PlumCrazy C-15 Composite Lower
PCF Manufacturing are selling a complete polymer AR-15 lower for $100.
[ Many thanks to Suburban Survivalist for sending me the link. ]
PCF Manufacturing are selling a complete polymer AR-15 lower for $100.
[ Many thanks to Suburban Survivalist for sending me the link. ]
Dang now that everyone is finding out about these things the price will go up and I’ll not be able to afford them!
0
0I’d give it a go… I may give it a go actually.
Plastic is fundamentally neither inferior nor superior to metal. What is inferior or superior is the design. A design made with polymer in mind will perform superbly. If they’ve done their engineering homework and have experienced designers, I’m sure it will be good.
as far as durability goes, durable against what? sand? shock? saltwater? Metal has it’s place, and so does polymer.
0
0Komrad, it’s a high impact polymer like anything Magpul would make, or like an LMT stock.
0
0Jason,
I have no experience with PlumCrazy. However the people that made these lowers are the same people from Professional Ordinance. Professional Ordinance plastic lowers are known to break in half.
It is not a good idea to mate metal and plastic threads together. BTW the PlumCrazy trigger group are made out of plastic.
Arfcom have a one year old active thread on PlumCrazy. 16 pages and counting.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=470964&light=
The only AR15 plastic lower that are proven to work was made by Cav Arms. Cav Arms got busted by the ATF and gone out of business. They made it work because their lower is one piece (lower and stock are together) and some area were reinforce with extra plastic.
I bought two Cav Arms, one for my cousin and one for me at $89 from DSG Arms. Be advise there is no more warranty on these and the only reason I bought it was for my AR15 collection. However I wouldn’t mind getting the purple, blue, and yellow if the price was reduce to $89. Use these lowers to get kids into shooting.
http://dsgarms.com/Category/26_1/Lower_Receivers.aspx
0
0The price scares me. A decent LPK will cost you $50-$60.
I have nothing against polymer, love my Glock.
0
0Field test with .450 Bushmaster upper.
Or a Bohica .50BMG upper.
In extreme heat or cold.
Then, maybe.
0
0So is it cheap ‘plastic’ or quality ‘polymer’ like glass-filled-nylon. I can’t tell because people who don’t like polymer always refer to it as plastic, which is technically correct but demeaning.
0
0Jd,un1911: I have had one if these lowers since June and can’t find a bad thing about it. I’ve shot hundreds of round through it with a bushmaster upper. Also you are mistaken, they are not the same people as the professional ordenance. And Calvary arms good quality??? Have do you really own one because you really need to check out the forums and what people say about them. I know the owner and have talked e with him quite a bit. Also people do not realize that price is for the COMPLETE lower; included are the lower parts and the complete collapsible buttstock.
0
0You’ll have to forgive me if some of my post did not make sense. I’m on a Droid and I can’t. See some of the lines I’m typing. Also I was reffering to Thea owner of PC, Ed, he’s a great guy and wanted to make a way for pretty much every patriotic American to be able to afford a AR-15. check out his youtube channel. “plumcrazyfirearms” he’s got plenty of bids of him and his friends using his product in semi and full auto.
0
0Also i think jdun1911 was kinda right on one thing the guys at plum Crazy was involved with the Professional Ordinance and then started Plum Crazy or something like that there was some kinda tie at one time. And there was some fitting problems with the Calvary Arms lower with I guess you can say the first gen but then I think they got all that straighten out with the second gen. I will let you know when I install mine I am using it for another build.
0
0got mine here in the People’s Republik of Kalifornia. Haven’t shot it yet, damn you work/in-laws. My first AR build so I slapped on a cheap DPMS Sportical.
0
0I have 2 of the Plum Crazy lowers. I have replaced the trigger groups on both lowers. I have found a major issue with the polymer trigger group that, in my opinion, is not only a safety issue, but a legal issue. On one of my lowers, with the hammer forward, the safety on, the charging handle was pulled to chamber a round. Part of the hammer started to get rounded over to the point that if the trigger was not quickly released after firing a round it would drop again, sometimes cause not only a second, but third of forth round to be fired. I have a new upper assembly chambered in 450 Bushmaster on the way and plan to mount it to one of the lowers.
0
0I have three Plum Crazy lowers and love them. One is on a 5.56, one on a 6.8 and another on a Bushmaster 450 upper. Now the Bushmaster you can feel the recoil like hell but the lower stands up to it. The 5.56 probably has around 400 rounds through it with out a glitch. There is also somebody on the web that did a beuwulf build on one with no problems. I recently bought a used Calvary Arms lower but have not mounted it on anything. But I recommend the Plum Crazy lowers for the price you cant beat them.
0
0Hmm, funny there is no response from jdun1911 after he was called on his misinformation.
Gabe
0
0Seth & Brian- I got mine from Upstate Armory in SC for $112 shipped.
0
0@Jason
Thank you for the clarification.
I wish people would stop saying plastic when referring to high-impact glass filled nylon polymers.
