USMC fields MAG-D 40mm Grenade Dispenser

Marine Corp Times reports that the USMC are fielding the DefenseShield MAG-D (Molle Adaptable Grenade Dispenser). The nifty device, which resembles a large magazine, allows easy access to five 40mm grenades.

MAG-D Demo Video

[ Many thanks to Lance for emailing me the link. ]

Related Posts

18 Responses to “USMC fields MAG-D 40mm Grenade Dispenser”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Johnwrote on November 12th, 2011 at 2:36 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    What? No sand storm test?
    I am disappoint.

    I guess it has those handy “cleaning vents” to purge all the sand out with your camelback water in the field, right?

    -.-
    Where do they get this shit?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. jimwrote on October 21st, 2011 at 7:40 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    wow.. how long is it going to take for someone to make a 40mm launcher that takes mags??

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  3. Willwrote on October 20th, 2011 at 7:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Anyone who has exchanged fire with the enemy knows the value in decreasing the time it takes to achieve fire superiority. This will dramatically increase the rate of fire for the grenadier. It allows him to have muscle memory. When you need HEDP you don’t want to be searching all over the place looking in empty fabric pouches to find your next round loosing valuable time.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. 6677wrote on October 19th, 2011 at 2:02 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Well, it seemed a good idea when I first saw the article float past as I scrolled through the front page, but now I think about it, no. I wouldn’t carry one. I was going to suggest double stacking but then the bulk towards the front might get a bit too much. Fabric pouches all the way, or the idea below me somewhere of mounting them to the back of a squadmate.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Andywrote on October 18th, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Might be my cheap laptop speakers, why does it sound like it is made out of cheap plastic?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Netforcewrote on October 18th, 2011 at 2:25 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    It’s a good idea alright but the man in the demo video looks like he’s having a hard time crawling with those dispensers on.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. 032125wrote on October 18th, 2011 at 10:06 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    40mm for 203 are a pain in the ass, no doubt about it. This is better than the dedicated vest, but it still sucks.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Martin (M)wrote on October 18th, 2011 at 9:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    This looks like a quick way to increase the area occupied by 5 40mm grenades by 25-30% This would be cool kit for the skinny guys that want to look bulked out.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Chasewrote on October 18th, 2011 at 8:28 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I want a short-barreled AR chambered in 40mm grenade that uses these magazines. ;-)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  10. Lancewrote on October 18th, 2011 at 7:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The system is fully ALICE and MOLLE system compatible. I like it replaces a MOLLE vest approach which took alot of space. I still find it interesting that USMC and the Army now have two different GL the USMC is staying with battle harden M-203 and the Army is going with the M-320.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  11. Hrachya Hayrapetyanwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 3:57 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    What if carry it on leg?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  12. Droptongwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 1:55 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Move the dispensers down. One on each thigh, distributes weight evenly, allows good access in prone position. Tactical thigh dispensers.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  13. Jeffwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 12:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    ehh, at least it looks more compact than the flc grenadier layout. You can at least have mag pouches on your person

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Sidwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 12:16 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I carried the M203 in Panama. Back then, the grenadier had a vest that took up the entire front of his body. Was too much.

    I can see what they were attempting here. It may have some utility if the grenadier carried one and other members of the fire team had one on their back. Much like getting ammo to the M240, every member of the squad needs to support the ammo load out. Having 5 rounds in a handy dispenser would not be that ackward. May want them on a sling rather than attached to the vest.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  15. Naterwrote on October 17th, 2011 at 10:39 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d just love to dive into the prone position with a couple of those bastards on…

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  16. charles222wrote on October 17th, 2011 at 10:10 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    These things look kinda ridiculously huge, and they destroy options for carrying way more important stuff on your rack, like NODs, radio, your IFAK, and so on. Not a good design IMO.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  17. Alex Swrote on October 17th, 2011 at 9:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Make a gun those big mags work with, then we’ll talk.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
  18. Entropywrote on October 17th, 2011 at 8:55 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is it just me, or does that seem like a hell of an awkward thing to have strapped to you? It reaches from that guy’s hips to his armpit which can’t be comfortable to patrol with.

    I can see the utility of it, but soft pouches for grenades would surely be better as they do not get in the way.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  1. Alex Swrote on October 17th, 2011 at 9:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Make a gun those big mags work with, then we’ll talk.

    This comment has been well-received! What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
  2. Droptongwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 1:55 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Move the dispensers down. One on each thigh, distributes weight evenly, allows good access in prone position. Tactical thigh dispensers.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  3. Sidwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 12:16 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I carried the M203 in Panama. Back then, the grenadier had a vest that took up the entire front of his body. Was too much.

    I can see what they were attempting here. It may have some utility if the grenadier carried one and other members of the fire team had one on their back. Much like getting ammo to the M240, every member of the squad needs to support the ammo load out. Having 5 rounds in a handy dispenser would not be that ackward. May want them on a sling rather than attached to the vest.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  4. Naterwrote on October 17th, 2011 at 10:39 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’d just love to dive into the prone position with a couple of those bastards on…

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  5. jimwrote on October 21st, 2011 at 7:40 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    wow.. how long is it going to take for someone to make a 40mm launcher that takes mags??

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. Chasewrote on October 18th, 2011 at 8:28 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I want a short-barreled AR chambered in 40mm grenade that uses these magazines. ;-)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  7. Entropywrote on October 17th, 2011 at 8:55 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is it just me, or does that seem like a hell of an awkward thing to have strapped to you? It reaches from that guy’s hips to his armpit which can’t be comfortable to patrol with.

    I can see the utility of it, but soft pouches for grenades would surely be better as they do not get in the way.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  8. Lancewrote on October 18th, 2011 at 7:11 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The system is fully ALICE and MOLLE system compatible. I like it replaces a MOLLE vest approach which took alot of space. I still find it interesting that USMC and the Army now have two different GL the USMC is staying with battle harden M-203 and the Army is going with the M-320.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  9. Hrachya Hayrapetyanwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 3:57 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    What if carry it on leg?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  10. charles222wrote on October 17th, 2011 at 10:10 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    These things look kinda ridiculously huge, and they destroy options for carrying way more important stuff on your rack, like NODs, radio, your IFAK, and so on. Not a good design IMO.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  11. Johnwrote on November 12th, 2011 at 2:36 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    What? No sand storm test?
    I am disappoint.

    I guess it has those handy “cleaning vents” to purge all the sand out with your camelback water in the field, right?

    -.-
    Where do they get this shit?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Willwrote on October 20th, 2011 at 7:59 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Anyone who has exchanged fire with the enemy knows the value in decreasing the time it takes to achieve fire superiority. This will dramatically increase the rate of fire for the grenadier. It allows him to have muscle memory. When you need HEDP you don’t want to be searching all over the place looking in empty fabric pouches to find your next round loosing valuable time.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. 6677wrote on October 19th, 2011 at 2:02 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Well, it seemed a good idea when I first saw the article float past as I scrolled through the front page, but now I think about it, no. I wouldn’t carry one. I was going to suggest double stacking but then the bulk towards the front might get a bit too much. Fabric pouches all the way, or the idea below me somewhere of mounting them to the back of a squadmate.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Netforcewrote on October 18th, 2011 at 2:25 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    It’s a good idea alright but the man in the demo video looks like he’s having a hard time crawling with those dispensers on.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Jeffwrote on October 18th, 2011 at 12:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    ehh, at least it looks more compact than the flc grenadier layout. You can at least have mag pouches on your person

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Martin (M)wrote on October 18th, 2011 at 9:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    This looks like a quick way to increase the area occupied by 5 40mm grenades by 25-30% This would be cool kit for the skinny guys that want to look bulked out.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. 032125wrote on October 18th, 2011 at 10:06 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    40mm for 203 are a pain in the ass, no doubt about it. This is better than the dedicated vest, but it still sucks.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Andywrote on October 18th, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Might be my cheap laptop speakers, why does it sound like it is made out of cheap plastic?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment