Kahr P380 CA-Legal model

Kahr will soon be shipping a California approved version of their P380 pistol. They are claiming it is the only polymer framed ultra-compact that is approved for sale in the state.

california p 380 pistol tfb Kahr P380 CA Legal model photo

The pistol has the required loaded chamber indicator ...

kahr kp38233 detail images tfb Kahr P380 CA Legal model photo
Loaded Chamber Indicator

The MSRP will be $733 and it should be shipping later this year.

Related Posts

9 Responses to “Kahr P380 CA-Legal model”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. Richsiwrote on December 16th, 2010 at 6:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Correction from above comment,

    I checked the the CA DOJ website and found that the certification will expire for this weapon on Feb. 18, 2012. I don’t think they are even going to make delivery before the certification expires.

    Correction: I meant to say “Feb. 18, 2011″ sorry about that!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Richsiwrote on December 13th, 2010 at 5:57 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I have had a Kahr P380 with night sights (CA) on order since April. (50% downpayment). I emailed Kahr sales in Sept. and they said it will be shipping late Sept. first week of Nov. Nothing yet! I email them another email again in Dec. and they NEVER emailed back so something is up with these guys for sure. I checked the the CA DOJ website and found that the certification will expire for this weapon on Feb. 18, 2012. I don’t think they are even going to make delivery before the certification expires. Not a very class outfit if you ask me. Wonder what’s going on has anyone any inside information?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Adamwrote on November 13th, 2010 at 4:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Good point, Sian.

    I guess I’m not used to seeing sights on a .380. The top of my P-3AT is practically flat.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Sianwrote on November 13th, 2010 at 7:42 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @Adam it shouldn’t, it only sticks up as much as the front sight, and the front sight has to clear the holster too.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Squidpuppywrote on November 13th, 2010 at 6:30 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve had one of these on order for months, as soon as Kahr announced them way back in July, or whatever. But since then I got a Colt Government MkIV and a Colt Mustang PocketLite. The Mustang is pretty much awesome. The Colt Govt is a Series 80, so the trigger suxxor, but a bit of work will fix that.

    There’s a case going to the 9th Circuit right now, from San Diego County that will either make the difference for Shall Issue CCW, or lock CA down to May Issue (i.e., no issue for most of us). If the 9th Circuit finds in favor of strict adherence with a nod to inclusion, Californians might just get to be like most of the rest of the Union. In the 9th Circuit’s jurisdiction, only CA and HI don’t have Shall Issue, or constitutional carry (no CCW required).

    Aside from CCW, the problem for these mouse guns in CA is the safety requirements, and the absurd certification process to get on the list of approved for sale handguns. Magazine safeties and loaded chamber indicators are difficult to accommodate on tiny pistols. My small Colts are okay, because they’re legacy grandfathered and were already in the state.

    The certification thing costs a lot of money and something like 5 samples each of every model to be certified, that you never get back. Smaller manufacturers choke on this, which ticks me off, because some of them have really cool stuff.

    Guy I know who owns the shop where I pre-ordered the Kahr, says these things are gonna be on “allocation” meaning very limited distribution. Still want one, I guess.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Bandito762wrote on November 12th, 2010 at 3:29 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Sian, you seem to forget about the mexican cartels running drugs into every major city.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Adamwrote on November 12th, 2010 at 3:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like the chamber indicator pokes up rather far… Mightn’t that affect its fit in it’s holster?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. MrMaigowrote on November 12th, 2010 at 6:46 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    WOW! I guess if you factor in the cost of living in Cali $733 is cheap.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Sianwrote on November 12th, 2010 at 4:35 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’m not sure of the need for an ultra-compact in California. The only people allowed to carry are also connected and rich enough to afford bodyguards.

    Good on Kahr though!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Adamwrote on November 13th, 2010 at 4:03 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Good point, Sian.

    I guess I’m not used to seeing sights on a .380. The top of my P-3AT is practically flat.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Richsiwrote on December 13th, 2010 at 5:57 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I have had a Kahr P380 with night sights (CA) on order since April. (50% downpayment). I emailed Kahr sales in Sept. and they said it will be shipping late Sept. first week of Nov. Nothing yet! I email them another email again in Dec. and they NEVER emailed back so something is up with these guys for sure. I checked the the CA DOJ website and found that the certification will expire for this weapon on Feb. 18, 2012. I don’t think they are even going to make delivery before the certification expires. Not a very class outfit if you ask me. Wonder what’s going on has anyone any inside information?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Richsiwrote on December 16th, 2010 at 6:10 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Correction from above comment,

    I checked the the CA DOJ website and found that the certification will expire for this weapon on Feb. 18, 2012. I don’t think they are even going to make delivery before the certification expires.

    Correction: I meant to say “Feb. 18, 2011″ sorry about that!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Sianwrote on November 13th, 2010 at 7:42 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @Adam it shouldn’t, it only sticks up as much as the front sight, and the front sight has to clear the holster too.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Squidpuppywrote on November 13th, 2010 at 6:30 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’ve had one of these on order for months, as soon as Kahr announced them way back in July, or whatever. But since then I got a Colt Government MkIV and a Colt Mustang PocketLite. The Mustang is pretty much awesome. The Colt Govt is a Series 80, so the trigger suxxor, but a bit of work will fix that.

    There’s a case going to the 9th Circuit right now, from San Diego County that will either make the difference for Shall Issue CCW, or lock CA down to May Issue (i.e., no issue for most of us). If the 9th Circuit finds in favor of strict adherence with a nod to inclusion, Californians might just get to be like most of the rest of the Union. In the 9th Circuit’s jurisdiction, only CA and HI don’t have Shall Issue, or constitutional carry (no CCW required).

    Aside from CCW, the problem for these mouse guns in CA is the safety requirements, and the absurd certification process to get on the list of approved for sale handguns. Magazine safeties and loaded chamber indicators are difficult to accommodate on tiny pistols. My small Colts are okay, because they’re legacy grandfathered and were already in the state.

    The certification thing costs a lot of money and something like 5 samples each of every model to be certified, that you never get back. Smaller manufacturers choke on this, which ticks me off, because some of them have really cool stuff.

    Guy I know who owns the shop where I pre-ordered the Kahr, says these things are gonna be on “allocation” meaning very limited distribution. Still want one, I guess.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. MrMaigowrote on November 12th, 2010 at 6:46 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    WOW! I guess if you factor in the cost of living in Cali $733 is cheap.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Adamwrote on November 12th, 2010 at 3:08 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Looks like the chamber indicator pokes up rather far… Mightn’t that affect its fit in it’s holster?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Bandito762wrote on November 12th, 2010 at 3:29 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Sian, you seem to forget about the mexican cartels running drugs into every major city.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Sianwrote on November 12th, 2010 at 4:35 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    I’m not sure of the need for an ultra-compact in California. The only people allowed to carry are also connected and rich enough to afford bodyguards.

    Good on Kahr though!

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment