo. Sounds like a Colt hater to me

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • Wresponded to Lance on December 08th, 2011 at 10:45 am Link To Comment |

        for once, i agree with you lance. The rifles you mentioned will not do anything less than a colt will.

        Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Lanceresponded to Lance on December 01st, 2011 at 9:43 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

      I agree Jdun id love to have Colts just as a contractor I cant afford one.

      Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

Leave a Comment