The new Ruger LCP-LM and LC9-LM incorporate LaserMax CenterFire lasers in their trigger guard. The on/off switch, which is forward of the trigger, is ambidextrous. The laser can be adjusted for both windage and elevation.
The MSRP of the LC9-LM (9mm) is $525 and the LCR-LM (.380 ACP) is $443. These prices are ~$80 more expensive than the standard laser-less models.
Thanks for the write up. I shot an SR-9 today and will be trying out the LC9-LM soon. It was good to see some in to and impressions before I try it.
0 
0Ok, didn’t thought of those points, thanks, folks.
1 2I like the setup of the Crimson Trace with the switch in the grip for a more natural position to control the laser .
0 1Looks nice. Hope it has a nice none Ruger trigger pull.
0 2Guys, small typo in the last sentence
The MSRP of the LC9-LM (9mm) is $525 and the LCR-LM (.380 ACP) is $443. These prices are ~$80 more expensive than the standard laser-less models.
Instead of LCR-LM should be LCP-LM.
0 2I think a laser is a good idea on a CCW, however the activation of the unit should be incorporated into the grip.
The button activated lasers forward of the trigger guard are great if you’re pulling your handgun from a static holster, as you can train your trigger finger to activate it safely when drawing.
However, a lot of these small pistols will be put in a pocket holster, that won’t always be orientated for a steady and identical draw each time. Basically, I wouldn’t want to fiddle with a laser button so close to the trigger in a frantic draw.
2 5I see your point Spud but I prefer the LaserMax set up. Laser works both directions, helps you orient the gun to the target and gives a visual cue to the goblin as to your location, especially if there is even a slight bit of smoke/dust/fog etc.
I like being able to turn the laser off while maintaining a firm grip on the weapon. I’ve tried it with my S&W M-640 and it’s difficult to do with the button on the grip and adrenaline pumping.
Just another point to consider. There doesn’t seem to be a perfect solution.
1 1The issue is a little different for the LCP vs a full sized handgun. I tried this little gun with both lasers. I was able to ease off the grip button and keep it steady enough for short range shooting. On the other hand with the laser max I found it too clumsy to get the switch on, then get to the trigger. Besides, as I imagined circumstances where I might aim the LCP at an assailant, in the vast majority he already sees me. So I went with the CT laser grip.
0 0At 21 feet and less, the typical point and shoot range of a CCW, sights are considered slow and using them extends the gun out into CQB wrestling range. A laser keeps it more on target held to the side and emphasizes muzzle sweep.
Pricing it at $80 more will get some attention if it’s $80 over the $275 I paid. Only the most flush suburbanite during the initial rush got stuck for more than $350. Those MSRP’s won’t stand a chance in the rough and tumble of Shotgun News adverts.
2 5Laser sights, for a one-inch barrel?
1 9Barrel is over 2 inches
2 0For dark conditions where it would difficult to get a sight picture with those tiny sights.
They’re also useful for normal handgun training.
1 2
Thanks for the write up. I shot an SR-9 today and will be trying out the LC9-LM soon. It was good to see some in to and impressions before I try it.
I like the setup of the Crimson Trace with the switch in the grip for a more natural position to control the laser .
Guys, small typo in the last sentence
The MSRP of the LC9-LM (9mm) is $525 and the LCR-LM (.380 ACP) is $443. These prices are ~$80 more expensive than the standard laser-less models.
Instead of LCR-LM should be LCP-LM.
Looks nice. Hope it has a nice none Ruger trigger pull.
Ok, didn’t thought of those points, thanks, folks.
I think a laser is a good idea on a CCW, however the activation of the unit should be incorporated into the grip.
The button activated lasers forward of the trigger guard are great if you’re pulling your handgun from a static holster, as you can train your trigger finger to activate it safely when drawing.
However, a lot of these small pistols will be put in a pocket holster, that won’t always be orientated for a steady and identical draw each time. Basically, I wouldn’t want to fiddle with a laser button so close to the trigger in a frantic draw.
I see your point Spud but I prefer the LaserMax set up. Laser works both directions, helps you orient the gun to the target and gives a visual cue to the goblin as to your location, especially if there is even a slight bit of smoke/dust/fog etc.
I like being able to turn the laser off while maintaining a firm grip on the weapon. I’ve tried it with my S&W M-640 and it’s difficult to do with the button on the grip and adrenaline pumping.
Just another point to consider. There doesn’t seem to be a perfect solution.
The issue is a little different for the LCP vs a full sized handgun. I tried this little gun with both lasers. I was able to ease off the grip button and keep it steady enough for short range shooting. On the other hand with the laser max I found it too clumsy to get the switch on, then get to the trigger. Besides, as I imagined circumstances where I might aim the LCP at an assailant, in the vast majority he already sees me. So I went with the CT laser grip.
At 21 feet and less, the typical point and shoot range of a CCW, sights are considered slow and using them extends the gun out into CQB wrestling range. A laser keeps it more on target held to the side and emphasizes muzzle sweep.
Pricing it at $80 more will get some attention if it’s $80 over the $275 I paid. Only the most flush suburbanite during the initial rush got stuck for more than $350. Those MSRP’s won’t stand a chance in the rough and tumble of Shotgun News adverts.
Laser sights, for a one-inch barrel?
For dark conditions where it would difficult to get a sight picture with those tiny sights.
They’re also useful for normal handgun training.
Barrel is over 2 inches