To “plastic” skeptics, metal may be more scratch resistant and better suited for handling high pressures but, polymer doesn’t rust, is impact resistant, is less expensive in some cases, absorbs recoil better in some cases, and can be shaped into different though not necessarily better shapes.
Check out this video from Ruger about the polymer trigger guards on their 10/22 rifles.
http://www.ruger.com/resources/videos.html
click more, then misc, then 10/22 trigger guard
0
0jdun1911, are you speaking from experience? Just curious as I have not read a single negative thing(beyond the expected naysayers) about these receivers to date.
I hear there are a few handgun manufacturers making guns out of this stuff, too
0
0Might consider for a dedicated .22 build, but that is about it.
0
0$100 plus an upper and I have me a rifle?
I’ve been wanting an AR, is this a good option for my first AR lower?
0
0Any word on the quality of these lowers?
I’ve seen tons of them for sale on Armslist.
0
0where can you buy one at?
0
0Oh wait I guess I couldn’t use it for a pistol since it already has the stock attached.
0
0Holy Crap that’s awesome. I need one for a pistol I want to build.
0
0These things have been the talk of the town over at AR15.com, and most customers seem pretty happy with them. The general consensus is they’re great on dedicated .22s and fine for a range gun, but no one will trust them in any serious role until someone can torture test a few.
Interesting to note the fire control parts are all plastic too, but some users have reported swapping to metal internals works fine and doesn’t seem to wear the pin holes excessively.
0
0No thanks I will stick with an all metal AR. I own a number of polymer handguns but plastic is plastic and in the end they all are not as durable as metal.
0
0W00T! Does anyone know anything about these? Will they fit the bill for someone who shoots <1000 rounds through it a year?
0
0oh dear god that scares me
I’d like to see a stress test on it though.
How did Bushmaster’s Carbon 15′s do? I heard horror stories of some one dropping a stripped lower and it shattering.
0
0will it be easier to separate the trigger group from the polymer lower than aluminum one?
0
0These seem like they would be good for putting on one of those 5.45 surplus safe upper, but iirc I read some guy tried that and said that the hammer doesn’t strike hard enough to ignite the primers on surplus ammo.
0
0I got one of these a couple mos ago because it is light & cheap. After doing a fair amount of research most everyone that owns one liked it. I’ve paired it with an upper using .22lr conversion kit and it has worked fine with no sign of unusual wear.
0
0I still can’t figure out where to buy this…
0
0How about a link to the link???
0
0M1911, oops, added.
0
0I would not recommend buying it unless you’re stripping it for parts. The receiver is plastic and the plastic threads is not strong and durable enough to hold onto the aluminum extension/buffer tube. In other words sooner or later it will break.
The Cavalry Arms Mark II design is different because the receiver and stock is one large plastic piece for those that are wondering.
0
1
I have 2 of the Plum Crazy lowers. I have replaced the trigger groups on both lowers. I have found a major issue with the polymer trigger group that, in my opinion, is not only a safety issue, but a legal issue. On one of my lowers, with the hammer forward, the safety on, the charging handle was pulled to chamber a round. Part of the hammer started to get rounded over to the point that if the trigger was not quickly released after firing a round it would drop again, sometimes cause not only a second, but third of forth round to be fired. I have a new upper assembly chambered in 450 Bushmaster on the way and plan to mount it to one of the lowers.
got mine here in the People’s Republik of Kalifornia. Haven’t shot it yet, damn you work/in-laws. My first AR build so I slapped on a cheap DPMS Sportical.
Also i think jdun1911 was kinda right on one thing the guys at plum Crazy was involved with the Professional Ordinance and then started Plum Crazy or something like that there was some kinda tie at one time. And there was some fitting problems with the Calvary Arms lower with I guess you can say the first gen but then I think they got all that straighten out with the second gen. I will let you know when I install mine I am using it for another build.
I have three Plum Crazy lowers and love them. One is on a 5.56, one on a 6.8 and another on a Bushmaster 450 upper. Now the Bushmaster you can feel the recoil like hell but the lower stands up to it. The 5.56 probably has around 400 rounds through it with out a glitch. There is also somebody on the web that did a beuwulf build on one with no problems. I recently bought a used Calvary Arms lower but have not mounted it on anything. But I recommend the Plum Crazy lowers for the price you cant beat them.
Hmm, funny there is no response from jdun1911 after he was called on his misinformation.
Gabe
@Jason
Thank you for the clarification.
I wish people would stop saying plastic when referring to high-impact glass filled nylon polymers.
To “plastic” skeptics, metal may be more scratch resistant and better suited for handling high pressures but, polymer doesn’t rust, is impact resistant, is less expensive in some cases, absorbs recoil better in some cases, and can be shaped into different though not necessarily better shapes.
Check out this video from Ruger about the polymer trigger guards on their 10/22 rifles.
http://www.ruger.com/resources/videos.html
click more, then misc, then 10/22 trigger guard
Seth & Brian- I got mine from Upstate Armory in SC for $112 shipped.
You’ll have to forgive me if some of my post did not make sense. I’m on a Droid and I can’t. See some of the lines I’m typing. Also I was reffering to Thea owner of PC, Ed, he’s a great guy and wanted to make a way for pretty much every patriotic American to be able to afford a AR-15. check out his youtube channel. “plumcrazyfirearms” he’s got plenty of bids of him and his friends using his product in semi and full auto.
Jd,un1911: I have had one if these lowers since June and can’t find a bad thing about it. I’ve shot hundreds of round through it with a bushmaster upper. Also you are mistaken, they are not the same people as the professional ordenance. And Calvary arms good quality??? Have do you really own one because you really need to check out the forums and what people say about them. I know the owner and have talked e with him quite a bit. Also people do not realize that price is for the COMPLETE lower; included are the lower parts and the complete collapsible buttstock.
Komrad, it’s a high impact polymer like anything Magpul would make, or like an LMT stock.
I’d give it a go… I may give it a go actually.
Plastic is fundamentally neither inferior nor superior to metal. What is inferior or superior is the design. A design made with polymer in mind will perform superbly. If they’ve done their engineering homework and have experienced designers, I’m sure it will be good.
as far as durability goes, durable against what? sand? shock? saltwater? Metal has it’s place, and so does polymer.
Dang now that everyone is finding out about these things the price will go up and I’ll not be able to afford them!
Jason,
I have no experience with PlumCrazy. However the people that made these lowers are the same people from Professional Ordinance. Professional Ordinance plastic lowers are known to break in half.
It is not a good idea to mate metal and plastic threads together. BTW the PlumCrazy trigger group are made out of plastic.
Arfcom have a one year old active thread on PlumCrazy. 16 pages and counting.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=470964&light=
The only AR15 plastic lower that are proven to work was made by Cav Arms. Cav Arms got busted by the ATF and gone out of business. They made it work because their lower is one piece (lower and stock are together) and some area were reinforce with extra plastic.
I bought two Cav Arms, one for my cousin and one for me at $89 from DSG Arms. Be advise there is no more warranty on these and the only reason I bought it was for my AR15 collection. However I wouldn’t mind getting the purple, blue, and yellow if the price was reduce to $89. Use these lowers to get kids into shooting.
http://dsgarms.com/Category/26_1/Lower_Receivers.aspx
The price scares me. A decent LPK will cost you $50-$60.
I have nothing against polymer, love my Glock.
So is it cheap ‘plastic’ or quality ‘polymer’ like glass-filled-nylon. I can’t tell because people who don’t like polymer always refer to it as plastic, which is technically correct but demeaning.
Field test with .450 Bushmaster upper.
Or a Bohica .50BMG upper.
In extreme heat or cold.
Then, maybe.
jdun1911, are you speaking from experience? Just curious as I have not read a single negative thing(beyond the expected naysayers) about these receivers to date.
I hear there are a few handgun manufacturers making guns out of this stuff, too
Might consider for a dedicated .22 build, but that is about it.
oh dear god that scares me
I’d like to see a stress test on it though.
How did Bushmaster’s Carbon 15′s do? I heard horror stories of some one dropping a stripped lower and it shattering.
W00T! Does anyone know anything about these? Will they fit the bill for someone who shoots <1000 rounds through it a year?
will it be easier to separate the trigger group from the polymer lower than aluminum one?
These seem like they would be good for putting on one of those 5.45 surplus safe upper, but iirc I read some guy tried that and said that the hammer doesn’t strike hard enough to ignite the primers on surplus ammo.
I still can’t figure out where to buy this…
I got one of these a couple mos ago because it is light & cheap. After doing a fair amount of research most everyone that owns one liked it. I’ve paired it with an upper using .22lr conversion kit and it has worked fine with no sign of unusual wear.
No thanks I will stick with an all metal AR. I own a number of polymer handguns but plastic is plastic and in the end they all are not as durable as metal.
These things have been the talk of the town over at AR15.com, and most customers seem pretty happy with them. The general consensus is they’re great on dedicated .22s and fine for a range gun, but no one will trust them in any serious role until someone can torture test a few.
Interesting to note the fire control parts are all plastic too, but some users have reported swapping to metal internals works fine and doesn’t seem to wear the pin holes excessively.
Any word on the quality of these lowers?
I’ve seen tons of them for sale on Armslist.
$100 plus an upper and I have me a rifle?
I’ve been wanting an AR, is this a good option for my first AR lower?
where can you buy one at?
Oh wait I guess I couldn’t use it for a pistol since it already has the stock attached.
Holy Crap that’s awesome. I need one for a pistol I want to build.
I would not recommend buying it unless you’re stripping it for parts. The receiver is plastic and the plastic threads is not strong and durable enough to hold onto the aluminum extension/buffer tube. In other words sooner or later it will break.
The Cavalry Arms Mark II design is different because the receiver and stock is one large plastic piece for those that are wondering.
How about a link to the link???
M1911, oops, added.