Armatac SAW-MAG
Armatac has developed a new version of their 150 round AR-15 compatible drum magazine and named it the SAW-MAG.
More information and a video can he had over at Defense Review.
Armatac has developed a new version of their 150 round AR-15 compatible drum magazine and named it the SAW-MAG.
More information and a video can he had over at Defense Review.
Ooh, look, a built-in sandbag rest!
0
0Well, it surely reduces the muzzle kick. =D
0
0for a grand it had better come with a better magazine catch for my lower as well. I could 150 rds breaking that rather quickly due to the weight.
0
0a magazine fed 5.56 on an AR doesn’t have the stroke to be “reliable”.
not to mention, you don’t need a squad automatic all the time, a MOLLE attached SAW is all that is really needed.
take a look at some youtube vids, it has a steel tower and no it isn’t going to a compromise a hardened steel mag catch, it doesn’t hurt the aluminum or polymer lower either, you’re way overhthinking things, one primary lower was used for years of testing.
This is the ultimage plug and play squad suppression device, it is big but it is very robust and doesn’t require lubricating.
The MSRP is 389$
0
0edit
a magazine fed converted to belt feed on an AR doesn’t have the stroke to be reliable
0
0Big, bulky, heavy. How does it affect performance?
0
0A $grand each!
0
0Good heavens! It’s bigger than an actual 200 round SAW box! No thank you.
0
0Here is my question, what are the effects on the rifle from the extra weight? Now what I would love to see is a good, simple, and affordable belt fed 5.56 upper.
0
0I agree with you Bryan. A belt fed 5.56 upper would be a plus over these massive box mags
0
0An absolute must-have item, for when you-
When you-
Wait a moment, it’ll come to me…
0
0Just in time for the M-27 right??
0
0
edit
a magazine fed converted to belt feed on an AR doesn’t have the stroke to be reliable
a magazine fed 5.56 on an AR doesn’t have the stroke to be “reliable”.
not to mention, you don’t need a squad automatic all the time, a MOLLE attached SAW is all that is really needed.
take a look at some youtube vids, it has a steel tower and no it isn’t going to a compromise a hardened steel mag catch, it doesn’t hurt the aluminum or polymer lower either, you’re way overhthinking things, one primary lower was used for years of testing.
This is the ultimage plug and play squad suppression device, it is big but it is very robust and doesn’t require lubricating.
The MSRP is 389$
for a grand it had better come with a better magazine catch for my lower as well. I could 150 rds breaking that rather quickly due to the weight.
Ooh, look, a built-in sandbag rest!
Well, it surely reduces the muzzle kick. =D
Big, bulky, heavy. How does it affect performance?
A $grand each!
An absolute must-have item, for when you-
When you-
Wait a moment, it’ll come to me…
I agree with you Bryan. A belt fed 5.56 upper would be a plus over these massive box mags
Here is my question, what are the effects on the rifle from the extra weight? Now what I would love to see is a good, simple, and affordable belt fed 5.56 upper.
Good heavens! It’s bigger than an actual 200 round SAW box! No thank you.
Just in time for the M-27 right??