Surefire Rapid Transition Sights (DD-RTS-SET)

Surefire's nifty Rapid Transition Sight are canted at 45 degrees to allow them to be used alongside scopes on 3-gun competition rifles. I have seen, and blogged about, canted picatinny rails for red dot sights but this is the first canted iron sight that I have seen with a built in rail attachment.

Surefire has them listed on their website for $238.

[ Many thanks to Heath for emailing me the info. ]

Related Posts

29 Responses to “Surefire Rapid Transition Sights (DD-RTS-SET)”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Jeff N.wrote on September 28th, 2011 at 8:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Great comments on the article.. if anyone is interested in more info on the sights they can check out http://www.dueckdefense.com There are some very good videos on the website which show the RTS sights in action.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Richwrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:41 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    This sight is designed for 2 purposes according to Barry Dueck.
    1) As a close range sight for 3-Gun shooters to more quickly engage targets when using a magnified optic to be a faster alternative than adjusting the scope and when at close range a magnified optic reduces FOV to an impractical range.

    2) As a fast transition for tactical units if the primary optic goes down. Dueck uses the example of a hostage situation when the primary battery fails.

    The reason that this is not a ‘flip up’ sight is that this sight is a transitional back up. If it was a flip up then the speed advantage of transitioning would be nullified.

    Also the benefit to 3-gunners using this mount as suppose to a secondary red-dot is that it keeps the gun out of the open class. As stated by Bill. If you have two optics on your rifle then all your weapons are allowed optics so your competing against guys with crazy race guns (pistols and shot guns w/optics).

    This sight is for operators who need to be able to transition to close range optics faster than having to engage flip up sights or transitioning to a secondary weapon and also don’t want a ‘shadow effect’ of co-witnessing iron sights through the primary optic

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. SoulTownwrote on April 02nd, 2011 at 2:55 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @ Jaime

    LMT MRP platform. You can see the proprietary barrel nut.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Traviswrote on April 02nd, 2011 at 1:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like an LMT MRP, you can see the little recesses at the end of the right side rail.

    http://www.lmtstore.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/l/7/l7ra1a.gif

    http://www.lmtstore.com/monolithic-rail-platforms-mrp-cqb/standard-mrp-rifle-version.html

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Jasonwrote on April 02nd, 2011 at 1:37 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @Jaime, that’s an LMT monolithic upper.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Krautwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 2:52 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Guh. As in A.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Jaimewrote on April 01st, 2011 at 6:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Does anyone know what rail is on that weapon?

    It doesn’t look like any Surefire rail.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Jaredwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 5:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Surefire is the Monster Cable of firearms

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. IllTemperedCurwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 5:09 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    An A2 rear sight, really? I can see setting it up as the A1 style, with the A2 knob, but the elevation drum seems to be totally useless.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Jasonwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 2:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Haven’t these been around for a while already? And why wouldn’t someone just put flip-up sights on offset mounts instead of this?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Rusty Raywrote on April 01st, 2011 at 2:29 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Take a look at the top of a susat sight sometime. It has a small peep sight and front blade. Despite the very short sight radius, it actually was ok for CQB-type short ranges.

    Cheers – Rusty

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. drewogatorywrote on April 01st, 2011 at 1:07 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think Bill answered my question, different classes. Maybe I shouldn’t comment so early!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  13. Adam Wwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 1:04 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Agreed, but now you can co-witness your reflex with a pair of canted irons for only $238 more… not because you have to, but because you can

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. drewogatorywrote on April 01st, 2011 at 12:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Uh, do you really need windage/elevation and a small aperture on these? Besides, there should be a handicap for optics in competition anyway. If you want to use optics that are so high powered you lose time up close but score better far away, that’s cool. But both? Just stick a reflex on the other side as well then, that way you’ll never, ever miss.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  15. Billwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 12:01 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think it’s for 3 Gun audience, not gangstas. Doing the iron sights keeps on in the tactical class and not into the open class designation I believe. Otherwise one would add a small reflex optic to complement a 4X scope for close-in situations.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Aurelienwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:57 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    That’s a pretty good idea. They more or less took the concept of early top-fed machine-guns like the Bren or the MAC24/29, which had canted sights so the magazine would not interfere with the sight line.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. Brianwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:51 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Holy SureFire mark up Batman!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Patwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve see quite a few people doing this with a 1x reflex sight. At $238 for iron sights might as well spend a few more $$ and go that route

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Tuuloswrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:30 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve seen similar in IPSC shooting for years, main difference is that the ones I’ve seen were mounted on the free float and imitated the regular pistol sights which IMHO are faster in close & fast shooting. And with the short range they are commonly used they tend to actually outperform peep sights.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. James.Denholmwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 10:41 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Seems like you’d have to re-train your shooting specifically to factor in the 45 degree tilt…

    On top of that, would this have any use whatsoever outside of matches? I can’t imagine SWAT teams bustin’ through windows, holding their scoped weapons at an angle.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. MibZwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 7:54 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve actually always thought this was an ingenious idea…my solution was to mount a scope on a top rail and a reflex optic on a side rail. Not as good as this, but certainly cheaper.

    I approve, now lower the price tag $200.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  22. Calimerowrote on March 31st, 2011 at 7:18 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Add an extra 45° of cant and you’ll have Surefire GRS (Gangsta Rapid Sights) ! :-)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. Lancewrote on March 31st, 2011 at 7:09 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I know a man who shoots competition with a doctor sight on one of these its a good deal and helps in tactical shoots.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  24. 032125wrote on March 31st, 2011 at 6:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    $238? I think I can wait a year or two for Magpul to make a plastic version.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  25. jdun1911wrote on March 31st, 2011 at 6:15 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    People are starting to like them for competition. I saw a few pictures of Magpul guys using them couple months ago.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  26. Brianwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:17 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Probably no coincidence that one of their sponsored shooters, Barry Dueck, makes the exact same sight.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. Jeremywrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:10 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cool sights. Not cool price.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  28. other stevewrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:05 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Yea…. I’ll be keeping my $238 thank you very much.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  29. alexwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    so theyre only half gangsta?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  1. Lancewrote on March 31st, 2011 at 7:09 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I know a man who shoots competition with a doctor sight on one of these its a good deal and helps in tactical shoots.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  2. drewogatorywrote on April 01st, 2011 at 12:49 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Uh, do you really need windage/elevation and a small aperture on these? Besides, there should be a handicap for optics in competition anyway. If you want to use optics that are so high powered you lose time up close but score better far away, that’s cool. But both? Just stick a reflex on the other side as well then, that way you’ll never, ever miss.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  3. drewogatorywrote on April 01st, 2011 at 1:07 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think Bill answered my question, different classes. Maybe I shouldn’t comment so early!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  4. 032125wrote on March 31st, 2011 at 6:40 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    $238? I think I can wait a year or two for Magpul to make a plastic version.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  5. MibZwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 7:54 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve actually always thought this was an ingenious idea…my solution was to mount a scope on a top rail and a reflex optic on a side rail. Not as good as this, but certainly cheaper.

    I approve, now lower the price tag $200.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. jdun1911wrote on March 31st, 2011 at 6:15 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    People are starting to like them for competition. I saw a few pictures of Magpul guys using them couple months ago.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  7. Jeremywrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:10 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Cool sights. Not cool price.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  8. Jeff N.wrote on September 28th, 2011 at 8:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Great comments on the article.. if anyone is interested in more info on the sights they can check out http://www.dueckdefense.com There are some very good videos on the website which show the RTS sights in action.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Jaredwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 5:33 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Surefire is the Monster Cable of firearms

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. IllTemperedCurwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 5:09 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    An A2 rear sight, really? I can see setting it up as the A1 style, with the A2 knob, but the elevation drum seems to be totally useless.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Jaimewrote on April 01st, 2011 at 6:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Does anyone know what rail is on that weapon?

    It doesn’t look like any Surefire rail.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Jasonwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 2:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Haven’t these been around for a while already? And why wouldn’t someone just put flip-up sights on offset mounts instead of this?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Krautwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 2:52 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Guh. As in A.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Richwrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:41 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    This sight is designed for 2 purposes according to Barry Dueck.
    1) As a close range sight for 3-Gun shooters to more quickly engage targets when using a magnified optic to be a faster alternative than adjusting the scope and when at close range a magnified optic reduces FOV to an impractical range.

    2) As a fast transition for tactical units if the primary optic goes down. Dueck uses the example of a hostage situation when the primary battery fails.

    The reason that this is not a ‘flip up’ sight is that this sight is a transitional back up. If it was a flip up then the speed advantage of transitioning would be nullified.

    Also the benefit to 3-gunners using this mount as suppose to a secondary red-dot is that it keeps the gun out of the open class. As stated by Bill. If you have two optics on your rifle then all your weapons are allowed optics so your competing against guys with crazy race guns (pistols and shot guns w/optics).

    This sight is for operators who need to be able to transition to close range optics faster than having to engage flip up sights or transitioning to a secondary weapon and also don’t want a ‘shadow effect’ of co-witnessing iron sights through the primary optic

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. SoulTownwrote on April 02nd, 2011 at 2:55 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @ Jaime

    LMT MRP platform. You can see the proprietary barrel nut.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Rusty Raywrote on April 01st, 2011 at 2:29 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Take a look at the top of a susat sight sometime. It has a small peep sight and front blade. Despite the very short sight radius, it actually was ok for CQB-type short ranges.

    Cheers – Rusty

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. Traviswrote on April 02nd, 2011 at 1:54 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like an LMT MRP, you can see the little recesses at the end of the right side rail.

    http://www.lmtstore.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/l/7/l7ra1a.gif

    http://www.lmtstore.com/monolithic-rail-platforms-mrp-cqb/standard-mrp-rifle-version.html

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Jasonwrote on April 02nd, 2011 at 1:37 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @Jaime, that’s an LMT monolithic upper.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Billwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 12:01 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I think it’s for 3 Gun audience, not gangstas. Doing the iron sights keeps on in the tactical class and not into the open class designation I believe. Otherwise one would add a small reflex optic to complement a 4X scope for close-in situations.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. James.Denholmwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 10:41 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Seems like you’d have to re-train your shooting specifically to factor in the 45 degree tilt…

    On top of that, would this have any use whatsoever outside of matches? I can’t imagine SWAT teams bustin’ through windows, holding their scoped weapons at an angle.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. Calimerowrote on March 31st, 2011 at 7:18 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Add an extra 45° of cant and you’ll have Surefire GRS (Gangsta Rapid Sights) ! :-)

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  22. Brianwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:17 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Probably no coincidence that one of their sponsored shooters, Barry Dueck, makes the exact same sight.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. Tuuloswrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:30 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve seen similar in IPSC shooting for years, main difference is that the ones I’ve seen were mounted on the free float and imitated the regular pistol sights which IMHO are faster in close & fast shooting. And with the short range they are commonly used they tend to actually outperform peep sights.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. Patwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:38 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve see quite a few people doing this with a 1x reflex sight. At $238 for iron sights might as well spend a few more $$ and go that route

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  25. Adam Wwrote on April 01st, 2011 at 1:04 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Agreed, but now you can co-witness your reflex with a pair of canted irons for only $238 more… not because you have to, but because you can

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  26. Aurelienwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:57 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    That’s a pretty good idea. They more or less took the concept of early top-fed machine-guns like the Bren or the MAC24/29, which had canted sights so the magazine would not interfere with the sight line.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. Brianwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 11:51 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Holy SureFire mark up Batman!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  28. other stevewrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:05 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Yea…. I’ll be keeping my $238 thank you very much.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  29. alexwrote on March 31st, 2011 at 4:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    so theyre only half gangsta?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

Leave a Comment