S&W Applies for Patent on M&P15-22

Smith & Wesson have just applied for a patent on their AR-15-patterned .22 rifle, the M&P15-22.

tmp pat 20100162604 tfb S&W Applies for Patent on M&P15 22 photo

U.S. Patent Application 20100162604: LIGHTWEIGHT, LOW COST SEMI-AUTOMATIC RIFLE

A lightweight and low cost semi-automatic rifle includes an upper receiver, a lower receiver, and a forend fabricated from injection-molded polymers. The rifle permits firing .22 LR or similar low-power ammunition from an AR-15 style frame, operates on the blowback principle, and provides a fully functional bolt catch and extractor/ejector/deflector.

Related Posts

8 Responses to “S&W Applies for Patent on M&P15-22”

Sort The Responses Below: Most Recent | Highest Rated
  1. cawpinwrote on July 12th, 2010 at 11:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @Chris: They’re trying to take advantage of the current state of the patent office in the US. They are granting patents for things that should never have been accepted. This patent application should be denied for nothing more than previous art.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Kylewrote on July 10th, 2010 at 6:20 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Whoops, never ming, i just looked at the picture again and saw what I thought was the barrel was actually the buffer tube

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Kylewrote on July 10th, 2010 at 6:19 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Why is the magazine in the patent picture backwards?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Chriswrote on July 10th, 2010 at 2:47 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @MrMaigo,
    I don’t think they’d try to do it if they weren’t confident they had a shot. Read the patent, that should answer any questions you have.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Jusuchinwrote on July 09th, 2010 at 2:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Maigo: I agree. What makes it different? I mean, there is a whole slew of manufacturers out there making ARs and whatnot.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. MrMaigowrote on July 08th, 2010 at 7:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is it really different enough to patent?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. AK™wrote on July 08th, 2010 at 5:16 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    “..low-cost”..yeah to them. For the consumer? probably in the neighborhood of $400.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. CMathewswrote on July 08th, 2010 at 4:35 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    “… or similar low powered ammunition.” .22 magnum AR-15?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  1. Kylewrote on July 10th, 2010 at 6:19 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Why is the magazine in the patent picture backwards?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Kylewrote on July 10th, 2010 at 6:20 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Whoops, never ming, i just looked at the picture again and saw what I thought was the barrel was actually the buffer tube

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. cawpinwrote on July 12th, 2010 at 11:38 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @Chris: They’re trying to take advantage of the current state of the patent office in the US. They are granting patents for things that should never have been accepted. This patent application should be denied for nothing more than previous art.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Chriswrote on July 10th, 2010 at 2:47 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    @MrMaigo,
    I don’t think they’d try to do it if they weren’t confident they had a shot. Read the patent, that should answer any questions you have.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Jusuchinwrote on July 09th, 2010 at 2:20 am Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Maigo: I agree. What makes it different? I mean, there is a whole slew of manufacturers out there making ARs and whatnot.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. AK™wrote on July 08th, 2010 at 5:16 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    “..low-cost”..yeah to them. For the consumer? probably in the neighborhood of $400.

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. MrMaigowrote on July 08th, 2010 at 7:31 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    Is it really different enough to patent?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. CMathewswrote on July 08th, 2010 at 4:35 pm Link To Comment | Reply To Comment

    “… or similar low powered ammunition.” .22 magnum AR-15?

    Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment