Winchester Model 1886 Short Rifle

New from Winchester ...

The new Model 1886 features a deeply-blued receiver, barrel and lever, along with a matching blued steel end cap and steel crescent buttplate. The stock is Grade 1 walnut with an elegant satin finish. The full-length tubular magazine holds six 45-70 Govt. cartridges.

Each Model 1886 comes with an adjustable rear buckhorn style sight and a gold bead Marble Arms® front sight, giving the rifle a graceful profile. The receiver is also drilled and tapped to accommodate other receiver sights.

The Model 1886 has an overall length of 43 inches and weighs 8 3/8 pounds. The rate of twist in the barrel is 1 in 20 inches.

MSRP is $1,269.

Related Posts

8 Responses to “Winchester Model 1886 Short Rifle”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. coyotewrote on March 23rd, 2011 at 12:45 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I would like it if Winchester brought out the 1886 in 50-110 and/or 50 Alaskan! or 475 Alaskan.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Daniel E. Watterswrote on March 18th, 2011 at 6:03 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Outside of the Model 94-series, I believe all of the other classic Browning designs being sold by USRAC/Winchester were made by Miroku, even before the old Winchester plant was shut down.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Arthur B.. Burnettwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 8:06 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Greetings from Texas,
    To each their own. I remember when the repops of the Smith and Wesson Schofields came out. Silly me, I thought the repop would cost less than an orginal.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. KBCraigwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 7:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The furniture is wide-grained crap.

    I love blued steel and wood, but if I’m paying upwards of a grand for a rifle, the wood has to be a step above “what we gave the local drill team”.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Southernerwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 4:14 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I would not consider purchasing any lever action with a rebounding hammer and tang safety.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Mike Swrote on March 17th, 2011 at 1:18 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I always thought lever-actions were supposed to be inexpensive brush guns, the kind you don’t mind getting scratched up while pushing through the woods or riding around on horseback.

    So why are Winchester’s so darn expensive? I’d be scared to take it out of the safe!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Martin (M)wrote on March 17th, 2011 at 1:13 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    One of my all-time favorites, and worth the price.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Matt Groomwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 12:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    How odd is it that Davide Pedersoli and Winchester would produce the same rifle, in the same caliber, only a year or so apart? Hmmm. That makes good business sense to me, but what does not is that the Winchester is only slightly cheaper than the Pedersoli, even though the Pedersoli is a premium model.

    Also, if by some unlikely chance these were in fact being built by Miroku, don’t expect to see them anytime soon.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Arthur B.. Burnettwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 8:06 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Greetings from Texas,
    To each their own. I remember when the repops of the Smith and Wesson Schofields came out. Silly me, I thought the repop would cost less than an orginal.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Daniel E. Watterswrote on March 18th, 2011 at 6:03 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Outside of the Model 94-series, I believe all of the other classic Browning designs being sold by USRAC/Winchester were made by Miroku, even before the old Winchester plant was shut down.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. coyotewrote on March 23rd, 2011 at 12:45 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I would like it if Winchester brought out the 1886 in 50-110 and/or 50 Alaskan! or 475 Alaskan.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. KBCraigwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 7:46 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    The furniture is wide-grained crap.

    I love blued steel and wood, but if I’m paying upwards of a grand for a rifle, the wood has to be a step above “what we gave the local drill team”.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Southernerwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 4:14 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I would not consider purchasing any lever action with a rebounding hammer and tang safety.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Martin (M)wrote on March 17th, 2011 at 1:13 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    One of my all-time favorites, and worth the price.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Mike Swrote on March 17th, 2011 at 1:18 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I always thought lever-actions were supposed to be inexpensive brush guns, the kind you don’t mind getting scratched up while pushing through the woods or riding around on horseback.

    So why are Winchester’s so darn expensive? I’d be scared to take it out of the safe!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Matt Groomwrote on March 17th, 2011 at 12:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    How odd is it that Davide Pedersoli and Winchester would produce the same rifle, in the same caliber, only a year or so apart? Hmmm. That makes good business sense to me, but what does not is that the Winchester is only slightly cheaper than the Pedersoli, even though the Pedersoli is a premium model.

    Also, if by some unlikely chance these were in fact being built by Miroku, don’t expect to see them anytime soon.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment