Emiliano Zapata is a Mexican national hero. He was a general in the Mexican revolution until being ambushed and killed by an opposing general who had claimed that he wished to surrender.
Paul, a reader of the blog, emailed me photos of a revolver in his collection that was once owned by Zapata.
Many more photos after the jump.
[ Many thanks to Paul for emailing me the photos. ] Continue Reading »
In the upcoming November issue of Esquire, there will be an article entitled "How They Were Betrayed". It is an adaption of a chapter from C.J. Chivers new book "THE GUN" ...
The unnecessary bloodshed and lives lost were tied to an American rifle and ammunition combination that was not yet ready for war, a circumstance directly related to the AK-47’s breakout and global spread. My investigation into the flawed introduction of the M-16 and of the young soldiers and Marines — who were knowingly failed by the Pentagon, a prominent American firearms manufacturer, and their own commanders and generals — became “The Accidental Rifle,” a chapter in THE GUN.
I was given a copy of THE GUN and am really enjoying it. I will be posting a review once I have finished reading it.
Ruger had finally sent out the press release with specifications for the Ruger SR40.
From the press release ...
The SR40 weighs 27.25 ounces (when empty) and ships with two fifteen-round, flush-fit magazines. A loading tool is also provided, although an anti-friction coating applied to the magazine body greatly reduces the force required to load the magazines to full capacity. It features a 4.1" barrel length, fully adjustable three-dot sights, and an integral accessory rail. It offers modern safety features such as a visual and tactile loaded chamber indicator, striker blocker, trigger safety, magazine disconnect, and a frame-mounted ambidextrous manual safety.
| Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Caliber | .40 S&W |
| Capacity | 15+1 |
| Finish | Brushed Stainless Steel |
| Frame | Black Glass-Filled Nylon |
| Sights | Adjustable 3-Dot |
| Barrel Length | 4.14" |
| Twist | 1:16" RH |
| Height | 5.52" |
| Weight | 27.25 oz. |
| Overall Length | 7.55" |
| Width | 1.27" |
| MSRP (Price) | $525 |
CNBC are airing an expose on the Remington Model 700 rifles claiming that they fire without the trigger being pulled and that this has resulted in deaths and injuries going back sixty years ...
The result of a 10-month investigation, CNBC examines allegations that the world's most popular hunting rifle is prone to firing without pulling the trigger, and that its manufacturer, Remington, has been aware of the situation for 60 years. Dozens of deaths and scores of injuries have been traced to the alleged problem. The story is told through corporate insiders, internal documents dating back to 1945, and a father searching for answers about the death of his nine-year-old son.
CNBC'S REMINGTON UNDER FIRE: A CNBC INVESTIGATION Will Premiere On Wednesday, October 20th at 9PM ET
The show will repeat that evening at 10PM ET, 12AM ET and 1AM ET.
The documentary will also repeat on the following dates/times:
Sunday, October 24th at 10PM ET
Thursday, October 28th at 8PM ET and 12AM ET
Sunday, October 31st at 1AM ET
YNN.com reports that Remington deny the allegations ...
Remington says it did provide the network with factual information and background materials but says "it appears that the story will be based on unproven allegations from trial lawyers."
A Remington spokesperson says the company continues to stand behind the Model 700 product that's being scrutinized.
I am interested to see what CNBC alleges is wrong with the Remington 700. It is widely known, and acknowledged by the company, that pre-1982 Model 700 rifles can fire automatically when the safety switched to the "Fire" position.
The problem with the pre-82 models was with the bolt-lock mechanism design. The bolt lock was enabled when the safety was turn on. The bolt lock prevents the bolt from being accidentally opened slightly, and therefor being unable to be fired, when stalking game. This mechanism was removed in 1982 after a lawsuit against the company.
The lawsuit was an unfortunate incident in Remington's history. The company knew about the problem, as did users of the Remington 700, but they had done nothing about it. But that was over 30 years ago. Since then the company has, and continues, to offer a Safety Modification program ...
If you own a Remington Model 700 or Model 40-X rifle:
Only those Model 700 or 40-X rifles made before March 1982 were manufactured with a bolt-lock mechanism. Model 700 or 40-X rifles made after March 1982 do not have a bolt-lock mechanism and may be loaded and unloaded with the safety in the “S” or “On Safe” position. Consequently, post-1982 Model 700 or 40-X rifles are not subject to this bolt-lock Safety Modification Program.
...
In either case, the total cost to you is $20 plus shipping and handling. You will also receive a safety redemption certificate to complete and submit in order to receive a free blaze orange hat (one hat per certificate).
It seems unlikely that in the internet age that there would be a widespread flaw with the most popular hunting rifle in America but yet unknown by the internet community. We shall see.
[ Full disclosure: As I have previously disclosed, The Freedom Group, who own Remington, advertise on this blog. ]
[ Many thanks to jdun1911 for emailing me the link. ]
This old Iver Johnson advertisement gave me such a good laugh 
[ Many thanks to Dave for emailing me the link. ]
Nick has compared cheap Wolf 5.56mm ammunition with other brands.
I have not used Wolf in a long time, but after reading Nick's article I will have to give it another try (or Tula).
From Army.mil ...
A member of the Basra Special Weapons and Tactics team demonstrates the proper form to ready a weapon to other members of the SWAT team during a training exercise in Basra Oct. 4. The SWAT Team is working with the 1st Battalion, 68th Armor Regiment to learn how to instruct other police officers in Basra. Photo Credit: Sgt. Cody Harding.
Read more about the Basra SWAT training here.
[ Many thanks to Lance for emailing me the link. ]
Tobias Obermeit, the Chief Design Engineer on the PMR-30 pistol at Kel-tec, generously offered to allow you (the readers) to submit questions for him to answer. Many questions were similar so I merged them into a single question.
There were a lot of question and I cannot thank Tobias enough for taking the time to answer them. I know that I have learn't many things that I was not aware before.
.
How much commonality is there between the new PMR-30 and the Grendel .22 WMR pistol?
Zero parts commonality. The only commonality design wise is the interior of the magazine. The way the magazine stacks the 30 rounds of 22WMR ammo is nearly the same. But every other part of the design is new and often very different. Trigger mechanism is better, The PMR-30 has a last shot bolt hold open, which the grendel did not. The grendel had a fluted chamber, the PMR-30 does not need this because of the hybrid locking system.
Are there any plans for a carbine version of the PMR-30 like the old Grendel R-31?
Yes, I am working on it right now. there are pictures of the current prototype design shown here. Availability and price is unknown at this point.
Are there any plans to produce a low-cap (10 round) magazine for those of us who live in capacity restrictive states like NY?
There are plans to offer a magazine block of some sort that could be used to limit magazine capacity (10, 15, or even 20 rounds could be done). But there are no plans to mold a special magazine for this, at this time.
Do you believe that the .22 WMR is an adequate man-stopper?
I do not believe that a single .22WMR out of a pistol is adequate...but I do believe 25 to 30 .22WMR's are adequate. It's not ideal, but the total amount of bullet weight in a full 30 round mag is 1500 grains (if 50 grain bullets are used). This compares to 10 rounds of 147 grain 9mm, or 13 rounds of 115gr. Of course bullet weight alone is not enough, but the velocity out of the PMR-30 is still quite good. (1230fps for 40 gr)
Do you have any word on .22 WMR loadings from any manufacturers that are optimized for pistol-length barrels?
No, but I have asked the question of a few ammo manufacturers. I believe it would only happen if there is a large spike in the demand for such ammo....which could happen.
When will you be making a PMR-30 in 5.7×28mm or .22 Long Rifle?
5.7x28mm most likely never, It's too long to fit in the grip of the PMR-30. 22LR would be a better fit, but will only be done if we can get 30 rounds in the magazine to feed reliably....which is not easy.
Why so short a barrel? Will there be a longer barrel/target version?
The barrel length was chosen to be the shortest possible for a 22WMR autoloader, in order to be as compact and lightweight as possible. Compact and lightweight is what Kel-Tec is known for. There are plans for a 5 inch threaded barrel for use with a flash suppressor, or even perhaps silencers. But this will not be released until we know that the extra weight of a silencer attached to the barrel will not adversely affect the hybrid locked breech system.
Nobody asked how the hybrid-blowback system worked, so Tobias explained ...
The hybrid locked/blowback system is simple in execution. There is technically no mechanical locking system in the gun. The cartridge case is the mechanical lock in the system.
The friction of the case locks the chamber (and therefore the barrel) to the case as they both recoil together....as long as the pressure is high enough. lower pressure rounds will cause less friction between the case and the barrel, and then the barrel stays still, or only moves a little.....It's a balancing act between the bullet friction pulling the barrel forward, and the case friction in the chamber pulling the barrel back. Bullet friction does not change much based on round pressure, but the case friction will.
.
From a multi-caliber point of view, If you had a bullpup in 762 how easy would it be to change to 556 – different lower, same upper and bolt carrier?
In theory the grip/forend assembly could be the same, and a new barrel/receiver/bolt/carrier assembly could be attached. Unfortunately since the receiver is legally the gun, this would not be a simple caliber conversion that could easily be purchased separately. It would legally be a new firearm.
Are Kel-Tec angry with Ruger for using their P3AT design aesthetic for the LCP?
No anger, copying is part of the firearms business, and I am sure you will see the P3AT style trigger mechanism in many other pistols (Taurus comes to mind). Personally, I was not happy that Ruger claimed to have a brand new design, when it was clearly based on our design, though. And when an upgrade to the trigger mechanism I designed found it's way into the ruger after coming out in the P3AT, it didn't make me feel any better. But that is the business.
Does Kel-Tec plan on exporting their pistols and rifles to Europe?
Some Kel-Tecs have actually been exported already. But the distributors handled that in the past. Now with the newer export regulations, things are a little tricky. But I believe there will be expansion in the export market, even with the increased complexity of export regulations. I believe Canada may see some Kel-tecs soon.
Will we ever see a Kel-Tec revolver?
Anything is possible...but I doubt it. It certainly would be innovative if it ever does happen, though.
Will we ever see a 7.62×39mm SU-16 that takes AK mags?
Probably not that takes AK mags, but I believe there are AR style magazines that accept that caliber. Not saying it will or will not happen though.
Does Kel-Tec have any plans for a larger caliber handgun?
No specific plans....and if we did have any, I couldn't talk about them anyway.
.
What did Kel-Tec learn about bullpups in the development of the RFB?
Kel-Tec learned how to make a great trigger for a bullpup. Also, Since the barrel and chamber is physically closer to the shooter, dealing with parts heating up and deflection of vent gasses needs to be handled differently as well. Forward ejection took a lot of R&D too.
What steps can high school and college students take to become a gun design engineer?
Start designing and drawing up your designs. pen and paper is good, and I always start there. I still keep a notebook with different design ideas that I sketch up as I have them (not all firearm ideas). But when you can get access to some 3D design software, perhaps in an art class or a design class, start drawing stuff up in 3D. Doesn't have to be guns, any mechanical designs help you get experience in how to draw in 3D and how things work together. Pay attention in physics, chemistry, math, and reading/writing classes. You might not think reading and writing is that important but you have to be able to communicate your ideas and designs with others.
In general, where is the starting point in designing a gun? Do you start from scratch or base it on a previous model? What component is designed last?
It depends on what you are trying to do. If you are designing for a specific size and capacity you generally design from the magazine out. but if you are just designing from scratch then basically you start from the bullet back, or from a standard cartridge and barrel length which already has an established energy and velocity. Usually you can use a common magazine and you have an idea of rifle or pistol. Based on the energy and pressure levels of the cartridge you are limited to certain types of cycling action (blowback, or locked breech, or gas operated,...) then based on the length and shape of the cartridge you can layout where the barrel starts and how far the action has to travel and so on. Usually the parts that are not primary functions of the gun are designed last, like slide stops, or sights, or sling mounts.
Is it harder to find acceptance with a revised design over a new to market design?
No,... but I'm not exactly sure what is being asked here. acceptance is a relative term. I would say it is hard for a military to accept a new design when comparing it to a tried and true design. But the civilian market is often more accepting of new and innovative designs over old designs.
What CAD software do you use to design your firearms?
We use Solid Edge ST2 (version 21) currently, but started at version 14 I believe.
How much influence do the departments of accounting, finance, and marketing have on weapon designs?
For Kel-Tec...not much. This is mainly due to the fact that the owner (George Kellgren) has full control of accounting finance and marketing. What he decides goes. But the sellability, market, and price point of the product is certainly discussed. That is one of the benefits of a smaller, privately owned company like Kel-Tec.
How does (BATFE and state) regulation fit into pricing?
Any legal requirement or special modification that needs to be done to make a firearm legal in a certain state will add to the price, even if you think it might not. Lets say one state won't allow threads on a barrel. That would mean we have to run a special batch of un-threaded barrels and make sure they are built correctly and go to the right distributors. these batches are usually much smaller than our standard batches and therefore can cost more to setup and deal with. Gun locks are required by state and federal law for each pistol, so that is added to the cost for all pistols.
I’m wondering who, in your informed opinion, are the great gun designers of all time?
Personally I like Gatling. His rotary barrel type gun was revolutionary and unique. Being a mechanical engineer, I really like the mechanisms with gears and cams. Colts revolver mechanism is also quite nice, but Browning's slide locking mechanism has really taken over most modern designs....But I think Gatling is my personal favorite.
What do you think will be the next great leap forward in gun design? I’m not talking about layout changes (bullpup) or caliber/bullet shape.
If battery technology keeps progressing, perhaps some electronic rail-guns will be possible, but that is at least a few decades away. firearms are simple, effective, and proven. Perhaps some simpler and cheaper electronic ignition systems. I don't see anything specific that is on the horizon right now. there are many new coatings that are becoming cheaper and useful, I know I would love to use some carbon fiber in some designs, but the cost is still rather high on that.
How do you measure the ‘timing’ of a breech-locking mechanism? I.e. how do you make sure that the bullet has left the barrel and the pressure dropped acceptably before the cartridge case starts to be pulled free of the chamber [Ed: This comment refers to the Kel-tec RFB rifle. ]
This is done at the computer first, during the initial design process. simple Newtonian physics combined with interior ballistics software can predict pretty accurately how long a certain weight slide will take to unlock and how much pressure is still in the barrel when this happens. Then a prototype can be made and high-speed video can be used to verify this if needed.
Do they use advanced brainstorming techniques and market research? Or is it more of an “Eureka!” thing. Actually, do all the people involved in the design have an extensive firearms background? Or is it sometimes those with little prior firearms experience that bring in ideas from “outside the box”?
Kel-Tec has a small design team. about 3 to 6 people are involved in the design to some extent, Generally one or two people will work primarily on a design, and consult with others if issues or questions pop up. we do consult with others who have some or even little firearm experience. Often these other people mention issues that you would not think of. I did not come from a firearms background when I first got this job, but I am certainly an enthusiast now. The CEO (George Kellgren) has been professionally designing guns since 1968, and we have machinists and technicians with military or even competition shooting experience as well as those who have little experience with firearms at all.
Professional market research is not used. But a few of us do regularly check the blogs (like this one) and forums and read magazines to get a good idea of what is going on in the firearm communities as a whole.
The vast majority of polymer framed pistols use nylon-6 or some variant, but until recently Ruger used a polyurethane “Isoplast” polymer for its pistols (P95, P97 using it, SR9 apparently using nylon). Why has nylon-6 been the overwhelming choice over other polymers?
Cost, Availability, and performance would be the reason to switch. There are many reasons to choose one product over the other, perhaps it gets used in multiple products, and buying in bulk will save money. the Nylon seems to have the edge in handling heat over the isoplast. We have stuck with Nylon from the beginning and have not had any need to switch, though we have changed glass content in the nylon as needed to increase or decrease stiffness.
Plastics/polymers are a relatively new material, with materials like nylon 6 seeing widespread use only in the last 60 years or so. How much do we know about their long term durability? Should a buyer expect a Kel-Tec, Glock, or other nylon-6 framed pistol to be completely reliable and as good as new in 30, 50, or 100 years?
30 years absolutely yes, 50 to 100 yes, if it is cared for correctly. As long as the nylon is protected and cleaned with the correct products, it should last as long as the steel, and certainly longer than wood. All the modern polymers have add-ins that protect it from UV rays from the sun. Early plastics did not have this and would eventually get brittle.
The RFB appears to be one of the more successful forward ejection bullpup designs of late. Did you choose tilt-locking specifically because of the extractor arrangement, or because perhaps you were working from a bullpupped FAL?
The locking system is specific to the forward ejection system. The way the extractors rotate up, does not allow the bolt to do anything but tilt. FAL mags were chosen because the feed lips are setup to deal with a bolt that tilts down into the magazine a little. (compared to an AR-10 mag which does not need to deal with this)
When shopping for a new gun, what are the signs of a good design? A bad one?
Materials are the first thing I would look at. good quality material is a must in any design. whether it is steel, aluminum, or plastic, or even a casting. I personally stay away from zinc cast guns, but they can be designed well these days. But the design should match the materials well. If there are lots of sharp edges or corners in a cast or molded part, these could be high stress areas that are likely to break in the future.
Nolo could not find any decent instructions online explaining how to strip a Vz.58 fire control group, so he wrote a guide on how to do it ...
You see, recently, I purchased a Vz. 58 steel trigger, to replace the plastic trigger my CZ-USA Vz. 58 came with. When I looked on the Internet for info on how to muck around inside the receiver, I found nothing, so I had to figure it out myself. Trying to remove the fire control group from this rifle without knowing how is really hard, and results in lots of unnecessary scrapes on your receiver, and a lot of fruitless banging and frustration. Removing the FCG after you know what to do, however, is really quite easy, if a bit tricky. I decided to write this to help people do it the easy way.
As John Hollister wrote, this is not something the consumer sees every day.
[Hat Tip: AAC Blo ]
